Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics

Notices

View Poll Results: Is Iran actively developing nuclear weapons?
Yes (and it worries me) 43 51.19%
Yes (and I don't care) 13 15.48%
No (and I'd be worried if they did) 5 5.95%
No (and I don't care) 6 7.14%
Not sure (and I am worried they would) 9 10.71%
Not sure (and I don't care) 8 9.52%
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-03-2008, 05:20 PM   #241 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I don't trust China, they may well be lying.

Iran is still trying to develop nuclear power..

The two need not be connected.
Fixed it for ya.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 05:44 PM   #242 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
Fixed it for ya.
Bravo! How original.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 05:56 PM   #243 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
Bravo! How original.
meh, whatever.....
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder

Last edited by silent_jay; 04-03-2008 at 07:13 PM..
silent_jay is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 05:59 PM   #244 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
In the short term, I am more concerned that Bush/Cheney will use the fact that Iran is becoming more influential in Iraq than the US (most recently as the go-between for the Malaki and Sadr) as a reason to get belligerent and bellicose again and do something incredibly stupid like invade Iran.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:30 PM   #245 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
host, it's all possible. I understand your position and I believe there's something to what you're saying. I know you hate the Bush administration, but I don't stop my critique at the administration or political lines. I'm quite certain that there's dirty dealing going on all over the place by our highest leaders from all parties and offices. I find it hard to believe otherwise and ranting on about the evil democrats or republicans is just silly (IMO).

The questions I originally asked are regarding the timing and intent of the Chinese government, not the legitimacy of the article or which Bush conspiracy you want to report on.

- - - - - - edit - - - - - -

OK, here's another article talking about China handing over intelligence about Iran to the IEAI. Hopefully the source is acceptable and the author not perceived as a tool in one of your Bush/Cheney conspiracies.

www.breitbart.com

I pray that one did the trick. If not, try these:

AP: China gave IAEA intel on Iran's nuclear activities
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2...ear-iran_N.htm

Nuclear Watchdog Gets China's Iran Intel
http://www.wjla.com/news/stories/0408/508290.html

China assists nuclear-arms probe of Iran - Intelligence sent to U.N. as international concern grows, diplomats say
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23918701/

If you don't like those ... then too bad.
Sigh.....Ottopilot, I've looked into the source of this report, and this is the earliest version that I can find....it appeared at the same time, 10:00 am edt and 7:00 am pdt, on April 2nd. The Telegraph's Mcelroy apparently simply embellished the original report. Here is the version, before it was "spiked" with quotes from John Bolton, and before the report lost it's "balance":

Quote:
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache...nk&cd=11&gl=us

and....
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache...nk&cd=19&gl=us

Nuclear Watchdog Gets China's Iran Intel

By GEORGE JAHN | Associated Press Writer
10:00 AM EDT, April 2, 2008

VIENNA, Austria - China has recently given the International Atomic Energy Agency intelligence about Iran's nuclear program despite Beijing's opposition to harsh U.N. Security Council sanctions on Tehran, according to diplomats familiar with the matter.

China and Russia have acted as a brake within the Security Council, consistently watering down a U.S.-led push to impose severe penalties on Tehran for its nuclear defiance since the first set of sanctions was passed in late 2006.

A Chinese decision to provide information for use in the agency's attempts to probe Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program would appear to reflect growing international unease about how honest the Islamic republic has been in denying it ever tried to make such arms.

The new development was revealed to The Associated Press by two senior diplomats who closely follow the IAEA probe of Iran's nuclear program.

The IAEA declined comment and no one answered the phone Wednesday at either the Chinese or Iranian missions to the IAEA.

The diplomats said Beijing was the most surprising entry in a substantial list of nations that have recently forwarded information that could be relevant in attempts to probe past or present nuclear weapons research by Iran.

The diplomats -- who demanded anonymity because their information was confidential -- attributed a generally increased flow of information to the U.N. nuclear watchdog to concern sparked by a February multimedia presentation by the agency to its 35 IAEA board members, which described intelligence previously forwarded by member states on Iran's alleged clandestine nuclear arms program.

<h3>One of the diplomats said the agency was on the lookout for misleading information provided it, either inadvertently or in attempts to falsely implicate Iran. One example, he said was a document showing experiments with implosion technology that can be used to detonate a nuclear device.

While the document appeared genuine, it was unclear whether it originated from Iran, said the diplomat.</h3>

Suspected weapons-related work outlined in the February presentation and IAEA reports preceding it include:

_ Uranium conversion linked to high explosives testing and designs of a missile re-entry vehicle, all apparently interconnected through involvement of officials and institutions

_ Procurement of so-called "dual use" equipment and experiments that also could be used in both civilian and military nuclear programs, and

_ Iran's possession of a 15-page document outlining how to form uranium metal into the shape of a warhead.

