Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


View Poll Results: With whom do you align yourself?
Republicans 3 13.04%
Democrats 5 21.74%
Libertarians 4 17.39%
Green Party 1 4.35%
Other Third Party 1 4.35%
Unregistered/Apathetic 4 17.39%
Independent 5 21.74%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-31-2007, 04:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Insane
 
Atreides88's Avatar
 
Location: The South.
Political Affiliations

I did some searching but could not find anything specific. I apologize ahead of time if this is a repost.

Anyway, it seems there is an eclectic mix of political ideologies on this board and was wondering just how many people affiliated themselves with the Democrats, the Republicans, or neither.

As for myself, I consider myself a classic conservative. A Republican in the mold of Theodore Roosevelt(hence the avatar) more than George Bush. I am pro-democracy, pro-capitalism, pro-small government, and am not a big fan of taxes. I could care less about abortion, gay marriage, and all the myriad of other things that are petty in sight of the larger issues of a slowing economy, the war on terror, and the loss of a large industrial base in America.
__________________
"There is no need to suppose that human beings differ very much one from another: but it is true that the ones who come out on top are the ones who have been trained in the hardest school." -- Thucydides
Atreides88 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I'm registered Green... think Kucinich meets Gore, with a socialist mix.
Willravel is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
We don't "register" ourselves in Canada - I find the idea of "registering" your political beliefs slightly odd, although some people do become members of parties - I get the impression it's not quite the same thing, however.

At any rate, I vote for whatever party best represents my beliefs and interests at the time of the election. Both federally and provincially over the years I have voted Liberal, Conservative and Green several times. Once, living in Quebec, I even voted for the Rhinocerous Party, a joke party that was formed to give people an option when they realized everyone else sucked.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:34 PM   #4 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
I find the idea of "registering" your political beliefs slightly odd...
Seconded.
Willravel is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 05:34 PM   #5 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
We don't "register" ourselves in Canada - I find the idea of "registering" your political beliefs slightly odd, although some people do become members of parties - I get the impression it's not quite the same thing, however.

At any rate, I vote for whatever party best represents my beliefs and interests at the time of the election. Both federally and provincially over the years I have voted Liberal, Conservative and Green several times. Once, living in Quebec, I even voted for the Rhinocerous Party, a joke party that was formed to give people an option when they realized everyone else sucked.
Well, the only reason you register is so you can participate in the primaries of the party you register for.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 05:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
We don't "register" ourselves in Canada - I find the idea of "registering" your political beliefs slightly odd...
thirded.
I'm registered independent. I guess my beliefs run closer to libertarian... but not enough to join the party. The party system can be a strength and a weakness. It reminds me of trade and labor unions. I'd like to see the official campaign period restricted to 90 days or less (including primaries).
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo

Last edited by ottopilot; 12-31-2007 at 06:36 PM..
ottopilot is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 06:10 PM   #7 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Washington State has recently required that we register our party affiliation, due to a Supreme Court decision that was reviewed for another state. I hate it! We are a State that has a large contingent of Independents (at least on the West side) but now we cannot participate in the primaries unless we pick a party ahead of time. What became of our right to privacy of the vote, if we must declare a party? This makes vote tampering all the more easier imo.
__________________
"You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to." Molly Ivins - 1944-2007
Elphaba is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 06:45 PM   #8 (permalink)
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
Washington State has recently required that we register our party affiliation, due to a Supreme Court decision that was reviewed for another state. I hate it! We are a State that has a large contingent of Independents (at least on the West side) but now we cannot participate in the primaries unless we pick a party ahead of time. What became of our right to privacy of the vote, if we must declare a party? This makes vote tampering all the more easier imo.
That's an interesting point Elphaba. I suppose the reasoning goes that primary elections aren't for public office. But then, they shouldn't have any standing in the general election.

It's tricky, because I can see the point that the Republicans don't want Democrats voting in the Republican primaries because they might get a weak candidate nominated for the general election (or vice versa --- I actually read something about the Dems feeling that Huckabee would be a great "glass jaw" opponent). In fact, the trickiness of the situation just goes to reinforce my belief that it is our political parties that run this country, not the elected officials or the people.

P.S. Atreides, it's too bad there's no unaffiliated or independent option that doesn't include "apathetic". You want a poll edit? It's your choice.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam

Last edited by ubertuber; 12-31-2007 at 06:47 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
ubertuber is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:00 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by djtestudo
Well, the only reason you register is so you can participate in the primaries of the party you register for.
Hmmm ... people here may join a political party, and in doing so generally become quite active, and participate in leadership elections and party caucuses.

My impression, and correct me if I'm wrong, but huge numbers of Americans are "registered" as either Democrats or Republicans, many (most?) of whom do not actively participate?

I think here relatively few people tend to tie themselves to parties, of which we have 3 "major" parties (Liberals, Conservatives, NDP), 1 major regional party (Bloc Quebecois) and 1 rapidly growing party (the Greens), whereas in the US, with only 2 parties, tens of millions want to permanently associate with one or the other and will never switch sides.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:46 PM   #10 (permalink)
Conspiracy Realist
 
Sun Tzu's Avatar
 
Location: The Event Horizon
Conservative on certain issues, Liberal on others.

