![]() |
Unusual punishments
I am against cruel punishments but I don't see any reason to be against unusual punishments. Can anyone tell me if there is something bad about unusual punishments? :confused:
|
There's a pretty wide latitude for things that could be considered "unusual" punishments. That would be limited only by the creativity of the sentencing judge short of cruelty. It might not be such a good idea to give judges such discretion in sentencing, would you want to be ordered to marry your SO if you had been about to break up with her (or even felt ambivalent about the idea) for example?
|
The law can only be quantitatively fair if it's standardized. I'm all for creativity, but if every judge is free to make up "stand on your head" or "swim 100 laps" as punishments, how can we really know that justice is being applied fairly and evenly without respect to the criminal's background?
|
I used to have a theory that "cruel and unusual punishment" had to be read the same way as the other phrase in the same sentence of the 8th amendment, "no excessive fines." In other words, it's a proportionality rule: punishments have to fit the crime, so you can't behead someone for jaywalking, or torture people for property crimes. But that's not how the Supreme Court has been reading it.
|
A judge rules that a thief who stole from a store stand outside for ? days wearing a sign that states "I stole from this store". Cruel? Not so much. Unusual? Perhaps. Might make him think twice.
An 18 yr dating a 16 yo w/consent, convicted of rape - "minor sex offender". Good luck trying to find a place to live after you get out of jail. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project