06-11-2008, 07:48 PM | #1 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Is this how to promote democracy?
The Bush administration is currently negotiating a new "status of forces" agreement with the Maliki government in Iraq in order to have legal cover for a long term occupation after Bush leaves office.
The current agreement that provides that cover was a UN resolution in '04 (after the fall of Saddam and the establishment of an interim government in Iraq). It expires at the end of this year. If a new agreement between the US and Iraq is not signed by Jan 1,09, a continued US occupation would be illegal under Iraqi and international law. Bush is reportedly insisting on several key provisions that have outraged the Iraqi of all parties: * 58 permanent US bases - currently there are only about 30 basesTo "encourage" (I would call it extortion) the Iraqis to accept these provisions, the US is reportedly holding hostage $50 billion of Iraq's funds currently held in the US. The Iraqi parliament must approve any final "status of forces" agreement yet Bush has unilaterally determined it is unnecessary for the US Congress to also approve the agreement.....democracy abroad, just not at home. The only think Bush may succeed in accomplishing with this "diplomatic" initiative is uniting the Iraqi parliament in a shared outraged over the US attempting to impose itself as "puppet master" of the Iraqi people for an undetermined period of time into the future. Quote:
WTF? Is this how we "promote" democracy abroad and demonstrate respect for the sovereignty of another nation?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 06-11-2008 at 08:45 PM.. |
|
06-11-2008, 07:59 PM | #2 (permalink) | |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
The terms of the agreement are pretty scary. Imperial dominance, to say the least. Though it can be argued that American imperialism is powerless considering how they're still struggling so much with Iraq and only Iraq. But that's for another thread.
Quote:
What do the people want?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
|
06-12-2008, 04:30 AM | #4 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
What do the people want? Ask the Iraqi's - over 70% want us out of their country. The leaders of Iraq and Iran just met and agreed that things will not be better for either country until the U.S. leaves Iraq. Bush, Cheney, and their croneys need to give up their desire to posess Iraq oil.
|
06-12-2008, 04:52 AM | #5 (permalink) |
Living in a Warmer Insanity
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
|
It might not have been a bad Idea to consult the USSR prior to this whole endeavor. It's possible they might have been able to give insight on how invading a Middle Eastern country and attempting to occupy it would turn out.
I keep hearing how once the violence stops having a force there will be much like it is in Japan, Germany or South Korea. First that assumes the violence is going to stop. Given the long history of the conflicts in the region I have my doubts. Centuries of war and killing, seemingly these folks don't let things go. We've lost something like 11 or 12 people this month and it's been the best month so far. Ok, we're down to one person a day. Is that acceptable? What if it were one a month? A year? How many American lives is Iraq worth? Then we have financial cost. How much is it going to cost to maintain a force there? Are we going to borrow that money too? Once we add Iraq to the list of foreign deployments are we going to added another country and another until we truly are "Team America World Police?"
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club Last edited by Tully Mars; 06-12-2008 at 04:55 AM.. |
06-20-2008, 07:44 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Confused Adult
Location: Spokane, WA
|
it's going to get to the point where genocide actually seems like a good answer if we keep killing eachother, they'll just want to call it the United States of Iraq just to be able to recoup some of the costs of this war.
I just watched "Stop Loss" today too. this whole thing is sickening. |
06-21-2008, 02:25 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Upright
|
Bush has it all wrong. Gemma Garrett obviously hits the nail on the head, politics just isn't glamorous and what's to like about THAT?:
http://video.news.sky.com/skynews/vi...urceID=1319115 |
06-21-2008, 03:31 AM | #9 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Bush administration is so fucking done. And they know it.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
Tags |
democracy, promote |
|
|