Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-10-2003, 11:34 PM   #81 (permalink)
lascivious
 
Mantus's Avatar
 
I hope I am not hijacking this thread, but omniscience does tie into free will so I guess it is relevant.

:::OshnSoul:::,

Omniscience is infinite knowledge. It is knowledge of everything past, present and future. Omniscience also means having knowledge of all possibilities and their past, present and future.

As god is infinite he is able to experience infinity. God's omniscience means that god already has knowledge of the experience of infinity. Now omniscient knowledge would not be as our knowledge. Our memory is vague and corrupt; while omniscient knowledge would be the equivalent of the experience. An omniscient being already knows what the experience would be like down to every single detail in all possibilities.

"In order to know your Self, to know what "You are" you must have what "You are not".

That would be a contradiction of omniscience, as one would already know the experience of not having omniscience.

“Couldn't He still choose to experience Himself, even if He knew the outcomes?”

Yes an omniscient god could, though the drive behind this would be questionable. As god would already have the knowledge of experiencing things with the knowledge of the outcome.

It’s rather perplexing; I don’t pretend to have the answers.
Mantus is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 11:37 AM   #82 (permalink)
:::OshnSoul:::
Guest
 
I can't pretend to have the answers, either- but I know within that we all do have the answers. They are not just lying around out there waiting for us to find them.
Ok, so- Does God have Free Will? Well, if you do believe that God gave us Free Will, then He would have that Free Will to give us. He can't give us something He doesn't have (and He has (is) everything, therefore He has given us everything.)
Now, so that this may make a little more sense- (this is my Truth, just stating it, not expecting you to make it your Truth)
God's Free Will, then, is Our Free Will. Hence, we share this Free Will equally. It's like bearing a child and giving them your traits or looks.
Now- even though God may be all-knowing, He still has the Free Will to choose to experience everything. He decided that what a better way to experience it than to create offspring and have Himself be experienced through a physical manner.
You can know that if you drop a ball, it will bounce back up, but you don't know the "feeling" of it until you actually experience doing it. And there are infinite outcomes of the ball bouncing, depending on how you let it bounce, where you bounce it, and what you do when it comes back up. God knows all of that, yet chose to experience it all to "feel" it all.
Now, what may not make sense yet, is if humans have made the choice to kill, then I'm saying that God also chosen that? Well, yes, in a sense. God will not hinder on our free will to choose. Yet God would make the Highest Choice (by not killing?) but that we don't listen to that Highest Choice, often ignoring it. He lets us make these choices in order for us to experience and evolve on our own pace. If He told us what to do, we wouldn't have free will, and He wouldn't either. Then there would be no sense in the physical experience of Life. God just communicates with us in every moment of every day- and the number one way He chooses to do that (the most effective) IS experience.
And, as far as my quote: In order to know your Self, to know what "You are" you must have what "You are not".
God is all- All that Is and All that Is Not. but He wanted to experience the polarities of Himself. Therefore, that is exactly what we are doing. Experiencing Who We Are and Who We Are Not. And God is experiencing All of that through us.
Don't you think that's possible? That God chose to experience Himself, even if He is omniscient? Afterall, He is God. Why can't God Be and Do anything and everything? Then He wouldn't be omnipotent.
 
Old 12-14-2003, 03:26 PM   #83 (permalink)
lascivious
 
Mantus's Avatar
 
You know for while there I almost bought Sho Nuff’s argument.

Then I realized something. How does something without free will know that it doesn’t have it?

Free will depends on the ability to choose. Yet this ability to choose will not be exercised if there is only one path to take. If one knows what a person is going to do then one gives that person only one path to take.

From the person’s perspective it may seem that free will is in effect and indeed the person will be making a choice; a choice that is already determined by the existence just one option. The other paths become an allusion, for there is only one possible choice.

This becomes even more self-evident if one acquires the knowledge of what choice oneself will make. If one has such knowledge then (unlike the movies) the future cannot be changed. Otherwise it one would have knowledge of an outcome, rather then a choice.

So if god is omniscient, then god has knowledge of all choices, therefore god has the power to choice, yet has just one path to chose from.

So in my view Kyo's argument retains the upper hand.



:::OshnSoul:::,
An omniscient being cannot say: “Gee, I wonder what it would be like to experience being a human?” An omniscient god would already know. I think that you are looking at it from a limited human perspective. Our imperfect memory cannot replicate an experience in all its detail. An omniscient deity on the other hand would have perfect knowledge of an experience, knowledge that would be equal to the real experience. We should start a new thread or something on the motivations of god. =D



Finally I offer a new argument against a god with free will.

God is supremely good. If a god is supremely good then god cannot make the choice of evil. Therefore god has limited free will.
Mantus is offline  
Old 12-14-2003, 10:38 PM   #84 (permalink)
:::OshnSoul:::
Guest
 
^^^^Where did I say that??? In no way did I mention that an omniscient God was curious or wondered- I said that God CHOSE to experience Himself. Please read carefully.
He Knows Everything, yet CHOSE/CHOOSES to experience it fully. Does that make sense?

Last edited by :::OshnSoul:::; 12-14-2003 at 10:41 PM..
 
