Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-04-2007, 10:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Democratic Congressman William Jefferson Finally Indicted

Finally, a democratic party member in congress is being indicted. I hope, that if Jefferson is found guilty, he is punished to the full extent of the law for his crimes, or at least as harshly as Scooter Libby is gonna be, for his crimes.

I do not believe that Jefferson has committed crimes that rise to the same level as those committed by Randy Cunningham were, since no funds that the DOD could have used to "support the troops", were diverted by Jefferson, as in Cunningham's case.

I do not believe that Jefferson committed crimes that rise to the same level as those that Tom Delay is accused of, or Bob Ney was convicted for. I predict that there will be renewed cries that "both parties" are equally corrupt, but I don't see much evidence to justify that opinion, do you?


Quote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...060400683.html
Indictment Sought Against Rep. Jefferson
FBI Probes Allegations Lawmaker Took Bribes to Promote Business Ventures

By Jerry Markon and Allan Lengel
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, June 4, 2007; 12:46 PM

Federal prosecutors are seeking an indictment today against Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.) in a longstanding FBI corruption probe centering on allegations that he took bribes to promote high-tech business ventures in Africa, sources familiar with the investigation said.

Prosecutors are presenting the case to grand jurors in Alexandria today, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because no charges have yet been filed.

If filed, the indictment would cap a long and tumultuous investigation that was stalled for months because of a legal battle over the constitutionality of an FBI raid on Jefferson's office last May. The raid came after the FBI found $90,000 in the freezer of his Capitol Hill home.

A political and legal maelstrom followed the raid, prompting President Bush to intervene and seal the seized documents for 45 days. In July, U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan, who had signed the search warrant, ruled that the raid was constitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals has yet to rule on the matter.

Jefferson, 60, is a potential political embarrassment for Democrats, just months after they took over control of Congress. Democrats had campaigned last year on the theme that Republicans had created a culture of corruption. In July, the House officially expelled Jefferson from the prestigious Ways and Means Committee.

At the time, then House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the allegations against Jefferson were too egregious to wait for a legal resolution.

"This isn't about proof in the court or law; this is about an ethical standard," she said.

News of the FBI probe hurt Jefferson in his reelection bid last fall, but he managed to win in a runoff, garnering 30 percent of the vote in a crowded primary field of 12 candidates. His campaign ads emphasized that he had not been charged with any crime.

The investigation began in March 2005 when Virginia investor Lori Mody, went to the FBI to complain that Jefferson and her business associate were trying to scam her in a high-tech business venture in Africa in which a copper wire technology would be used to deliver the Internet and cable television.

Mody agreed to wear a listening device for federal authorities, previously issued court documents said.

During an undercover sting, on July 21, 2005, Jefferson told Mody that he needed to give Nigerian Vice President Atikua Abubakar $500,000 "as a motivating factor" to make sure they obtained contracts.

Mody eventually agreed to give Jefferson $100,000 -- in marked bills from the FBI, court records have indicated. A few days later, $90,000 was found in Jefferson's freezer.

Eventually, Mody's business associate Brett Pfeffer and Vernon L. Jackson, the president of iGate, a Louisville based high tech firm, pleaded guilty to bribing Jefferson to use his political influence to push through a lucrative contract in Africa to sell technology for the Internet and cable television. Both are serving time in prison.
host is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 11:04 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Good get him out of there. I've thought for a while that he needed to step down. Corruption is bad regardless of who does it.
Rekna is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 11:23 AM   #3 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
IMHO, this guy is not a very smart corrupt polititian as well as the others you mentioned. I believe that most of our corrupt polititians know how to play the game and we will never catch them. Those that we catch are probably just the tip of the iceberg.
flstf is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 11:36 AM   #4 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Lock him up, but for God's sake don't let this take any attention away from the bigger corrupt politicians.

It'd be funny if he was actually responding to a nigerian scammer...
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 01:49 PM   #5 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
It's about freakin' time
tecoyah is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 03:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Upright
 
Estevez's Avatar
 
Location: Central Illinois
The real crime was that he got re-elected.
Estevez is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 07:42 PM   #7 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Estevez
The real crime was that he got re-elected.
Nah, the real crime was that the Fed's overstepped in confiscating his House records and that delayed his formal charges. That's the only thing that kept this criminal from being indicted nearly a year ago. I expect Nancy to suspend his involvement on any committee (she gave him a mini-job) and work toward replacing the bum asap.

