11-06-2006, 06:02 PM | #1 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Why are we paying for this...
Haliburton is being paid cost+ profit for their expenses. This means that the more they spend and the more inefficient they are, the more money they make. So they are doing very shady things to get their cost up while not getting noticed. For example they are charging $45 for a 6 pack of coke, they are charging $85,000 for an oil filter, they are driving empty trucks around, when a truck gets a flat they are ditching the truck and buying new ones. This is horrible.
This is what happens when we have no bid contracts given out to friends so they can get rich. This is what happens when there is no oversight. This is what happens when people are afraid to speak out for being labeled a terrorist sympathizer. Say thanks to Bush and Cheny for increasing our debt 4 trillion dollars and putting the money and their and their friends pockets. http://www.senate.gov/~schumer/Schum...ton061704.html Quote:
|
|
11-06-2006, 06:40 PM | #2 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: Tobacco Road
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
11-06-2006, 06:50 PM | #3 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
NCB....I know you like obscure bills in Congress:
Quote:
http://www.sigir.mil/
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 11-06-2006 at 06:58 PM.. |
|
11-06-2006, 07:12 PM | #4 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Tobacco Road
|
Nobody likes corruption, even us wascally wepublicans. However, to think that this crap is anything new and is limited to just one party is either naive or dishonest.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-06-2006, 07:20 PM | #5 (permalink) | |
More anal, less shenanigans
Location: Always lurking
|
Quote:
Halliburton no-bid contracts under Bush = bad.
__________________
. Last edited by xxSquirtxx; 11-06-2006 at 07:22 PM.. |
|
11-06-2006, 07:21 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Absolutely....corruption is just as old as the US democracy itself and neither party is immune.
But in the case of US tax dollars for Iraq reconstruction, it was the Dems (with a few Repubs) in the Senate in '04 who insisted on an amendment to require the quarterly SIGIR reports (which is why some Dems first voted against Iraq emergency spending, then voted for it, when the amendment was added)....and it is the Repubs in the House trying to kill the only oversight of how our tax dollars are being spent in Iraq. But I can see why you would rather generalize. Quote:
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire |
|
11-06-2006, 07:30 PM | #7 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: Tobacco Road
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
11-06-2006, 07:38 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Location: Washington DC
|
Thanks....Now that I think about it, I think I do recall Haillburton contracts in the "UN sanctioned" operation in Kosovo to prevent genocide. If there wasnt oversight by an independent agency llike SIGIR, shame on the Congress back then as well.
I just dont understand why some continue to offer excuses and rationalizations ("they did it) for not holding the current Repub Congress and Bush accountable for how our money is being spent in Iraq.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire |
11-06-2006, 07:51 PM | #9 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: Tobacco Road
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
11-06-2006, 08:34 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Location: Washington DC
|
Then I hope you will agree with me that this effort by the repubs on the House Armed Services Committee to kill the SIGIR program is one of those stupid laws (or amendments) to be introduced in Congress this year.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire |
11-06-2006, 09:03 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Fort Worth, TX
|
There is a reason there is a no-bid contract on this, because no other company has the experience that Haliburton has in supplying our troops. What you don't understand is although expensive, Haliburton supplies, and DELIVERS, required equipment and supplies our troops require... and they require a lot.
This isn't simple economics, in simple economics if an item is not delivered costs run up and the project gets delayed. If these items are not delivered people die. Personally I'd rather pay the extra money to ensure that does not happen. Haliburton is an ENORMOUS company which has proved reliable in supplying our military for years. And the usage of the analogy of the $600 toilet seat shows how the critics do not fully realize the military equipment bureacracy. It was not a simple plastic toilet seat lid which cost $600, it was an entire toilet for a B-52 bomber. What makes this $600? Well it required multiple pressure chambers, all immune to corrosion caused by waste, so that when a pilot (in a pressurized cabin) sat and defacated his bowels were not pulled from his body. It had to be reinforced so that an exposed and thus weakened part of the fuselage was not an Achillies heel, nevermind the paper thin aluminum shell in the rest of the aircraft. So you can see that after passing all these Colonels and Generals the price of the toilet could skyrocket, nevermind the fact that the limitted number which would be produced would inherantly drive up costs. Apply this formula to Iraq, where you have to drive across a county the size of Texas full of people who purposefully target these convoys. These drivers are not military personell, so to volunteer for this job ENORMOUS sums of money are thrown at them... extend that money for training. Then, because the military can not provide adequate defenses for every convoy, hire at great costs ex-military mercenaries... which get expensive fast. Then realize that you're providing everything from toothpics to bullets to over 100k people who need these items daily. Yes, it's expensive. Every war in history has been expensive. However this Haliburton hate is unfounded, the company has served plenty of Presidents in the past and has a proven record which very few if any companies can boast. ... Just be glad the people who are doing the Big Dig didn't get the job...
