04-22-2005, 05:58 PM
|
#81 (permalink)
|
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by balderdash111
Gah!!!
I am so sick of this, so I am not going to bother trying to figure out what you are saying here.
|
And yet you write on.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by balderdash111
FYI, the NIST is going to release a new report this spring in which it explains the WTC7 collapse in greater detail. Among their findings (surprise!) there was more damage to the South facade of WTC7 than was originally realized
|
Oh so you've read the report that's coming out in the spring. Can I borrow you're time machine when you're done with it? I really want to meet Jesus.
Quote:
Originally Posted by balderdash111
Wait....of course they'll say that now b/c they are part of the conspiracy!
|
Yikes. Get decaf next time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by balderdash111
I just re-read the NOVA piece and the Popular Mechanics piece on the WTC attacks. These address and refute each of the points you endlessly repeat to support this conspiracy theory, and ni my opinion they do so convincingly.
|
I shut them all down earlier as I recall. But that was another thread. Perhapse I should do it again?
Quote:
Originally Posted by balderdash111
Nevertheless, it is quite clear will that you have no interest whatsoever in giving up this theory.
|
I'll give it up when it stops making sense. Until then, I will persue the truth.
|
|
|