A U.S. intelligence estimate late last year said Tehran worked on nuclear weapons programs until 2003, while Israel and other nations say such work continued past that date.
I suspect that this is part of a new campaign by Bush/Cheney to justify a preemptive military attack against Iran, possibly coordinated with an Israeli attack against Syria:
Quote:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/971398.html
Last update - 10:40 03/04/2008 (Date is April 3rd....)
Israel fears Syrian army moves may signal Hezbollah attack
By Amos Harel, Avi Issacharoff, Yuval Azoulay and Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondents
Tags: Israel, Syria, IDF, Hezbollah

Israel is concerned that recent actions by the Syrian armed forces are a possible preamble for a Hezbollah operation against the northern border and a broader conflagration.

The Deputy Chief of Staff, Major-General Dan Harel, warned Wednesday that Israel will respond with a heavy hand against anyone trying to target Israel.

In a further sign that tensions are mounting along the Israel-Syrian border, Defense Minister Ehud Barak has canceled a scheduled visit to Germany.
Advertisement
The London-published daily Al-Quds al-Arabi reported Wednesday that the Syrians have recently deployed three armored divisions because Damascus is concerned about an Israeli attack.

Sources in the defense establishment say the report in the Arabic-language paper are exaggerated, but note that Syria has taken some unusual steps recently.

One of the possible explanations for the Syrian actions is that Damascus is aware of Hezbollah's plans to carry out a revenge attack against Israel for what it claims is Jerusalem's responsibility in the assassination of terrorist mastermind Imad Mughniyah in February.

According to defense sources in Israel, the Syrians are preparing for the likelihood that Israel's response to a Hezbollah attack will be severe and may result in a regional confrontation.

Senior political sources told Haaretz that Syria and Hezbollah are in close and constant coordination. They say that Hezbollah will not carry out an offensive operation against Israel without Syria being fully updated on the group's plans.

In recent months the Syrian army has held a defensive posture on a fairly broad level. This posture has been bolstered after the Mughniyah's assassination, and are reminiscent of the preparations made by the Syrian armed forces in the summer of 2007, before the Israel Air Force attack in northeast Syria.

Israel sees the Syrians' readiness mostly in their missile units, as well as in artillery and rocket battalions. There is also a bolstering of forces along the border with Lebanon, which seems to follow growing domestic tensions there as a result of a deadlock in the process for selecting a new president.

Smaller units have also been deployed in other areas, and an effort is evident to raise the level of preparedness of reserve units.

In recent months, the Syrian army has been carrying out more training than in earlier periods, a process that coincides with a bolstering of the armed forces with the procurement of sophisticated arms, much of it paid for by Iran.

The visit by Defense Minister Barak to the northern border on Tuesday was not coincidental and was directly linked to the growing tensions.

Barak said that Israel is the most powerful country in the Middle East and warned against challenging it.

At the same time, Israel sent messages to Damascus along secret channels that it has no offensive intentions, but warned that it would not hold back if attacked, even if Hezbollah and Syria argue that the attack was a retaliation for Mughniyah's assassination.

Israeli security sources said there is no intelligence that shows Syria is planning offensive action against Israel, but it pointed out that the Syrian deployment is troubling and requires a high level of readiness by the IDF.

At Northern Command, the readiness is at high level, especially to counter possible Hezbollah attacks seeking to avenge the killing of Mughniyah.

Intelligence concerned by assassination possibility

According to intelligence assessments, Hezbollah may - in coordination with Syria and Iran - try to assassinate senior Israeli public figures.

The defense establishment is particularly worried about attacks against Israeli targets in the developing world, where Hezbollah may use local terrorist infrastructure affiliated with extremist Islamic organizations.

In its report, Al-Quds al-Arabi noted that the Syrians are preparing not only for an Israeli offensive against Syria, but also in Lebanon against Hezbollah.

The newspaper reported that Syria is following IDF movements very closely as well as the statements by Israeli leaders in the media. Here they see incitement and an attempt to ready Israeli and international public opinion toward war against Syria.

The report noted that the Syrian army is carrying out extensive exercises and that it has called up some reserves for a possible confrontation.

Syria also deployed three armored divisions, special forces and nine infantry brigades near the border in an area near Lebanon's Beka'a Valley, because of concerns that Israel may attack through its flanks, the newspaper reported.

Deputy Chief of Staff Harel discussed the reports in the Arab press on the elevated state of readiness in the Syrian army during a briefing with reporters yesterday.

"I see no reason at all for unusual tension in the North and I do not think that any side is interested in a military confrontation," he said.

