Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-22-2006, 03:04 AM   #81 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
This is only tangential, but is anyone else's browser doing the whole "let's render this page super fucking obnoxiously wide" thing? Every time i look at this thread i have to manually remove post 13 to make it so i don't have to scroll to the right to read the posts.
Mine does that at work but not here at home - just on this thread. Could not begin to tell you why.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 12-22-2006, 08:00 PM   #82 (permalink)
Banned
 
"PS: How's the tits forum?"....consistently entertaining.
matthew330 is offline  
Old 12-28-2006, 11:27 AM   #83 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Consider what is suggested by the OP in two current threads...
"Socialist regulators are killing freedom in America"

"A looming call for violent revolution against the wealthy is just and necessary"
Perhaps these over-reactionary tomes are what are driving people away from discussion here.

Gimme a fucking break! Why discuss such nonsense?

In the words of Arnold...."I'll be back" when the discussions return to practical political issues of the day.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 12-28-2006, 11:55 AM   #84 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Consider what is suggested by the OP in two current threads...
"Socialist regulators are killing freedom in America"

"A looming call for violent revolution against the wealthy is just and necessary"
Perhaps these over-reactionary tomes are what are driving people away from discussion here.

Gimme a fucking break! Why discuss such nonsense?

In the words of Arnold...."I'll be back" when the discussions return to practical political issues of the day.
Whether something is reactionary or not is really a matter of perspective, and TFP is all about an amalgam of perspectives from all over the world. To some people, a growing number of people, things like the richest of the rich coming together to fuck over everyone are a call to arms. Here we discuss that. If it's nonsense to you, that's cool. Just check out other threads. I've thought a few threads on Politics were nonsense a few times, but I still come back.
Willravel is offline  
Old 12-28-2006, 12:18 PM   #85 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Consider what is suggested by the OP in two current threads...
"Socialist regulators are killing freedom in America"

"A looming call for violent revolution against the wealthy is just and necessary"
Perhaps these over-reactionary tomes are what are driving people away from discussion here.

Gimme a fucking break! Why discuss such nonsense?

In the words of Arnold...."I'll be back" when the discussions return to practical political issues of the day.
Yup....it isn't "nonsense" to create and conduct the stealth campaign financed for $!85 million by America's 18 richest families, to influence legislation to eliminate inheritance taxes......but it is "nonsense" to react to it by discussing it on a thread here.

I suppose that it is nothing to react emotionally about......because our "revolution" should always be conducted withing the "form", right??
Quote:
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/revolutn.html
THE REVOLUTION WAS

Garet Garrett

1938

.....At the end of the first year, in his annual message to
the Congress, January 4, 1934, President Roosevelt
said: "It is to the eternal credit of the American people
that this tremendous readjustment of our national life
is being accomplished peacefully."

Peacefully if possible -- of course.

But the revolutionary historian will go much further.
Writing at some distance in time he will be much less
impressed by the fact that it was peacefully accom-
plished than by the marvelous technic of bringing it to
pass not only within the form but within the word, so
that people were all the while fixed in the delusion that
they were talking about the same things because they
were using the same words. Opposite and violently
hostile ideas were represented by the same word signs.
This was the American people's first experience with
dialectic according to Marx and Lenin.

Until it was too late few understood one like Julius C.
Smith, of the American Bar Association, saying: "Is
there any labor leader, any businessman, any lawyer
or any other citizen of America so blind that he cannot
see that this country is drifting at an accelerated pace
into administrative absolutism similar to that which
prevailed in the governments of antiquity, the govern-
ments of the Middle Ages, and in the great totalitarian
governments of today? Make no mistake about it.
Even as Mussolini and Hitler rose to absolute power
under the forms of law... so may administrative
absolutism be fastened upon this country within the
Constitution and within the forms of law."....
dc_dux, consider the reaction of the masses in Stockholm , or in Paris, Berlin, or even in Tokyo, to awakening one day to find the state of economic inequality, and the trend toward even more of it.....which we currently look forward to, in the US. Would my post and the discussion that followed in my thread, really be that "radical"?

You apparently make your livelihood from the principle of "compromise solution" in national US politics in the US. If you haven't noticed, dc_dux, that principle and process had been pre-empted, bought out....it no longer exists, and it didn't as far back as 1933.

We experience a radicalized time of "takeover" by the rich. They've destroyed our unions by exporting the jobs out from under them. They never stop their endeavor for advantage, for control. They do this by any means neccessary, including by aggressive pre-emptive war. They play by no rules and resort to violence when it suits them.....but for us to talk about a critical mass, resulting from the success of their efforts.....is enough to drive you away from here, in protest? Who do you really serve, dc_dux?
host is offline  
Old 12-28-2006, 12:59 PM   #86 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
I think it a little strange to suggest that pure evil is being wreaked upon us by the rich and then support violent revolution against them in the same breath. It's not that I don't see the potentials and actuals at play as to the disparity between the poor and wealthy in the world, it just seems ideologically extreme to suggest that our recourse is to take up arms and kill people, not to mention hypocritical.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 12-28-2006, 04:36 PM   #87 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Whether something is reactionary or not is really a matter of perspective, and TFP is all about an amalgam of perspectives from all over the world. To some people, a growing number of people, things like the richest of the rich coming together to fuck over everyone are a call to arms. Here we discuss that. If it's nonsense to you, that's cool. Just check out other threads. I've thought a few threads on Politics were nonsense a few times, but I still come back.
Will, I agree on the amalgam of perspectives. I just dont find it personally productive to engage in a discussion when the premise is based on (in the words of Goldwater) "extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice" whether it comes from the left or the right. I suspect others may share my disinterest in such discussions (just an observation on the recent the lack of discussion..*shrug" but who knows?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by host
....You apparently make your livelihood from the principle of "compromise solution" in national US politics in the US. If you haven't noticed, dc_dux, that principle and process had been pre-empted, bought out....it no longer exists, and it didn't as far back as 1933.

.....but for us to talk about a critical mass, resulting from the success of their efforts.....is enough to drive you away from here, in protest? Who do you really serve, dc_dux?
Host.I am full capable of separating my strong personal beliefs from the obligations of my livelihood...and I made my feelings known on our current tax policy, the widening wealth gap, and the danger of the unsustainable exploding growth of our national debt in other threads. I agree with your assessement and respect your passion, but dont believe in your suggested solution.

And, who do I really serve?
My secret is out

I was a charter member of the DC branch of "Billionaires for Bush"...
Billionaires for Bush is a grassroots network of corporate lobbyists, decadent heiresses, Halliburton CEOs, and other winners under George W. Bush's economic policies. Headquartered in Wall Street and with over 60 chapters nationwide, we'll give whatever it takes to ensure four more years of putting profit over people. After all, we know a good president when we buy one.
....but have been pretty much inactive since our second coronation ball in Jan 2005. (you can find me in there somewhere)

Happy New Year to all!
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 12-28-2006 at 04:51 PM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

Tags
metaquestion


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360