Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-12-2005, 08:06 AM   #41 (permalink)
Insane
 
Phage's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAlyra2004
1. Space is a vacuum and in that vacuum there is matter and electromagnetic radiation and time dimensions etc. Our universe is in this "space". Space may be infinite, and it likely goes beyond our universe.
Not exactly. What many people call "space" is anything outside the atmosphere of the Earth, but in the terms of the universe it is an area in which things can exist. This space can be occupied by matter or other forms of energy, or it can be completely empty. Our universe is all the matter and energy that exist, and also all the empty space in which matter and energy can exist. We do not know if space is infinite or not because we have not found an edge, but it does seem to be getting larger. (I will talk about time later down.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAlyra2004
2, Assuming you already know about matter and electromagnetic radiation: Time is a dimension that has properties. It can be bent like light and is affected by the gravity effect etc.
This is a good way to think of it in a general sense, but it is much more complex. Lets just say that the rate at which time passes is variable and relative to the observer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAlyra2004
3.When all matter was together in a singular place (singularity) electromagnetic radiation and time were bent to the point that they all turned back in on the singularity. (who knows what the actual shape was... I prefer a ball for simplicity)
Try to imagine a point rather than a 3 dimensional object. A point has no length, width, or depth at all. Think of a map grid; point (32,57) is infinitely small.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAlyra2004
4. When point 3 was the case our universe was small, all atomic activity had stopped... the small singularity resided inside of an infinitely large vacuum we call space.
Negative on the last half of number 4; space itself was a single point. Length, width, and depth were meaningless because everything including the capacity to exist was all in the same place (all places were one). I cannot really comment about if atomic activity was stopped or not because pretty much all of our understanding of the universe today make no sense in that context.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAlyra2004
5. The Big bang occurred a billionth of a second later and ..kabloom....and the expanding universe began. Matter, radiation, etc started it's journey outward, into the vacuum. Because of it's speed , time was/is affected.
Matter and energy did extend out, but space extended as well. Suddenly things could exist apart from each other. This can also be considered to be the start of time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAlyra2004
6. When scientists debate over the shape of space and time and our universe they are talking about the space-time dimensions of our universe. There is nothing to say that there are not other universes outside of our own, in space.
Scientists are talking about not only the matter and energy but also the capacity to exist that makes up our universe. There might be other universes "outside" our own but it would be a peculiar concept indeed.

I would like to make a simple analogy to better explain the concept of "space", as you seem to be thinking of it as merely a vacuum. Remember that a vacuum is "A space empty of matter".

Lets imagine a piece of paper, which for our example will be completely 2 dimensional (no thickness). On this paper we will draw a stick figure and let him explore the area. Soon enough he will come to an edge of the paper. Beyond the edge of the paper the capacity for drawn things to exist ceases. You are probably thinking of this piece of paper floating in the air somewhere or sitting on a table; you are still stuck thinking in a 3 dimensional context. Remember in our example I only defined the sheet of paper and outside the sheet of paper is truly nothing.

If you can begin to think in the terms of 2 dimensions then you can understand how hard it would be to add an unknown type of dimension to our 3D view. Scientists cannot disprove the possibility of other universes but they would be separated from us by an indescribable void and located in a manner which hurts my brain to think about.
Phage is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 10:15 PM   #42 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Born, Moscow,ID. Live: Moscow, ID.
It seems to me that is space was infinite, and we trace it back to the big bang, then it must have been infinite then, just incredibly dense. You can't shrink infinity into a point, or expand a point into infinity.

If space was at one time a singularity, it must now be finite. I guess.
mtb_chris is offline  
Old 07-09-2005, 07:30 AM   #43 (permalink)
Insane
 
Phage's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtb_chris
It seems to me that is space was infinite, and we trace it back to the big bang, then it must have been infinite then, just incredibly dense. You can't shrink infinity into a point, or expand a point into infinity.

If space was at one time a singularity, it must now be finite. I guess.
Keep in mind that just because we cannot find an edge does not indicate that something is infinite, therefore any declarations of space being infinite in size are only speculation. With space "stretching" it is quite possible that if there is an edge it would be impossible to observe or reach because space is being created faster than the speed of light.

Then again, the current workings of the universe may not conform to current logic and we need to reorder our ways of thinking to understand it.
Phage is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 07:29 AM   #44 (permalink)
Wehret Den Anfängen!
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Phage, there is no need for the "finite sized universe" hypothesis.

All experiments attempting to find the width of the universe have failed.

If this was true, space was never a point.

On the other hand, there are models that seem to indicate a phenomina like our visible universe could inflate out of a 20-lb concentration of a particular strange field in a hot medium. If this was the case, then the visible universe would just be an inflated bubble within something else, much much larger than our cosmic horizon. We would be like underwater animals, living at a hot spring on the bottom of the ocean. A seemingly infinite universe to them is just some small corner of the 'real' universe.

