Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics

Notices

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2006, 07:06 PM   #81 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: You're kidding, right?
Quote:
I am only shocked that you would see a limitation that hinders your ability to carry out a meaningful debate, and accept it.
Quote:
that conservatives don't have the time to go about such silly nonsense to make whatever garbled opinions they have be accepted as true,
Quote:
and so the story of ustwo comes to a close.
it was not an interesting story, but it was one.
now the credits run.


o look there was no script.


the credits end, the television is switched off.
I'm new here, so I'd appreciate it if someone would tell me if these are "flames" or "trolls."

Thanks.
_God_ is offline  
Old 09-30-2006, 07:13 PM   #82 (permalink)
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
This entire thread is a troll.
Ch'i is offline  
Old 09-30-2006, 07:15 PM   #83 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by _God_
I'm new here, so I'd appreciate it if someone would tell me if these are "flames" or "trolls."

Thanks.
Flaming is the act of sending or posting messages that are deliberately hostile and insulting, usually in the social context of a discussion board on the Internet.

A troll is often someone who comes into an established community such as an online discussion forum, and posts inflammatory, rude, repetitive or offensive messages designed intentionally to annoy or antagonize the existing members or disrupt the flow of discussion, including the personal attack of calling others trolls.

(ty, wikipedia)

Those are the difinitions, you decide.
Willravel is offline  
Old 09-30-2006, 08:07 PM   #84 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
I've been away from the computer for 48 hours, in case anyone has wondered at my silence on this issue. Had a great time riding roller coasters. And now I'm home to TFP's politics board, which is a roller coaster of its own.

This whole thing (not the thread, the issue) is so painfully myopic as to be laughable. To those who are in favor of this constitutional-crisis-in-the-making: your boys are only in power for two more years, at which point it'll be somebody else, and if it keeps going the way it's currently going, it'll be somebody you won't like much. Would YOU like THEM to have the legal authority to pick up anybody they deem to be "against America" without warrant or probable cause and take them away to torture? Or will you be screaming dictatorship if they have that kind of power?

Second: this whole thing (not the issue, the thread) points to PRECISELY what's wrong in American political discourse. USTWO: YOU CAN'T START A THREAD AND THEN PROUDLY IGNORE THE RESPONSES WITHOUT HAVING POSTED A TROLL. You had no intention of having a discussion here. I suspect you were mainly interested in cutting off a very likely (and unassailable) liberal point. There's no basis for discussion here. There's no point. I'm right on the edge of giving up on Tilted Politics--why the hell should I bother when there's no expectation that ANYTHING I say will even be read?

Will's learned assertion about torture is as valid as your learned assertion about global warming. My opinion on global warning has actually been swayed by what you had to say about it, and largely because of your credentials in the matter. I recommend you open your mind and pay some attention to someone who might--shocking though it may seem--actually know something you don't, politically inconvenient though it may be to you.

I don't know what I hope to cause with the preceeding paragraph. He's way too busy filling cavities (isn't that convenient?) to actually engage in the conversation he started.
I'm not obligated to respond to every liberal poster sorry ratbastid. There are not enough hours in my day to deal with each of you, I had my say, you can have yours, I don't have to tell you where you are wrong, I don't have to read hosts links when he posts them.

I don't have to justify my opinion beyond what it is, which just so happens to be the same opinion as 65% of the US senators.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 09-30-2006, 08:56 PM   #85 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I'm willing to go with the opinion of all of human history over some psychobabble.
Just because you call something an opinion doesn't make it so. If I were to say, "In my opinion, the sky is red" or "in my opinion, onions are made of paper" I'd be wrong. If you had the necessary training and understanding of the history of war or psychology in it's many forms, you'd know that the "opinion of all human history" on torture can be well summarized in a small statement: torture is a tool of conrol through fear, and it has not, will not, nor will it ever produce reliable results. To suggest otherwise is to suggest an untruth; to suggest otherwise is to misrepresent the truth; to suggest otherwise is to lie.

