10-24-2006, 12:25 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Pleasure Burn
|
Pro-marijuana legalization ballots in Nevada & Colorado
Nevada voters will have to decide on Question 7 in November. It allows the possesion of less than an ounce of dope by those older than 21. It also increases penalties for DUI of marijuana and sales to minors. It will, if passed, license and tax cannabis growers and sellers (in the form of stores). The tax is $45 per ounce.
Colorado voters decide on Amendment 44. It is similar to the initiative passed by Denver voters last year, which made possesion of an ounce or less legal (while sales and growing are still illegal). This ballot does not allow the opening of "shops". It's mainly for police to stop pestering people cheefin' up in their homes. The groups/people against these initiatives (unsuprisingly including the Bush admin.) generally argue that if these pass, they send the "wrong message" to children, that it's okay to get high. They also argue that Nevada and/or Colorado shouldn't be the "launching pad" for marijuana legalization. Proponents (suprisingly including most Nevada religious groups) argue that the current cannabis laws and systems simply do not work, and only create dangerous gangs and drug dealers. They also state statistics showing the staggering harmfulness of alcohol (violence, rapes, DUI's) and the relative safety and benefits of smoking dope versus drinking alcohol. Personally, I am very exited about the possibilities of both of these initiatives. It's time to end this senseless war on marijuana. If voters pass these ballots, it will be the beginning of the end for prohibition. One can argue all day and night about the dangers of cannabis, but it simply doesn't make sense when deadly drugs like Oxycontin, alcohol, and cocaine are more legal than pot. And the curiousity of teenagers will prevail over the harshest of laws. I think many of us knew that one, right? TFP, argue for these ballots or against. I would like to hear some other opinions. And of course...VOTE!! |
10-24-2006, 12:44 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
World needs ditch diggers too.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
10-24-2006, 12:51 PM | #3 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Tobacco Road
|
I have no problems with this. If people choose to be losers and smoke dope, more power to them
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2006, 01:41 PM | #5 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
Great propositions, although I do think that a $45/oz tax is quite a bit high. I'd still rather focus on getting it legal and then doing away with the excessive tax. |
|
10-24-2006, 02:34 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Alien Anthropologist
Location: Between Boredom and Nirvana
|
Yeah, there has been a breeding population among the trolls here on tfp...it's starting to make me want to post elsewhere and send my $$ there too.
Nothing gets past these few trolls who seem to shoot down anything the rest of us want to discuss and sadly these trolls are as narrow minded as my 81 year old mother! HAH
__________________
"I need compassion, understanding and chocolate." - NJB |
10-24-2006, 02:45 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
spudly
Location: Ellay
|
Quote:
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam |
|
10-24-2006, 03:01 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Alien Anthropologist
Location: Between Boredom and Nirvana
|
Just for the record: I think pot should be legalized in each & every state in the USA.
Sadly, I hate to think how our f*****g Gov't would ruin its quality and who profits from the cultivation and dispursement/marketing. It's great for Aids patients and/cancer patients and people who live life totally stressed. I don't imbibe (any longer for personal reasons) but several close friends still do and they are an amazing bunch of smart proactive people who are college professors, doctors, lawyers, shrinks, counselors CEOs and yeah, even freakin' ditch diggers. But the point is: they have never committed any crimes other than the occasional puff on a joint. Amen. So Be It. Let's legalize smoke and let more American farmers continue to live in Peace and be able to pay their mortgage
__________________
"I need compassion, understanding and chocolate." - NJB |
10-24-2006, 03:02 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Sorry but I've yet to see someone who is excited about pot legalization who would count as a winner at life.
I've seen it add to the downfall of a lot of kids when I was in college, but oddly I didn't see much of it in dental school or beyond, and we had some pretty wild parties. The one student who was into it dropped out. So make it legal, I don't really care, but to me it won't be anything but a drug for losers. I suppose it might work for artists, but they need a whole different skill set.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
10-24-2006, 03:23 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
these are useless initiatives in any state and hold zero legal strength, even if passed by a huge margin. This issue was decided in favor of the controlled substances act in Jun of 2005. Once again, the heavy hand of the federal government can control what you grow, on your own land, in your own home, for your own consumption, as long as they SAY that it affects interstate commerce.
http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/su...3-1454.ZO.html
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
10-24-2006, 04:03 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Easy Rider
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
|
I think we should legalize pot as well as many other drugs. The war on drugs is lost and a waste of billions of dollars much like prohibition was.
