Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-19-2008, 05:05 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
A little disappointed in Mr. Obama

So, today Obama announced that he would not participate in the public financing system after all.

Truth-o-meter

I can understand why he would do so - his job right now is to win the election. But still, he's stepping away from principles here.

I'll still vote for him in Nov, though.
robot_parade is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 05:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
I don't know about "stepping away from principles". Did you actually see his announcement? It's being positioned as a highly principled move. Obama is the first candidate since the inception of those public funds after Watergate to decline them, because he says the system is broken and invites third party (what is it, 549? some number I'm too lazy to look up) groups like the Swiftboaters to circumvent the system and run attack ads on lobbyist money. He's inviting donations for the first campaign ever run that is outside the broken system. That's what he's saying.

I guess the fact that he can now clobber McCain financially doesn't hurt...
ratbastid is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 06:12 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
I don't know about "stepping away from principles". Did you actually see his announcement? It's being positioned as a highly principled move. Obama is the first candidate since the inception of those public funds after Watergate to decline them, because he says the system is broken and invites third party (what is it, 549? some number I'm too lazy to look up) groups like the Swiftboaters to circumvent the system and run attack ads on lobbyist money. He's inviting donations for the first campaign ever run that is outside the broken system. That's what he's saying.

I guess the fact that he can now clobber McCain financially doesn't hurt...
Well, I was referring to the fact that he said he would "aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.” And now he isn't. I understand and agree with the reasons why he's doing it, but there it is. You can say he didn't explicitly promise to use the public financing system, but that's just mincing words, AFAICT.
robot_parade is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 06:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Confused Adult
 
Shauk's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA
what reason does he have to pursue it if McCain opted out back in February? it has to be a mutual agreement if it's going to be fair.
Shauk is offline  
Old 06-20-2008, 07:38 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
A true politician would be foolish not to make the most of an advantage they have over an opponent to win an election. Obama has a fund raising advantage over McCain and his ability to raise funds far exceeds what he could get from the public financing system. Given the fact that he is a politician, I would expect him to do what he did. I am not disappointed now and I won't be disappointed in the future - he is clearly going to be making politically motivated decisions.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 06-20-2008, 08:12 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shauk
what reason does he have to pursue it if McCain opted out back in February? it has to be a mutual agreement if it's going to be fair.
McCain opted out of public financing for the *primary*. He is going with public financing for the general election. Of course, he's going with public financing because he can't raise more than that on his own. I have no illusions that he would drop public financing if he thought he could raise more that way, just like Obama.
robot_parade is offline  
Old 06-20-2008, 02:21 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
I'm not bothered in the least by Obama's decision. I expect he will take a short term hit for it, but it has no staying power as an issue.

He attempted to engage the McCain campaign to include voluntary limits on the political parties' funding in support of the respective campaigns as part of an agreement to accept public financing...and was rebuffed.

I understand why McCain and the RNC rebuffed Obama; the RNC (and to a lesser extent, Republican Party) has a fund raising advantage and more cash on hand. On the other hand, the Democratic congressional funding organizations are kicking ass.

IMO, the greatest inherent problem with the current public financing system is that the candidates can simply encourage their supporters to contribute to the party instead of directly to the candidate's campaign (and make it appear in fund raising ads/letters that contributors are giving to the campaign).

So if McCain accepts the public financing, all of the big donors and PACs for McCain will now give their money to the RNC instead.

I do give Obama credit for prohibiting the Democratic party from accepting PAC money, even though there are probably loopholes here as well

The candidates can exert influence on the respective party fundraising. Obama chose to do so..McCain did not.

The issue of the independent 527 organizations (on both sides) is far more abusive to the system..there is no direct relationship with the campaigns (or at least, there is not supposed to be) and very little accountability for what can and cannot be said in a 527 ad.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 06-20-2008 at 03:03 PM.. Reason: added link
dc_dux is offline  
Old 06-20-2008, 05:41 PM   #8 (permalink)
All important elusive independent swing voter...
 
jorgelito's Avatar
 
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I'm not bothered in the least by Obama's decision. I expect he will take a short term hit for it, but it has no staying power as an issue.

He attempted to engage the McCain campaign to include voluntary limits on the political parties' funding in support of the respective campaigns as part of an agreement to accept public financing...and was rebuffed.

I understand why McCain and the RNC rebuffed Obama; the RNC (and to a lesser extent, Republican Party) has a fund raising advantage and more cash on hand. On the other hand, the Democratic congressional funding organizations are kicking ass.

IMO, the greatest inherent problem with the current public financing system is that the candidates can simply encourage their supporters to contribute to the party instead of directly to the candidate's campaign (and make it appear in fund raising ads/letters that contributors are giving to the campaign).

So if McCain accepts the public financing, all of the big donors and PACs for McCain will now give their money to the RNC instead.

I do give Obama credit for prohibiting the Democratic party from accepting PAC money, even though there are probably loopholes here as well

The candidates can exert influence on the respective party fundraising. Obama chose to do so..McCain did not.

The issue of the independent 527 organizations (on both sides) is far more abusive to the system..there is no direct relationship with the campaigns (or at least, there is not supposed to be) and very little accountability for what can and cannot be said in a 527 ad.
I agree. I raised an eyebrow at first but have since been satisfied with his explanation. Still, doesn't hurt to keep monitoring the situation.
jorgelito is offline  
Old 06-21-2008, 07:07 AM   #9 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
He's not the coming Messiah. He's a politician is going to make political moves. Seriously did anyone not see this coming? The non-stop infotainment channels make this sound like some huge issue, I don't see it.

