Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


View Poll Results: Is Waterboarding, Torture? Has Pres. Bush Now Admitted to Approving Torture?
Waterboarding is a from of Torture and it is illegal to do 24 100.00%
Waterboarding is not a from of Torture and it is legal to do 0 0%
President Bush seems to admit knowing about & approving waterboarding 16 66.67%
President Bush seems NOT to admit knowing about & approving waterboarding 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-17-2008, 12:38 PM   #41 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
Don't care about one side doing it, but up in arms if the other side does it, what is it you call that again? Anybody? Anybody?
Hey, they can do what we do, in fact PLEASE do exactly what we do, we don't need another beheading video on the net.

PRETTY PLEASE WITH SUGAR ON TOP, MR. TERRORIST, FOLLOW THE CIA RULE BOOK.

Hows that?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 12:39 PM   #42 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
We are fighting an unconventional UN-uniformed enemy who views civilians as targets.
... Who views civilians as targets... In Iraq? Really? Who is this magic "enemy" of yours? Can you be more specific than "The Terrorists"?

The US has killed more Iraqi civilians than any other force, by the way A report in 2005 showed US forces the largest killer of civilians--the cause of 37.3% of Iraqi civilian casualties, up till then. I can't find any studies of the question since then, but I trust the numbers are roughly unchanged

Also, let's not forget there WAS no so-called "Al Qaida In Iraq" before we invaded. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi didn't align himself with Al Qaida until 2004, in response to the invasion. And even after that, their suicide attacks have largely targeted ISF, US, UN and Coalition forces, not civilians. (I'm not saying they haven't killed civilians too--just that they probably view that as collateral damage, not the primary target.)

So.... Who the hell are you talking about? Or are you just barfing out talking points?

I KNOW you're not trying to tie this thing to 9/11, right? Right?

Last edited by ratbastid; 04-17-2008 at 12:42 PM..
ratbastid is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 12:57 PM   #43 (permalink)
Insane
 
Herk's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
Not a lot vexes me more than writing an elaborate post then having it ripped away by 'invalid thread specified'.

In short,
Ustwo, I have always held your opinion in decently high regard, though I have regularly and staunchly disagreed with you. Your two wrongs equal a right and mild torture is okay comments really cement my assumption that your logic engine and moral compass are in dire need of repair.

I spent a lot of the lost post apologizing for potentially breaking the rules there, but I'm skipping it the second time around. The school of thought that being from a different culture excludes you from equality of person bugs me. Are we to assume that everybody that was tortured beheaded somebody and put it on the internet, or is it possible that they are good people fighting for what they think is right. Maybe they have children they love. Maybe they care about their community. Maybe they are people.
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!-
Herk is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:08 PM   #44 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herk
Not a lot vexes me more than writing an elaborate post then having it ripped away by 'invalid thread specified'.

In short,
Ustwo, I have always held your opinion in decently high regard, though I have regularly and staunchly disagreed with you. Your two wrongs equal a right and mild torture is okay comments really cement my assumption that your logic engine and moral compass are in dire need of repair.

I spent a lot of the lost post apologizing for potentially breaking the rules there, but I'm skipping it the second time around. The school of thought that being from a different culture excludes you from equality of person bugs me. Are we to assume that everybody that was tortured beheaded somebody and put it on the internet, or is it possible that they are good people fighting for what they think is right. Maybe they have children they love. Maybe they care about their community. Maybe they are people.
If waterboarding and Slimshady is good enough for our people (the waterboarding is part of training), its good enough for terrorists.

I'm sorry, but I thought we were fighting a war here, this isn't a 'nice' thing, and I do not see waterboarding as a big deal as compared to the consequences of prolonged terror attacks. I think under the controlled and limited uses we use it under its perfectly acceptable.

So please, you can cry me a river about it, but I lose no sleep over someone treated as such. They are still able to walk around and talk about it after, unlike the 1000's of civilians they have blown up purposefully.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
... Who views civilians as targets... In Iraq? Really? Who is this magic "enemy" of yours? Can you be more specific than "The Terrorists"?

