Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-19-2006, 05:58 AM   #1 (permalink)
Degenerate
 
Aladdin Sane's Avatar
 
Location: San Marvelous
France Threatens to Nuke Terrorist States

France said on Thursday it would be ready to launch a targeted nuclear strike against any state that carried out a terrorist attack on French soil.

Is a Nuclear strike against terrorists warranted? When the real nutball Islamofascists are trying to bring about the End Times, isn't this just handing them what they want?

Here's the article:

France defends right to nuclear reply to terrorism
By Reuters January 19 11:50

In a speech defending France’s costly nuclear deterrent and toughening policy against terrorism, President Jacques Chirac said Paris must be able to hit back hard at a hostile state’s centres of power and its “capacity to act”.

“The leaders of states who would use terrorist means against us, as well as those who would consider using in one way or another weapons of mass destruction, must understand that they would lay themselves open to a firm and adapted response on our part,” Chirac said during a visit to northwestern France, where France’s nuclear submarines are based.



“This response could be a conventional one. It could also be of a different kind.”

Chirac said all of France’s nuclear forces had been configured with this strategy in mind and the number of nuclear warheads on French nuclear submarines had been reduced to allow targeted strikes.

It was the first time he had so clearly linked the threat of a nuclear response to a terrorist attack, but he made no mention of any specific threat against France.

“Against a regional power, our choice would not be between inaction or annihilation,” he said.

“The flexibility and reactivity of our strategic forces would enable us to exercise our response directly against its centres of power and its capacity to act.”
© Reuters Limited
__________________
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
Aladdin Sane is offline  
Old 01-19-2006, 06:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
This is ridiculous. Clearly he is just sabre rattling at Iran.

The problem is if you were to nuke Tehran, you are going to kill more people who are likely to support you than not. Iran is not teeming with people who want to destroy the world. Many want to return to the democratic state they once enjoyed.

All it would do is prove correct those who say the west wants to destroy the Mulim nations.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 01-19-2006, 06:29 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i was reading about this during before i saw this thread, so thought i would give an idea of how this is being covered in the france this morning. the links are all to french articles--the rest of the post is early-morning, bleary-eyed plot summary. all this to give a denser context for the op.

http://www.lemonde.fr/web/article/0,...-732337,0.html

according to the lead story in this morning's le monde, this speech was primarily aimed at floating a justification for continued expenditures on nuclear weapons in a post coldwar context---i;ve linked the article above, but wont quote it because it is in french---but there is a denser context for this than the op considered---but given that the source is the reuters summary, this is not a surprise, nor is it the poster's fault. basically the main motive is a defense of the approximately 3 billion euros/year that gets diverted into nuclear weaons systems in a situation of intense budgetary pressure...the article says that the president in france is in a curious position and does not often speak publically about nuclear weapons--the official position was outlined in 2001---the 2001 speech outlines the basic nuclear strategy france has adopted, and this latest speech is being seen as an inflection/nuancing/adaptation of the premises of the general policy outline.
so in this speech, chirac apparently has expanded the range of "national interests" threats to which might trigger a nuke response to include energy, and indicated a reconfiguration of the french nuclear weapons capability roughly in line with the notions rumsfeld was floating a couple years ago--the overall strategy is now more oriented toward "precision targetting" rather than "mutually assured destruction".

the speech also links nuclear weapons to the range of possible responses to "terrorism" and takes note of the situation that is unfolding with iran--this dimension is played down in le monde a bit, but more prominent in the summary coverage you see in the center-right paper le figaro:

http://www.lefigaro.fr/perm/afp_depe....p62u919s.html

an editorial from libération (technocrat-left):

http://www.liberation.fr/page.php?Article=352373

all for now.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 08:32 AM   #4 (permalink)
NCB
Junkie
 
NCB's Avatar
 
Location: Tobacco Road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
This is ridiculous. Clearly he is just sabre rattling at Iran.

The problem is if you were to nuke Tehran, you are going to kill more people who are likely to support you than not. Iran is not teeming with people who want to destroy the world. Many want to return to the democratic state they once enjoyed.

All it would do is prove correct those who say the west wants to destroy the Mulim nations.
1. I agree. For France to threaten any country is a joke.