I'm way more interested in who he picks as his VP and his policy ideas.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 06-23-2008, 05:25 AM   #10 (permalink)
Ambling Toward the Light
 
SirSeymour's Avatar
 
Location: The Early 16th Century
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I'm not bothered in the least by Obama's decision. I expect he will take a short term hit for it, but it has no staying power as an issue.
Staying power as an issue is not the issue. The real issue is that at the end of the day, when the decision has to be made, Obama just proved to everyone that he is just like every other politician...willing to trade principle for position.

He made a promise and now that it is more politically expedient to do so he is reversing himself. Over the last 2 or 3 months I had rethought my outlook on this election and I was prepared to vote for a democrat for the first time in my life for President because I really thought he was different. This announcement has caused me to sit down and really rethink that.
__________________
SQL query
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0
Zero rows returned....
SirSeymour is offline  
Old 06-23-2008, 05:41 AM   #11 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirSeymour
Staying power as an issue is not the issue. The real issue is that at the end of the day, when the decision has to be made, Obama just proved to everyone that he is just like every other politician...willing to trade principle for position.

He made a promise and now that it is more politically expedient to do so he is reversing himself. Over the last 2 or 3 months I had rethought my outlook on this election and I was prepared to vote for a democrat for the first time in my life for President because I really thought he was different. This announcement has caused me to sit down and really rethink that.
SirSy:

IMO, every voter should think carefully about their outlook on the election and the candidate of their choice.

BUt I also believe the candidates should be judged using the same or comparable standards.

If you are judging Obama as *a different kind of candidate" and he fails to meet that standard....then I suggest also judging McCain on his many flip flops - bush tax cuts, off shore drilling, immigration policy, etc (to ingratiate himself with the conservatives who dont trust him) ..or his self-proclaimed "anti-lobbyist" image while having nearly 100 lobbyists acting as advisors and fund raisers.... and how these "principles" fit within his "straight talk express"

I get a sense that some voters seem to be holding Obama to a higher standard for his pledge to "change the way Washington works" and be "a different kind of a candidate" than they do for McCain's pledge to "say what I mean and mean what I say".

If that is the case (Obama being held to a higher standard)...why do you think that is?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 06-23-2008 at 06:01 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
dc_dux is offline  
Old 06-23-2008, 06:24 AM   #12 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
EDIT: I got my Obama-bashing threads mixed up. Thanks, host.

Last edited by ratbastid; 06-23-2008 at 12:01 PM..
ratbastid is offline  
Old 06-23-2008, 08:42 AM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I get a sense that some voters seem to be holding Obama to a higher standard for his pledge to "change the way Washington works" and be "a different kind of a candidate" than they do for McCain's pledge to "say what I mean and mean what I say".

If that is the case (Obama being held to a higher standard)...why do you think that is?
The McCain standard is low. McCain does not have the support of the Republican Party conservative base. His "maverick" reputation may have earned him political points with some, but for many (including me), he is not a principled individual. McCain has staked out a unique position on political issues that shows that he can not be trusted. I will not vote for him under almost any circumstance.

On the Democrat side we had Hilary Clinton, I don't agree with her on many things, but I do know what to expect from her. Obama, is an unknown - he is proving to be more like McCain at this point than I am comfortable with. Ironically in a McCain/Clinton race I would have voted for Clinton. In a McCain/Obama race I was open to the idea that Obama might be a "new" kind of politician, but now I am not. Not just because of the campaign finance issue, but a series of disappointments on his part. I am still hoping McCain is not the Republican Party nominee.

I also think that if Democrats knew in February what is known now about Obama, he would not be the Democratic Party nominee. In answer to your question, I don't think Obama is being held to a higher standard.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 06-23-2008, 09:56 AM   #14 (permalink)
Ambling Toward the Light
 
SirSeymour's Avatar
 
Location: The Early 16th Century
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
I don't know about "stepping away from principles". Did you actually see his announcement? It's being positioned as a highly principled move.
Of course it is being "positioned" as highly principled. That is what politicians do...they "position" everything so that it appears advantageous to them. Unfortunately most of America seems to fall for it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Obama promised to support a filibuster of any legislation that granted retroactive immunity to telcos.
I'm sorry...I thought we were talking about financing his campaign and his opting out of accepting public money for it. Did I miss something?
__________________
SQL query
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0
Zero rows returned....

Last edited by SirSeymour; 06-23-2008 at 10:00 AM..
SirSeymour is offline  
Old 06-23-2008, 11:28 AM   #15 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirSeymour
...I thought we were talking about financing his campaign and his opting out of accepting public money for it. Did I miss something?
Here is what Obama pledged:
In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election.... I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.
If you look deeper into his plan, it involved both candidates agreeing to public financing by the candidate AND voluntary limits on fund raising by the DNC and RNC, particularly soliticing big money donors, on behalf of the respective candidates (in part for self-serving reasons since the RNC has historically been much better fund raisers than the DNC).

And here is what happened:
Quote:
Robert Bauer, general counsel to the Obama campaign, said ...that he met with his counterpart on the McCain campaign, Trevor Potter, but by the time they met, it was clear to him the McCain campaign was already well into its own private-funding plan in conjunction with the Republican National Committee (RNC).
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 06-23-2008 at 11:35 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 06-23-2008, 12:05 PM   #16 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirSeymour
I'm sorry...I thought we were talking about financing his campaign and his opting out of accepting public money for it. Did I miss something?
I posted that in the wrong thread. Sorry for the confusion.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 06-23-2008, 12:22 PM   #17 (permalink)
Ambling Toward the Light
 
SirSeymour's Avatar
 
Location: The Early 16th Century
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
I posted that in the wrong thread. Sorry for the confusion.
No worries. I thought that might be the case after reading the other thread.
__________________
SQL query
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0
Zero rows returned....
SirSeymour is offline  
 

Tags
disappointed, obama

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360