Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-11-2004, 04:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
Insane
 
Bentley Little's Avatar
 
Location: In my head...
Embrionic Gender Selection

I was watching 60 Minutes and they had a segment on how couples could choose the gender of their baby with IVF (In-verto fertilization). It involves extensive medical procedures and only a handleful of doctors nationwide know how to do it properly.

My question is this: Are we playing God when we have the ability to chose the gender of our baby or our we just using the skills God gave us to do what we do as humans?
__________________
That is my 2 cents.
Bentley Little is offline  
Old 08-11-2004, 05:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: nyc
I don't feel that we are playing god, though i do question the practice in general -- i hope that we might look to china and learn from their mistakes in the area of gender selection. When a society that is rooted in sexual inequality is given the option of choosing the gender of their children (or as is the case in China reproduction is limited) gender diversity is often sacrificed.
brianna is offline  
Old 08-11-2004, 06:52 PM   #3 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: VT
I don't feel we are ever "playing god" because we are just furthering our knowledge and using it how we want. I don't think that the term "playing god" can really be applied to anything today, or anything in the near future. I think people use that term a little too loosely, because playing god would mean doing something that only god could do, which is basically things we don't know, so... bleh I'm rambling. Anyways, I think it's fine, as long as it's not abused, and I don't believe in a god or all powerful being. Science is the answer, and what we have here, is science.
Sp0rAdiC is offline  
Old 08-11-2004, 08:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
Insane
 
Yeah, it's not "playing God"

we've been doing things like this in a macro scale for a long time. it may be different regarding your religious belief but if you believe animals are creations too, then we have been breeding dogs for centuries. the point is human has long been known to take traits they like and don't like, through scientific process "choose". of course it's quite different in the scientific sense as we directly alter a human's trait (the sex) but the fundemental idea of altering traits for ones own preferences has been done for a long time. i don't think it's playing God as much as playing "nature" for being the "selection factor" or if you study eco. for driving the "directional naturual selection".
orphen is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 09:03 AM   #5 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Well I think that you are asking entirely the wrong question, and it is for that very reason that I am firmly of the belief that religion and god should be kept entirely out of ethical discussions and politics (ha! yeah right! as if! Silly naive Flim!)

To show this, imagine I answered your question with "Yes. It would be 'playing God'; so what!?"

The questions we should be asking about matters like this is "should be allow parents to choose the gender of their child? If so, why? If not, why not? What are the potential pros and cons. Is a future going down such a path a desirable one or not?" We need to tackle the situation head on, based on its merrits not through a useless conduit of "god".

These matters are indeed vital and should be discussed in depth, without the need to resort to mystical "gods". This is too important to allow religion to mess it up.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 06:31 PM   #6 (permalink)
Insane
 
i like where you stand CSfilm but don't you agree science does need moral in a fundemental level? (i'm an atheist..) I frankly agree with you that religious dogmas/ rules SHOULD be left out of science but i still believe scientists need to be trained in ethics (yes, it does require training at times) or else the world may be quite dangerous with all these mad scientist threatenting to change our weather pattern. well maybe not that bad, but I think some ethics is needed only merely for perpetuating human existance and utilitarian happiness as long as the end result of good, i believe breaking a few laws set my this god fellow isn't such a bad deal. of course one may argue by breaking laws of god, you are bringing doom/misery to the human kind. now that's a point of stalemate for both sides of the arguement~ i think
orphen is offline  
Old 08-13-2004, 10:18 AM   #7 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Absolutely orphen! Nowhere in my post did I suggest that science should not be subjected to ethical considerations. But my point was that we can only get anywhere by asking the correct questions. Those involving god are not the correct questions.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 08-15-2004, 08:38 PM   #8 (permalink)
Happy as a hippo
 
StormBerlin's Avatar
 
Location: Southern California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bentley Little
I was watching 60 Minutes and they had a segment on how couples could choose the gender of their baby with IVF (In-verto fertilization). It involves extensive medical procedures and only a handleful of doctors nationwide know how to do it properly.

My question is this: Are we playing God when we have the ability to chose the gender of our baby or our we just using the skills God gave us to do what we do as humans?

