Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Paranoia (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-paranoia/)
-   -   Moon Landing... true or not?.. waht do you think? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-paranoia/15259-moon-landing-true-not-waht-do-you-think.html)

sipsake 08-06-2003 01:06 PM

Korean? Hehehe...wrong again! What are you...0 for 2 now?

Of course you didn't want to start an argument, you just wanted to claim someone was arrogant while stating you didn't care what anyone else thinks. Pretty much the definition of arrogance, eh?.

Sorry, I just couldn't pass up the irony in your post.

Cynthetiq 08-06-2003 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by deuce812
What does your name mean in Korean? Is that what you were going for? I believe you spelled it wrong if you were.

If you wouldn't have cut out half my message you would have saw I didn't want to read others opinions because I didn't want to start any arguements. Arguements can be good mm kay? But that is not the message I am trying to convey.

and if you bothered to read the thread you would have seen the messages that other people have tried to convey, and not just your single biased point of view. I read your message from top to bottom and the fact remains that since you didn't bother to respect other's opinions how do you expect them to respect yours?

deuce812 08-06-2003 01:11 PM

Sipsakei or something similiar in korean is swearing something, I have a korean friend from school that always says something similar.

No problem, I'm vain too.

lalalapi 08-06-2003 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mtsgsd

BTW, no one has mentioned that NASA actually has admitted to faking some still and movie shots. They say that it was necessary for the public because the originals were too poor a quality to be worth much. Hmmm.

Would you care to provide a link to verify your claim? I don't mean to sound like an arse, but it does not seem entirely implausible and therefore warrants the attention.

newmanator 08-09-2003 06:50 PM

omg people think we landed on the moon, lol thats funny stuff

mingusfingers 08-09-2003 10:08 PM

I think we did.

Lassus 08-10-2003 05:47 PM

lol my roomie belives no one has landed on the moon ever, but then she is partially blind in one eye from doing a acid tab in it,

go figure

Raw Kuts 08-10-2003 11:07 PM

"The astronaughts wanted the flag to wave, it seems it worked to well!" wasn't the argument. The argument was that because they knew a regular flag would just stay limp, they added another pole that extended horizontally from the top of the vertical pole. This horizontal pole supported the flag, and if it is not extended all the way, then the flag will be ruffled, and look like it is waving.

merkerguitars 08-11-2003 04:19 AM

Hell yes we did....like others said...the russians would of exposed it a long time ago and make a big fuss about it if we didn't....

JamesS 08-11-2003 11:26 PM

It would have come out by now in a more mainstream way if any part of the adventure had been manipulated, methinks.

sipsake 08-12-2003 05:12 AM

I've been suprised by the number of conspiracy theorists who believe it was faked.

TRPF 08-12-2003 12:32 PM

Then where did the Moon Rocks come from???


hehehe


I believe it did happen, but it does make for a funny idea though.

macthelist 08-12-2003 04:29 PM

Geez, I've seen the moonrocks. I'd hate to think I'm that naive...

348Dav 08-13-2003 12:00 AM

Its hard to form an opinion on this, because everytime you think you have figured it out, something new comes along that changes your perception.

iktoweya 08-13-2003 05:43 AM

after seeing this poll i was reminded of jim carey as loyd in dumb and dumber when he reads the article on the wall and yells " WE LANDED ON THE MOON!!!"

muckluck 08-13-2003 09:49 AM

I belive it did happen. But some of the movies look really fake. Like craters and mountains in the background look to be made of cardboard. And the flag looking like its waving in the wind, and the reflectons in the visor.

funbob 08-13-2003 10:06 AM

We landed on the moon, conspiracy theories aside, we landed. Of course that is just my opinion.

Beltruckus 08-13-2003 10:10 AM

I just ate a moon pie so they had to have been there :P

j/k i didn't but I do think they landed on the moon. And if I were one of the Astronauts i would be pissed that people think otherwise.

jumpingbeans 08-18-2003 12:05 PM

My, My...WE WERE ON THE MOON....

mastboy4 08-18-2003 02:47 PM

honest i have no idea if they Did land cuz people have been saying that it was staged and shit, but i mean behind every lie theres a bit of truth so maybe they did not land after all

morlock 08-18-2003 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Liquor Dealer
Some might call me naive and perhaps stupid but I believe in my government and I believe what they say - knowing full well that at times they do not tell me everything - for which I am greatful and at times, it may err on its facts. I do not believe that the government intentionally attempts to deceive the people of the United States.

I think your alone in that, that you actually believe in our U.S. government, they screw us over so bad, do one thing and tell us another, and thats just the stuff that they couldn't properly cover up in the first place. Everything else none of us actually know about. And they DO intentionally decieve us. So with that said, I will say one thing. You're naive.

Sun Tzu 08-18-2003 10:10 PM

I just wanted to hear some ideas:

The international space station doesnt seem like a good place for stellar warfare, or even training for the new mary of fighter-astronauts trained for taking out enemy satellites or fellow floating enemies. The obvious because its international.

http://enterprise.spawar.navy.mil/index.cfm

www.space.com/news/china_dod_030801.html


www.jntf.osd.mil/programs/tenants/swc.asp

www.commondreams.org/views01/0127-04.htm



THe space station is for science. In my view and from what Ive heard they're repeating allot of what they did with SKYLAB. So would an international lunar base be better? WHy did exploration and research just abruptly stop?

Nitro 08-19-2003 01:23 AM

A moon base wasn't built because it is already hard enough to build a space station.
Why should you go to Alaska to do some experiments when you can do them somewhere near home?
Furthermore most experiments require not only low gravity but very low gravity to work. What most people tend to forget is that the moon does have a gravity field even if the accelaration is only one sixth that of earth.
The russians had a very neat moon programme but dicontinued manned "deep":D space exploration in favour of building space stations in orbit.
If the US hadn't really landed on the moon the russians would have known and would never have stopped their own programme.

Nitro 08-19-2003 02:36 AM

A moon base wasn't built because it is already hard enough to build a space station.
Why should you go to Alaska to do some experiments when you can do them somewhere near home?
Furthermore most experiments require not only low gravity but very low gravity to work. What most people tend to forget is that the moon does have a gravity field even if the accelaration is only one sixth that of earth.
The russians had a very neat moon programme but dicontinued manned "deep":D space exploration in favour of building space stations in orbit.
If the US hadn't really landed on the moon the russians would have know

Sun Tzu 08-19-2003 01:21 PM

6

Sun Tzu 08-19-2003 01:24 PM

oops. . .sorry wrong button

Midlandmadman 08-20-2003 11:16 AM

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...... I wanna change my vote........ I said probably but maybe no....... I only say that cause I myself can't prove they did. I believe they did, though.

Mel 08-20-2003 08:56 PM

Im not sure if it happened or not, but if it didn't they are pretty good liers and I think that we should just leave it alone... it's like a fairy tale story for that generation when they heard it on the radio, we don't need to take it away from them :).

krd913 08-24-2003 03:41 PM

It is true why go to all the hipe and work not to go there? But some people think we didn't go to the moon and elvis is still alive.

LaZy 08-26-2003 08:17 AM

umm is this a trick question? :) yea, i think we went to the moon.

i thought this link was pretty good too.
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches...os_010427.html

wouldn't you want to go to a place made of cheese?

Y.A.T.S. 11-03-2005 09:24 AM

I don't think man was on the moon... but what the hell do I know?... I don't even belive in god... [cough]... excuse me, God

5757 11-03-2005 09:49 AM

I need the MAYBE option with wierd space music playing in the backround... :lol: ...........................dUn DUn dUn..........m a y b e . .
haha.

hossified 11-03-2005 10:15 AM

3 things that make me think we didn't land there:
-the radiation zone you'd have to fly through between the earth and the moon would have definitely caused terminal illness' to the astronauts, yet none have developed
-why hasn't anyone been back?? Doesn't fit human nature to dicover something and than touch the surface of exploration and than just quit
-that lunar module looks like something my little brother would build! It has gold foil on it!!! Our modern shuttle has 'troubles' entering earth atmosphere due to heat /friction.....you think that little tin can of a module could handle that ok?? The thing had the aerodynamics of a barn door, which would make flying it off the moon surface near impossible....and than being able to handle re-entry into earth.....I find that very unlikely....

...if there is speculation why doesn't nasa aim the hubble telescope at the moon and show us proof to deny these false claims??? That thing could zoom right in and show the flag!

...with the times as they were, AMerican film was really in developing stages and with the cold war, the US pulled some pretty crazy stuff.....I think this was a way of showing superiority to the world.....

tecoyah 11-03-2005 01:09 PM

The simple fact is....you can actually see the lander base thru a high powered telescope....and Scientists have done so.....Kinda hard to fake.

In anticipation of silly rebuttals....I am now looking for the Pics

Willravel 11-03-2005 01:48 PM

I'm certian the moon landing was real.

aKula 11-03-2005 07:14 PM

Actually tecoyah they recently took some pictures of the moon using the hubble telescope and the resolution was not good enough to see the lander. Having said that I do not think the moon landings were fake.

Cynthetiq 11-03-2005 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aKula
Actually tecoyah they recently took some pictures of the moon using the hubble telescope and the resolution was not good enough to see the lander. Having said that I do not think the moon landing were fake.

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/...bble_moon.html

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1..._image3_lg.jpg

jwoody 11-04-2005 03:02 AM

I believe that the moon landing actually happened, on the moon.

I also believe that some photos of the event were staged in a studio, here on Planet Earth.

Neither of these views contradict the other.

Suppose you'd spent all this money and risked human life in the process, the people you're trying to impress want more than some crappy black & white, out of focus video of the event.

cyrnel 11-04-2005 04:20 AM

Cyn, I don't believe Hubble did more than the rex pics. The pic with the buggy was from '72. Hubble can't resolve with sub-20ft detail from Earth Orbit, can it?

Hey, here's a great answer from slashdot.
Quote:

The highest resolution Hubble is capable of is 0.0072 arc-seconds.

An arc-second is defined such that a 1 meter object will appear as 1 arc-second at a distance of 206,256 meters.

The distance from Hubble (~600km orbit) to the moon (~384,400km) is ... well, about 383,800 km

So if Hubble produced an image with 1 pixel-per-arcsecond resolution, a pixel would be 1.86 kilometers. But the highest resolution is 0.0072 arc-seconds, or about 140 times better than that.

So the smallest object Hubble can see on the moon is 13 meters wide.

Neither the lander module or the rover are that big. Not even close. Good luck finding something that's less than a pixel wide!
=Smidge=
Anyway there's supposed to be an EU satellite going into moon orbit next year. Part of their plan is to check out old landing zones. We should hear the end of this stuff soon.

Now, just imagine the swarming theories should the EU sat suffer any failure. :)

aKula 11-04-2005 04:37 AM

Cyrnel those EU governments are all left wing nuts, if you can't trust the God fearing government of the USA you can't trust those communists either ;)
And if it does fail, then the USA (or some higher secretive power) sabotaged it.
So either way the conspiracy theories can continue.
/sarcasm


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360