Libertarian
__________________
To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.- Stephen Hawking
Sun Tzu is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 08:12 PM   #11 (permalink)
Black Belt in Slacking Off
 
Location: Portland Or-ah-gun
I find it funny that the number of Libertarians equal the number of GOP and Dem combined. And that's after my vote in the Big Two is included.
__________________
Slacking off with style since 1981.
Sensei is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 08:22 PM   #12 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Sensei, I can only speak for myself but there is nothing in the poll selections that I can choose. It is missing an important part of the electorate that can change red to blue and blue to red. Independents are not so easily classified as the poll choices.
__________________
"You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to." Molly Ivins - 1944-2007
Elphaba is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 08:30 PM   #13 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
Washington State has recently required that we register our party affiliation, due to a Supreme Court decision that was reviewed for another state. I hate it! We are a State that has a large contingent of Independents (at least on the West side) but now we cannot participate in the primaries unless we pick a party ahead of time. What became of our right to privacy of the vote, if we must declare a party? This makes vote tampering all the more easier imo.
Maybe its to keep people from screwing with primaries by voting for the worst candidate on the other side.

For example I'd love every right wing voter to vote to nominate Kusinich, but only because I know he would lose the general election. That sort of tampering isn't the intent of the primary.

Edit: ah uber covered it.

The poll needs to be reworded really.

Its who you VOTE for that matters, not who you align with (aka Libertarian).
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 08:52 PM   #14 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Maybe its to keep people from screwing with primaries by voting for the worst candidate on the other side.

For example I'd love every right wing voter to vote to nominate Kusinich, but only because I know he would lose the general election. That sort of tampering isn't the intent of the primary.

Edit: ah uber covered it.

The poll needs to be reworded really.

Its who you VOTE for that matters, not who you align with (aka Libertarian).
Am I supposed to be in awe of this *new* revelation, U2? Sheesh. That argument is the whole basis of the SCOTUS review of one state's voting record that got automatically extended to my state. There is no evidence that primary voting was ever manipulated in that way in Washington, but what the hey! You must now choose a political "name" for yourself and if you refuse to do so you cannot participate in the primaries. Primary games are not the issue. Forced voter identification of party is the issue.
__________________
"You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to." Molly Ivins - 1944-2007
Elphaba is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 08:55 PM   #15 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
Am I supposed to be in awe of this *new* revelation, U2? Sheesh. That argument is the whole basis of the SCOTUS review of one state's voting record that got automatically extended to my state. There is no evidence that primary voting was ever manipulated in that way in Washington, but what the hey! You must now choose a political "name" for yourself and if you refuse to do so you cannot participate in the primaries. Primary games are not the issue. Forced voter identification of party is the issue.
Well I hope you can cope with it then. I don't see it as a big deal to be quite honest.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 09:16 PM   #16 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
I am quite certain that you wouldn't.
__________________
"You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to." Molly Ivins - 1944-2007
Elphaba is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 09:26 PM   #17 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Well I hope you can cope with it then. I don't see it as a big deal to be quite honest.
Weren't you the one who was convinced that anyone would sell their vote? You're starting to paint a consistent picture, but I'm not sure it's the one you intend.
Willravel is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 10:38 PM   #18 (permalink)
Insane
 
Atreides88's Avatar
 
Location: The South.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ubertuber
P.S. Atreides, it's too bad there's no unaffiliated or independent option that doesn't include "apathetic". You want a poll edit? It's your choice.
Well, I suppose an "Independent" option could be added, I have no idea how to do that. The "unregistered/apathetic" was geared towards those who were not registered to vote and/or were apathetic to the politics. Sorry for any confusion or inconvenience.
__________________
"There is no need to suppose that human beings differ very much one from another: but it is true that the ones who come out on top are the ones who have been trained in the hardest school." -- Thucydides
Atreides88 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 10:41 PM   #19 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
I am quite certain that you wouldn't.
You want to vote in a party primary as an independent...... well no.

If you want to take part in the primary you should at least declare you are a member of that party. I think this is in fact a good thing as its a weakness in the whole primary system some have been talking about exploiting as of late. In 2000 for example McCain won the Michigan Republican primary as the democrats elected to not hold a primary, and based on exit poll data it were democrats who gave him the victory, democrats who had no intention of voting for him in the general election for the most part I'm sure.

There is no obligation for a party to have a primary in the first place. Its a way for their members to have a voice, in the old days this did not happen. Even today it doesn't always happen.

Honestly the primary system as a whole has issues but how a party wants to do it is up to them.

If it were for the general election, then ok I'd be all up in arms, but its not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Weren't you the one who was convinced that anyone would sell their vote? You're starting to paint a consistent picture, but I'm not sure it's the one you intend.
And what would that be will? That for enough money anyone would change their vote? True, even an idealistic kid fresh out of school would if the check were big enough. If the election comes down to one vote then he can get all remorseful. As for this issue, will you know that primaries are for the party right?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 11:06 PM   #20 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
And what would that be will?
You don't seem to place a high value on a democratic vote.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
As for this issue, will you know that primaries are for the party right?
Of course. I also know that they're polarization-paloozas and are entirely useless. The idea of anyone voting for reps from parties, especially third parties and indys, seems more reasonable to me. It seems stupid to, for example, be a republican, choose a republican candidate, but still be free to vote for any candidate. Does that make sense to you?
Willravel is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 11:42 PM   #21 (permalink)
We work alone
 
LoganSnake's Avatar
 
Location: Cake Town
100% apathetic.
__________________
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing that you'll be an idiot in the future. Common sense is knowing that you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
LoganSnake is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 11:44 PM   #22 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoganSnake
100% apathetic.
I appreciate your honesty and consistency!
Willravel is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 09:59 AM   #23 (permalink)
We work alone
 
LoganSnake's Avatar
 
Location: Cake Town
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I appreciate your honesty and consistency!
Mama taught me not to lie.

But seriously, I've tried getting interested in politics at one point, but nothing came out of it.
__________________
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing that you'll be an idiot in the future. Common sense is knowing that you should try not to be an idiot now. - J. Jacques
LoganSnake is offline  
 

Tags
affiliations, political


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:14 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62