If this creep has any honor toward his position at all, he will resign NOW!.
__________________
"You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to." Molly Ivins - 1944-2007
Elphaba is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 08:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Sure is refreshing to see such generally partisan people acknowledge the illegality of the illegal activities of the certain members of their own political party.
filtherton is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 09:34 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
He should absolutely resign immediately.

But one partisan question still remains....and that is, with all the evidence they had against him, why did Gonzales feel it was necessary to raid his House office (the first time in the history of Congress) and did not feel that same necessity in the Cunningham or Ney investigations?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 09:45 PM   #10 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
Sure is refreshing to see such generally partisan people acknowledge the illegality of the illegal activities of the certain members of their own political party.

Let's keep in mind that he has been indicted. He has not been found guilty, and he claims innocent. He is therefore innocent - at least until he is proven not to be. That's how the laws of this country are supposed to work.

That said, I think he's guilty as hell, and the minute the jury comes back with that verdict he should resign or be kicked out. There's no excuse for that crap, no matter what party commits the offense.
shakran is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 10:04 PM   #11 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Shakran...you are absolutely right.

Just for the record, Duke Cunningham did not resign at the time of his indictment. It was only after he pleaded guilty to taking more than $2 million in bribes - link

Bob Ney did not resign at the time of his indictment, but waited until weeks after he pleaded guilty to multiple crimes of corruption (it took the judge 9 minutes to read through all of the corrupt activites Ney engaged in from 2000 through 2004 -link)

Its a bit hypocritical for the House Repub leader to call for an immediate expulsion order for Jefferson, when he took no such action on Cunninghamd and Ney - link

/end of my partisan observations.

But Jefferson should still do the honorable thing and step down now.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 06-05-2007, 06:06 AM   #12 (permalink)
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
Let's keep in mind that he has been indicted. He has not been found guilty, and he claims innocent. He is therefore innocent - at least until he is proven not to be. That's how the laws of this country are supposed to work.

That said, I think he's guilty as hell, and the minute the jury comes back with that verdict he should resign or be kicked out. There's no excuse for that crap, no matter what party commits the offense.
That's a good point.

However, if he knows he's guilty, he ought to have the balls to resign.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
ubertuber is offline  
Old 06-05-2007, 07:24 AM   #13 (permalink)
Thank You Jesus
 
reconmike's Avatar
 
Location: Twilight Zone
Yeah he is innocent, with over $90k in tin foil in his freezer.
Its ok though dont fret Dems, he will serve his 250 years and when he gets out his constituents will reelect him, just like Marion Barry.
__________________
Where is Darwin when ya need him?
reconmike is offline  
Old 06-05-2007, 07:39 AM   #14 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ubertuber
That's a good point.

However, if he knows he's guilty, he ought to have the balls to resign.

Agreed, but corrupt assholes are the same no matter what side of the aisle they sit on. If he's innocent, he shouldn't resign. If he's guilty, he's almost certainly a big enough asshole that he'll try to beat the rap and keep his seat.
shakran is offline  
Old 06-05-2007, 09:18 AM   #15 (permalink)
Huggles, sir?
 
seretogis's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
Why are some of you expecting "balls" and "honor" from career politicians?

He'll do what the rest of them do, wait until he is convicted to resign, even if he knows that he is 100% guilty.
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames
seretogis is offline  
Old 06-06-2007, 01:53 AM   #16 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
Well, it would seem the Congress is taking this more seriously than in the past. Even Jefferson may have found one of his balls....tiny though it may be:

Quote:
WASHINGTON - The House ordered a speedy internal investigation that could oust indicted Rep. William J. Jefferson from Congress before his bribery trial.

Mindful of anti-corruption sentiment among voters last November, the House passed two resolutions Tuesday that require the ethics committee to investigate charges more quickly than in the past.

Jefferson, meanwhile, resigned his seat on the Small Business Committee in response to his indictment on federal charges of taking more than $500,000 in bribes. Democrats already had moved to take that seat from him. Jefferson admitted no wrongdoing.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070606/...JJep_aqJ.s0NUE

Maybe there is one small L.E.D. at the end of this dark tunnel.
tecoyah is offline  
Old 06-06-2007, 06:01 AM   #17 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
At the same time that the House passed the rule for the Ethics Committee to investigate if Jefferson should be expelled (as Tecoyah's article notes, a recommendation for explusion would be a first by the House), it passed a concurrent rule that directs the Ethics Committee to respond to the indictment of any House member by empaneling an investigative committee within 30 days.

