Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2007, 11:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Political Satire "Face Off", Is One Side of the Political Spectrum Better At It?

"Left" leaning folks have Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and what seems to be a multitude of political satirists to bring attention and humor to the absurdities observed in the political positions, statements, attitude, and bearing of their counterparts who lean to the right.

This inspired me to create a thread where folks of different political persuasions can post their "best stuff", or their reactions to what is already posted. I am biased......but I don't find anything from the right that can compete with "The Daily Show's" Jon Stewart, or with Stephen Colbert. Show me that I am wrong.

Stewart and Colbert are the successes they've become because they have a quality of universal appeal. Comments about the level of universal appeal of posted examples of the best satire are encouraged.

If an satirical example does not strike you as humorous, tell us why. If the premise of satirical political pieces consistently evoke an offensive or "not funny" reaction from one "side", but are considered humorous by the other "side", is it more because of the parochialism of those who find humor in the work, or the hypersensitivity of those who take offense, or vice versa?

This stuff strikes me as humorous. Does one side have a talent for producing political satire which has a more universal appeal than the other side is able to create? Now that there is no more "one party rule" in Washington, this seems like a perfect time for both directions of the political spectrum to show us what they've got:

Quote:
http://jonswift.blogspot.com/2007/01...n-is-dead.html

<i>Jon Swift

I am a reasonable conservative who likes to write about politics and culture. Since the media is biased I get all my news from Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Jay Leno monologues.</i>

Saturday, January 13, 2007
Breaking News: Michael Ledeen Is Dead

Exclusive: Must credit Jon Swift
According to a confidential source, Michael Ledeen, Pajamas Media's supreme pundit, is dead. Apparently he was not well for some time. I have not been able to get any independent confirmation of what my source is telling me, but I have decided to go ahead with this story anyway because, after all, that is what Ledeen would have wanted me to do.

Sadly, Ledeen did not live to see his greatest scoop vindicated: his report that the Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was dead. Or if he hadn't actually died, was dying. If not right at the moment, then eventually. Iran denied the report, dismissing it as "Internet rumors," and even Michelle Malkin, who is a bit of a stickler for verifying rumors before she prints them, said, "This is either going to be a two-ton feather in Pajamas's cap or a major embarrassment." Even after pictures surfaced of Khamenei (which may have been of an imposter! Or Photoshopped!) making an appearance in public, Ledeen stuck to his guns. His last post on January 10 reported the death of Carlo Ponti, who is, in fact, dead.

Despite his untimely death, Michael Ledeen will continue to live on through the influence his ideas will have on American foreign policy for years to come. Ledeen often advised and Karl Rove on foreign policy and Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz were among his admirers. If it is true that we have declared double-secret war on Iran, you can thank Ledeen, who was a tireless advocate for regime change Iran. Ledeen is a longtime expert on Iran whose expertise on the country goes back to his stint as an advisor to Robert MacFarlane in the Reagan Administration when he helped negotiate the deal that would later be known as Iran-Contra, just one the many successful foreign policy initiatives Ledeen was involved in. In fact, Ledeen was more than a pundit, which elicited grudging admiration even from critics like Matthew Yglesias, who wrote after his name surfaced in relation to the forged documents about yellowcake from Niger (which he denied any involvement with), "I used to find Ledeen's habit of popping up in these contexts to be a bit shady. Nowadays, I think it's sort of admirable. My life as a trained professional political pundit is pretty dull. Lots of time looking at computer screens and the occassional conversation. My other friends in this game are all the same way. But Ledeen does wet work! It's just so cool and makes me look pretty lame by comparison."

But our upcoming (or ongoing) war with Iran is not the only legacy Ledeen leaves behind. Ledeen warned in 2003 that France and Germany may have made an alliance with Islamic terrorists to bring down the United States. "They dreaded the establishment of an American empire, and they sought for a way to bring it down," he wrote. "So the French and the Germans struck a deal with radical Islam and with radical Arabs: You go after the United States, and we'll do everything we can to protect you, and we will do everything we can to weaken the Americans." Eventually, it looks like we may have to go after our "allies," Ledeen said: "If this is correct, we will have to pursue the war against terror far beyond the boundaries of the Middle East, into the heart of Western Europe." When we invade France and Germany, we'll have Ledeen to thank. I think we can all sleep better at night knowing that he was giving this kind of advice to the Bush Administration.

There is no question Ledeen's foreign policy advice will be greatly missed. Ledeen supplied the principal rationale for going to war with Iraq, which his friend Jonah Goldberg called the "Ledeen Doctrine." According to Goldberg, Ledeen once said, "Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business." Although he modestly claimed later to have nothing to do with the decision to invade Iraq, and, in fact, told Vanity Fair, "I opposed the military invasion of Iraq before it took place," it was typical of the man not to seek out credit for his ideas. Some critics would go so far as to accuse Ledeen of lying about his support for the war, but they just didn't understand the subtle, sophisticated way he had of expressing himself. For example, when he told an interviewer that we should invade Iraq "yesterday," what he was actually saying was that we shouldn't invade Iraq because everyone knows it would be impossible to do something yesterday unless you had a time machine. And just because he criticized those who opposed the war, it doesn't mean he supported the war. He was highly critical, for example, of Brent Scowcroft who said that, "I think we could have an explosion in the Middle East. It could turn the whole region into a caldron and destroy the War on Terror." To Ledeen, that was a good thing. "One can only hope that we turn the region into a cauldron, and faster, please. If ever there were a region that richly deserved being cauldronized, it is the Middle East today," Ledeen wrote.