Secondly, below Plank-distance and Plank-time, modern physics is silent. In the early parts of the big bang, the equations of physics keep spewing out infinities and nonsense: cosmologists have pushed back the model of the universe to fractions of a second after "time 0", but the last little bit is not understood.

The fact is, alot of these things are still up in the air. So making definite statements about things like this isn't honest.

There are many models which explain why the visible universe seems like it is. One of the strongest involves a 'space inflation field' in a very hot early universe -- that model explains everything from the baseline universal ratio of helium to hydrogen to the clustering of galaxies to the tempurature and tempurature variation of interstellar space, to redshift from far galaxies and stars. The "hot inflation" model of the universe is called "the big bang". But even in that one model, there are many details that are not ironed out, and there are competing theories that explain what we can see but make different predictions about things we can't yet detect. (Example: gravity wave predictions differ between the "big bang" model and the "brane collision" model)
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
Yakk is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 09:19 AM   #45 (permalink)
Insane
 
Phage's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakk
All experiments attempting to find the width of the universe have failed.

If this was true, space was never a point.
My point was that it is not possible to prove that the universe is infinite in size, you can only prove it is finite. Your statement at the top about space never being a point needs clarification; if we view space-time as being created in the Big Bang then space could certainly have been a point. With the observed expansion of space-time there is no indication that it is expanding "into" anything at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakk
The fact is, alot of these things are still up in the air. So making definite statements about things like this isn't honest.
Too true, and as our understanding of the universe increases we may come across truths which defy our current logic.
Phage is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 09:57 AM   #46 (permalink)
Wehret Den Anfängen!
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
My point was that it is not possible to prove that the universe is infinite in size, you can only prove it is finite.
Suppose you had a theory that indicates that space is infinite, and has other corroborating things it also indicates. That is pretty strong evidence.

Remember, science 'facts' are statements that are disprovable and have proven hard to disprove. No statement in science (unless you include mathematics in science) are "proved" in the strict sense. Trial by fire is the rule: if the statement survives tough challenges, you gain confidence in it.

Eventually, you end up with as much confidence in a statement as you should have when using Newton's laws to work out the path of a baseball.

Quote:
Your statement at the top about space never being a point needs clarification; if we view space-time as being created in the Big Bang then space could certainly have been a point. With the observed expansion of space-time there is no indication that it is expanding "into" anything at all.
Why could it not have come into being infinite in 4 dimensions (space x 3 and time x 1)? If the current extent of space is indeed infinite, then no amount of inflation could have inflated a point to infinite space.

Alot of current theories claim that space-time is infinite in at least one dimension (time), it doesn't seem that much of a stretch to assume that it is infinite in 4, especially with the current knowledge that the universe is not folded up within the observable radius.

My point is simply that saying "space started as a point that defined all that is" is overly strong. That is one of the theories.

Others include spacetime being an inflation of a relatively small area (from plank-area to something as huge as an atom or even more), the brane-collision model, just something that happens within blackholes, or many other quite decent theories.
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
Yakk is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 11:25 AM   #47 (permalink)
Insane
 
Phage's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakk
Suppose you had a theory that indicates that space is infinite, and has other corroborating things it also indicates. That is pretty strong evidence.
...
Alot of current theories claim that space-time is infinite in at least one dimension (time), it doesn't seem that much of a stretch to assume that it is infinite in 4, especially with the current knowledge that the universe is not folded up within the observable radius.
I can understand why some theories would say that time is infinite in the dimension of time, but what corroborates that? We already know that there was a start, and just because we have not come to an end does not mean that there will not be one. Sure, we cannot come up with a good reason for it to end (but then we don't really have a good reason for it to start anyway).

I take issue with your statement that nothing except mathematics in science is proven. For instance, anyone can go out and determine the boiling point of water at standard pressure. This is an observable phenomenon. Stating that the universe is infinite in size is not an observable phenomenon and cannot be proved correct, only disproved.

As you said, if theories are hard to disprove then your confidence in them becomes greater. However this only applies if it is reasonable that tests can be performed that would disprove the theory if it was wrong. An example of this in action: I propose that the center of the star Alpha Centauri A suddenly formed little green men last Tuesday. It is very difficult (impossible we presume) to disprove such a theory but it does not make any sense for us to gain confidence in it because of that.

Now look at the theory "Space is infinite in size." Is it within our capacity to disprove this theory? No, but it is also unreasonable to assume that it is within our capability at this time to disprove it were it false.

In any case, your point is well taken. Our discussion is based on current theories and views of the structure of the universe and are very likely to change as we progress. One day we may be looked back at in the same way we look back at those who believed that the world was flat.
Phage is offline  
 

Tags
expanding, universe


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360