Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-02-2008, 09:09 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
This little piggy...

In tribute to Ustwo, I willfully and truthfully acknowledge that there are little piggies in both parties.



Citizens against Government Waste released its 2008 Congressional Pig Book today...its exposé of pork-barrel spending.:
Quote:
In fiscal year 2008, Congress stuffed 11,610 projects (the second highest total ever) worth $17.2 billion into the 12 appropriations bills. That is a 337 percent increase over the 2,658 projects in fiscal year 2007, and a 30 percent increase over the $13.2 billion total in fiscal year 2007. Alaska led the nation with $556 in pork per capita ($380 million total), followed by Hawaii with $221 ($283 million) and North Dakota with $208 ($133 million). CAGW has identified $271 billion in total pork since 1991.

http://www.cagw.org/site/News2?page=...ticle&id=11350
The top porkers in the Senate:
Three Republicans (Cochran, Stevens, Shelby) followed by four Democrats (Landrieu, Byrd, Innouye, Murray)

The candidates:
Clinton - 281 projects, $296 million
Obama - 53 projects, $97 million

and kudos to McCain - 0 projects, $0

List of Senate porkers (pdf)

List of House porkers (pdf)
Are your members of Congress porkers? (search the database)
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 04-02-2008 at 09:16 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 01:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
not all pork projects are bad. i bet folks in Arizona wouldn't mind McCain getting them a little money for roads and bridges now and again
Derwood is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood
not all pork projects are bad. i bet folks in Arizona wouldn't mind McCain getting them a little money for roads and bridges now and again
I agree that all earmarks are not bad....its the process that stinks. Earmarks should be much more transparent and directly tied to specific legislation and not slipped into larger spending bills.

I would also add that McCain's "no pork" record is a tad disingenuous. As I understand it, he just gives his list of "must have" pet projects to some of the Republican House members from Arizona and they take the hit for it. But Arizona is still at the bottom of the list, right there with two big blue states:



I am disappointed that the Democrats did not enact real earmark reform. They did at least impose a new requirement that Members must include their name on earmark requests with a justification of why its needed and not just slip them into appropriation bills in the middle of the night as has been done for years. The Republicans voted against it.

Pelosi said she will make stronger reform a priority this year (we'll see), but it could be a good election year issue.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 04-02-2008 at 02:28 PM.. Reason: added chart
dc_dux is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 03:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Crazy
 
smoore's Avatar
 
Location: West of Denver
I'm proud to see Colorado in the bottom five. We could use some serious cash to rebuild parts of the two interstates that get really pounded from interstate trucking though.
__________________
smoore
smoore is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 03:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
dc ... thanks for bringing this up, one of my pet bipartisan gripes!

I'm down in FL for spring break and I promised the family not to post or surf. So while they're in the shower ...... too late.

Oh well ... it had to be a quicky. keep up the good work.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 03:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
loquitur's Avatar
 
Location: NYC
If a project is worthwhile at the local level, the local govt should fund it. I'm mystified about why federal money should get spent on this stuff, even if it's worthwhile. That's what we have state and local governments for.
loquitur is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 05:09 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by loquitur
If a project is worthwhile at the local level, the local govt should fund it. I'm mystified about why federal money should get spent on this stuff, even if it's worthwhile. That's what we have state and local governments for.
It falls under the broad concept of revenue sharing.....sending federal tax dollars back to fund projects in the state from which it came......if its done responsibly through specific authorizations in legislation and not through earmarks hidden in appropriation bills .
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 04-02-2008 at 05:13 PM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

Tags
piggy


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360