But Harel also struck a threatening note when he reiterated what has lately become a favorite statement among the top IDF brass and Defense Minister Barak: "Anyone who tries to harm Israel needs to keep in mind that Israel is the most powerful country in the region and its response will be hard and painful. We are constantly vigilant and ready for action."
Syria is reported to be taking defensive steps, as it fears an impending Israeli attack:
Quote:
http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/20..._calls_res.php
Syria calls reserve troops over fear of Israeli attack
Wednesday, 2 April, 2008 @ 7:11 PM

Beirut / Damascus - Syria's military has called up part of its reserve troops over fears of an Israel Defense Forces offensive, the London-based al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper reported on Wednesday.

assad - olmer front.JPG

Syria is also conducting wide-scale military exercises in preparation for an Israeli strike which might be combined with an attack on Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The Syrian army is closely monitoring the movement of Israeli forces along the northern border, al-Quds al-Arabi also reported.

In addition to the military preparations, the sources said on the condition on anonymity, that Damascus has raised its security alert level over the concerns that Israeli forces would infiltrate its territories through the Bekaa Valley area of Eastern Lebanon , regarded as a 'soft spot' on the border.

The newspaper reported that Damascus viewed the Israeli media reports and statements made by senior Israeli officials as attempts to prepare the Israeli and global public opinion for a war against Syria.

Over the past few weeks, the Syrians have stationed three armored divisions, special forces and nine mechanized infantry divisions opposite Lebanon's western valley, as the Syrians estimate that a ground Israeli invasion may take place in that area.

Israel has been on high alert following the end of a 40-day mourning period for Imad Mugniyah, who was killed in a Feb.12 bombing in Damascus.

Israel threatened to wage another war against Lebanon if Hezbollah retaliates for the killing of Mugniayah.

Following the threat an Israeli warship violated Lebanon's waters last month, but was intercepted by an Italian ship operating under UNIFIL.

Iranian listening stations

In a related development, Israeli security officials have said that Iran has set up sophisticated listening stations in Syria in recent months to intercept Israeli military communications.

The officials offered no details on how many stations had been set up. They spoke on condition of anonymity Tuesday because they were not authorized to disclose information about defense operations.

"Israel is taking new precautions because of the listening stations," the
officials said.

Israeli military officials say Iran helped Lebanese Hezbollah guerrillas pick up Israeli radio communications during the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Several months ago, all radio communications were ordered to be encrypted, security officials said.

On Tuesday, Israeli intelligence officers told a parliamentary committee that Hezbollah was replenishing its arsenal with medium- and long-range missiles, and improving its systems.

They said there were intelligence assessments that Hezbollah might carry out an operation against northern Israel through another organization, the Haaretz newspaper reported Wednesday, without naming the other organization.

Syria denies reports

Syria on Wednesday denied the Al-Quds Al-Arabi report : "The report, which was published in Al-Quds Al-Arabi is totally false," Col. Ahmad Munir Muhammad, a member of the Syrian parliament's National Security Committee, told The Media Line on Wednesday. Muhammad said that "President [Bashar Al-Assad's] message is clear: we are for a just and comprehensive peace and for the implementation of the United Nations' resolutions."

"Hezbollah has proven that it can thwart an Israeli attack on its own," he added. The purpose behind such an Israeli invasion, said Muhammad, would be to divert the pressure of public opinion from the "American crisis in Iraq and the crises within Israel."


The Al-Quds Al-Arabi report coincided with the Israeli government announcement that Israeli citizens will be given new gas-masks. The Israel Security Cabinet authorized Wednesday a plan to issue the population upgraded gasmasks as part of preparations for a possible future, non-conventional war.

Sources: AP, Press TV
host is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 03:03 AM   #246 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by host
Sigh.....Ottopilot, I've looked into the source of this report, and this is the earliest version that I can find....it appeared at the same time, 10:00 am edt and 7:00 am pdt, on April 2nd. The Telegraph's Mcelroy apparently simply embellished the original report. Here is the version, before it was "spiked" with quotes from John Bolton, and before the report lost it's "balance":


I suspect that this is part of a new campaign by Bush/Cheney to justify a preemptive military attack against Iran, possibly coordinated with an Israeli attack against Syria:

Syria is reported to be taking defensive steps, as it fears an impending Israeli attack:
sigh ...



OK, make of it what you will to satisfy your daily evil Bush/Cheney quota. I was looking more for a discussion regarding the timing and intentions of the Chinese by releasing this information after violence against Tibetan protesters and the upcoming Olympics (like post #38). But it's not my thread, so have at it.
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo
ottopilot is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 05:23 AM   #247 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
Fixed it for ya.
Fixed....

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G2y8Sx4B2Sk&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G2y8Sx4B2Sk&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

Shame I gotta keep using that.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 07:49 AM   #248 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
sigh ...

OK, make of it what you will to satisfy your daily evil Bush/Cheney quota. I was looking more for a discussion regarding the timing and intentions of the Chinese by releasing this information after violence against Tibetan protesters and the upcoming Olympics (like post #38). But it's not my thread, so have at it.
Chinese gubermint spokesfolks have vehemently denied "realeasing" anything, and none of the "diplomats" who "contributed" to the report are willing to release who they are, so.....

Ottopilot, all of the effort I've put into assembling this post, to try to persuade you to consider that you have been "conned" by an "Op", is wasted if I cannot get your attention....

