![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Stereophonic
Location: Chitown!!
|
If you're after much new music to listen too, I think you'd be better off with Sirius. Sure its a few bucks more than XM, but you have like 60 commercial free music stations, as opposed to only 40 or so on XM. Also the sound quality is much better on Sirius. A rep from Sirius told me that their streams are 98% of full CD audio, whereas XM streams 128k MP3's. Sirius's current system can handle 300 commercial free music stations with no upgrades, and they also have plans to offer streaming video. XM is nowhere those capabilities.
__________________
Well behaved women rarely make history. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
Completely bananas
Location: Florida
|
It sounds like a terrific idea, especially if you live in a radio-challenged area, but I just hate monthly fees.
Of course, I have no problem paying way too much for satellite television. If you spend a good amount of your time listening to the radio, you'll probably enjoy it. I just wonder how many casual listeners are going to take the plunge? |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
Keep on rolling. It only hurts for a little while.
Location: wherever I am
|
I will probably make the switch to Satellite radio once I can afford the hardware. I spend almost 4 hour a day in my truck and spend half that time switching stations trying to avoid commercials. I imagine the musical variety will be much better on satellite.
__________________
So, what's your point? It's not an attitude, it's a way of life. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
Insane
|
Crutchfield is offering a package for like $300 or so, you get everything you need for a home and car XM radio.
http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S...&cc=01&g=69000 for there website. |
![]() |
Tags |
radio, satellite |
|
|