Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-29-2008, 11:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
cookie
 
dy156's Avatar
 
Location: in the backwoods
history, not news or political science...

Been awhile since I've posted, but impressed with the politics board of late...

There's a big long meaty thread here about whether it will be "the economy, stupid" as a major campaign issue again this year as it was in 1992. There are plenty of other parallels to that presidential campaign as well. (please- no comments about long and meaty)

It might be tempting to draw parallels to the '92 campaign- A very unpopular president named Bush was struggling to avoid a deep recession resulting -in part- from a war in Iraq- and through the president's efforts (I predict) the economy will turn around just in time for the new president to take credit.

But I think '96 is the better example based on the Republican field. Here's my observations/predictions why:
Giuliani = Forbes; a NY social liberal and economic conservative who exits relatively early.

Romney = Phil Gramm; the "thinking conservatives'" logical choice who is "right" on all the issues but kind of creepy with some baggage as an individual- Romney has lasted longer because let's face it- he looks and sounds more presidential.

Huckabee = Buchanan; social conservative who strikes a chord with many and does surprisingly well early on, but is alarming to the big-business Republicans

McCain= Dole; war hero and perennial presidential primary loser who no one is really excited about but gets the nomination, only to show his lack of political savvy in losing to someone entrenched in power but tainted by allegations from the past with a last name of Clinton.

Sorry, can't think of as many parallels on the Democratic side. John Edwards is no Paul Tsongas. Perot jumped in (again) but just as an afterthought, just as billionaire Mike Bloomberg is rumored to be considering doing this year. Obama has a little more credibility than Jerry Brown did.

just consider it "deep thoughts... by Dy156"
dy156 is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 09:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Somnabulist
 
guy44's Avatar
 
Location: corner of No and Where
I dunno. There's a lot of big, big differences between the 1996 Presidential race and 2008. For one, of course, 1996 was Clinton's year from the start, and the Republicans were pretty much just fighting to be clobbered in the general. This year is, obviously, quite open as no sitting President or Vice President is in the running.

As for the specific examples, Forbes was really much more like Romney than Guiliani. Forbes and Romney (at least early in the primary, and again in Michigan) ran as socially moderate conservative CEO candidates. Obviously Romney tried very hard to pretend he was a socially conservative theocon for a few months, but I think this comparison holds up better than Forbes:Guiliani. America's Mayor didn't really run on economic conservatism or social liberalism, but rather 9/11 9/11 9/11 - almost like a one-issue third party candidate.

I'm not sure there is a good Phil Gramm comparison amongst the current bunch, as you nailed the fact that he had an odd combination of being a respected Washington Establishment member as well as a pretty skeezy dude.

Buchanan actually parallels better, I think, with Tancredo/Hunter, as his isolationist far-right rhetoric was displayed far more prominently than any populist viewpoints he has.

McCain and Dole are the most obvious pairing, in that both were probably the most famous Republican senators of their time when they ran (as well as war heroes to boot). But Dole was very much Mr. Establishment, while I think McCain obviously has a lot of detractors amongst the Republican base for a few of his stances. Also, Dole was really just a Senior Legislator Guy, like Reid or Frist, while McCain has already run for President and has the entire mainstream media apparatus in his thrall.

Frankly, though, this race is much different than 1996. The GOP is split in the primary down its main factional lines: theocon (Huckabee), neocon (McCain, Guiliani), moneycon (Romney), and fringe libertarian (Paul), in a way that wasn't evident at all 12 years ago. The country is in a much worse place, and quite frankly, the GOP got seven years with almost complete control of the government and screwed the pooch so badly that this year looks like it could be a generational shift away from the Republicans to the Democrats.

Also, in 1996 the Democrats were running a popular, center-left incumbent president in Clinton; in 2008 the Democrats have a primary which has drawn literally record amounts of support and attention. A woman or a man of color will be the nominee for President from one of the major parties for the first time, all of which means that this primary season has no easy comparison anywhere in history - at least for the Democrats.
__________________
"You have reached Ritual Sacrifice. For goats press one, or say 'goats.'"
guy44 is offline  
 

Tags
history, news, political, science

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360