Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-14-2003, 05:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
what is evil

what is evil for that matter what is good


i have no answer to this question other then to say they are terms we humans came up with to explain the complex in simple terms
dragon2fire is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 06:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
Evil is an action against another that is destructive, intentional (in some weird cases it could be un-intentional), and meant to hurt or offend someone. It is just cold to think that evil doesn't exist, as well as just plain stupid. Sure one could argue that its a notion concieved by man, but it is also an action created by man. In the grand scheme of things, for our "existence", there has to be balance thus you have good and evil.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 09:27 AM   #3 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
...Sure one could argue that its a notion concieved by man, but it is also an action created by man...
What's you point?

It is a concept concieved of men. It is an action committed by men. How that that prove that it's not a social construct?
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 09:37 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Louisville, KY
Evil is when a human lives by a certain set of choices, knowing full well that another suffers for it, knowingly or unknowingly, despite having alternatives. Good is when the human lives by the alternative choices, even if that puts him/her at a disadvantage over those who chose the path of evil.

Evil can be manifested in the tiniest of decisions. You see someone drop a dollar and not notice, so you pick it up - do you return it to its rightful owner, or pocket it? They will never notice its gone, so why not keep it? A lack of moral principles, or a tendency to often bend them, leads people to evil.
__________________
You do not use a Macintosh, instead you use a Tandy
Kompressor break your glowstick, Kompressor eat your candy
Kompressor open jaws, Kompressor release ants
Kompressor watch you scream, Because Kompressor does not dance

Last edited by Nefir; 07-15-2003 at 09:39 AM..
Nefir is offline  
Old 07-21-2003, 01:41 AM   #5 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Your opinion on the definition of evil is just that, an opinion. What is good, what is evil... what is pious, what is impious... right vs. wrong...

These are questions that have no universal answers. Each person has their own answer, and while society influences what we believe, we're individuals with our differing views on things
syquestrd270 is offline  
Old 07-21-2003, 06:22 AM   #6 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Interesting that you all put this in human only terms.

Or is that a limitation of this argument?
Akuma7g is offline  
Old 07-21-2003, 06:41 AM   #7 (permalink)
My future is coming on
 
lurkette's Avatar
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: east of the sun and west of the moon
I think you can define an action or an outcome as "evil", but I'm not sure I believe in evil as a concept, as a force that "causes" people to behave in certain ways. I would think there are much more rational, empirical ways to identify the causes of behavior. Then again, I hear some stories that make me think twice about that and wonder how a human could ever be so twisted.
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."

- Anatole France
lurkette is offline  
Old 07-21-2003, 09:01 AM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Autonomous Zone
Personally, I subscribe to the utilitarian theory of ethics. Since I am not a philosopher, I'll quote wikipedia:

Utilitarianism is both a metaethical doctrine, and a theory in normative ethics. Utilitarianism holds, in its simplest form, that "the good" is whatever yields the greatest "utility". Utility has been understood in different ways - happiness, pleasure, preference-satisfaction, etc. - but it is always a naturalistic conception of an individual's good. As a metaethical doctrine, it holds that "whatever yields the greatest utility" is the meaning of the word "good" (thus it is a naturalistic theory of metaethics); while as a normative theory, it merely holds that "whatever yields the greatest utility" is in fact good, whatever the meaning of the word "good" may be.


Basically, a good act is one which causes the greastest amount of pleasure to most people*, while an evil one causes the greatest amount of pain.

*Some, myself included, would include animals.

[edit] linky
http://utilitarian.org/one.html


Last edited by Pennington; 07-21-2003 at 09:08 AM..
Pennington is offline  
Old 07-26-2003, 07:05 AM   #9 (permalink)
COMPLETED and A TRAINER
 
Location: BEAN_TOWN
man is evil, and life is good.
For if there were no life, how could there be evil?
__________________
LEATHER, LATEX and LACE "SSC"
"Nothing That Gives Pleasure is Bad"

Quality is for those who know
what they want and are at peace with what they have.

