The dumb Grand Field Theory
 

Bear with me, I have to create a visual for this: Think of a plant that grows two lightbulb like appendages off of a tall stalk (a streetlight-plant!), and each carries a representation of a form of thought and everything that form says is true. The stalk combines them and energizes them with, let's say, reality.




In one bulb we have, Science: The What and How.
Under that, Evolution: the Mechanics of creation


on the other bulb, Philosophy: The How and Why.
Under this, Creationism: the creation itself




Both of these bulbs are connected to this single assumption that creation (reality) exists. And so it does. Duh, indeed? :thumbsup:

The What, postulated by the science-ists, are the clues that form their How(s), how the universe came to be this, this thing that it is.

The Creationists don't really focus on the What, but have a lot to say about "How"s, and Philosophy in general has to do with the "Why", yes?





So, here's your stupid Grand Field Theory

Man: Thought is spectral?
God: Your world is singular
--------and the Universe only follows itself.

Man: Conservation of Mass and Energy is the answer!
God: ...
Man: WHY is life, then?
God: Life IS.
Man: That's not an answer
God: I'm God and what I say goes. :P
...
Man: So what do I do about it?
God: THAT is out of my jurisdiction.


:grumpy: :expressionless: :)