The US has killed more Iraqi civilians than any other force, by the way A report in 2005 showed US forces the largest killer of civilians--the cause of 37.3% of Iraqi civilian casualties, up till then. I can't find any studies of the question since then, but I trust the numbers are roughly unchanged

Also, let's not forget there WAS no so-called "Al Qaida In Iraq" before we invaded. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi didn't align himself with Al Qaida until 2004, in response to the invasion. And even after that, their suicide attacks have largely targeted ISF, US, UN and Coalition forces, not civilians. (I'm not saying they haven't killed civilians too--just that they probably view that as collateral damage, not the primary target.)

So.... Who the hell are you talking about? Or are you just barfing out talking points?

I KNOW you're not trying to tie this thing to 9/11, right? Right?
ratbadtid I know I waste my breath, (and dear god did you REALLY quote the world socialist web site as a reliable source?) but when we purposefully target civilians to kill them and bring terror on the population give me a call. I think the last time would have been Nagasaki.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

Last edited by Ustwo; 04-17-2008 at 01:11 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:23 PM   #45 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Until you've been waterboarded, saying it's not torture is truly and completely meaningless in every sense of the word.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:55 PM   #46 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
ratbadtid I know I waste my breath, (and dear god did you REALLY quote the world socialist web site as a reliable source?) but when we purposefully target civilians to kill them and bring terror on the population give me a call. I think the last time would have been Nagasaki.
Notice, though, you didn't answer my questions. You got distracted by what was really a side point.

WHAT enemy are you talking about exactly?
ratbastid is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:38 PM   #47 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
If waterboarding and Slimshady is good enough for our people (the waterboarding is part of training), its good enough for terrorists.
Exactly, context is everything. Ask them how they'd feel about waterboarding Bush or Cheney.
powerclown is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:44 PM   #48 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerclown
Exactly, context is everything. Ask them how they'd feel about waterboarding Bush or Cheney.
"They" would like indictments, investigations, a trial, and then jail time. I suspect that rat, host, and all of the other "they"s on this board would agree.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:51 PM   #49 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
There's a thread on the Straight Dope message board that is VERY enlightening on the subject. A participant there, one Scylla, is an intelligent, educated, and vocal conservative--basically that board's Ustwo. He'd been arguing for the use of advanced interrogation techniques earlier in other threads. Just to see what all the hoopla is about, and to settle for himself the question of whether it's torture, he waterboarded himself.

He physically did it himself--controlling the flow of water, his physical position. His plan had been to try it that way, then have his wife help with a second attempt.

He says:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scylla
I didn't allow anybody else to try it on me. Inconceivable. I know I only got the barest taste of what it's about since I was in control, and not restrained and controlling the flow of water.

But there's no chance. No chance at all.

So, is it torture?

I'll put it this way. If I had the choice of being waterboarded by a third party or having my fingers smashed one at a time by a sledgehammer, I'd take the fingers, no question.

It's horrible, terrible, inhuman torture. I can hardly imagine worse. I'd prefer permanent damage and disability to experiencing it again. I'd give up anything, say anything, do anything.

The Spanish Inquisition knew this. It was one of their favorite methods.

It's torture. No question. Terrible terrible torture. To experience it and understand it and then do it to another human being is to leave the realm of sanity and humanity forever. No question in my mind.
The thread is VERY interesting reading, and I recommend at least the OP to every single person posting in this thread. I can't imagine you considering yourself well informed on the subject of waterboarding without reading at least that.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=448717
ratbastid is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:52 PM   #50 (permalink)
Insane
 
Herk's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
If waterboarding and Slimshady is good enough for our people (the waterboarding is part of training), its good enough for terrorists.

I'm sorry, but I thought we were fighting a war here, this isn't a 'nice' thing, and I do not see waterboarding as a big deal as compared to the consequences of prolonged terror attacks. I think under the controlled and limited uses we use it under its perfectly acceptable.