It is interesting to note that one member who voted against both resolutions was repub Cong. John Doolittle (possibly the next House member to be indicted?). Doolittle’s home was searched by the FBI in April as part of the investigation into disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/...007-06-05.html

Even more promising is a proposal that a panel of four congressional outsiders be set up to decide which complaints merit investigation by the Ethics Committee. Since Congress has rarely shown the balls to investigate one of their own (The committee’s historical data show that just one complaint has been filed by a member in the past six years, and just two have been filed since 1997.) This would allow outside groups to call for investigating a House member's conduct and this new indepedent would decide to proceed or not.
http://public.cq.com/docs/cqt/news110-000002524230.html
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 06-06-2007 at 06:05 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 06-07-2007, 01:51 AM   #18 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Now THIS is what I'm talkin' about!

Thanks for the good news, Host.
The_Dunedan is offline  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:46 PM   #19 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
I needed to pick myself off the floor when I heard Jefferson's attorney comment today. The "defense" is that Jefferson was a willing participant in a FBI sting of an illegal Nigerian operation. *That's* why he had $90K in his freezer!

Wouldn't that suggest that the FBI and DOJ do not coordinate their investigations? Oh, wait. That has been a problem.
__________________
"You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to." Molly Ivins - 1944-2007
Elphaba is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 07:48 AM   #20 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
I have a problem when our Federal government engages in "sting" operations. I also think there is something wrong when the government encourages people to do things that would normally be illegal or things that would put them at risk to entrap a person who may have had no intent on violating any law.

When it comes to "white collar",financial crimes. I think almost everyone has a "price" or a point where they would do something they would not ordinarilly do, even if it is illegal. So to me it seems that the Federal government could target any person, set-up a sting with a high enough potential reward and entrap that person and that they could do that all day every-day to millions of people.

I find it interesting that some who are very vocal about the Bush administration's use of phone records to track the communications of terrorists at war with us, say nothing about the potential abuse of "sting" operations.

Jefferson may be guilty, but this may prove to be an interesting case on a number of levels as the facts come out.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 10:37 AM   #21 (permalink)
Insane
 
joshbaumgartner's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by seretogis
Why are some of you expecting "balls" and "honor" from career politicians?
It is not incidental that the sentiment that noone can be a career politician without going corrupt is so widespread. It that very sentiment that is pushed by the corrupted.

If integrity is rare in the field, then it is all the more important that we emphasize standards and act strongly to enforce them. There are polititians who have courage and honor and who act on them. They are by and large sidelined. The media doesn't get any ratings by reporting on honorable behaviour of representatives. When they do get press it is ridicule of their "extremist" positions--one who stands firm on principle must be an extremist, right?

I expect high standards of those who serve me at the high levels of the Federal Government. That I am routinely dissappointed by their actions is not going to cause me to lower my standards, but merely encourage me to be all the more insistant that those who seek such jobs meet those standards and are held accountable when they don't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
I have a problem when our Federal government engages in "sting" operations.
An excellent concern. Sting operations have their place, but in my view, they should only be used to target those which the police have specific reason to believe are already engaging in illegal activities. The purpose of the sting is to therefore verify that suspicion while collecting the evidence to that effect.

In the case of a bribery situation, if the police had collected reports, tips, or whatever to lead them to believe there was a significant chance that an individual was taking bribes, then yes, a sting may be warranted to try and replicate a similar opportunity, and see if indeed that person was going to participate. But if they don't have specific information that the person is actively involved in real bribery, they have no business setting up the sting.

I don't have enough details to say one way or the other in regard to the Jefferson case, so don't take any of this as an indication of my feelings on his case in particular. But in general, I share your concern about stings. I do want police to have tools to catch criminals, and am eager to see our law enforcement agencies tackling our government officials when they break the law. But at the same time, the purpose of law enforcement is to deter and prevent crime, not to encourage it just so they can arrest people.

Last edited by joshbaumgartner; 06-12-2007 at 10:52 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
joshbaumgartner is offline  
 

Tags
congressman, democratic, finally, indicted, jefferson, william

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360