That is not opinion. That is fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I don't have to justify my opinion beyond what it is, which just so happens to be the same opinion as 65% of the US senators.
And when those senators go on record as saying that torture is an effective way to extract information, I will tear their arguments apart as I have done with you. Until that day, you stand in a very small group of individuals who do not have the knowledge to back up what they claim.
Willravel is offline  
Old 09-30-2006, 08:56 PM   #86 (permalink)
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I'm not obligated to respond to every liberal poster sorry ratbastid
So if they're not liberal, its okay? Looking at one side of a debate/argument isn't a.... nevermind. Why bother.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
There are not enough hours in my day to deal with each of you, I had my say, you can have yours, I don't have to tell you where you are wrong, I don't have to read hosts links when he posts them.
With that kind of logic, you are never wrong because no one is ever right. Not everything is an opinion; there are facts in this world, and ignoring them will not change that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I don't have to justify my opinion beyond what it is, which just so happens to be the same opinion as 65% of the US senators.
Two people doing something wrong doesn't make it any less wrong. Six billion people doing something wrong doesn't make it any less wrong.

You have officially lost your priviledge to deem anyone else a hypocrit.

Last edited by Ch'i; 09-30-2006 at 09:05 PM..
Ch'i is offline  
Old 09-30-2006, 09:54 PM   #87 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
couple things and i'm mainly only subscribing to this thread bc the issue in question disgusts me to the core of my being.

anyway: 1. torture does not work. period. It gets you LOADS of information, just not much useful info and you have to sort out the hundreds of lies. I would spill my guts, EVERYTHING i know, ever knew, ever will know...and i can pretty much guarantee that 80% of it will be ...questionably accurate. You deprive someone of sleep and they mess up little details such as names, places, and actions; ie, the very thing you're after.

2. Even Star Trek proved that torture does not work.

3. One of the absolute scariest parts of this for me: The inclusion of hearsay. Seriously, WTF!? someone under duress can finger someone else and there is another timewaster.

Face it, there are MANY other avenues we could pursue. as one senator said, tough on terror..light on brains.

Anyway, the thing that comes back to my mind everytime i try to wrap my head around the fact it got through the senate: Just how hard would republicans have bitched if clinton had even come CLOSE to this much unilateral power?

I'm just glad there are 2 yrs left. If the left fucks up the next election and the republicans win again...I have no idea what will happen to me but i can feel it's the big one...
__________________
Live.

Chris
Paq is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 12:47 AM   #88 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paq
.......Anyway, the thing that comes back to my mind everytime i try to wrap my head around the fact it got through the senate: Just how hard would republicans have bitched if clinton had even come CLOSE to this much unilateral power?

I'm just glad there are 2 yrs left. If the left fucks up the next election and the republicans win again...I have no idea what will happen to me but i can feel it's the big one...
After thinking about this for several days.....and reading and posting about the possibility of it....for much longer, I don't think that the main controversy is about torture. It is about a series of "tests"....."they" are probing....taking an "inch", at a time.......to measure our reaction. After each inch taken, "they" are further emboldened. Jefferson predicted their "urge":
Quote:
& what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that his people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Col. William S. Smith, 1787
........and from Justice Joseph Story:
Quote:
The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
-- Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story of the John Marshall Court
I've posted about it here:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...25#post2130025
This is the way what has happened, is described in an NPR piece:
Quote:
....Interpretation at the Discretion of the White House

The legislation that Congress passed does not say enemy combatants are people who "take up arms on the side of al-Qaida." The bill instead refers to people who provide "material support" to the enemy. <b>The language of the bill says that is the standard for both citizens and non-citizens. But Berenson says that's not how the administration will apply it.</b>

"As a practical matter, it would turn out to be a much higher standard for an American citizen," Berenson says. He says a "very demanding review" would need to take place within the executive branch before the president would sign an order declaring a U.S. citizen to be an enemy combatant.

"There's really no risk that a U.S. citizen who merely gives a charitable contribution, in error, to an organization that supports terrorism is going to find him or herself declared an enemy combatant," he says.

<b>Yet this higher standard is not spelled out anywhere in the bill. Berenson acknowledges that what he describes is the White House's interpretation.</b>

To Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, that sounds as if the administration is saying, "Trust us." And with a phrase as general as "material support," he's not comfortable doing that.

