Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2006, 05:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
About that california thing again...

I know that awhile back I started a thread about how screwed up cali was and got kinda roasted for it, so I thought that I would amend that and say that cali's 'lawmakers' are kooky and screwed up. That way I don't offend anyone here and can tell it like it is.

http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/mo...l/14286218.htm

Quote:
A bill making it a crime for a mountain lion to attack a human has been introduced into the state Legislature.

Assembly Bill 2273, introduced by Assemblyman Bill Maze, R-Visalia, is intended to make victims of mountain lion attacks eligible for compensation for their injuries through the state crime victims' fund, according to Somke Mastrup, deputy director of the state Department of Fish and Game. For them to be eligible, they must be crime victims.

Mastrup reported on a number of bills pending in Sacramento at Thursday's meeting of the state Department of Fish and Game in Monterey, legislation that the commission should keep an eye on, he said.
So, what I want to know is, will the mountain lions get a public defender, or do they have to prove their indigency first?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 06:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Seattle
How soon before the first faked mountain lion attack claim would be made I wonder....
Topper is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 06:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
Observant Ruminant
 
Location: Rich Wannabe Hippie Town
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
I know that awhile back I started a thread about how screwed up cali was and got kinda roasted for it, so I thought that I would amend that and say that cali's 'lawmakers' are kooky and screwed up.
As a native Californian, I won't argue with you on that one!

But actually, this is the old California political game of trying to siphon off dedicated funds and use them for a different purpose -- in this case, compensating victims of mountain lion attacks. Which, I admit, is kookier than usual. I'd love to hear the backstory on that one.

As for the first faked claim -- not long. Some joker with a half-decent dogbite will try his luck, and probably even convince himself that he deserves the money.

Last edited by Rodney; 04-07-2006 at 06:21 PM..
Rodney is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 06:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
<3 TFP
 
xepherys's Avatar
 
Location: 17TLH2445607250
It's not a kooky law, per se. It's trying to work around current limitations. It would make more sense just to propse legislature that alows "victims of mountain lion attacks eligible for compensation for their injuries through the state crime victims' fund" without making it unlawful for an attack to occur. *shrug* Decent plan, very bad wording and conceptual plan.
xepherys is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 06:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
well, heres what I know of the history........I think.

Last year there was a man who killed a mountain lion in his backyard. Now, I believe that mountain lions are 'protected' species in california. If i'm wrong on that, please correct me.

This man who killed the mountain lion claimed self defense (obviously, panthers have killed people in the past) yet the local prosecutor charged this man anyway.

So, this LOOKS like an attempt to keep the killing of mountain lions illegal by setting up some sort of 'victim' fund for those that are attacked by a mountain lion, as long as they don't kill it.....what happens if the lion kills the person?

sorry, I can't wrap my head around this one yet.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 06:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
Observant Ruminant
 
Location: Rich Wannabe Hippie Town
I went and checked out the analysis of the bill over at the ca.gov website, and it comes down to this:

Mountain lions are a protected species, and the legislator (from a rural area) doesn't think the species should be protected. But he realizes he's got no way of changing that, because the mass of voters are in favor of protecting endangered species.

So his reasoning goes like this: since the government mandates that mountain lions should be protected, the gov't is therefore responsible for anyone hurt by a mountain lion, and should pay. It just so happened that one person in his district was attacked; one of 12 confirmed mountain lion attacks in the last 20 years. The author is quoted:

""As mountain lions reproduce - with no predator higher on
the food chain - their numbers have and will flourish. This
has set California on a crash course with nature and has
resulted in multiple vicious attacks. We are responsible to
those victims. They should have a resource to go to for
assistance with medical bills and similar expenses related to
those attacks."

What this really shows is the prediliction for the average California legislator to grandstand on minor issues (there are 30 million of us here) while not addressing any of the hard problems in this state, like imploding schools, lack of health care, prisons in crisis, and other things that are politically dangerous to deal with. But mountain lion attacks -- yeah, I'm all over it.

Here's the URL to the analysis of the bill, performed by one of the staffers for the assembly committee that heard it.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/a..._asm_comm.html

Last edited by Rodney; 04-07-2006 at 06:39 PM..
Rodney is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 07:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodney
I went and checked out the analysis of the bill over at the ca.gov website, and it comes down to this:

Mountain lions are a protected species, and the legislator (from a rural area) doesn't think the species should be protected. But he realizes he's got no way of changing that, because the mass of voters are in favor of protecting endangered species.

So his reasoning goes like this: since the government mandates that mountain lions should be protected, the gov't is therefore responsible for anyone hurt by a mountain lion, and should pay. It just so happened that one person in his district was attacked; one of 12 confirmed mountain lion attacks in the last 20 years. The author is quoted:

""As mountain lions reproduce - with no predator higher on
the food chain - their numbers have and will flourish. This
has set California on a crash course with nature and has
resulted in multiple vicious attacks. We are responsible to
those victims. They should have a resource to go to for
assistance with medical bills and similar expenses related to
those attacks."

What this really shows is the prediliction for the average California legislator to grandstand on minor issues (there are 30 million of us here) while not addressing any of the hard problems in this state, like imploding schools, lack of health care, prisons in crisis, and other things that are politically dangerous to deal with. But mountain lion attacks -- yeah, I'm all over it.

Here's the URL to the analysis of the bill, performed by one of the staffers for the assembly committee that heard it.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/a..._asm_comm.html
Well when you put it like that, I actually agree with this guy. If your not allowed to shoot them when they endanger your livestock or family, the government should pay for the damages.

Yes there are always "bigger" issues, but our lawmakers work on this type of legislation all the time. They can't always be working on the number 1 issue.
samcol is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 07:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
Observant Ruminant
 
Location: Rich Wannabe Hippie Town
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcol
Yes there are always "bigger" issues, but our lawmakers work on this type of legislation all the time.
No they don't. They avoid working on them, because California public policy is basically paralyzed; whatever you need to fix, there's an interest group with money -- and just enough bought-and-paid-for legislators, if not the governor -- standing in the way. Your basic California legislator keeps his head down, does what the party bosses say, and in return is allowed to bring a little pork home to his district (so he can get reelected) and get silly little bills passed that make them look effective but don't upset any entrenched interests.

I spent some time in the company of a few state legislators just the other day and, as always, I in the main was not impressed. The majority of them, I wouldn't have in my house.
Rodney is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 07:17 PM   #9 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
I think some responsibility should be taken with the encroachment into cougar territory. Catch and release would be a good solution to this problem. Remove the big cats into the mountain ranges and they will thrive.

We catch a glimpse of a coug now and then, but we live in bfe and have not yet encroached on their territory. We only see them during the summer when they come down for a drink of lake water. We don't bother them and they don't bother us.
Elphaba is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 07:21 PM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodney
No they don't. They avoid working on them, because California public policy is basically paralyzed; whatever you need to fix, there's an interest group with money -- and just enough bought-and-paid-for legislators, if not the governor -- standing in the way. Your basic California legislator keeps his head down, does what the party bosses say, and in return is allowed to bring a little pork home to his district (so he can get reelected) and get silly little bills passed that make them look effective but don't upset any entrenched interests.

I spent some time in the company of a few state legislators just the other day and, as always, I in the main was not impressed. The majority of them, I wouldn't have in my house.
My fault. I've always been terrible at grammar. I was implying that they work on the smaller issues like this all the time and rarely hit the bigger issues.
samcol is offline  
 

Tags
california, thing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:37 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360