The AP reporter who filed the story that your UK Telegraph "reporter", Damien McElroy later embellished, is George Jahn. Jahn has s history of being fed anti Iranian government information by:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...eh&btnG=Search

George Jahn's Iranian "insider" source, is Alireza Jafarzadeh. Fox New's own articles by Alireza Jafarzadeh, Fox's Foreign Affairs "consultant", confirm that he was MEK's politcal wing spokesperson in Washington for a dozen years, until August 2003. That was the month that the US shut down that office in Washington, just after the US invasion of Iraq.

....and, there is this:
Quote:
http://www.rutlandherald.com/apps/pb...81/1002/NEWS01
Ritter says White House preparing for war in Iran

April 4, 2008

By ED BARNA Herald Correspondent

MIDDLEBURY — Scott Ritter, former head of weapons inspection in Iraq who protested there were no weapons of mass destruction to justify an invasion, believes the same is true for Iran.

But there is an 80 percent chance of war with Iran, he told about 200 people Wednesday at Middlebury College as part of a series of talks facilitated by the Vermont Peace and Justice Center.

The pattern of preparations for such a conflict has been steadily developing and involves Congress as well as the Bush-Cheney administration, he said.

People ask him if he feels vindicated by the absence of WMDs in Iraq, he said, but "there isn't any vindication in being right about this one." A war with Iran would hasten the ongoing decline of American standing in the world, and afterward Russia and China would be ready to take advantage of the resulting power vacuum, he said.

Among the war clouds Ritter cited were:

# Preemptive strikes against the two groups most likely to erupt if the United States invaded Iran, Hezbollah (unsuccessfully attacked by Israel) and Moqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army (unsuccessfully attacked in Basra by Iraq's central government).

Ritter predicted a similarly disappointing showing if the American forces attacked Iran, a country 2-1/2 times as large and populous as Iraq that is much more unified culturally and did not have its army destroyed in a previous war with the United States.

# Recent visits to Middle Eastern allies by high officials, ostensibly for other purposes, but really to prepare them for the effects of such a war.

# The appearance of the "miracle laptop," as Ritter called it, a thousand pages of technical documents supposedly from a stolen Iranian computer, which dubiously had just the sort of information the administration needed to support a hard-line stand on Iran.

# Congressional supplementary funding for more "bunker-busting" bombs, with a contract completion deadline of April.

# Congressional supplementary funding for the extra bombers to carry those bombs, with a contract completion date of April.

# Cheney's order to send a third aircraft carrier battle group close to the Persian Gulf, a necessary bolstering of forces for a war with Iran.

Admiral William Fallon, the first admiral to be head of Central Command, said that level of naval forces was unnecessary and blocked the move. Ritter said that was "a heroic thing."

The main target of Ritter's criticisms was an American public that couldn't pass a test on the Constitution and understands little of international history and politics, and refuses to believe the life of an Iraqi is worth as much as the life of an American.

He began his talk, not by trumpeting the danger of war, but by talking about spring, and the birds that will soon have babies in their nests. Mother birds will forage, come to the nests, see open mouths begging for food, and puke into each one, he said.

Just so, Ritter said, people sit in front of their televisions every night and wait to be stuffed with mushy phrases like "The surge has been successful" and "Baghdad is 70 percent secure" and "We have apparently won the war."

"The reality of Iraq is that it is a broken nation," Ritter said. Groups like the Kurds and Shia are not unified groups, there is already a civil war, and most of the opposition to our presence comes from our being the invaders, he said.

"It is far too easy to look for people to blame," he said. For instance, "we blame the media, but the media simply give us what we're asking for."

Everyone needs to start understanding and caring about their Constitutional rights, and everyone needs to start finding the facts for themselves and taking strong individual stands, Ritter said. If you do nothing but take in what the TV and newspapers tell you, "all you're going to get in return is puke."
<h3>Ritter was an expert on Iraqi WMD.....HE WAS RIGHT.....HE SPOKE PUBLICLY LAST NIGHT......HE GETS NO COVERAGE from AP.....none !</h3>
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&um...nG=Search+News

Now, let us examine the press coverage "enjoyed" by the other side:

Isn't this exactly the same as the use of "intelligence" from Chalabi to make the case for war in Iraq?

Quote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7902719/...playmode/1098/
Terror Watch: A Strange Source of Intelligence on Iran
The State Department says MEK is a terror group. Human Rights Watch says it’s a cult. For the White House, MEK is a source of intelligence on Iran.

By Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball
Newsweek
updated 6:51 p.m. ET, Fri., May. 20, 2005

May 18 - A controversial exile movement cited by President George W. Bush as a source of information on Iran's nuclear ambitions is condemned for psychologically and physically abusing its own members in a new report by Human Rights Watch.

