06-19-2003, 07:13 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Brook Cottage, Lanark, Scotland
|
Entertainment is too vague a term . . . does it only include things that make us smile? Or perhaps 'serious' art too?
__________________
Where your talents and the needs of the world cross . . there lies your vocation. |
06-19-2003, 09:01 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Practical Anarchist
Location: Yesterday i woke up stuck in hollywood
|
i think you need to define entertainment more, im entertained by my wallpaper, which is completly separte from western culture
__________________
The Above post is a direct quote from Shakespeare |
07-11-2003, 02:10 AM | #12 (permalink) |
Upright
|
Entertainment is a double-edged sword. It is both the "bread and circuses" method of controlling public opinion, and also a necessary stress release from the drudgery of modern workaholic life. Your entertainment is basically leisure time at whatever activity you choose to participate in. I, for one, consider most entertainment media nowadays to be a tad too much of the numbness persuasion.
|
07-11-2003, 06:29 AM | #13 (permalink) |
My future is coming on
Moderator Emeritus
Location: east of the sun and west of the moon
|
Is tribal dancing as much entertainment as reading a Harry Potter book? Do you make a distinction between active (physical such as dance or sport, mental such as game playing) and passive (television, to some extent internet) entertainment?
I think the crux of most entertainment is that it transports people beyond their immediate situation. I wonder if anybody has an antropological/social evolutionary perspective on this - what was the role of entertainment for our earliest ancestors, vs. the role it has assumed now? I agree with ARTelevision that (to paraphrase - hope I get the essence of your statement right) entertainment keeps "the masses" from rebelling by giving them an outlet for (or perhaps masking) the dissatisfaction with their lives necessarily created by living in a repressive and power-unbalanced hegemony. If Marx had ever seen a television he would have thought that it, not religion, was the opiate of the masses. I think entertainment can either be liberating and transcendent, or it can be repressive and controlling, depending on the type of entertainment and the disposition of the persons engaging in it.
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing." - Anatole France |
Tags |
entertainment… |
|
|