02-05-2008, 01:20 PM | #201 (permalink) |
Upright
|
Just want to make sure I have this right...
We have an administration that was able to, in less than nine months in office, coordinate an incredibly intricate and flawless attack, working with terrorists that have been training for the operation in the U.S. for two full years before the administration took power, indicating that the previous administrations would have had to have been on board with this, as well? Sold me. Pass the tin foil hats. |
02-18-2008, 11:00 AM | #202 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: way out west
|
Yes, just nine months
But it's perfectly OK to think cavemen in Afghanistan planned it and were able to overcome the logistics like air defences and making buildings a block away collapse. The official story is not fact. It is theory that is lopsided to favor the version of events they claim. If you are truly objective and look at ALL the evidence without trying to assess blame from the start you can find the official story is not true. You at least owe that to yourself. But then again if you still leave milk and cookies for Santa you don't deserve truth. Last edited by fastom; 02-18-2008 at 11:33 AM.. |
02-27-2008, 03:15 PM | #203 (permalink) | |
Psycho
|
Quote:
__________________
A little silliness now and then is cherished by the wisest men. -- Willy Wonka Last edited by balderdash111; 02-27-2008 at 03:20 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
|
02-29-2008, 08:29 AM | #204 (permalink) | |
The sky calls to us ...
Super Moderator
Location: CT
|
Quote:
Out of professional courtesy, I won't offer my unrestrained personal opinion on the topic, but I don't think it's really worth discussing anymore. |
|
02-29-2008, 01:27 PM | #205 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
Thanks MSD - I agree this thread is more or less useless at this point, but I have seen others get slammed for taking an uncivil tone so was wondering why stuff like this gets a pass
__________________
A little silliness now and then is cherished by the wisest men. -- Willy Wonka |
02-29-2008, 01:51 PM | #206 (permalink) | |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Quote:
No, it was not 9 months in the making. The PNAC has been planning since at least 1994, if not earlier. Wolfowitz's words about a 'new Pearl Harbor' were absolutely clear. In addition to that, several federal agencies ran scenarios that when combined are very close to what happened on 9/11, starting in 1998. Planes crashing into the WTC and Pentagon, AF responses, bombing WTC, etc... the data was all there. BTW, the other thread is simply slow not dead. That one thread has more data than 10 host threads combined. That takes a lot of time to process and then address. |
|
Tags |
attacks, questions, surrounding, terrorist, unanswered |
|
|