Unfortunately this will ultimately have to be done at the federal level. As dksuddeth pointed out, the courts have overruled local laws in this matter with creative use of the interstate commerce clause. |
10-24-2006, 04:29 PM | #15 (permalink) |
immoral minority
Location: Back in Ohio
|
I like the high tax, and I also think that it should be the government that sells it and run the clubs where it can be smoked at. Hell, I have to get entered into a database to buy allergy medicine, imagine if buying weed multiple times came up in someones background check. Plus it is better to make some money than spend it trying to stop drug dealers. But then we wouldn't need as big of a DEA and police force.
|
10-24-2006, 04:51 PM | #16 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: Princeton, NJ
|
Quote:
Good to meet you Ustwo. Frankly, I think one of the biggest barriers to legalization is that most sucessful, with-it, "winners at life" who also smoke pot can't come forward and say it. I'll say it in the relative anonymity of the internet, but I wouldn't in most public situations with my name attached. If I had a normal desk job in most corporate or government environments I probably wouldn't even say it here. |
|
10-24-2006, 04:52 PM | #17 (permalink) | |
Devils Cabana Boy
Location: Central Coast CA
|
Quote:
Legalize, regulate and tax the hell out of it
__________________
Donate Blood! "Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen |
|
10-24-2006, 04:59 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Mistress of Mayhem
Location: Canton, Ohio
|
I know some very intelligent people who smoke pot. I dont care who smokes it as long as they dont smoke it around me since I am allergic and upon smelling it either get sick in a trash can or have a fabulous migraine.
__________________
If only closed minds came with closed mouths. Minds are like parachutes, they function best when open. It`s Easier to Change a Condom Than a Diaper Yes, the rumors are true... I actually AM a Witch. |
10-24-2006, 05:10 PM | #19 (permalink) | ||
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
BTW taxing the hell out of it will just make a black market for it. I think the huge tax was added to HELP pass it, so that non users who dont' give a shit either way will think 'well some good can come of it'. The tax itself will make it harder to regulate. Quote:
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. Last edited by Ustwo; 10-24-2006 at 05:12 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
10-24-2006, 05:44 PM | #20 (permalink) |
Lover - Protector - Teacher
Location: Seattle, WA
|
What the fuck happened to you, man..?
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel |
10-24-2006, 06:40 PM | #21 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: In the middle of the desert.
|
They can pass it, and the use/possesion/sale of pot will remain a crime under the CSA, and that's all there is to it.
What the legalize pot crowd need to do is get an act of congress declaring pot legal, then it will be. State actions will be overridden by congressional actions under the interstate commerce clause.
__________________
DEMOCRACY is where your vote counts, FEUDALISM is where your count votes. |
10-24-2006, 07:46 PM | #22 (permalink) | |
Devils Cabana Boy
Location: Central Coast CA
|
Quote:
__________________
Donate Blood! "Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen |
|
10-24-2006, 08:25 PM | #23 (permalink) |
Pleasure Burn
|
Cannabis is in Schedule I of the CSA, cocaine is in Schedule II (as is methamphetamine, PCP and opium). Thus, cocaine is available via perscription under federal law, and weed isn't.
The $45 tax does seem high, however it's an ounce of pot, which I currently pay ~$300 for anyways. |
10-25-2006, 01:47 AM | #24 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
OK, so lemme get this straight.