"S/M is about emotion; the erotic tension between my impulse toward something and my resistance against it."-- Virginia Barker

i8one2 is offline  
Old 07-26-2003, 09:43 AM   #10 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Texas
Quote:
Originally posted by Pennington
Basically, a good act is one which causes the greastest amount of pleasure to most people*, while an evil one causes the greatest amount of pain.
First things first, I know next to nothing about Utilitarianism, although I did browse the link you provided a bit. Unfortunatly, I just don't have it in me today to take it in properly. So-the above statement sounds like mob rule, to me. Is that the case?


back to the thread, now. For me, good and evil are dependent on the person. That is, it's an attribute we arbitraily assign as individuals, and the declaration of anything to be 'good' or 'evil' has no berring on the worth of the action/object/person etc. To put a fine point on it, I basicaly agree with syquestrd270.
__________________
" ' Big Mouth.
Remember it took three of you to kill me.
A god, a boy, and, last and least, a hero.' "
Pellaz is offline  
Old 07-26-2003, 11:33 AM   #11 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Hong Kong.
Good and evil are social convention.

Take, for example, a hypothetical "evil" society in which the two are reversed. Good would be... well, not "evil" probably, just plain stupid. Evil would, however, be good. And hey, why not?
Jaron is offline  
Old 07-26-2003, 01:24 PM   #12 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Autonomous Zone
Quote:
Originally posted by Pellaz
So-the above statement sounds like mob rule, to me. Is that the case?
Every action causes pain or/and pleasure to some degree to everyone envolved. If there was someone who was completly moral and did absolutly everything to maximise the amount of pleasure to pain, he would have to look deeply at everything he did to understand if it was morally right or wrong. Nobody does this. Utilitarianism simply states that if you have the choice between helping someone and hurting someone, than its morally right to help someone and morally wrong to hurt someone. If you have the choice of causing 1000 people harm or 15 people the same amount of harm, than its morally right to cause 15 people harm. But nobody forces you to do the morally right thing. The only thing you'll have to live with is your own conscience.
Pennington is offline  
Old 07-26-2003, 03:28 PM   #13 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Texas
Ok, that's much clearer to me, thanks much.
__________________
" ' Big Mouth.
Remember it took three of you to kill me.
A god, a boy, and, last and least, a hero.' "
Pellaz is offline  
Old 07-26-2003, 03:29 PM   #14 (permalink)
Upright
 
If you want to do some reading on the subject check out Evil: Inside Human Violence and Cruelty by Roy Baumeister. It's appears to be well researched and supported, and is very interesting, if somewhat depressing. I can't really summarize in a forum post, but among the main points are that "pure evil" is primarily a myth and most instances that look that way are distorted in media reports, victim accounts, and even just the perceptions of those hearing about them.
SomeDude is offline  
Old 07-26-2003, 03:51 PM   #15 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
thanks, Pennington - clear, concise, to the point, and indisputable.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-26-2003, 04:08 PM   #16 (permalink)
mepitans
Guest
 
evil is the opposite is good. Without good, there is no evil. Eliminate the good.
 
Old 07-27-2003, 02:58 AM   #17 (permalink)
Crazy
 
subjective
nulltype is offline  
Old 07-27-2003, 03:37 AM   #18 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Autonomous Zone
Quote:
Originally posted by nulltype
subjective
This is somewhat true, Hilter thought that he was doing humanity good by getting rid of tha parasitic races and some neo nazis today feel that he was morally right in killing millions of people. People that they see as less than human. That's the key though, they see them as less than human, and therefore aren't considered when maximizing utility. We know that what he did was wrong and evil, but some future society might see our killing of animals and fetuses as horrible and unforgivable acts against civilization. But to talk about what is "right" and "wrong" we have to be able to look at it objectivly and utilitarinism is the best system to do so, in my opinion.
Pennington is offline  
Old 07-27-2003, 12:23 PM   #19 (permalink)
Crazy
 
evil is what hurts society and good is what makes society better. They are both terms made to make people understand what is better and worse for society as a working unit.
TawG is offline  
Old 07-27-2003, 10:02 PM   #20 (permalink)
Archangel of Change
 
I don't think good or evil exists. It is just something humans made up. Take animals for example:

One animal kills another of the same species. Is that evil? I don't think so. One animal steals from another of the same species. Is that evil? I don't think so. For some reason, people have to think of humans as "better" than everything else. That is part of the power behind religion. It makes people feel special, and therefore better than animals. People like to feel superior because it feels good. They may not realise their desire to feel superior, but if you ask them if humans are above animals, they will say yes. Sure humans are more complex than other animals, but the level of complexity doesn't determine the worthiness of a living thing. Nothing deserves to life more than anything else. How does this have to do with the topic? Good is superior to evil. People like to be good, because it means they are better people than the evil people. They call people evil so that there is a living manifestation of the inferior that is evil. Everyone probably feels they are a better person than Hitler (with the exception of neo-nazis). It is build into you to want to be better than someone else. You want to be good, because it is better than evil. That is possibly one reason behind the concepts of good and evil. Right and wrong are different things.

I subscibe to the "greater good" way of looking at things. Everyone sees the world differently so there is no true definition for good or evil.
hobo is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 12:34 AM   #21 (permalink)
Crazy
 
evil was given a name when someone didnt get their way
good was born when someone wanted to feel better about themself

actions described by the words are opinions
example:
generally, i think we can agree that itd be evil to mutilate someone
generally, its not considered evil to kill someone who is attempting to cause harm to others. can be considered good(defense)
but if you kill someone whos about to kill 500 other people, and you then proceed to mutilate his corpse, its debatable
you just saved people, but youre being indulgeant in your affairs there with the hacking and whatnot.
__________________
cough

Last edited by maxero; 07-28-2003 at 12:37 AM..
maxero is offline  
Old 07-30-2003, 09:36 PM   #22 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Pennington
This is somewhat true, Hilter thought that he was doing humanity good by getting rid of tha parasitic races and some neo nazis today feel that he was morally right in killing millions of people. People that they see as less than human. That's the key though, they see them as less than human, and therefore aren't considered when maximizing utility. We know that what he did was wrong and evil, but some future society might see our killing of animals and fetuses as horrible and unforgivable acts against civilization. But to talk about what is "right" and "wrong" we have to be able to look at it objectivly and utilitarinism is the best system to do so, in my opinion.
We <i>think</i> that what he did was wrong and evil. I suppose what we really think is that his assumptions were wrong and his actions were illogical. That his race was not superior, and had no right to kill the inferior races. Obviously if we agreed that this was the right path, we would not consider him to be evil. I don't think anyone can truly say that something is good or evil because there is no objective way to view such a thing. It is an inherently subjective judgement, a matter of opinion. Even if everyone agreed that something was good or evil, that does not make it objective fact. I didn't really understand your last sentance, I am unfamiliar with utilitarinism.

Then again, I think there's some law that once someone mentions Hitler on a thread, further discussion is pointless.

I'm not arguing that good and evil don't exist (they exist as much as other human constructs). Just that they are subjective.
nulltype is offline  
Old 07-31-2003, 01:10 PM   #23 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: SE USA
Godwin's Law. I'm fairly sure it is not properly applied to discussions of philosophy, more that it is applied to flames.
Moonduck is offline  
Old 07-31-2003, 02:09 PM   #24 (permalink)
Rookie
 
cliche's Avatar
 
Location: Oxford, UK
Moonduck - in which case the thread is over? Just when it was getting interesting

My question is: does anyone who is truly evil believe themselves to be so? And if they don't, what does this mean to those who say that morality is objective?
__________________
I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones. -- John Cage (1912 - 1992)
cliche is offline  
Old 08-02-2003, 11:09 AM   #25 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: SE USA
Morality is objective. It is objective simply because, by definition, morality is a societally-defined set of accepted behaviours. Whether an individual believes themselves evil or not is irrelevant. It is society at large that decides where one fall on the good-evil axis.
Moonduck is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 01:17 AM   #26 (permalink)
Rookie
 
cliche's Avatar
 
Location: Oxford, UK
Moonduck - morality is objective but defined by society? Does this mean there are multiple objective moralities, one for each society with different rules?
__________________
I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones. -- John Cage (1912 - 1992)
cliche is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 09:59 PM   #27 (permalink)
Tilted
 
evil is opening a hot coke
xman is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 06:30 AM   #28 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: kyle
what is moral or evil is largely determined by what particular normative ethical theory you subscribe to.
Posting a picture of a 19 year old female with a dildo stuck in her pussy on the TFP would be moral to a utilitarian (in the sense that the degredation of one 19 year old is far offset by the pleasure derived by 3,000 TFP viewers)
But a person subscribing to Kantian ethics would ask "would I want my sister or daughter picture posted here?" and conclude that it was imoral or evil
Brdd99boy is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 12:31 PM   #29 (permalink)
Upright
 
People do what makes them happy.