2. What "democratic state they once enjoyed" are you talking about?

3. So we shouldnt use military force to resolve problems because it "would prove people right"?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Stewart, Former Minister of the Environment of Canada
"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."
NCB is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 08:41 AM   #5 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCB
1. I agree. For France to threaten any country is a joke.

2. What "democratic state they once enjoyed" are you talking about?

3. So we shouldnt use military force to resolve problems because it "would prove people right"?
I think the "democratic state they once enjoyed" that Charlatan is talking about is Iran, but I may be mistaken.

There's military force and then there's dropping a nuke on a country, the two are very different things.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 08:47 AM   #6 (permalink)
NCB
Junkie
 
NCB's Avatar
 
Location: Tobacco Road
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
I think the "democratic state they once enjoyed" that Charlatan is talking about is Iran, but I may be mistaken.
I understand that, but clearly he's unaware that Iran was a monarchy before it was a theocracy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Stewart, Former Minister of the Environment of Canada
"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."
NCB is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 08:56 AM   #7 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCB
2. What "democratic state they once enjoyed" are you talking about?
The Iranians had a democratically elected government in the 1950s which was headed by Prime Minister Mossadegh. It was brought about by moderates seeking reform. It was overthrown with much assistance by the CIA who reinstalled the Shah. The Shah and his brutal regime was then overthrown by the fundamentalists led by Khomeni.

Ironically, the fundamentalists gained power because the moderates were deemed too weak in the face of the Shah and his american backers. Additionally, the Shah squashed freedom of speech and dissent except for in the Mosques. Hence the rise of militism and fundamentalism that went on to become one of the greater threats we seem to face today.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCB
3. So we shouldnt use military force to resolve problems because it "would prove people right"?
1.There is a BIG difference between military force and dropping a nuclear bomb on another nation.

2. Dropping a weapon of mass destruction is not only laden with sick irony but further suggests to the people around the world that perhaps those who say, the West is out to destroy Islam are right. This one action would not only turn most of Islam against the West but would also turn many, MANY people in the west against whichever idiot thought it was OK to drop a nuke.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 11:06 AM   #8 (permalink)
NCB
Junkie
 
NCB's Avatar
 
Location: Tobacco Road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
The Iranians had a democratically elected government in the 1950s which was headed by Prime Minister Mossadegh. It was brought about by moderates seeking reform. It was overthrown with much assistance by the CIA who reinstalled the Shah. The Shah and his brutal regime was then overthrown by the fundamentalists led by Khomeni.

Ironically, the fundamentalists gained power because the moderates were deemed too weak in the face of the Shah and his american backers. Additionally, the Shah squashed freedom of speech and dissent except for in the Mosques. Hence the rise of militism and fundamentalism that went on to become one of the greater threats we seem to face today.
They had a constitutional monarchy for 4 years. That hardly constitutes a "democratic state they enjoyed". In fact, shortly after their limited elections, Musaddiq ruled with unlimited power, much liken the Shahs had. Thus, the US aided his overthrow for a more pro western leader.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Stewart, Former Minister of the Environment of Canada
"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."
NCB is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 11:37 AM   #9 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCB
They had a constitutional monarchy for 4 years. That hardly constitutes a "democratic state they enjoyed". In fact, shortly after their limited elections, Musaddiq ruled with unlimited power, much liken the Shahs had. Thus, the US aided his overthrow for a more pro western leader.
That's an interesting twist of the truth.

Yes, it was a short lived democracy. It was short lived because, Mossadegh and his government decided it was in the interest of their nation to nationalize the Iranian oil. Yes, the Shah was a more pro-Western leader, but most puppets are beholden to their puppet masters, no?

I think most people can see the irony when Bush and his Administration talk about bringing democracy to the Middle East. The cause for democracy was greatly set back the US intervention in the first place.

Toppling of a moderate like Mossadegh (and propping up other regimes like the Sauds) led inexorably to the rise of fundamentalism in the Middle East.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 11:47 AM   #10 (permalink)
NCB
Junkie
 
NCB's Avatar
 
Location: Tobacco Road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
That's an interesting twist of the truth.

