Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-05-2007, 07:30 AM   #41 (permalink)
Junkie
 
If you have a problem with the flag ask the owner to remove it. If he doesn't remove it then contact the police who will remove it for him. But don't break the law to remove it.

On a side note does this country always have to be afraid of the bogeyman? First there were Communists, then there were Arabs, now there are Mexicans!
Rekna is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 08:57 AM   #42 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Washington State
McDonalds should be repremanded.

http://www.usflag.org/flagetiquette.html
Racnad is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:08 AM   #43 (permalink)
Tilted
 
MrTia's Avatar
 
an interesting sidebar: obama announced today he's taking off his flag pin, which i think is cool of him -- that whole thing was starting to really smack of conformism.

i remember when the whole flag decal fad got popular thinking, wait a minute, these aren't flags, these are fake pictures of flags. is that kosher based on the whole flag etiquette thing? and it looks like they had to make an exception for it. i wonder if they wrote that part after 9/11 or if wavy flag decals have always been loopholed in to the rules.
__________________
The height of cultivation always runs to simplicity.
-- Bruce Lee
MrTia is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:29 AM   #44 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
the flag fetish set enjoys it when public figures genuflect in their direction.
"see?" they say.
"he's one of us."

in democracy in america, tocqueville noted a quirk amongst the 1830s americans that he met--you had to flatter the country and in their need for flattery, these folk were more demanding than any courtier.
genuflecting is a form of flattery just as most other submissive behaviours are.

what's curious about obama's choice is that it is getting press as if it were meaningful in some way.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:37 AM   #45 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
The flattery, being necessary as it is, explains the press. 'Meaningful', of course, is subjective. I'm sure you and I don't care, but for those to whom the flag is something holy it's a big deal. I'm not saying it's right, just sayin.
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:44 AM   #46 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
what's curious about obama's choice is that it is getting press as if it were meaningful in some way.
Not really, fox news is the one giving it press. The are trying to paint him as unpatriotic. This is right next to the article that states 1 in 5 dem's want us to loose the war in Iraq which is right next to the article about how 86% of Americans are praying.......
Rekna is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:52 AM   #47 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
ah--i saw "coverage" of obama as a blurb on the front page of the nytimes.
tha faux news is on the case is no surprise.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 10:28 AM   #48 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Just for the record, it is NOT illegal under federal law to fly another flag above the US flag.

The so-called federal law, the Flag Code, codifies a set of ADVISORY administrative rules, with no penalties or enforcement provisions regarding the "proper" display of the flag:
Quote:
The Federal Flag Code provides uniform guidelines for the display of and respect shown to the flag. In addition to the Code, Congress has by statute designated the national anthem and set out the proper conduct during its presentation.

The Code is designed "for the use of such civilian groups or organizations as may not be required to conform with regulations promulgated by one or more executive departments" of the federal government.

Thus, the Flag Code does not prescribe any penalties for non-compliance nor does it include enforcement provisions; rather the Code functions simply as a guide to be voluntarily followed by civilians and civilian groups.

The Federal Flag Code does not purport to cover all possible situations. Although the Code empowers the President of the United States to alter, modify, repeal, or prescribe additional rules regarding the flag, no federal agency has the authority to issue "official" rulings legally binding on civilians or civilian groups.

http://kyl.senate.gov/constit_center/RL30243.pdf
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 10-05-2007 at 10:35 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 10:30 AM   #49 (permalink)
Tilted
 
MrTia's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
ah--i saw "coverage" of obama as a blurb on the front page of the nytimes.
tha faux news is on the case is no surprise.
i'm pretty sure, as a jihadist demoncrap, obama "osama" mohammad would have no use for the stars and stripes according to faux nooz.
__________________
The height of cultivation always runs to simplicity.
-- Bruce Lee
MrTia is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 10:45 AM   #50 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Just for the record, it is NOT illegal under federal law to fly another flag above the US flag.

The so-called federal law, the Flag Code, codifies a set of ADVISORY administrative rules, with no penalties or enforcement provisions regarding the "proper" display of the flag:
Thanks! So the LEGAL immigrant was breaking no laws when this guy decided that he was offended so he defaced and stole the mans property. Looks like the vet needs to go to court.
Rekna is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 10:55 AM   #51 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
There may be a state law or local ordinance in Nevada, where this occurred, but if so, such laws would certainly violate first amendment rights, based on a Supreme Court ruling in the 90s regarding flag desecration.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 05:08 PM   #52 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: South Louisiana
I have worked in several other countries around the world. If americans tried the things in these countries that the aliens do over here there would be more americans in foreign prisons than they could hold. Try waving an american flag in mexico & see what it will get you. I think the mexican who flew the mexican flag over the american flag should be deported. If they want to be here follow the rules or go somewhere else.

edited by cynthetiq: please do not use ALLCAPS in posts.