.....n 1997, the Clinton administration put MEK on the State Department's list of foreign terrorist groups. MEK's U.S. supporters, among whom at one point numbered dozens of members of Congress, charged that the Clinton administration only labeled MEK as a terrorist group as part of an ill-conceived attempt to improve relations with the ayatollahs who currently run Iran. However, the Bush administration added two alleged MEK front organizations to the State Department's terrorist list in 2003.

Despite the group's notoriety, Bush himself cited purported intelligence gathered by MEK as evidence of the Iranian regime's rapidly accelerating nuclear ambitions. <h3>At a March 16 press conference, Bush said Iran's hidden nuclear program had been discovered not because of international inspections but "because a dissident group pointed it out to the world." White House aides acknowledged later that the dissident group cited by the president is the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), one of the MEK front groups added to the State Department list two years ago.</h3>

In an appearance before a House International Relations Subcommittee a year ago, John Bolton, the controversial State Department undersecretary who Bush has nominated to become US ambassador to the United Nations, was questioned by a Congressman sympathetic to MEK about whether it was appropriate for the U.S. government to pay attention to allegations about Iran supplied by the group. Bolton said he believed that MEK "qualifies as a terrorist organization according to our criteria." But he added that he did not think the official label had "prohibited us from getting information from them. And I certainly don't have any inhibition about getting information about what's going on in Iran from whatever source we can find that we deem reliable."

However, current and former senior U.S. national-security officials, who asked not to be named because they are not supposed to talk about intelligence-gathering activities, say that all the major revelations MEK publicly claims to have made regarding nuclear advances in Iran were reported in classified form—and from other sources—to U.S. policymakers before MEK made them public. A Western diplomat familiar with the work of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations component that has been monitoring Iran's nuclear program, said that while the MEK has occasionally come up with accurate information about Iran's nukes, the group has come up with a similar number of other tips that have not checked out......
Quote:
http://www.cfr.org/publication/9158/
Mujahadeen-e-Khalq (Iranian rebels)

Updated: October 2005

* What is Mujahadeen-e-Khalq?
* What are MEK’s origins?
* Who are MEK’s leaders?
* Where does MEK operate?
* How big is MEK?
* What major attacks has MEK been responsible for?

What is Mujahadeen-e-Khalq?

Mujahadeen-e-Khalq (MEK) is the largest and most militant group opposed to the Islamic Republic of Iran. Also known as the People’s Mujahadeen Organization of Iran, MEK is led by husband and wife Massoud and Maryam Rajavi. MEK was added to the U.S. State Department’s list of foreign terrorist groups in 1997 and to the European Union’s terrorist list in 2002 because its attacks have often killed civilians. Despite MEK’s violent tactics, the group’s strong stand against Iran —part of President Bush’s “axis of evil”—and pro-democratic image have won it support among some U.S. and European lawmakers.
What are MEK’s origins?

MEK was founded in the 1960s by a group of college-educated Iranian leftists opposed to the country’s pro-Western ruler, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The group participated in the 1979 Islamic revolution that replaced the shah with a Shiite Islamist regime led by the Ayatollah Khomeini. But MEK’s ideology, a blend of Marxism and Islamism, put it at odds with the postrevolutionary government, and its original leadership was soon executed by the Khomeini regime. In 1981, the group was driven from its bases on the Iran-Iraq border and resettled in Paris , where it began supporting Iraq in its eight-year war against Khomeini’s Iran. In 1986, MEK moved its headquarters to Iraq, which used MEK to harass neighboring Iran. During the 2003 Iraq war, U.S. forces cracked down on MEK’s bases in Iraq, and in June 2003 French authorities raided a MEK compound outside Paris and arrested 160 people, including Maryam Rajavi.

Who are MEK’s leaders?

Maryam Rajavi, who hopes to become president of Iran , is MEK’s principal leader; her husband, Massoud Rajavi, heads up the group’s military forces. Maryam Rajavi, born in 1953 to an upper-middle class Iranian family, joined MEK as a student in Tehran in the early 1970s. After relocating with the group to Paris in 1981, she was elected its joint leader and later became deputy commander-in-chief of its armed wing. Experts say that MEK has increasingly come to resemble a cult that is devoted to Massoud Rajavi’s secular interpretation of the Koran and is prone to sudden, dramatic ideological shifts. After being released from police custody on bail, Maryam Rajavi was confined to the MEK compound in France , and the investigation continues. Massoud Rajavi was last known to be living in Iraq , but authorities aren’t certain of his whereabouts or whether he is alive.
Where does MEK operate?

The group’s armed unit operated from camps in Iraq near the Iran border since 1986. During the Iraq war, U.S. troops disarmed MEK and posted guards at its bases. In addition to its Paris-based members, MEK has a network of sympathizers in Europe, the United States, and Canada. <h3>The group’s political arm, the National Council of Resistance of Iran, maintains offices in several capitals, and used to have a branch in Washington, D.C. before U.S. officials closed it down in August 2003.</h3>

How big is MEK?