Ratner says the Bush administration has a history of broadly interpreting what constitutes material support. 'It certainly includes a very broad level of behavior, " Ratner says. "The real problem is, it's really up to the administration to define it, and that's pretty sad to me.".....
"They" <b>pushed</b> with Patriot Acts I & II and Gitmo, the incarceration of Padilla, the implementation of Miltitary Tribunals, and by ignoring the provisions of the FISA law. Our "reaction" to each incremental "taking" of our former rights and protections, is observed, and the result is that they are emboldened to "take" more. More than 60 percent of both houses of our legislature voted for this:
Quote:
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001625.php
Debate the Merits of Torture? Who Has the Time?
By Paul Kiel - September 28, 2006, 2:04 PM

Over the last two days, the Senate has been considering <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/010019.php">a bill</a> that, just about everyone can agree, is of singular importance.

The Senate has allotted itself <b>ten hours of debate to consider the bill and five amendments offered for it.

Compare that to the three days of debate</b> Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) provided in June, to consider the Marriage Protection Amendment (and even after that, the amendment failed). At the time, Democrats <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=432632">complained</a> that Frist was eating up precious floor time with a political stunt.

Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), one of the main backers of measure, <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=432632">objected</a>: <b>"If it was purely politics, let me assure you we'd be debating this in September."</b>
What the post 9/11 period seems to be, is an acceleration of the "give them an inch, and they'll take a mile", that the US Constition was drafted and structured to circumvent. In 1788, it was a compromise.

The question now is.....if the US executive is hindered, as he and the majority of the legislators are claiming, in his duty of "protecting" us, by our constitutional rights....why have a constitution, at all? How much further does the "trust us", element that this new "law" reduces our formerly guaranteed "rights", down to.....have to be taken....via new laws to come....such as a law to legitimize the ignoring, by the executive, of the FISA surveillance law, before our constitution is so "hollowed out", that all of our major protections...from the government, are permitted, only at the discretion, of the government?

Isn't fear of our reaction, if "they" go "too far", the only real deterrent we can project, to discourage "them" from doing just that? They're testing us to see how much they can erode the constitution, before we rise up in protest.

We've failed every test, and the majority of our representatives now vote to transfer some of our remaining "rights" to them. We're again failing to react, by intimidating them. If the coming election results fail to shift the legislative balance towards preserving our remaining rights, and conducting a more honest, accountable, and transparent government, whether because of corrupted voting, or by the "will" of the majority, what then?

When do we react on a grassroots level, and how? Wouldn't peaceful, persistent protest, beginning ASAP, help to avoid violent reaction, further down the road, when the transfer of our rights, to "them" continues, or will the current "process" end up eliciting no signifigant protest at all?

How do you know, when it is "too late" to resist, and to attempt to turn this power transfer, (coup?) "around"? Is life, if you accept that it is "too late", worth living?

Last edited by host; 10-01-2006 at 12:57 AM..
host is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 02:17 AM   #89 (permalink)
Huggles, sir?
 
seretogis's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
We all just heard the flushing sound, and we're swirling about the bowl. It's only a matter of time, now.
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames
seretogis is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 02:30 AM   #90 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...09-28-19-09-50


While I can hear the clicking figers of typed outrage from here, we can now put to rest the whole 'does the president have the power' or 'do terrorists have rights under the constition' argument.

I of course have long advocated the use of torture for terrorists, being that you can't expect people willing to turn themselves into human bombs for the gift of magic virgins from their invisible friend in the sky to give information willingly and it will save innocent lives. Being US methods are not maiming and more along the lines of discomfort I don't shed any tears or feel we left some mythical high road in light of how our enemies treat prisoners.

This is a needed tool in the war on terror, I'm just surprised so many democrats signed on but I'm willing to be that every one of them is up for re-election this year or thinking of running for the presidency in 2008.

I really think the dems that signed on are the ones that are going to have hell to pay at the polls. I honestly cannot think of a reason why they would have done that.

and again, it's not torturing people who HAVE done something, but people who MAY have done something...or MAY have been indicated by someone else to have done something...or MAY have been a brother of a cousin of a relative of a neice of a mother of a son who happened to have passed a blown up bus at some point.

IE....i do not trust the current guard with whom to torture and extract info from.

host's points about the accelerated inch into miles argument is very well apt here and it honestly makes me sick to my stomach...I just can't conceive of how this bill even got drafted.

as for a 'needed tool'..no, a NEEDED tool in the war on terror would be to actually inspect the cargo coming into this country by ship...that is a NEEDED tool in the war on terror.