So please, you can cry me a river about it, but I lose no sleep over someone treated as such. They are still able to walk around and talk about it after, unlike the 1000's of civilians they have blown up purposefully.
I don't know what slimshady has to do with this but I'll just ignore that part. Waterboarding is part of what training. I know the Air Force Para rescue Jumpers and Combat Controllers go through something similar to this, as training for high wind, water bound rescue missions, but surely you wouldn't compare torture for the purpose of extorting predefined answers to voluntary training in the armed services. I don't know, maybe you would.

I don't think that waterboarding is indirectly proportional to the prolonging of terrorist attacks. Can you tell me how you derived this notion?

Also, please enlighten on these 'controlled and limited uses'. I didn't know we were privy to the information regarding how much it has been used, and I'm not sure where I can see the regulation covering its implementation. Unless that regulation says something like:

"Waterboarding is a term developed by the United States government and intended to be used non-interchangeably with normal word 'waterboarding' which means torture. Furthermore, when used by the federal government, from now on, the term shall be used to mean the following: Prisoners are asked to answer a string of questions. For each right answer, we notate and move on to the next question. For each wrong answer, we notate and move on to the next question. Furthermore, prisoners will still be required to provide there full name, service number, and identify their host nation as guided by the Geneva Conventions and Law of Armed Conflict."

That is about the only acceptable definition I can come up with.
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!-
Herk is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:55 PM   #51 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herk
I don't know what slimshady has to do with this but I'll just ignore that part.
It's an innocence by association fallacy. Listening to rap isn't that bad, and Ustwo would like us to think that listening to rap and being waterboarded are the same, thus being waterboarded isn't so bad. It's misrepresentation via the transitive property.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:16 PM   #52 (permalink)
Insane
 
Herk's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
It's an innocence by association fallacy. Listening to rap isn't that bad, and Ustwo would like us to think that listening to rap and being waterboarded are the same, thus being waterboarded isn't so bad. It's misrepresentation via the transitive property.
That reminds me. I saw you pointing out logic fallacies the other day, and it made me pleased. This is one of my favorite websites for keeping on my toes. I make these mistakes, too, sometimes, but I try and avoid them consciously.
http://www.infidels.org/library/mode...hew/logic.html
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!-
Herk is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:17 PM   #53 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
It's an innocence by association fallacy. Listening to rap isn't that bad, and Ustwo would like us to think that listening to rap and being waterboarded are the same, thus being waterboarded isn't so bad. It's misrepresentation via the transitive property.
It isn't? Why not?

If disrespecting a book such as putting the Koran in a toilet is considered torture to some, why can listening to rap not be considered torture to others?

Or is it again another case of, "I'm fine with it being a particular way that is agreeable to me, but when it's not, other people have to change."
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:31 PM   #54 (permalink)
Insane
 
Herk's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
It isn't? Why not?

If disrespecting a book such as putting the Koran in a toilet is considered torture to some, why can listening to rap not be considered torture to others?

Or is it again another case of, "I'm fine with it being a particular way that is agreeable to me, but when it's not, other people have to change."
I cannot figure out what you mean here Cyn, but I think I agree.
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!-
Herk is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:33 PM   #55 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
the comparison between putting a koran in a toilet and listening to rap if you don't like it---as if these were of the same order---answers the question (falsely) in advance and blurs out everything of importance. deliberate violation of a norm held by (many) muslims who see the koran as in itself the word of god--but this not in the way an xtian would, but more literally so is problematic in that it is about degradation and frankly about some foul ethnocentric horseshit that you woulda thought went away abotu the time of the crusades, when legions of xtian lunkheads would do that sort of thing to "celebrate" the triumph of jesus and all that over the "heathens"

it is not AT ALL of the same order as making someone listen to a kind of music that they do not like.

and even the last statement can mean more than one thing: making someone "listen" to most anything at extreme volume for 48 hours, say, is also not making them listen to a kind of music they do not like. it's about sleep deprivation, which can be argued is a form of psychological torture.

what is the interest in deliberately trivializing the matter?
where is this coming from?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite

Last edited by roachboy; 04-17-2008 at 03:36 PM..
roachboy is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:41 PM   #56 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Let us see who used waterboarding in the past:

Algeria
The technique was also used during the Algerian War (1954-1962). The French journalist Henri Alleg, who was subjected to waterboarding by French paratroopers in Algeria in 1957, is one of only a few people to have described in writing the first-hand experience of being waterboarded. His book The Question, published in 1958 with a preface by Jean-Paul Sartre (and subsequently banned in France until the end of the Algerian War in 1962) discusses the experience of being strapped to a plank, having his head wrapped in cloth and positioned beneath a running tap:

The rag was soaked rapidly. Water flowed everywhere: in my mouth, in my nose, all over my face. But for a while I could still breathe in some small gulps of air. I tried, by contracting my throat, to take in as little water as possible and to resist suffocation by keeping air in my lungs for as long as I could. But I couldn't hold on for more than a few moments. I had the impression of drowning, and a terrible agony, that of death itself, took possession of me. In spite of myself, all the muscles of my body struggled uselessly to save me from suffocation. In spite of myself, the fingers of both my hands shook uncontrollably. "That's it! He's going to talk," said a voice.

The water stopped running and they took away the rag. I was able to breathe. In the gloom, I saw the lieutenants and the captain, who, with a cigarette between his lips, was hitting my stomach with his fist to make me throw out the water I had swallowed.

Alleg stated that he had not broken under his ordeal of being waterboarded. Alleg has stated that the incidence of "accidental" death of prisoners being subjected to waterboarding in Algeria was "very frequent."

Vietnam
Waterboarding was designated as illegal by U.S. generals in the Vietnam War. On January 21, 1968, The Washington Post published a controversial photograph of two U.S soldiers and one South Vietnamese soldier participating in the waterboarding of a North Vietnamese POW near Da Nang. The article described the practice as "fairly common." The photograph led to the soldier being court-martialled by a U.S. military court within one month of its publication, and he was discharged from the army. Another waterboarding photograph of the same scene is also exhibited in the War Remnants Museum at Ho Chi Minh City.


Chile
Based on the testimonies from more than 35,000 victims, of the Pinochet regime, the Chilean Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture concluded that to provoke a near death experience, by waterboarding, is torture.

Khmer Rouge
The Khmer Rouge at the Tuol Sleng prison in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, used waterboarding as a method of torture between 1975 and 1979. The practice was documented in a painting by former inmate Vann Nath, which is on display in the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum.


U.S. Military survival training
All special operations units in all branches of the U.S. military employ the use of waterboarding as part of survival school (SERE) training, to psychologically prepare soldiers for the eventuality of being captured by the enemy forces.

Jane Mayer wrote for The New Yorker:

According to the sere affiliate and two other sources familiar with the program, after September 11th several psychologists versed in sere techniques began advising interrogators at Guantánamo Bay and elsewhere. Some of these psychologists essentially “tried to reverse-engineer” the sere program, as the affiliate put it. “They took good knowledge and used it in a bad way,” another of the sources said. Interrogators and bsct members at Guantánamo adopted coercive techniques similar to those employed in the sere program.[43]

and continues to report:
many of the interrogation methods used in sere training seem to have been applied at Guantánamo.

Seems the US though it was wrong in the past and surprise, surprise they were fighting a war at some of those times, like Vietnam and what's that, it was illegal then, so being in a war and war not being a 'nice' thing seems to be even more of a flimsy argument than they were before.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:42 PM   #57 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
let me put it in the same context that you're framing the Koran.

If a Fundamental Christian feels that Heavy Metal or Hip Hop is the work of the devil is that then not the same?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:43 PM   #58 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
same move, different words.

where is this desire to trivialize torture coming from?
what does it get you?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:45 PM   #59 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
I'm not trying to trivialize it. I'm trying to understand where it means something and under what context and conversation.

The origins of the trivalization started elsewhere. I'm regurtitating that it is a form of torture to some muslims and is supported in that context because it's a religious document.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:58 PM   #60 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
well, personally, i am more of the school that desicrating the koran is just an ugly, stupid, barbaric thing to do in itself, and that the breaking down of someone's personality in order to extract information is a dubious undertaking. i think that the line it treads is problematic, veering necessarily close to psychological torture--and i'm glad that i am not in a position of trying to figure out what would be ok to do and what would not---but not as glad as i am that ustwo is not in a position to make that determination.

i don't think that treating an "enemy" as a human being is a big stretch.
i just don't.

waterboarding is not in any such grey area.
waterboarding is torture--look at silent jay's post above, and remember what it used to be called--even the terminology "waterboarding" suggests something more benign than what it really is.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 03:59 PM   #61 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
It isn't? Why not?