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas |
11-06-2006, 09:15 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Republican slayer
Location: WA
|
Quote:
|
|
11-06-2006, 09:16 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Industrialist
Location: Southern California
|
There is no reason to politicize this. Both sides of the aisle are responsible for this one along with lots of other things. It is very simple to think that having a (D) or an (R) following a person we have never met's name makes a difference. The fact that Halliburton may have taken advantage of their contract is not a lot different than the rest of us being taken advantage of by our elected officials.
The rate that incumbents get re-elected in this country (well above 90%) ought to signify a general feeling of satisfaction with the ones we have in office. Both sides are taking advantage of us and then telling us that if we don't vote for them (even though they are the lesser of two evils) that they are doomed. Very few candidates even make a passing attempt at addressing their own merit on anything other than straw-man issues. Instead the "boogie man" might get elected so you better continue to vote for me. Let me be the one to tell you, this kind of thing is not going to end any time soon no matter who gets elected tomorrow.
__________________
All truth passes through three stages: First it is ridiculed Second, it is violently opposed and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER (1788-1860) |
11-06-2006, 10:56 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
Nothing you have posted here explains why Coke bottled in Kuwait costs $7.5 a can, or why an oil filter is $85,000. And it definetly doesn't explain why they are driving empty trucks around and telling their employees to say they worked 12 hours a day even if they didn't or why they told their employees to "just look busy". I'm sorry but your attempt to excuse this behavior doesn't work. Did you even read the article? |
|
11-07-2006, 01:03 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: South Florida
|
I am sorry but in a country taht has no coke getting a case of 30 for $45 is not such a bad deal. I have been over there (the middle east) and have seen government orders and how things are acquired. Its never cheap and things cost a lot more. Now if Haliburton was able to run down to the local 7-11 then 45 dollars would be a little outrageous.
They do not have those options and if you have to spend a little more to bring a little bit of home to the American in Iraq then I say go ahead and do it. Most people inthe united states see things on paper and have no idea idea what it takes to make certain things happen. Sometimes it takes more than people understand. I am not saying that Haliburton is not padding their bill, I am sure they are, but congress approved it and I am sure there are poiliticians on both sides getting rich of this whole no bid thing that haliburton managed to chum its way into. Next time anybody goes to Iraq and see Haliburton trucks doing nothing or driving around just to drive around let us all know. I addressed the 7 dollar coke. Think about how much people pay for cokes at concerts and other expensive places. It can cost upwards of 5 dollars for a single12 OZ can. Now the 85,000 dollar filter. So its a filter. What kind of Filter? What is it's application? How many microns will it filter out? What is the life expectancy? What is it made of? Until you can answer some of these questions, there can be no answer to yours. I have seen and $93,000 engine replaced because of a small failed part but in order to replace that part it would have cost the Government about $150,000 in man hours and special tools and was simply cheaper to replace the entire engine. Now if you said that a $93,000 engine was replaced because a 25 dollar part failed, it sounds crazy, but if you say that it would have cost $150,000 to get that part replaced then spending the money to replace the engine makes more sense. If you were drinving a truck in a convoy through Iraq that may or may be being escorted. Do you want to be the guy that gets to chane that tire. I know I wouldn't want to. It is far cheaper to replace that truck then to replace the contractor. We cannot see the whole story of what goes on in Iraq. The media reports what it thinks will make people read the articles and watch the stories and in turn the commercials and paid advertising. It's all about the dollar. I am not saying that there is not some waste going on, but the actual amount of waste being created may be an exxageration.
__________________
"Two men: one thinks he can. One thinks he cannot. They are Both Right." Last edited by florida0214; 11-07-2006 at 01:14 PM.. Reason: More to add |
11-07-2006, 01:11 PM | #16 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
I hope everyone knows that Haliburton has and continues to botch the job. Remember that Haliburton failed to protect the water supply throughout Iraq, the water that our troops were drinking. It's not uncommon for proposals to be filled with unreliable figures and to give kick backs to subcontractors or politicans.
|
11-07-2006, 01:16 PM | #17 (permalink) | |
pigglet pigglet
Location: Locash
|
Quote:
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style |
|
11-07-2006, 02:06 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
Clarification,
There is no $85,000 oil filter, the complaint is that instead of providing routine maintenance they replace the $85,000 vehicle. I don't necessarily have a problem with no-bid contracts as long as things are kept in order. You can say that nobody else has the experience to do it, well nobody will until they are given the opportunity. |
11-07-2006, 02:29 PM | #19 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
I thought the argument was that private sector organizations could do logistics and supply cheaper than the public one? Does this mean that if the military supplied themselves it would cost more?
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
11-07-2006, 02:42 PM | #20 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
11-08-2006, 12:52 AM | #21 (permalink) | |
Psycho
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
paying |
|
|