MEK is believed to have some 10,000 members, one-third to one-half of whom are fighters. Experts say its activities have dropped off in recent years as its membership has dwindled. MEK has had little success luring new recruits and is composed mostly of its founding members.
What major attacks has MEK been responsible for?

The group has targeted Iranian government officials and government facilities in Iran and abroad; during the 1970s, it attacked Americans in Iran. While the group says it does not intentionally target civilians, it has often risked civilian casualties. It routinely aims its attacks at government buildings in crowded cities. MEK terrorism has declined since late 2001. Incidents linked to the group include:

* the series of mortar attacks and hit-and-run raids during 2000 and 2001 against Iranian government buildings; one of these killed Iran’s chief of staff;
* the 2000 mortar attack on President Mohammad Khatami’s palace in Tehran;
* the February 2000 “Operation Great Bahman,” during which MEK launched twelve attacks against Iran;
* the 1999 assassination of the deputy chief of Iran’s armed forces general staff, Ali Sayyad Shirazi;
* the 1998 assassination of the director of Iran’s prison system, Asadollah Lajevardi;
* the 1992 near-simultaneous attacks on Iranian embassies and institutions in 13 countries;
* assistance to Saddam Hussein’s suppression of the 1991 Iraqi Shiite and Kurdish uprisings;
* the 1981 bombing of the offices of the Islamic Republic Party and of Premier Mohammad-Javad Bahonar, which killed some seventy high-ranking Iranian officials, including President Mohammad-Ali Rajaei and Bahonar;
* support for the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran by Iranian revolutionaries;
* the 1970s killings ofU.S. military personnel and civilians working on defense projects in Tehran.

It’s unclear how many attacks MEK has carried out; according to experts, the group’s claims of responsibility for attacks inIran are often exaggerated, and sometimes MEK is blamed by the Iranian government for attacks it didn’t stage.
Fox New's Former MEK Political Wing Spokesman and "representative in Washington for a dozen years", files one <a href="http://search2.foxnews.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&client=my_frontend&proxystylesheet=my_frontend&output=xml_no_dtd&site=story&getfields=*&filter=0&sort=date%3AD%3AS%3Ad1&q=Alireza+Jafarzadeh">Anti Iran "story" per week</a> at FOX:
Quote:
FOXNews.com - A Blow to Nuclear Bomb Making of Ayatollahs in Iran ...
Feb 27, 2008 ... FNC Foreign Affairs Analyst Alireza Jafarzadeh. FNC Foreign Affairs Analyst Alireza Jafarzadeh. • E-mail Alireza ...
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,333291,00.html
Quote:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,339295,00.html
Five Years After: Tehran Remains Enemy No. 1 in Iraq

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

By Alireza Jafarzadeh

<img src="http://www.foxnews.com/images/301018/0_61_0_61_AJ_320.jpg">

........Alireza Jafarzadeh is the author of The Iran Threat: President Ahmadinejad and the Coming Nuclear Crisis (Palgrave: February 2008).

Jafarzadeh has revealed Iran's terrorist network in Iraq and its terror training camps since 2003. He first disclosed the existence of the Natanz uranium enrichment facility and the Arak heavy water facility in August 2002.

Until August 2003, Jafarzadeh acted for a dozen years as the chief congressional liaison and media spokesman for the U.S. representative office of Iran's parliament in exile, <h3>the National Council of Resistance of Iran.</h3>
Quote:
http://www.newshounds.us/2006/09/02/..._terrorist.php
Is FOX News’ Foreign Affairs Analyst A Former Terrorist?
Reported by Ellen - September 2, 2006
Quote:
http://www.observer.com/2007/iranian...iraq-s-chalabi
In Iranian Friend of the Neocons, Shades of Iraq’s Chalabi
by Niall Stanage | June 5, 2007

Consider the scenario: A Middle Eastern nation is in the Bush administration’s sights; an expatriate opposition figure of dubious provenance emerges and becomes prominent in Washington and across conservative media; this opposition figurehead claims to be in possession of sensational intelligence which indicates that the leadership of his native land is hell-bent on destruction and that immediate action is needed.

Stop me, as the Smiths once sang, if you think you’ve heard this one before.

The nation in this instance is not Iraq but Iran. And Alireza Jafarzadeh, a man who is intimately linked with the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (M.E.K.), is—at least in the minds of skeptics—playing a role akin to that performed by Ahmed Chalabi in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq.

Mr. Jafarzadeh, unsurprisingly, does not welcome the comparison. His role, he claims, “is exactly the opposite of what Chalabi was.” But the similarities are uncanny.

Mr. Jafarzadeh’s prominence—<h3>his claims have been cited publicly by President Bush—is peculiar</h3>, to say the least, given that the group with which he is so closely linked has long been listed as a foreign terrorist organization by the State Department.