If disrespecting a book such as putting the Koran in a toilet is considered torture to some, why can listening to rap not be considered torture to others?

Or is it again another case of, "I'm fine with it being a particular way that is agreeable to me, but when it's not, other people have to change."
Apples to oranges. The Qur'an in the toilet is subjective torture. Waterboarding is universal (for those that have experienced it).
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:21 PM   #62 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Apples to oranges. The Qur'an in the toilet is subjective torture. Waterboarding is universal (for those that have experienced it).
So you're a Muslim and knows what it feels like to feel that kind of torture and pain?

So long as you use the same words to describe it and only chose to modify it with qualifiers, I'll still state that it falls into the realm of ""I'm fine with it being a particular way that is agreeable to me, but when it's not, other people have to change."
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:37 PM   #63 (permalink)
Insane
 
Herk's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
well, personally, i am more of the school that desicrating the koran is just an ugly, stupid, barbaric thing to do in itself, and that the breaking down of someone's personality in order to extract information is a dubious undertaking. i think that the line it treads is problematic, veering necessarily close to psychological torture--and i'm glad that i am not in a position of trying to figure out what would be ok to do and what would not---but not as glad as i am that ustwo is not in a position to make that determination.

i don't think that treating an "enemy" as a human being is a big stretch.
i just don't.

waterboarding is not in any such grey area.
waterboarding is torture--look at silent jay's post above, and remember what it used to be called--even the terminology "waterboarding" suggests something more benign than what it really is.
Well put. This all sounds to me like a new inquisition.
__________________
-Blind faith runs into things!-
Herk is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:42 PM   #64 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
So you're a Muslim and knows what it feels like to feel that kind of torture and pain?
Go look up subjective.

Edit: just asked a friend who's a lot more Muslim than you are. You know what he said?
"nah it's just disrespectful, not torture"

Last edited by Willravel; 04-17-2008 at 04:49 PM..
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:42 PM   #65 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
The thread is VERY interesting reading, and I recommend at least the OP to every single person posting in this thread. I can't imagine you considering yourself well informed on the subject of waterboarding without reading at least that.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=448717
I particularly enjoyed post #17.
powerclown is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:46 PM   #66 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerclown
I particularly enjoyed post #17.
So you concede that waterboarding is torture?
ratbastid is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:47 PM   #67 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
I particularly enjoyed post #1, especially considering he was someone who thought waterboarding was fine........until he tried it on himself, I wonder how many of the people who think it is fine on TFP would have the balls to try it, my guess is not a damn one, it might actually open their eyes to *shudder* something new, which seems scary to most of the people who feel it is ok.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:49 PM   #68 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
I particularly enjoyed post #1, especially considering he was someone who thought waterboarding was fine........until he tried it on himself, I wonder how many of the people who think it is fine on TFP would have the balls to try it, my guess is not a damn one, it might actually open their eyes to *shudder* something new, which seems scary to most of the people who feel it is ok.
I did.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:51 PM   #69 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
I always find it interesting to see who does and who does not vote on a given poll ...
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:58 PM   #70 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Go look up subjective.

Edit: just asked a friend who's a lot more Muslim than you are. You know what he said?
"nah it's just disrespectful, not torture"
so now it's pick a more muslim than you are tact. seriously, that's absurd. How about I keep looking until I produce one that feels it is? I'm sure I can find one... that's how absurd that is.

I've not chimed in on how I feel about torture, and at this point, I will state I'm fine with it. I'm fine with capital punishment. I'd love for public caning to be here in the US instead of just Singapore and Malaysia, maybe people would be better behaved.