Legalizing cannabis and taxing it, which would apparently bring the price to around $100/oz, is going to generate a black market and cause a problem. That's your arguement, right Ustwo? But the current illegal status, which gives cannabis a value of $300/oz ( frequently even more ) hasn't generated a black market and caused problems? What are you smoking, and where can I buy some? You do realize that even -with- taxation, grass would be a minimum of 50% cheaper than it is now, probably much more than that...how is this supposed to cause a black market when one of the immidiate results of legalization would be a precipitous drop in prices? If I can buy an ounce of White Widow for $150, from a corner store, why would I skip that in order to pay $400 from a guy on the street? As for not knowing any pot-smoking Dentists; I'm not surprised. From the sound of your posts, you'd have no idea what to look for. A lot more of your co-workers smoke than will admit it, although most medical types go in for either opiates or blow. Although frankly, my own guess is that they simply didn't tell you they were smoking, because it took them all of 5 seconds to figure out you would call the cops. I've used cannabis for almost two years to suppress debilitating migraines. The list of known, theraputic uses for this stuff is as long as my arm; Migraines, cluster-headaches, MS, Fiber Myalgia, Glaucoma, athsma ( in vaporized form ), insomnia, nausea, etc etc etc. In the Czech Republic, where I now live, cannabis use is semi-legal and -very- widespread. 30% of the population report using it at least once per month. Oddly enough, I can't seem to find any stories of stoned doctors killing people, or stoned drivers causing huge pileups...loads of alchohol-related shit, though. Funny thing, that. Oddly enough, the Czechs also have a very deep-seated hatered for informants...so guess who Czech cops spend their time chasing? Murderers, thieves, rapists...you know, actual criminals, rather than people who ingest the medically-harmless flowers of a highly prolific weed. Yes, some people can't handle cannabis. But these are people who have a hard time handling a "STOP" sign; if you're dumb before you spark up, you're gonna be dumb afterwards. Yes, some people let pot control their lives. Some people also let the NFL, stock-market, or Beanie-babies control their lives. Should we now ban sports, stock trading, and stuffed animals? And here's the bottom line; what buisiness is it of yours, the Govt's, or ANYones, what someone puts into their own body? Where do you get off saying you own people? Where did you get this idea that someone else was your property, to dictate to as needed, regarding the intimate details of their lives? It's about self-ownership, people. Last edited by The_Dunedan; 10-25-2006 at 02:22 AM.. |
10-25-2006, 03:49 AM | #26 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
Quote:
people, as a whole, will find the cheapest way to acquire whatever it is that they want and taxing marijuana, like they did with guns or alcohol, will only embolden people to find ways to do it cheaper than what the government will price it at. Quote:
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." Last edited by dksuddeth; 10-25-2006 at 03:54 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
10-25-2006, 06:16 AM | #27 (permalink) |
Devils Cabana Boy
Location: Central Coast CA
|
One big reason black markets exist is because there is no legal system for illegal goods, the only way to settle a dispute is with violence.
__________________
Donate Blood! "Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen |
10-25-2006, 06:28 AM | #28 (permalink) |
Extreme moderation
Location: Kansas City, yo.
|
I've always been for the legalization of pot because I want police spending their time catching and punishing other forms of criminals.
Unfortunately, I don't have any faith in the government to do this in an efficient way.
__________________
"The question isn't who is going to let me, it's who is going to stop me." (Ayn Rand) "The truth is that our finest moments are most likely to occur when we are feeling deeply uncomfortable, unhappy, or unfulfilled. For it is only in such moments, propelled by our discomfort, that we are likely to step out of our ruts and start searching for different ways or truer answers." (M. Scott Peck) |
10-25-2006, 06:38 AM | #29 (permalink) | |
Free Mars!
Location: I dunno, there's white people around me saying "eh" all the time
|
Quote:
Btw Ustwo, meet another winner: In college with another year to go, marks are good, I smoke recreationally (one a month or so) and haven't had much trouble with it. I think you're just stereotyping people who use drugs. Not all of them are bad ya know?
__________________
Looking out the window, that's an act of war. Staring at my shoes, that's an act of war. Committing an act of war? Oh you better believe that's an act of war |
|
10-25-2006, 06:44 AM | #30 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
Quote:
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
|
10-25-2006, 06:51 AM | #31 (permalink) |
Devils Cabana Boy
Location: Central Coast CA
|
even with high taxes (which dont have to be excessive) a large pot farm could produce pot dirt cheep, and undercut all the current black markets.
__________________
Donate Blood! "Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen |
10-25-2006, 07:20 AM | #32 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
Quote:
2 people grow pot. One does it via the legal way and one does it illegally. Now, the one doing it legally has to have a government agency apply their regulation, which costs money, and that increases the cost already. Now, add the tax, high or low it makes no difference, and that increases the cost even more. Now go to the guy doing it illegally. No regulation, no cost increases, no taxes. who's going to have a bigger share? most likely it will be the guy doing it legally, because the individual user will want to avoid legal issues, but there would still be a black market that you will never be able to get rid of. If prohibition truly worked, or tight gov regulation and high taxes worked, we'd never had to deal with shine runners or gangsters with illegal machine guns.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
|
10-25-2006, 07:43 AM | #33 (permalink) |
Devils Cabana Boy
Location: Central Coast CA
|
Well your logic is good, but you forget about size. If we have one person growing it illegally, skipping the taxes, they have to stay small, out of sight; where as the legal guy, can have a large farm, a large operation which cuts cost, and produces a higher yield. Also, illegally requires expensive lights, and equipment, legally, you can be outside in the sun, it still requires equipment, but not as much.