He ceased to represent the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) in the U.S. when its Washington office was forced to close in 2003. The closure took place because, in the eyes of the State Department, the NCRI was—and is— merely a front for the M.E.K......
Quote:
http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/rm/2003/20072.htm
On-the-Record Briefing
Ambassador Cofer Black, Coordinator for Counterterrorism
Remarks at On-the-Record Briefing on the Release of the Annual Patterns of Global Terrorism 2002 report
Washington, DC
April 30, 2003

.....QUESTION: What does the State Department think about the ceasefire that was signed between the MEK and the U.S., U.S. CENTCOM, in Iraq?

Since this group is still on the terrorist list, as I understand it, Americans are not supposed to deal with them at all. <h3>And that's always been kind of a -- there is a problem in Washington, D.C., because they keep an office open here.</h3>

So can you tell me how this squares with the MEK's terrorist status?

AMBASSADOR BLACK: Sure, I'll be happy to, happy to try. The Secretary has recommended that the President determine that the laws that apply to countries that support terrorism no longer apply to Iraq. The President's determination to provide greater flexibility in permitting certain types of trade with and assistance to Iraq; thus, we can treat Iraq like any other country not on the terrorist list.

I think it's important to underscore some facts here. MEK is designated by the U.S. Government as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. This organization mixes Islam and Marxism in their battle to establish what they claim would be a secular state in Iran.

Until the recent war in Iraq, they were allied with the government of Saddam Hussein and received most of their support from this regime. They have assisted the Hussein regime in suppressing opposition within Iraq, and performed internal security for the Iraqi regime. MEK, or as some recently referred to as the People's Mujahedin, has also attacked and killed Americans.

<h3>The MEK and its many aliases, including the political NCRI, are designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations.</h3> The United States Government does not negotiate with terrorists. MEK's opposition to the Iranian Government does not change the fact that they are a terrorist organization. We understand the agreement on the ground in the field is a prelude to the group's surrender. Commanders make tactical decisions to end conflict with enemy combatants successfully.

There's a lot of activity in various areas underway in Iraq -- of which this is one -- I would refer you to CENTCOM and their briefers to get better insight to the decision-making and the actions of our commanders, coalition commanders on the ground.

<h3>This is a pretty special group. They are a Foreign Terrorist Organization.</h3> They are not well liked in Iraq; they could not be put with the general prisoner population. They are following the orders of the coalition commanders, and their situation will be addressed in the coming days and weeks.

Yes, sir. .......
Quote:
http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle15562.htm
<div align="center">
<center>
<table border="0" width="90%">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<p align="center"><b><font size="5">Gunning for Iran</font></b><p align="center">

<b><font size="4">Exposed : Where The U.S. gets its
&quot;intelligence&quot; about Iran's nuclear program</font></b><br>
<br>
You must've heard the howls of protest from the International
Atomic Energy Agency after the release of a US House of
Representatives report on Iran's nuclear program. The IAEA
branded the American report &quot;outrageous and dishonest&quot; for
asserting that Tehran's nuclear plans were geared towards
weapons. This, of course, was just the latest flare-up in the
running debate over Iran's supposed nuclear ambitions. So where
is Washington getting its information? <br>
<br>
Try an Iranian opposition group known as the Mujahedin-e-Khalq -
MeK for short. Given the debacle over Saddam's non-existent WMDs
in Iraq, you'd reckon there'd have to be a touch of caution
where Iranian exiles peddling nuclear secrets are concerned. But
as Bronwyn Adcock tells it, when the MeK speaks, Washington
hardliners listen. <br>


<table cellSpacing="0" cellPadding="3" width="100%" border="0" id="table2">
<tr>
<td class="content"><b>TRANSCRIPT<p>Three weeks ago in
New York, journalists were summoned to this hotel for a
press conference. It has been organised by this man -
Alireza Jafarzadeh, an Iranian exile who regularly
reveals what he claims is inside information on Iran's
nuclear program. </b></p>
<p><i>ALIREZA JAFARZADEH, MUJAHEDIN-E-KHALQ LOBBYIST: I
would like to share with you today the information I've
gotten from the very same sources that have proven
accurate in the past. </i></p>
<p><b>Today, Jafarzadeh announces he's discovered an
apparently sinister new development. </b></p>

<p><i>ALIREZA JAFARZADEH: A very important aspect of the
Iran regime's nuclear weapons program is actually laser
enrichment, and the information I've gotten from my
sources today suggests that Iran is heavily involved in
laser enrichment program. </i></p>
<p><b>As always, the information is incredibly detailed,
with maps, names and addresses. Since 2002, Jafarzadeh
and the Iranian opposition group he's connected to, the
Mujahedin-e-Khalq, or MeK, have made nearly 20
intelligence revelations, in press conferences from
Paris to New York, Washington and London. </b></p>
<p><i>ALIREZA JAFARZADEH: And they are scheduled to be
able to get the bomb by 2005. </i></p>
<p><b>The MeK revelations have had an extraordinary
impact, sparking inspections in Iran by the nuclear
watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency.
According to the MeK, Iran is building a nuclear bomb,
and the world should be very afraid. </b></p>
<p><i>ALIREZA JAFARZADEH: I think the world has to take
the Iranian regime's threat very, very seriously. These
ayatollahs believe in what they say, believe that they
can eliminate Israel off the map, they can eliminate the
superpowers. </i></p>
<p><b>According to this Iranian opposition group, there
is only one solution. </b></p>