There are things that are done in this life that are not pleasant. There are things that I am not able to or willing to do myself. This is when other people who can do or will do those things come into play for me. This can be as low as cleaning my house to collecting garbage to finding out information about insurgents and terrorists. Having had an uncle who was tortured, drained of precious blood to give to ailing Japanese, and then beheaded during WWII, I'm all for it being used as the tool that it is.

I'd like to minimize it as much as possible, and I'd like to target those that fit the profile. I'd like to believe that it is not used against innocents, but I am not naive to think that it has not happened in the past and will not happen in the future.

I'd vote if I could, I find it is torture and a legal thing to do, not a choice I have up there. And the second one, I don't care if Bush knew or didn't know.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 05:00 PM   #71 (permalink)
Thank You Jesus
 
reconmike's Avatar
 
Location: Twilight Zone
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
I particularly enjoyed post #1, especially considering he was someone who thought waterboarding was fine........until he tried it on himself, I wonder how many of the people who think it is fine on TFP would have the balls to try it, my guess is not a damn one, it might actually open their eyes to *shudder* something new, which seems scary to most of the people who feel it is ok.

I have had it done to me, along with being put in a 4 foot by 4 foot wooden box for days at a time. Big deal, if it gets one of them who would stick a c-4 charge up my mothers ass to squeel like a prom date, then its bath time Osama.
__________________
Where is Darwin when ya need him?
reconmike is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 05:02 PM   #72 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
so now it's pick a more muslim than you are tact. seriously, that's absurd.
Yes, I thought so when you brought it up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
So you're a Muslim and knows what it feels like to feel that kind of torture and pain?
But I decided to indulge you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
/snip, opinions regarding torture.
To each their own, but realize that regardless of your personal feelings regarding torture, it's illegal under the Geneva Conventions, which the US signed in good faith. And as we all know any and all treaties signed by the US are US law.

Last edited by Willravel; 04-17-2008 at 05:45 PM.. Reason: edited summarization
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 05:20 PM   #73 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I did.
How did I know will had tried it, it's something I'm contemplating trying, but I guess it takes a manly man like mike to have no ill effects of it, I mean a 4 by 4 foot box for days, sounds like Full Metal Jacket to me, was R. Lee Ermey your DI as well?
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 05:24 PM   #74 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I did post #30.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 05:28 PM   #75 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
I'll give it a shot tomorrow night, see how it is, I'll post my reaction to it as well, maybe even get a buddy to take some pics of the process.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 06:08 PM   #76 (permalink)
Thank You Jesus
 
reconmike's Avatar
 
Location: Twilight Zone
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
How did I know will had tried it, it's something I'm contemplating trying, but I guess it takes a manly man like mike to have no ill effects of it, I mean a 4 by 4 foot box for days, sounds like Full Metal Jacket to me, was R. Lee Ermey your DI as well?
Ill effects? LOL and get bounced out of recon school?

It was part of escape and evasion training, and training similar to sere.

Try living in a box, it puts queen size bed in a whole new perspective.

I dont recall wooden boxes in FMJ, but my DI made Ermey look like Mother Theresa.
__________________
Where is Darwin when ya need him?
reconmike is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 06:11 PM   #77 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
reconmike, how did they waterboard you? Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but I can't imagine being waterboarded for more than maybe 45 seconds at a time maybe 2 or 3 times in a row. I ended up puking.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 06:22 PM   #78 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
So you concede that waterboarding is torture
Quote:
There are things that are done in this life that are not pleasant. There are things that I am not able to or willing to do myself. This is when other people who can do or will do those things come into play for me. This can be as low as cleaning my house to collecting garbage to finding out information about insurgents and terrorists. Having had an uncle who was tortured, drained of precious blood to give to ailing Japanese, and then beheaded during WWII, I'm all for it being used as the tool that it is.

I'd like to minimize it as much as possible, and I'd like to target those that fit the profile. I'd like to believe that it is not used against innocents, but I am not naive to think that it has not happened in the past and will not happen in the future.

I'd vote if I could, I find it is torture and a legal thing to do, not a choice I have up there. And the second one, I don't care if Bush knew or didn't know.
This is how I feel about it as well.
powerclown is offline  
 

Tags
admitted, approving, bush, pres, torture, waterboarding


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360