You will never get rid of a black market completely, there will always be a reason to be under ground... but if we can get more into the real market, it will reduce crime (violent crime) and increase tax revenue.
__________________
Donate Blood! "Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen |
10-25-2006, 08:20 AM | #35 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
Medicinal marijuana use isn't the question here either, nor are the majority of those who use pot doing for medical reasons. That leaves my 'losers' comment and I still stand by it, and I don't really care what % of Czech's smoke it. What I see in marijuana users is a lack of ambition, a 'what me worry?' attitude, and if that’s what they want fine, because the world does need ditch diggers and their other forms of employment equivalent.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
10-25-2006, 08:28 AM | #36 (permalink) | |
Submit to me, you know you want to
Location: Lilburn, Ga
|
Quote:
Alcohol adds to the downfall of kids in college as well... I knew more than a fair share of kids that got kicked out, or couldnt continue because of alcohol related problems. IMO it should be legalized, to me..its no different than alcohol, and if beer/wine/liquor are legal (with people who partake paying a tax) so should pot
__________________
I want the diabetic plan that comes with rollover carbs. I dont like the unused one expiring at midnite!! |
|
10-25-2006, 08:45 AM | #37 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
10-25-2006, 08:49 AM | #38 (permalink) |
Submit to me, you know you want to
Location: Lilburn, Ga
|
um...not back in my day they werent or at least in GA....it was 18 not 21. I was always a year behind the change when they raised it from 18-21 (they raised it one age each year for 3 years)
So when I was 18 the drinking age was 19...when I was 19 it was 20, when I was 20 it was 21....most of my friends were a few years older than me...so..illegal? Nope
__________________
I want the diabetic plan that comes with rollover carbs. I dont like the unused one expiring at midnite!! Last edited by ShaniFaye; 10-25-2006 at 08:50 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
10-25-2006, 09:21 AM | #39 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
South Dakota also has a similar bill on the ballot but only for medical purposes (it will defiantly fail though). I don't smoke pot, and probably never will. But I fully support legalizing it and here is why.
If you legalize it first and foremost you can control it better. They can tax it to generate revenue and more importantly take the money out of the drug dealers and terrorists hands. Cutting the drug dealers profits down 75% is going to stop a lot of them from dealing. Finally I think the measures should go further and allow people to grow it themselves thus completely eliminating the drug dealing market for this drug. But to me the biggest perk of allowing growth is that it will lessen the medical costs for many people and stop the big drug companies from over charging on meds. Why is the government forcing people to spend billions of dollars on drugs when they could spend pennies at home for meds that are just as effective? Here is what I would like to see. People who wish to grow their own have to purchase a growers license yearly, there would be different licenses (ie personal use, distributing license ect). The money generated from this license goes to educating children about the use of ALL drugs and their dangers, including alcohol. People who don't pay the taxes are guilty of tax evasion and would be prosecuted as such. So in summary lets see what happens. Crime is reduced, sick people feel better, greater tax revenues, money is moved from the drug dealers, terrorists, and drug companies hands back to the people, and children know more about the effects of all drugs. Now tell me what is the down part of this? I am a firm believer that the only reason pot has not been legalized is because our politicians have been bought off by lobbyists from the drug companies who what to protect their monopoly on medicine. Anyone ever wonder why Europe doesn't have nearly the problems the US does with binge drinking? Maybe because they have it growing up and it isn't such a huge deal when they go to college. Last edited by Rekna; 10-25-2006 at 09:35 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
10-25-2006, 09:38 AM | #40 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
all of this talk about regulating and taxes, etc. is useless. The feds have a vested interest in keeping marijuana on the CSA and it's tied to the war on drugs. It's profitable for them, moreso than legalizing it ever would be. If you want to see personal use become legal, you absolutely MUST get a supreme court who will limit congressional authority on the commerce clause to interstate commerce only and not intrastate 'that can affect interstate' commerce.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
Tags |
ballots, colorado, legalization, nevada, promarijuana |
|
|