Thats it.

It makes US Marines happy to roll into Iraq. Plus they get paid decently.

It made the 911 hijackers happy to take out their rage on America.

It made the firefighters who went in and bravely died happy to fight fires and help people inside.

It made the businesspeople inside happy to be making money, probably regardless of how they went about doing it.

Once thats taken care of its all a matter of majority opinion and whether not the way you get your kicks happens to seriously impede somone else's.
32v4c is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 03:13 PM   #30 (permalink)
Upright
 
It is my belief that there is no absolute good or evil unless there exists some greater metaphysical truth that rationalizes absolute good or evil.

Interestingly enough, a study proposes that intelligent people tend towards altruism ("good") and less intelligent people tend towards selfishness ("evil.") On another note, various cultures do share similar conceptions of good and evil. The sanctity of life, for instance, is respected (or at least recognised, hence the pleasure/displeasure taken when defiling it) by most.
orbital is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:50 PM   #31 (permalink)
mepitans
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally posted by orbital
It is my belief that there is no absolute good or evil unless there exists some greater metaphysical truth that rationalizes absolute good or evil.

Interestingly enough, a study proposes that intelligent people tend towards altruism ("good") and less intelligent people tend towards selfishness ("evil.") On another note, various cultures do share similar conceptions of good and evil. The sanctity of life, for instance, is respected (or at least recognised, hence the pleasure/displeasure taken when defiling it) by most.
More intellegent people are more "good" because they have switched their view from egocentric, to ethnocentric, to sociocentric, to maybe even world centric. Meaning, they can understand the perspective of theirselves, their own race, their society, then eventually all beings on earth and possibly higher.

Less intellegent people don't develop those views, hence the selfishness
 
Old 08-08-2003, 08:50 AM   #32 (permalink)
Insane
 
sin is evil, good is much harder to define
__________________
winning isn't everything but
losing isn't anything
sportsrule101 is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 06:00 PM   #33 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Canada and I love it here
evil is richard simmons
__________________
Beauty can be found in the darkest day and on the darkest hour and even in the darkest mind
Lassus is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 07:47 PM   #34 (permalink)
Addict
 
hiredgun's Avatar
 
I think too many people have this shifty, slimy view that good and evil are entirely malleable constructions created in their entirety by man and molded by society. I tend to think that while a "societal" or "majority" view is important, that good and evil are still something more absolute than the notions held by "most people".
hiredgun is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 08:13 PM   #35 (permalink)
Fledgling Dead Head
 
krwlz's Avatar
 
Location: Clarkson U.
Evil is relative....
krwlz is offline  
Old 08-14-2003, 02:48 PM   #36 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Tigerland
Evil is when people continue to do what they know to be wrong.

or

Evil is what happens when good people refuse to act.
Easytiger is offline  
Old 08-14-2003, 03:09 PM   #37 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by Easytiger
Evil is when people continue to do what they know to be wrong.

or

Evil is what happens when good people refuse to act.
what is "wrong"? what is "good"?

Talk about skirting the issue!
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 08-14-2003, 05:42 PM   #38 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Evil is that which is in direct contradiction to what is good.

Good varies greatly.
Xell101 is offline  
Old 08-14-2003, 05:44 PM   #39 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by Xell101
Evil is that which is in direct contradiction to what is good.

Good varies greatly.
so therefore evil varies greatly.

stop with the non-answers already!
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 08-14-2003, 05:58 PM   #40 (permalink)
mepitans
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Moonduck
Morality is objective. It is objective simply because, by definition, morality is a societally-defined set of accepted behaviours. Whether an individual believes themselves evil or not is irrelevant. It is society at large that decides where one fall on the good-evil axis.
There is morality above society. Do a quick read on Kohlberg's 6 stages of moral development. I personally think that there is no good or evil. What people mistake for good is for lack of a better word, love.
 
 

Tags
evil


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:10 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360