Last edited by Cynthetiq; 10-06-2007 at 04:02 AM.. Reason: replaced ALLCAPS
Digbudro is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 05:50 PM   #53 (permalink)
Crazy
 
archetypal fool's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digbudro
I HAVE WORKED IN SEVERAL OTHER COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD. IF AMERICANS TRIED THE THINGS IN THESE COUNTRIES THAT THE ALIENS DO OVER HERE THERE WOULD BE MORE AMERICANS IN FOREIGN PRISONS THAN THEY COULD HOLD. TRY WAVING AN AMERICAN FLAG IN MEXICO & SEE WHAT IT WILL GET YOU. I THINK THE MEXICAN WHO FLEW THE MEXICAN FLAG OVER THE AMERICAN FLAG SHOULD BE DEPORTED. IF THEY WANT TO BE HERE FOLLOW THE RULES OR GO SOMEWHERE ELSE.
First of all, the man is an American Citizen, just like you. It's interesting that you're still calling to have him deported. If you see a white person desecrating the flag, would you also call to have him deported to whatever country his family originates from? (And this includes people who keep their flags out at night unlighted, people who have flag bumper stickers, people who wear cloths decorated with flags, people who decorate their home with the flag, people who use flag handkerchiefs, people who buy flag-covered napkins and plates [I always see them everywhere on Independence Day, despite the fact it is many times more disrespectful than what the store owner did] etc. Source)

Second, if he was indeed ignorant of the "law" then he meant no disrespect (this doesn't mean it's right, but dammit, he didn't know - his intention wasn't to make a political statement). However, that's just speculation and taking his word for it. On the other hand, if he knew it was against the "law", then it was a political statement, and is therefore protected by the First Amendment - if you want him deported, then you're a hypocrite, and you've gone against the very thing that flag represents - meaning that you've completely missed the point of it and that you're idolizing a piece of cloth.

Third, read dc_dux's post above regarding the "law" in this matter.
__________________
I have my own particular sorrows, loves, delights; and you have yours. But sorrow, gladness, yearning, hope, love, belong to all of us, in all times and in all places. Music is the only means whereby we feel these emotions in their universality. ~H.A. Overstreet
archetypal fool is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 07:39 PM   #54 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
When I try to post in all caps, it stops me.
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 08:47 PM   #55 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
I wonder if the jingoistic knuckleheads who froth over the flag know whether the framers of our country (you know, the ones they claim kinship to in their seething hatred of anything un-American) were more interested in private property rights or flag etiquette.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses
JumpinJesus is offline  
Old 10-09-2007, 06:04 PM   #56 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
I think that the Vet should be prosecuted. Whether or not the store owner knew the flag code is irrelevant. Being offended by someone does not give you the right to criminally trespass, vandalize, and steal their property. Prosecute the vet to the fullest extent of the law.
Terrell is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 12:25 AM   #57 (permalink)
Upright
 
37OHSSV's Avatar
 
Location: Lesbian trapped in a man's body
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTia
^that's fair, but it always seems like some folks take this stuff way too seriously. like how people freak out over all these trumped up stories of demonstrators burning the flag. they're pinheads to do that but to fly into a rage over it gives them too much credit and attention.

it's a SYMBOL, yanno? what's important is preserving the freedoms it represents.
Your avatar makes your post more interesting. If that flag had had the word "nigger" (yes, I said it) on it, no one would be questioning the appropriateness of its removal.

Burning a US flag is free speech; removing an illegally flown Mexican flag is not.

Conclusion: Free speech must be approved by the left.
37OHSSV is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 03:37 AM   #58 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by 37OHSSV
Burning a US flag is free speech; removing an illegally flown Mexican flag is not.
How many times need it be said that flying a Mexican flag above the US flag is NOT illegal.

In fact, it is no more illegal than flying the US flag in inclement weather or not placing your hand over your heart when reciting the pledge of alligence.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 04:17 AM   #59 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by 37OHSSV
Your avatar makes your post more interesting. If that flag had had the word "nigger" (yes, I said it) on it, no one would be questioning the appropriateness of its removal.
This is nonsense. The same could be said about a pornographic flag, too, and has little to do with the fact the flag was Mexican.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 10:22 AM   #60 (permalink)
Like John Goodman, but not.
 
Journeyman's Avatar
 
Location: SFBA, California
I looked around and couldn't find an update on what's going on, but this would be a perfect opportunity for the store owner to ask the vet to help him hang the flag properly, and it would be happy time for all. Just because it's only etiquette and isn't a crime to hang another national flag over our own doesn't mean it's not a dick thing to do. With wearing the flag, flag bumper stickers, etc, you can usually tell what's meant to display pride in America. The problem with hanging a Mexican flag over an American flag on U.S. soil is that it's an (unintentional) signal that somebody desires Mexican nationality in the fullest sense of the word brought to where he's settled. Imagine having served your country, America, in military service, only to walk around and find out people were immigrating here and acting like it was still Mexico, treating their U.S. citizenship as secondary.