I can almost guarantee that this will blow up in the faces of those who signed it.

then again, it will be spun in such a way that all dems are evil and bush is god.
__________________
Live.

Chris
Paq is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 02:36 AM   #91 (permalink)
Upright
 
set back 900 years

OK, if this legislation sets us back 900 years then i guess we'll be right where we need to be in dealing with terrorist. You can't be rational with irrational murderers. Why should anyone who randomly kills anyone to escalate their own agenda be given rights ?
Tora! Tora! Tora! ? If you replace Pearl Harbor with the Twin Towers and watched the movie, then you could see the striking similarities in all the mistakes we are making now. We are only serious about politics, not serious about terrorism.
republicat1 is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 02:38 AM   #92 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Not so long ago, a Canadian was sent to Syria by the United States because it was thought he might be a terrorist. The Syrians tortured a confession out of him in one of their lovely penal establishments run by the Assad family.

As you might guess, he was eventually released and the confession proven to be bogus. An innocent man was held for a year and tortured. I'm sure this improved the security situation in the US and especially in various dental offices in the lower 48.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.

Last edited by highthief; 10-01-2006 at 04:44 AM..
highthief is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 03:37 AM   #93 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by republicat1
OK, if this legislation sets us back 900 years then i guess we'll be right where we need to be in dealing with terrorist. You can't be rational with irrational murderers. Why should anyone who randomly kills anyone to escalate their own agenda be given rights ?
Tora! Tora! Tora! ? If you replace Pearl Harbor with the Twin Towers and watched the movie, then you could see the striking similarities in all the mistakes we are making now. We are only serious about politics, not serious about terrorism.
This is a deliberate step on a planned progression into "the executive" ruling under terms of undeclared "marshall law". Your argument attempts to justify suspension of due process and the bill of rights. If suspension of "some rights" is required...because we're at war....why stop at "some rights".

Why not argue to simply, "trust the president"....suspend the congress, exclude the courts from any interference with what "the decider", decides. After all, he's made us safer, and he's been right, most of the time, Right????
host is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 05:06 AM   #94 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paq
2. Even Star Trek proved that torture does not work.
THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS!

Okay, so Ustwo doesn't care that he's trolling. He's proud of it. He's under no obligation to actually discuss the fallout of his screeds. Fine. Great.

Pinochet legalized torture too, by the way. And there was a right-wing fringe that trusted him when he did it. He too strong-armed the rest of his government into supporting it. It became one of the worst civil rights disasters in modern history.

Remember: we're dealing with a US President who has referred to the Constitution as "just a god damned piece of paper."
ratbastid is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 07:16 AM   #95 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS!
I was in the lead, but ratbastid just won the thread. Thanks for playing everyone.

Phony intel extracted from false confessions given by tortured prisoners of war are necessary for the Bush administration to maintain they're many myths about the wars and to instil fear in those that they seek to control. How else will they suggest the insurgency in Iraq is run by Syria or Iran or Saudi Arabia? How else would they be able to build military bases in a soverign country that we invaded?

It's all quite simple. It's all quite insane.
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 09:20 AM   #96 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I was in the lead, but ratbastid just won the thread. Thanks for playing everyone.
Yeah, when it comes to geeky pop culture references, I'm pretty untouchable.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 09:31 AM   #97 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Yeah, when it comes to geeky pop culture references, I'm pretty untouchable.
O RLY?

Did you know that Chain of Command was directly lifeted from Orwell's 1984 when Winston was captured and tortured by O'Brien? O'Brien heald up 4 fingers in front of Winston, and tried to compel him to say there were five fingers. Winston, is inferrior to Picard, in that he broke and actually saw 5 fingers.
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 09:33 AM   #98 (permalink)
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS!
He really did. Congradulations ratbastid.

I'm still amazed by the general reaction of the public. They really do not seem to care. It seems that if no majority makes a big deal out of it, no one assumes its a big deal. Everyone is to preoccupied with their lives, and I guess they're used to our government acting the way it should. But if the people within a democracy won't even flinch when the constitution is being battered the way it is, how can that democracy hope to function?

You're right will, it truly is insane.

Last edited by Ch'i; 10-01-2006 at 09:38 AM..
Ch'i is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 11:00 AM   #99 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: You're kidding, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch'i
This entire thread is a troll.
Perhaps. It's also a feeding frenzy in which several people attack another (sometimes in BIG RED LETTERS) and declare themselves victorious when their target isn't interested in responding to each and every accusation.

My "flame or troll" question wasn't a request for definitions. It was intended to point out that one or the other was occurring, in spite of the forum rules. I was left with the impression that it's okay for some people, but not others, to flame or troll. I still have that impression.

There is no meaningful difference between ustwo's response and this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
......Exactly..............No Offense to Ace, Just not worth the time,and inevitable arguments.
That statement was accepted without the orgy of self-congratulation over a perceived "victory" that took place earlier in this thread.

The concept of "fair and balanced," is missing here, unless you're using Al Franken's version.
_God_ is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 11:13 AM   #100 (permalink)
Banned
 
_God_,

I'd love it if you could direct me to some web pages where I might be exposed to the influences on the formation of your political opinions. It's not required, but I'm always engaged in doing the same....regarding my opinions, for you to examine. I may not end up agreeing with you, but if you share your sources, I might end up respecting "where you're coming from", so to speak.

We learn from each other here
host is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 11:20 AM   #101 (permalink)
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by _GOD_
Perhaps. It's also a feeding frenzy in which several people attack another (sometimes in BIG RED LETTERS) and declare themselves victorious when their target isn't interested in responding to each and every accusation.
Much of what you say is true, but in this statement I am curious. Ustwo clearly stated several times "I don't have the desire to respond to every liberal". He enacted a debate, then refused to read those points which conflicted with his. The debate was unbalanced to begin with.

Last edited by Ch'i; 10-01-2006 at 11:23 AM..
Ch'i is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 12:36 PM   #102 (permalink)
Mistress of Mayhem
 
Lady Sage's Avatar
 
Location: Canton, Ohio
My turn. Our POW men and women arent treated as saints. I dont care if we torture POW we collect. It wont cost me a wink of sleep. Morals? Yes I have problems with torture as a moral standpoint. Yet I also have a problem knowing that our people are being subjected to unknown terrors.

Will is right. Psychology. We may get some things out of some people but many wont talk and would rather die.

Now...

After spending a good bit of time reading the roaring debate of the past few pages of posts I would like to provide a very broad statement.

People who live in glass houses should NOT throw rocks.

Anyone can review posting histories for a month or more and narrow it down to how long it is between our posts and from that put together how much time anyone of us spends on TFP vs. how much time we DO NOT spend posting here... I know, ive done it.

People should be careful what they claim.

This is NOT a threat this is a simple observation. I do not like it when people toot a horn they do not know how to play.

I feel people should be careful what and who they believe. There are some seriously heated feelings going on in this thread. All I am saying is simply this. Try not to get worked up about some things. They may not be what they seem.
__________________
If only closed minds came with closed mouths.
Minds are like parachutes, they function best when open
.
It`s Easier to Change a Condom Than a Diaper
Yes, the rumors are true... I actually AM a Witch.
Lady Sage is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 03:00 PM   #103 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Sage
*snip*
Now...

After spending a good bit of time reading the roaring debate of the past few pages of posts I would like to provide a very broad statement.

People who live in glass houses should NOT throw rocks.

Anyone can review posting histories for a month or more and narrow it down to how long it is between our posts and from that put together how much time anyone of us spends on TFP vs. how much time we DO NOT spend posting here... I know, ive done it.

People should be careful what they claim.

This is NOT a threat this is a simple observation. I do not like it when people toot a horn they do not know how to play.

I feel people should be careful what and who they believe. There are some seriously heated feelings going on in this thread. All I am saying is simply this. Try not to get worked up about some things. They may not be what they seem.

I feel like i missed something you were referring to in here. I don't wanna cal anyone out, just curious as to what sparked this comment. PM if you wish, or just post it.

Anyway, i do have a problem wtih the "eye for eye" mentality...namely, the world will soon be blind. I feel like we're heading that way now, actually
__________________
Live.

Chris
Paq is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 07:51 PM   #104 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paq
I feel like i missed something you were referring to in here. I don't wanna cal anyone out, just curious as to what sparked this comment. PM if you wish, or just post it.
It is merely a guess on my part, but the following post has created a stir:
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch'i
Ustwo has managed to skip over almost every post debunking his original argument. Either that, or he doesn't have a rebuttal. I take it you concede Ustwo?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Didn't read them.