Yes, it was a short lived democracy. It was short lived because, Mossadegh and his government decided it was in the interest of their nation to nationalize the Iranian oil. Yes, the Shah was a more pro-Western leader, but most puppets are beholden to their puppet masters, no?

I think most people can see the irony when Bush and his Administration talk about bringing democracy to the Middle East. The cause for democracy was greatly set back the US intervention in the first place.

Toppling of a moderate like Mossadegh (and propping up other regimes like the Sauds) led inexorably to the rise of fundamentalism in the Middle East.
1. If there was anyone twisting the truth, it was you. I'm not the one who implied that the Iranians had enjoyed a long history of democracy which in actuality existed for only 4 years and was over 50 years ago.

2. Irony and hypocrisy in govt has existed since the beginings of govt, even in Canada. Its naive to think that it still doesnt exist everywhere.

3. He was hardly a moderate. That said, I dont necessarily agree with the US intervention to overthrow him back then
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Stewart, Former Minister of the Environment of Canada
"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."
NCB is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 12:07 PM   #11 (permalink)
Free Mars!
 
feelgood's Avatar
 
Location: I dunno, there's white people around me saying "eh" all the time
I support France's threats against any states that SPONSERS terrorist intending to attack France or any other allies in similar nature to 9/11. It's just another form of deterrent similar to those used by USSR and United States during the cold war

Quote:
The leaders of states who would use terrorist means against us
That is worded quite differently from what other news source

Quote:
President Jacques Chirac warned Thursday that France could respond with nuclear weapons to a state-sponsored terrorist attack
States that use terrorist to attack other nations still deserve to be nuked. I wouldn't mind if Canada did the same threat too

Last edited by feelgood; 01-20-2006 at 12:11 PM..
feelgood is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 12:16 PM   #12 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCB
1. If there was anyone twisting the truth, it was you. I'm not the one who implied that the Iranians had enjoyed a long history of democracy which in actuality existed for only 4 years and was over 50 years ago.

2. Irony and hypocrisy in govt has existed since the beginings of govt, even in Canada. Its naive to think that it still doesnt exist everywhere.

3. He was hardly a moderate. That said, I dont necessarily agree with the US intervention to overthrow him back then
NCB: The point is the Iranian people brought about their own organically grown (for lack of a better word) democracy. They didn't have it forced on them. They didn't even go to war for it. They brought it about through the natural course of political growth and maturity.

No it wasn't a long history (I never said, or implied that it was) but that doesn't mean that they didn't enjoy it any less.

And yes, he, and those who worked to bring about the new system of government, were moderate compared to what came after. They were just the sort of people that we see every day running functioning democracies around the world.

Just because he didn't agree with British rule over the oil fields does not make him "hardly a moderate".
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 12:26 PM   #13 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
A quick read on Mossadegh: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossadegh
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 02:51 PM   #14 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCB
1. I agree. For France to threaten any country is a joke.
No threats uttered by a country that owns nuclear weapons - no matter if France, the US or Iran - is a joke. Never.
__________________
Knowing is not enough, we must apply.
Willing is not enough, we must do.
Dyze is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 05:40 PM   #15 (permalink)
seeker
 
Location: home
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyze
No threats uttered by a country that owns nuclear weapons - no matter if France, the US or Iran - is a joke. Never.
Yea France's nuclear arsenal is so tiny
They can only destroy the Earth 12 times over
Not like the USSR and the US who can
destroy the world.....what 50 times over?
French Nuclear Arsenal
Quote:
The French nuclear arsenal, largely a legacy of De Gaulle's insistance on French strategic independence, is the third largest in the world
__________________
All ideas in this communication are sole property of the voices in my head. (C) 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009
"The Voices" (TM). All rights reserved.
alpha phi is offline  
Old 01-22-2006, 01:12 PM   #16 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
You really have to admire the sheer arrogance of Chirac. He's a marvellous leader in his way, so contemptous and superior. He is by far the strongest statesman in Europe.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 01-22-2006, 01:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
This is the unofficial stance of any and all nuclear countries. If you huke us, we'll nuke you. France just said what everyone else is thinking. Arab Middle Eastern countries, welcome to the MAD club.
Willravel is offline  
 

Tags
france, nuke, states, terrorist, threatens

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:45 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360