CB_Brooklyn

The Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico says Dr Judy Wood's 9/11 directed energy weapon evidence is "interesting and worthy of further consideration".


Read on...


March 16, 2007: Former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dr Judy Wood files a Request for Correction with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding the 9/11 NIST Report. Dr Wood cites fraud and deception, and shows clear evidence that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weaponry.

Dr Judy Wood is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.

Dr Wood's Request for Correction (RFC) is archived on the US Government's Department of Commerce website in PDF format:

RFC (March 16, 2007):
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_002667

Supplement#1 (March 29, 2007):
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_002722

Supplement#2 (April 20, 2007):
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_002899



April 7, 2007: Dr Wood sends letter to

* The Head of U.S. Air Force Directed Energy Directorate
* The Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director for Management
* The Board of Directors of Directed Energy Professional Society

The main question of this letter: "Are the effects set forth in RFC filed with NIST consistent with the destructive effects that would result from the use of directed energy weapons?"

See here for full letter with additional comments by Jerry Leaphart:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/DEW_letter.html



April 27, 2007: Wood and Leaphart are contacted and have telephone conversation with

The Director of Public Affairs
Directed Energy Directorate
Air Force Research Laboratory/DEO-PA
Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico



May 3 2007: Leaphart sends letter to the Director of Public Affairs:
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070503_letterGarcia.pdf



May 4, 2007: Leaphart receives the following FAX from the Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base (emphasis added):

===================================
MESSAGE: I received your fax yesterday and your FedEx package today, and had a chance to review the materials you sent. During our telephone conversation I outlined a variety of directed energies that might have future weapons applications but I'm not aware of any that are mature enough to cause the damage at the World Trade Center. Lasers are the most likely candidates for nearer-term weapons use and, to that enc, we have conducted laboratory tests to evaluate the effects of laser energy on different materials. For the most part, those materials have been metals, not concrete structures. Effects on metals are from the heat generated by an intense beam of coherent light, which cause the metals to weaken and split. Given sufficient heat, metals would melt (become liquids) and, given significantly more heat, could turn to gases. Since we haven't tested concrete I don't know if the effect would be dust. You report phenomena that we cannot explain here, either because we don't have enough data or because the phenomena are not within our area of expertise. While on a personal level I may find Dr Wood's investigation interesting and worthy of further consideration, on a professional level we are unable to devote our limited resources to activities outside of our charter, I wish you success in your endeavor and am available to answer whatever directed energy questions may arise.
===================================

See here for a scan of the original FAX document:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Garcia_letter.html


Dr Wood's 9/11 directed energy weapon evidence is "interesting and worthy of further consideration"!


--------------------------


June 29, 2007: The Chief of the Management and Organization division at NIST replies to Dr Wood, and states they need more time to respond to her RFC:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_letter.html

NIST needs **more time** ??


--------------------------


See Dr Judy Wood's 9/11 directed energy weapon research here:
http://drjudywood.com

balderdash111

2 things:

1) Obviously, this is nothing more than a polite brush-off. He says he thinks this as a personal matter, not a professional one.

2) This is public affairs officer.

__________________
A little silliness now and then is cherished by the wisest men. -- Willy Wonka

CB_Brooklyn

He did not deny that DEWs were used on 9/11. And it was no brush off... he already had a phone conversation with Wood and Leaphart, and his FAX said he's more than happy to answer further questions.

Some Evidence for Weapons using Energy that is Directed on 9/11




Round cylindrical holes in WTC 5 and WTC 6:




Clean vertical cut on north wing of WTC 4, where all material on other side of cut is missing:




WTC 4 cut in direct path of South Tower's north wall:




Cars with missing engine blocks and unexploded gas tanks:




Front of police car toasted while rear in pristine condition. Plastic red light on top survived:




Front of fire truck wilted. Where did its engine go?




Tower's steel core turned to dust: [Video 1], [Video 2], [Video 3]





See Dr Judy Wood's 9/11 DEW Research:

http://drjudywood.com -- Download her latest radio interviews in the News Section.
(MP3 Hotlink: Fetzer/Wood - July 19, 2007)

Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)

Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt