![]() |
Quote:
Tuberculosis, diphtheria, cholera, malaria, typhoid... hell, the most common cause of death in third world infants is diarrhea. The first world probably has fewer instances of all these combined (except diarrhea) than HIV and AIDS. There are plenty of good viruses out there that are easier to stop in the West, kill in a far shorter time, spread more easily and they probably dont take a great stretch to become even more efficient at the hands of someone who knows how. Instead someone goes to the trouble of creating a new virus, one that potentially takes years to kill and is incurable in the West. "Some say that AIDS came from the monkeys, and I doubt that because we have been living with monkeys (since) time immemorial" Avian flu and SARS anyone? |
Quote:
She's a total dumb ass. I don't know how anyone could take her seriously after that line. A second year biology student should be able to explain it to her. |
What a pity.
I've kinda lost a lot of respect for her now. Oh well... Mr Mephisto |
Oh my god. I'm agreeing with Ustwo ;)
Yes, she is a dumbass. The idea that HIV is a bioweapon is dumbass. If you're gonna make a bioweapon, you make one that can survive outside the body for more than a few seconds. You make one that's spread by respiration, not sex - it's easy to avoid sex, it's not so easy to avoid breathing. You make one that spreads very fast and to multiple people from the primary source. i.e. AIDS can only be transmitted to one person at a time (unless you get really kinky). An effective bioweapon virus would be spreadable to an entire room of people at the same time from one person - i.e. an airborne virus. Finally, what possible motivation could anyone have for attacking poor people in Africa. They don't exactly hold a grip on anything in the world. If HIV were a bioweapon, it would have been released in the United States or the USSR - somewhere with a lot of influence that has targets people would actually give a crap about killing. |
Quote:
|
And the fact that we americans use condoms more than africans ;)
|
Quote:
There's also diamonds, gold, uranium, rubies, coal, copper, manganese, zinc, cocoa, coffee, timber and others. Quote:
|
[QUOTE=adysav]13 African countries are petroleum exporters.
There's also diamonds, gold, uranium, rubies, coal, copper, manganese, zinc, cocoa, coffee, timber and others.[QUOTE] Then why didn't we release it in Saudi Arabia and the other OPEC nations? If you hadn't noticed, we get a lot more oil from them, and they screw us over a lot more. As for the other imports, they don't add up to enough value from Africa alone to justify a massive bio attack on them. Why aren't we attacking other countries that export these products as well? It just doesn't add up. Quote:
|
Quote:
Wangari Maathai is an African hero, Nobel doesn't prescribe all winners to be Academics. Her statements may be naive at most and she deserves more respect that you give, she is working to help Africa. AIDS is on her doorstep, killing her children, friends and neighbours, it is eating Africa from the inside. And still she work for Africa, building, educating and sharing. She is growing Africa. Her statement may not have a seemlessly solid foundation, but it spells out her desperate need for understanding why her people are dying. How much has this bullshit Iraq war cost? How many HIV infected/poverty stricken families could have been helped for the price of one missile? It's disgusting and pointless what is happening. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Heh, I'm almost starting to believe this myself. |
Quote:
It appears as if I have contracted the virus, I must now go screw an under age virgin, then I shall be saved... At the same time people in the first world are out there being more fucking ignorant because they actually know about the shit. |
Quote:
You can keep making lame excuses for her if you like, but this is insane. |
Quote:
It is ridiculous to call her a lying politician, her work has nothing to do with politics. Suddenly the camera is on her and she had the opportunity to raise an important issue. The issue is Aids awareness. Admittedly (and understandeably) the issue is tainted with suspician of the west. Well who isn't suspicious of the West? |
This thread is about one post from being moved to "Paranoia"
|
Why wait. This one was overdue. Carry on.
|
Quote:
The scientific technology in the 1970's was nowhere near capable of engineering a completely new virus and it still isn't there today. At best, viruses can be engineered to be more pathogenic. Also, it was only recently that existing viruses whose genes and proteins are well understood could be made by "incubating" all of the correct genes in a tube to yield whole virions. But don't let science get in the way of your conspiracy theories. |
I wasn't aware that humans could create retroviruses... I was talking with my mom about this who has a degree in microbiology and biochemistry from UT, and she said as far as she knew, humans could slightly modify retroviruses, but since we can't create the necessary RNA for a retrovirus, what the woman put forth is rather kuckoo-brained and not based in factual science at all. If you think about it, if we could create retroviruses, we'd find a cure a lot quicker, because if you know how to make it, you'll also know how to unmake it.
|
Quote:
What do you know, you're just a scientist! Clearly people who've won the Nobel prize for planting trees and caring for Africa are far more competent talking about AIDS than you! :rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
She's not dumb, she just said a dumb thing. Lots of people have weird beliefs.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project