<p><i>ALIREZA JAFARZADEH: You need to slay the dragon.
This is the solution. You need to slay the dragon, which
means regime change. </i></p>
<p><b>The MeK is playing a key role in what's shaping up
as one of the critical contests of our time - the
stand-off between the US and Iran, played out here at
the United Nations General Assembly two weeks ago. </b>
</p>
<p><i>PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH AT UN: Iran must abandon its
nuclear weapons ambitions. </p>
<p>AHMADINEJAD, IRAN PRESIDENT AT UN, (Translation): All
our nuclear activities are transparent and peaceful and
fully overseen by the IAEA </p>
<p>CROWD: Down with terrorist! Ahmadinejad terrorist!
Down with terrorist! </i></p>

<p><b>Outside the United Nations that day Alireza
Jafarzadeh and the Mujahedin-e-Khalq, are again trying
to get their opinion heard. </b></p>
<p><i>ALIREZA JAFARZADEH: Obtaining the bomb, the
nuclear bomb would unquestionably give Tehran the upper
hand in the region. </i></p>
<p><b>And some powerful forces in the West are
listening. The MeK's main backer in Washington is a
newly formed think tank called the Iran Policy
Committee, headed by a former Reagan White House
official, Professor Raymond Tanter. </b></p>
<p><i>PROFESSOR RAYMOND TANTER, IRAN POLICY COMMITTEE:
The regime change clock has to start. Right now, the
regime change clock is not even ticking. </i></p>
<p><b>In the Iran Policy Committee, Professor Tanter has
created a powerful grouping of former CIA, Pentagon and
White House officials. At forums like this briefing on
Capitol Hill, the group is trying to convince the
American Government that the MeK can help them achieve
the goal of regime change. </b></p>
<p><i>PROFESSOR RAYMOND TANTER: We didn't choose the
Mujahedin-e-Khalq. The data hit us between the eyes. The
analysis passes what I call 'the interocular test' - it
hits you right between the eyes. I invented that phrase.
</p>

<p>CROWD (Translation): Ahmadinejad terrorist!
Ahmadinejad terrorist! Down with the terrorist! </i></p>
<p><b>But for some, the sight of exile groups bearing
gifts of intelligence for the West just brings back bad
memories. </b></p>
<p><i>PROFESSOR GARY SICK, COLOMBIA UNIVERSITY: In the
past, on Iraq, we were fed a lot of false information to
try to get our attention and to get us to do what we
did. We bought it, and I have a very hard time
understanding how anybody can maintain a straight face
and say, &quot;Again,&quot; we should do the same thing all over
again. </i></p>
<p><b>Professor Gary Sick has served on the National
Security Council under three presidents. He was the
principle White House aide for Iran during the Iranian
revolution and hostage crisis, and has followed the
country closely ever since. He's extremely sceptical
about the MeK. </b></p>......
</td>
</tr>
</table>
************************************************

Lemme ask you, Ottopilot, why you think that the Bush administration, committed to a "war on terror", is so enthusiatically influenced by the former spokesperson of a dozen years, and Washington lobbyist for a terrorist organization, instead of by the opinion of an WMD expert who was right about Iraq, Scott Ritter, and by the US intelligence community's NIE on Iranian nuclear weapons development?

Why does the press ignore Ritter, but prints and broadcast everything that a former MEK propagandist tells them? Isn't the press "too liberal"? Didn't the press learn a lesson when it simply printed without challenging the pre-Iraq invasion statements of US administation officials?

Isn't it true that anyone who believed the exact opposite of what Bush and Cheney said about the WMD threat from Iraq, had a much better grasp on the reality on the ground in Iraq, on the actual "imminent threat" posed by Saddam's regime? Isn't "imminent" threat, the only grounds for preemptive attack, and even then, isn't it insufficient grounds for military action, based on US <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression">treaty obligations</a> via being a signatory to the UN charter?

How does Fox News openly and unabashedly give a former terrorist organization member, basically the "keys" to it's website and boradcast space to make any accusations against the Iranian regime that he wants to make?

Why do you allow yourself to be "taken in"?

Last edited by host; 04-05-2008 at 10:02 AM..
host is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 08:51 AM   #249 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Fixed....

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G2y8Sx4B2Sk&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G2y8Sx4B2Sk&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

Shame I gotta keep using that.
It is a shame you keep using that, it's pretty lame, I expected more than that Ustwo, what a disappointment.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
 

Tags
developing, iran, nuclear, weapons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360