This might shock you but with a job like I have, I tend to focus on one responder at a time, I don't have the desire to respond to every liberal with too much time on their hands and by skipping the usual suspects who post multiple cut and paste articles or who can't figure out where the caps key is, I'm don't feel a need to respond. I'm not even sure what could have been 'debunked'.
Elphaba is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 08:14 PM   #105 (permalink)
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
I apologize for any self proclaimed victory I may have depicted; it was not my intention. Certain people should be held accountable for making an argument while refusing their antithesis'. I will be more patient tomorrow, but I am not sorry for pointing this out.

Last edited by Ch'i; 10-01-2006 at 08:23 PM..
Ch'i is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 08:41 PM   #106 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by _God_
Perhaps. It's also a feeding frenzy in which several people attack another (sometimes in BIG RED LETTERS) and declare themselves victorious when their target isn't interested in responding to each and every accusation.
The big red letters wern't an attack. They made clear a repeatedly ignored point that is very much relevant to the thread topic. Ustwo has ignored that point through several threads, and it was clear to me that normal means of posting were not enough for him to understand the error in his logic. Torture is not a reliable source for information, therefore using torture to extract information is useless. That should be made clear, espically since it seems that torture is now going to be excused in our CIA secret prisons.

_God_, I am left to wonder: when are you going to post about the thread topic? Or will it just be threadjacks?
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 08:46 PM   #107 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I don't have to justify my opinion beyond what it is, which just so happens to be the same opinion as 65% of the US senators.
I'm not too sure that this is something I would claim, considering the bozos that have sat in the senate for the last 20 years, but that's just me.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 10-02-2006, 07:16 AM   #108 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
my my this thread certainly tanked, didn't it?
it's a shame because this is an important topic. i suppose that is among the points of a troll, really--to reduce questions political to lint personal, distract, divert, etc.

i have thought quite a bit about this one over the weekend.

i think there are several underlying reason why this thread generated such heat--the official sanctioning of torture, the rewriting of the geneva conventions, the granting of immunity from prosecution for war crimes of a cadre that would have you think that americans cannot commit war crimes a priori, the legitmation of military kangaroo courts, the validation of the bushleague legal black hole, the expansion of the notion of enemy to potentially include american citizens, the suspension of habeas corpus...the fact that congress bent over and approved this...the stacking of the courts with far right activists appointed in the name of thwarting "activism"---problems with the last two presidential elections that remain unresolved....

years of fiasco international and domestic...

it seems that public protest has gone away: it is almost like the masses of people who turned out in opposition to the iraq debacle around the coutry actually believed the administration would take note of them, would listen, as if they had been chumped by the illusion that cowboy george is a decent fellow--and when the war unfolded anyway, people were disappointed then depressed (myself among them)---and we went home.
and we stayed home.
they are still at home.
we are all still sitting at home.

all this within a system that allows for the exercize of political freedom one day every 2 years. after that pesky, mediated freedom business is out of the way, we the people are stuck with whatever the more powerfully organized and well-funded political machine manages to put into place. and there is no way to get rid of the results--no mechanism for a vote of no confidence, no way to bring down an administration no matter how incompetent of disengenuous they may be. the result of our charade of political freedom is two year blocks of impunity.

better still, we self-evidently are living through an extended transitional phase in the social and political organization of capitalism. this adds even more fine treats to the pile: a radically polarized class society in which there is no functional discourse of class conflict--this polarization effects education, it squanders lives and potentials---it is expressed in the development of a prison-industrial complex for management of the poor, increased violence, increased repression---it is predicated on economic injustice and even manages to generate a certain level of flinstone contempt for the notions of economic and social justice.
the reorganization of capitalism that has been unfolding over the past 20 years has created fundamental problems for the american system of social reproduction that have not been addressed and that cannot be addressed within the present ideological climate of nationalist fantasy and denial.

so it feels sometimes like we are crash test dummies in a small car heading at high speed toward a very big wall.

so people appear to be at the least worried and at the worse afraid.
so we watch tv

conservative ideology traffics in fear, directing it toward the illusion of manly men doing manly things as if the idiocy behind this was not only other than a problem, but a source of reassurance.
we watch this on tv.