Ledeen claimed that he actually wanted to go after Iran before we went after Iraq. But even if he did believe that Iraq was the wrong crappy country to throw against the wall at the wrong time, as he now claims, he predicted that the American people would welcome the War in Iraq with flowers, no matter how many people were killed. "I think the level of casualties is secondary," he said. "I mean, it may sound like an odd thing to say, but all the great scholars who have studied American character have come to the conclusion that we are a warlike people and that we love war.... What we hate is not casualties but losing." If it is true that the American people love war, then Ledeen may have been the most American person of all.

Ledeen's unique perspective grew out of his interest in Italian fascism, which he studied while earning a PhD. at the University of Wisconsin and then in Rome, where he went after being rejected for tenure at the University of Washington in St. Louis. (Faculty members said he was rejected for plagiarism and the "quality of his scholarship" but it was no doubt in reality because of his iconoclastic conservative views.) Ledeen believed that despite the bad name Mussolini gave to fascism, there were plenty of good fascist ideas that were worth salvaging. His theory of "Creative Destruction," which holds that sweeping away the old order through violence is the only way for society to progress, was one of the black-shirted babies Ledeen saved from Mussolini's bathwater. "Change -- above all violent change -- is the essence of human history," he wrote in his book, Machiavelli on Modern Leadership. Ledeen's many protégés in the Bush Administration who subscribed to his ideas about "creative destruction" would no doubt be surprised to learn that American foreign policy of the last few years owes a tip of the hat to ol' Benito Mussolini.

To know Ledeen was to love him. He leaves behind a beautiful family who will continue his important work: his wife Barbara, a former aide to Sen. Rick Santorum; his daughter Simone who nabbed a job working for the Civilian Provisional Authority in Iraq and did such a bang-up job getting the Iraq economy on its feet by driving around bags of cash in the trunk of her car; and his sons Gabriel, a Marine, who spent a lot of time drinking designer coffee in Iraq, and Daniel, a student at Rice University, who once asked Michael Moore how he felt about Hezbollah distributing his film Fahrenheit 9/11, but was unfairly cut off before he could ask his follow-up question, "When did you stop beating your wife?" Let us remember them all in our prayers.
Quote:
http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2007_...48752691093424
<br><br>
Thursday, January 11, 2007

Our Leader's visual aids
<br><br>

<center><img src="http://webpages.charter.net/micah/dejavu.jpg">
<br><br>
From Supreme Commander George Milhouse Bush's speech:.....</center>

Last edited by host; 01-14-2007 at 11:54 AM..
host is offline  
Old 01-14-2007, 11:47 AM   #2 (permalink)
Getting Medieval on your ass
 
Coppertop's Avatar
 
Location: 13th century Europe
You know what's sad? It's not that far of a stretch to believe that many Americans, our dear leader included, upon seeing that map would think it really was a map of the Middle East.
Coppertop is offline  
Old 01-14-2007, 02:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
The Capitol Steps satirize and parody both sides of the politcal spectrum in song. They are former Senate staffers (I was also a Senate staffer when they started in the 80s, but I cant sing) who have since turned it into a full time career, recording 20some CDs and touring and performing around the country.

http://www.capsteps.com/

Trent Lott singing "It's Not Easy Bein' White" and the song about domestic wiretapping, " Do You Fear What I Fear?" from their Christmas Bush cd are pretty funny. I'll have to look for the one of Hillary singing "I'll do it my way"

Historically, its interesting that most political satirist seem to be on the progressive side. From Mark Twain and Will Rogers to, more recently, Lenny Bruce, Mort Sahl and Richard Pryor.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 01-14-2007 at 03:10 PM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 01-14-2007, 03:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
I think there is little doubt that the Left tend to be more successful, and quite frankly generally funnier than the Right.

There are exceptions, the success of the Blue Collar tours outshine almost any other comical tours anywhere. However, these performers keep their personal political views out of their standups.

I've often thought about the reasons why satire tends to be completely one sided. Is it simply seen as obtuse for a conservative to use satire, or are the conservative justifications simply more complex (don't worry, I don't believe this for a second). What I believe the problem is, is the stereotype of the "conservative." He is always either, white/old/rich/serious or is trailor-trash who hates minorities. Neither of these would be funny to see them making fun of anyone. While the liberal stereotype tends to be young, charismatic and full of life (liberal, not hippy-liberal stereotype).

I think the liberalism which is spread through South Park is the best many on the right can point to. Their views are in no way politically correct, and constantly thrash liberals, yet manage to strike a chord in the American psyche. Yes, they trash conservatives too, but as I said that's about all we can boast really.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 01-14-2007, 09:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
I can tell you who does political satire for the "right" just as well as Jon Stewart.

Jon Stewart.

The Daily Show, although obviously leaning in the other direction, has never shied away, from what I have seen over the years, of going after everyone.

I think that is what really makes it funny, because if it was just a half-hour of "Bush is dumb" jokes it would have been canceled for lack of viewers a long time ago.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 01-14-2007, 09:59 PM   #6 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I was going to say, the Daily Show took on Clinton time and again. They took on Gore and Kerry, as well.
Willravel is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 08:22 AM   #7 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
Probably the funniest satirists on the right are Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly, and Rush Limbaugh. On the left would probably be Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

What makes them so funny is that they try to deliver their positions in all seriousness but you can just imagine them thinking to themselves "There, that should get me some publicity".

Watching news commentators, etc..take them seriously is always good for a laugh. Also SNL has done some funny skits on Bill, Hillary and Monica from time to time.
flstf is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 12:25 PM   #8 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
^^^ They have been doing Colbert and we didn't know it?
Elphaba is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 12:49 PM   #9 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Just as a note, I think that it's interesting that all the "funny" people listed thus far were into comedy first and politics later. Comedy is a skill that most political folks don't have the time or want to hone.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 12:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Agreed, Jazz. Case in point: Al Gore.
Willravel is offline  
 

Tags
face, off, political, satire, side, spectrum


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76