If you would consider that "playing God" then something as cheezy as taking an aspirin for your headache would fall under "playing God" as well. All the aspirin does is mask the headache, it doesn't help you figure out why you have the headache in the first place. If you weren't supposed to have a headache, then you wouldn't. a lot of people would argue that your headache is a message that there's something wrong with your body. Forgive me if this is all broken up, I've had a drink or two. If there are any question, I can clarify
__________________
"if anal sex could get a girl pregnant i'd be tits deep in child support" Arcane
StormBerlin is offline  
Old 08-15-2004, 10:02 PM   #9 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormBerlin
If you would consider that "playing God" then something as cheezy as taking an aspirin for your headache would fall under "playing God" as well. All the aspirin does is mask the headache, it doesn't help you figure out why you have the headache in the first place. If you weren't supposed to have a headache, then you wouldn't. a lot of people would argue that your headache is a message that there's something wrong with your body. Forgive me if this is all broken up, I've had a drink or two. If there are any question, I can clarify
I completely agree. the notion of playing God is not that new in this sense. If you ever read Angel and Demon you might remember one scene in which one of the characters with relgious parents would not allow him to recieve antibiotic for his disease. they said God will decide the outcome of you ailment; all you need is faith and all that. Although the debate here is on a radically different scale but hte foundation and advancement of medical science is giving human more power over his/her own life.

Thus depending on your religious belief, what "playing God" is can be defined very differently. As I posted before, I personally believe control over our own life should not be tabooed due ot religious reasons.
orphen is offline  
Old 08-16-2004, 01:23 AM   #10 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: In this weak human flesh
Quote:
My question is this: Are we playing God when we have the ability to chose the gender of our baby or our we just using the skills God gave us to do what we do as humans?
Are we neatly sidestepping the issue of whether the foetus is sentient* or not here? 'Cause IMO it's where the action's at. Ethically speaking, if you believe the foetus is human, then it's a form of child abuse.

But, to answer your question: how are we playing god? I'd argue manipulating the gender of your child isn't divine. There's very little miracle to it, simply scientific rituals. Making an infertile person fertile is closer to biblical examples of god dabbling in midwifery, and deeply more miraculous.


*For my own ethical purposes, I only place moral value in sentience. You may say "human" or "a person", you get the idea?
__________________
"Don't take any guff from these swine"
Techno is offline  
Old 08-16-2004, 04:33 AM   #11 (permalink)
Oh dear God he breeded
 
Seer666's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bentley Little
I was watching 60 Minutes and they had a segment on how couples could choose the gender of their baby with IVF (In-verto fertilization). It involves extensive medical procedures and only a handleful of doctors nationwide know how to do it properly.

My question is this: Are we playing God when we have the ability to chose the gender of our baby or our we just using the skills God gave us to do what we do as humans?
Of course we are. We were made in His image. We're just learning the tools of the trade that we are to inherit.
__________________
Bad spellers of the world untie!!!

I am the one you warned me of

I seem to have misplaced the bullet with your name on it, but I have a whole box addressed to occupant.
Seer666 is offline  
Old 08-16-2004, 04:48 AM   #12 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Since there isn't any "god" it's not about playing god.
I think abortion is a better thing to do than have children but if one absolutely must have children there's no reason why one shouldn't choose traits, as possible. Perhaps that will cause people to like them a bit more more and care more about them and perhaps even take better care of them - given the supremely egoistic and self-centered thing parenting is. Who knows.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 08-21-2004, 02:13 PM   #13 (permalink)
Insane
 
Bentley Little's Avatar
 
Location: In my head...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seer666
Of course we are. We were made in His image. We're just learning the tools of the trade that we are to inherit.
That's an interesting angle...something to think about.
__________________
That is my 2 cents.
Bentley Little is offline  
Old 09-01-2004, 12:31 PM   #14 (permalink)
Upright
 
I think there is nothing wrong or unethical about wanting to select the gender of one's child. There would be something wrong with someone else (like the gov't) selecting the gender one's child. FYI- the topic is discussed at the national level here -http://www.bioethics.gov/
kirth gersen is offline  
 

Tags
embrionic, gender, selection

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:01 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360