and there is no coherent oppositional politics, fantasies of the right notwithstanding.
we learn this on television.



so we express our discontent in spaces that are available like this.
but we all know that what we say in spaces like this is mostly therapeutic.
a little playground in which we all get to try out rationalizations that enable us to get out of bed in the morning.
a pseudo-public sphere of pseudo-public debate.

within the exercize in sublimation that participation in such pseudo-public debates in a pseudo-public sphere, the bigger picture repeats itself.
the confusion comes in the assumption that these repetitions are meaningful.
they are meaningful in a therapeutic sense, but not in a political sense.

this brings me back to this thread:

i am not surprised or shocked or even particularly disturbed by how this has gone.
i saw nothing surprising in ustwo's selective reading strategies--i would even applaud his frankness--but nothing in it was surprising, was it?

thing is that while ustwo's refusal to take seriously positions directed against his extreme right politics resembles aspects of the bigger picture, it is not that bigger picture.
and freezing him out of the board does not change that bigger picture.
he is just a guy.
a person like the rest of us who has to work out ways to manage, to rationalise what is happening around him, who has to work out systems of thinking that enable him to get out of bed in the morning and act as though his life is meaningful-----just as the rest of us are.

this is not the bigger picture.
the bigger picture is overwhelming.
if you add up the elements of it and really think about what they mean, it can be paralyzing.
powerlessness is not good.
denial is a coping mechanism.
dissent is a coping mechanism.
between them are siginificant differences in types of information processed, logic and the willingness to spell out that logic.
but in a pseudo-public sphere, the line between political argument and coping mechanism is thin indeed.

let's try to remember that.

i would prefer better debates.
i would also prefer to operate without illusions.

back to the question of torture on the way out: the united states has practiced torture as a matter of routine policy for at least 50 years. the united states has trained generations of torturers at lovely institutions like the school of the americas. the united states has sanctioned torture in other places: the united states endorsed pinochet, the united states endorsed the argentine military regime, the united states supported the shah of iran--on and on and on.

have you seen "dogville"?
von trier is right.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 10-02-2006, 04:50 PM   #109 (permalink)
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
Great point.
Ch'i is offline  
Old 10-03-2006, 05:40 PM   #110 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by _God_

The concept of "fair and balanced," is missing here, unless you're using Al Franken's version.

Please...then TEACH Me....
tecoyah is offline  
Old 10-05-2006, 04:29 AM   #111 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel

_God_, I am left to wonder: when are you going to post about the thread topic? Or will it just be threadjacks?
God has a history of poorly defined points, Attack , and aggressive reaction...expect it to become worse before it gets better as hes still in the Old Testament mindset.
tecoyah is offline  
Old 10-05-2006, 09:58 AM   #112 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
God has a history of poorly defined points, Attack , and aggressive reaction...expect it to become worse before it gets better as hes still in the Old Testament mindset.
that is about the funniest thing i've read in a long
long
long
time
__________________
Live.

Chris
Paq is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 04:08 PM   #113 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Was this bill properly ratified? If my understanding is correct this bill should of been pocket vetoed. Congress passed it on the 28th of September, adjourned the 29th, and Bush signed on the 17th of October. This makes over 10 working days of no action while congress was adjourned which is a veto by default.


Last edited by samcol; 10-19-2006 at 04:11 PM..
samcol is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 07:56 PM   #114 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Congress is actually on a recess. Adjournment most commonly refers to "Adjournment Sine Die" which happens at the end of each two-year session of Congress.

The current 109th Congress will likely return after the election (particularly if the Repubs lose the House and want one last chance to try to push their legislative agenda before they become the minority) and adjourn sometime in December.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 08:34 PM   #115 (permalink)
Rawr!
 
skier's Avatar
 
Location: Edmontania
While I am not an American, I have been watching American politics with inscreasing fascination for years. I watched global outrage for the war in iraq, which many called illegal, and still do. I watched american citizens allow numerous encroachments on their freedoms; and the only true resistance to this gradual erosion i saw was the patriot act, which was pushed through anyways. Now an essential cornerstone of personal liberty has simply been removed- habeus corpus.