Now I enjoy good humor in immigration style, ie "American by birth, (Your Nationality Here) by the grace of God." And I don't think private flag displays are going to present much offense to anyone. But this shop (I'm assuming) being open to the public brings it to higher standards than a place of residence, does it not?
Journeyman is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 10:41 AM   #61 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Let's face it - it's because it is a Mexican flag. People would not be getting their knickers in a twist (at least to this extent) if it was the Canadian, Swedish or Australian flag. Or the McDonald's flag, which I've certainly seen flying higher and more centrally than both American and Canadian flags across North America. I get the feeling that the level of hate towards other nationalities in parts of the US goes, in order: 1) Mexico 2) Cuba 3) France 4) Iran

If you've got a problem with the guy, don't shop at his store, protest, have a march or something, but defacing the property is the wrong way to go. Stealing is the wrong way to go.

That Mexican should take advantage of the US gun laws and legally cap that old guy in the ass next time he tries to steal from his property.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 10:47 AM   #62 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
Let's face it - it's because it is a Mexican flag. People would not be getting their knickers in a twist (at least to this extent) if it was the Canadian, Swedish or Australian flag. Or the McDonald's flag, which I've certainly seen flying higher and more centrally than both American and Canadian flags across North America. I get the feeling that the level of hate towards other nationalities in parts of the US goes, in order: 1) Mexico 2) Cuba 3) France 4) Iran
wrong on so many levels. I'd care, and I WOULD cut them down no matter the country.


Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
That Mexican should take advantage of the US gun laws and legally cap that old guy in the ass next time he tries to steal from his property.
you obviously have no grasp of the reality of gun laws in this country.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 11:00 AM   #63 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
wrong on so many levels. I'd care, and I WOULD cut them down no matter the country.
You'd break the law, and you'd be trying to enforce a law through vigilantism that barely anyone knows exist and that clearly wasn't being broken intentionally. That's neither brave nor noble.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
you obviously have no grasp of the reality of gun laws in this country.
How many times have you talked about shooting someone who was attempting to rob your house? The property is private.
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 11:04 AM   #64 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
I just saw the video for the first time.

The vet pulls both flags down, cuts off the US flag and crumples it up in his hands.

MSN video

I dont think that treatment of the US flag is recommended in the Flag Code.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 10-11-2007 at 11:06 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 01:45 PM   #65 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
You'd break the law, and you'd be trying to enforce a law through vigilantism that barely anyone knows exist and that clearly wasn't being broken intentionally. That's neither brave nor noble.
bravery and nobility would have nothing to do with it. Flying a foreign flag OVER the US flag is an indicator that the property in question is being claimed by said flags representative country. case in point, flying the US flag on the statue of saddam after baghdads fall. what an uproar about us 'claiming' the country.

Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
How many times have you talked about shooting someone who was attempting to rob your house? The property is private.
But, I know the laws of most of the states. In TEXAS, after dark, with an expectation that said property would most likely not be able to be recovered, I can shoot. During DAYTIME, that would be unlawful. I KNOW the gun laws very well so I know that simply shooting someone over property being stolen is not in itself a lawful act....UNLESS certain conditions can be met.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I just saw the video for the first time.

The vet pulls both flags down, cuts off the US flag and crumples it up in his hands.

MSN video

I dont think that treatment of the US flag is recommended in the Flag Code.
I'm thinking that the OP isn't quite like what the video shows.
I would now have to call that particular veteran....whats that word? oh yeah. MORON!!!
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."

Last edited by dksuddeth; 10-11-2007 at 01:49 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 10-11-2007, 02:04 PM   #66 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
I'm thinking that the OP isn't quite like what the video shows.
I would now have to call that particular veteran....whats that word? oh yeah. MORON!!!
Stop the presses.....we agree on this point!

I even support your right to commit vandalism, malicious mischief (or however the crime of destruction of or damage to the property of another is codified in Nevada) if you consider it a personal act of civil disobedience (rather than vigilantism) and are willing to pay the price for your action (fine, jail time, paying for the destroyed property or all of the above) in response to an action by a fellow citizen who committed no crime, but simply broke a voluntary rule of flag etiquette.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 10-11-2007 at 02:15 PM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 10-12-2007, 06:42 AM   #67 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
wrong on so many levels. I'd care, and I WOULD cut them down no matter the country.

Illegally entering a person's property to make some sort of citizens arrest on a bit of material fluttering in the breeze is not a rational act.

As stated, the correct way to handle such things is within the bounds of the law - protest, sue, demonstrate, lobby. The armegeddon and the accompanying survival of the best armed has not been visited upon us yet.

But anyway, it's your country, do what you will with it.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 10-13-2007, 10:10 PM   #68 (permalink)
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
 
Superbelt's Avatar
 
Location: Grantville, Pa
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I just saw the video for the first time.

The vet pulls both flags down, cuts off the US flag and crumples it up in his hands.

MSN video

I dont think that treatment of the US flag is recommended in the Flag Code.
Exactly. While in the act of committing a crime against someone who was violating a guideline for flag display, this guy disrespects the flag he is trying to protect even further by balling it up and shoving it up his armpit.

I'm pretty big on proper respect for the flag. I'll point out to people frequently when they are doing something wrong, like the filthy displays they have up on their car.
But I won't go and commit a crime to gain resolution.
Superbelt is offline  
 

Tags
destruction, flag, illegal, private, property


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:42 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360