Old 12-15-2003, 06:20 AM   #85 (permalink)
Crazy
 
But why would an omniscient being choose to experience something when its omniscience makes it just as if it already did? I think that's what Mantus is trying to say.
__________________
-radonman
radonman is offline  
Old 12-15-2003, 12:04 PM   #86 (permalink)
:::OshnSoul:::
Guest
 
The difference here is that our human perception of this is that we have "forgotten" all of this- all of what we know- and we are here to "remember" it. Therefore, we don't think in terms of an omniscient being, so it is hard for us to imagine that "God" would choose to do that.
I am not out to prove anything here- only trying to broaden the minds of others and consider that:
God is ALL. God is All that Is and All that Is Not. God is the Essence of EVERY SINGLE grain of Life Itself and that God is Infinite. Humans have a hard time comprehending the magnitude of "God's" Being. That we can't understand things like His Free Will and His Choice to experience Himself.
Let's Look at it this way:
Billions of years ago- There's God- just the Essence of Him with no Earth, no Humans, no Living things, no anything.....He knows everything of Himself- that is His essence that is just BEing, yet He's getting "bored" just BEing. He wants to create. He wants to Experience Himself in magnitudes and infinite planes and levels and forms and dimensions of his Being. God said "Let there be Life" and BANG (as we know it the Big Bang Theory) where everything is created with one Big Bang. Life is created. His "offspring" was born.
You ask why? I ask WHY NOT? It's GOD!! God can do anything! If God wants to experience Himself, then He will! Why does it have to be questioned? We are still also thinking in terms of us being seperate from God- that God is superior and that God is an outward source from Us- out there....somewhere.....Everything He created is of Him.

We are the essence of God, therefore, there is no need to consider God seperate from us. Also, Viewing (experiencing) Himself in infinite forms and ways creates such an Infinite Universe so magnificent, it is hard for us to fathom the magnitude-that is why we question it.

There is a difference is knowing all and knowing the experience of all. That is where some people get confused. Omniscience is knowing all, but that is seperate from experience of knowing all. God at one time KNEW He was God- that He was Infinite and Omnipotent. So- He chose to experience BEing Infinite and Omnipotent.
 
Old 12-16-2003, 03:00 AM   #87 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
Quote:
Originally posted by Mantus
Finally I offer a new argument against a god with free will.

God is supremely good. If a god is supremely good then god cannot make the choice of evil. Therefore god has limited free will.
I think free will is defined as the ability to choose one's course of action free from outside influence. Since sin is to miss the mark, I would claim that it is analogous to not perfectly effecting one's will.

Thus, a deity with perfect free will would be free from the constraints that restrict one's will. The inability to commit evil (the opposition to a good will) doesn't limit one's will, but rather allows the ability to effect one's will perfectly. I don't agree that diminishes one's freedom--it actually allows it.
smooth is offline  
Old 12-16-2003, 10:32 AM   #88 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally posted by Mantus
[B
Finally I offer a new argument against a god with free will.

God is supremely good. If a god is supremely good then god cannot make the choice of evil. Therefore god has limited free will. [/B]
You would first have to prove the existence of good and evil. Last i heard the good and evil were in the eyes of the beholder.
filtherton is offline  
Old 12-16-2003, 11:31 AM   #89 (permalink)
lascivious
 
Mantus's Avatar
 
Quote:
I think free will is defined as the ability to choose one's course of action free from outside influence. Since sin is to miss the mark, I would claim that it is analogous to not perfectly effecting one's will.
So gods has freedom but god’s will is supremely strong. Very enlightening, thank you smooth.

Though this brings up a question. Is supreme free will determined by the lack of all outside as well as internal influence or just outside influence? Certainly if one has an inclination, that inclination cannot be the result of oneself.

If god is supremely good from the start then he is controlled by an inclination. On the other hand if god’s goodness were a choice, then god would not be supremely good by nature. This brings us to the question of omnipotence. If god gives himself a command to be supremely good, can he break it? Why would he break it? Well since there is no natural inclination to be good, god can just as well be evil, as a being without any inclination is simply neutral.

Quote:
You would first have to prove the existence of good and evil. Last i heard the good and evil were in the eyes of the beholder.
Could not agree more filtherton and certainly one could not exist without the other. That doest mean I cannot use the common theoretical descriptions of a theoretical being to come up with theoretical arguments
Mantus is offline  
Old 12-16-2003, 05:43 PM   #90 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
Quote:
Originally posted by Mantus
So gods has freedom but god?s will is supremely strong. Very enlightening, thank you smooth.

Though this brings up a question. Is supreme free will determined by the lack of all outside as well as internal influence or just outside influence? Certainly if one has an inclination, that inclination cannot be the result of oneself.

If god is supremely good from the start then he is controlled by an inclination. On the other hand if god?s goodness were a choice, then god would not be supremely good by nature. This brings us to the question of omnipotence. If god gives himself a command to be supremely good, can he break it? Why would he break it? Well since there is no natural inclination to be good, god can just as well be evil, as a being without any inclination is simply neutral.



Could not agree more filtherton and certainly one could not exist without the other. That doest mean I cannot use the common theoretical descriptions of a theoretical being to come up with theoretical arguments
Ooh, I hope I don't get too metaphysical for my own good

Good question.

I should have defined a free will as one which is uninfluenced by any forces outside the will itself.

I define sin or evilness as a contradiction of that will--nothing more. I don't define it in terms of the subjective judgements of the consequences of the act.

Therefore, I claim that a free will can not (or maybe will not by its own accord) go against itself (i.e., sin).

There is no natural inclination to be good or evil. Those are our subjective interpretations. In fact, the christian and Jewish Scriptures plainly state that their deity created both the "good" and the "evil" to effect the deity's will.

The only natural inclination, as I understand it, is to follow one's will if one is free to do so. No command to be "good" exists to be given and, as such, no command could or would be broken.

EDIT: I'm not being facetious but I am not willing to cede the point that one's inclination can not be the result of one's nature (which is how I would understand the phrase, "the result of oneself"). If you have a logical proof of that, I would like to see it. I'm not sure where you would derive it from, however, because I think the Western ethicists would claim that inclinations do come from a thing's nature.

Last edited by smooth; 12-16-2003 at 05:49 PM..
smooth is offline  
 

Tags
free, god


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360