Don't you guys care, as citizens of a free and democratic country, that at any time, for any reason, a government offical could simply take you away to prison and leave you there to rot for the rest of your life? That they can also torture you if they feel like it? That they can take you to court, and prosecute you using classified evidence that you're not allowed to see? At this moment, It is not out of their bounds to sentence you to death for reasons they see fit to proscribe.

I find this extremely disturbing, and it makes me glad that I live in Canada, at least for the moment. I don't understand why there haven't been protests in the streets; or any sign of dissatisfaction at all. Is all that you can do is watch and mourn it's loss?

edit- found a video of Keith Olbermann saying it very eloquently.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIe2fPmGFYw
__________________
"Asking a bomb squad if an old bomb is still "real" is not the best thing to do if you want to save it." - denim
skier is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 08:48 PM   #116 (permalink)
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by skier
Don't you guys care, as citizens of a free and democratic country, that at any time, for any reason, a government offical could simply take you away to prison and leave you there to rot for the rest of your life? That they can also torture you if they feel like it? That they can take you to court, and prosecute you using classified evidence that you're not allowed to see? At this moment, It is not out of their bounds to sentence you to death for reasons they see fit to proscribe.

I find this extremely disturbing, and it makes me glad that I live in Canada, at least for the moment. I don't understand why there haven't been protests in the streets; or any sign of dissatisfaction at all. Is all that you can do is watch and mourn it's loss?
There are plenty of us who care, and actively try to resist such erosion. We are not the majority, unfortunately. The republican's future in the 2008 election looks grim, however. Two years is a long time to wait.

I suggest you direct this question towards the rightwingers. That should give you your answer...

...specifically Ustwo, he supports torture.

Last edited by Ch'i; 10-19-2006 at 08:50 PM..
Ch'i is offline  
Old 10-21-2006, 04:18 AM   #117 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
When I was younger, I knew I lived in the best country the world had to offer. I felt great joy in my luck for being born here, and pride in the accomplishments of my elders. I looked at all the wonderful things around me, and understood how extremely fortunate I was in comparison to virtually anyone outside the United States, in terms of freedoms and material comforts.
This has changed, as I think of my own children growing up. I am virtually powerless to halt the revisions taking place right now. I can only vote my conscience and hope for the best, knowing deep inside these hopes are impotent in the face of fear and hatred surrounding them. Over the last five years I have looked to the future with a mixture of dispair and frustration, as this country I truly love becomes something I do not like.
One is forced in this climate to look at a larger picture, and in some ways compromise principles in hopes of stopping some measure of the degradation so obvious , and painful. I have never been a Democrat, and in fact spent the majority of my life as a Republican, Even up to the first incarnation of a Bush Presidency....I can no longer support what that party represents, as it seems to be Killing the American Spirit I grew up with.

I only Pray I am not forced to vote for Hillary....But I cant see her damaging our counrty in the way Bush has.

/End Rant
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
tecoyah is offline  
Old 10-21-2006, 06:18 AM   #118 (permalink)
pig
pigglet pigglet
 
pig's Avatar
 
Location: Locash
Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
I have never been a Democrat,...I can no longer support what that party represents, as it seems to be Killing the American Spirit I grew up with.

I only Pray I am not forced to vote for Hillary....But I cant see her damaging our counrty in the way Bush has.
tec, i'm right on board with you. i've pretty much voted 3rd party since i've had the right to vote, but i might have to (icky icky foo) think about voting with the Republican-lights this time around. Not that it will mean jack shit down here in the Glorious South, but this shit has got to go.



End Dogpile
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style

Last edited by pig; 10-21-2006 at 06:19 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
pig is offline  
Old 10-24-2006, 10:22 AM   #119 (permalink)
The Death Card
 
Ace_O_Spades's Avatar
 
Location: EH!?!?


I love how bob the angry flower always manages to state exactly how I feel
__________________
Feh.
Ace_O_Spades is offline  
Old 10-24-2006, 10:26 AM   #120 (permalink)
NCB
Junkie
 
NCB's Avatar
 
Location: Tobacco Road
I love how tough interegation tactics have been hijacked and are now considered torture. It breaks my heart that this country has become so pussified
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Stewart, Former Minister of the Environment of Canada
"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."
NCB is offline  
 

Tags
approves, senate, terrorists, torture


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360