![]() |
|
View Poll Results: What is the power of your car engine? | |||
Less than 100 BHP |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 4.51% |
100 to 200 BHP |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
51 | 38.35% |
200 to 300 BHP |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
43 | 32.33% |
300+ BHP |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
28 | 21.05% |
I don't know |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 1.50% |
I don't care |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 2.26% |
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
Engine power
So, why do we all like powerful engines in our cars?
It never used to mean much to me, but when I got to Australia (home of the 'rev heads), I went native and bought a OTT 4.0 litre Turbo-charged rear-wheel beast. Wierd, when you consider I only commute about 12km to work, across city traffic, once or twice a week. So, what powered engine did you spend your money on? Mr Mephisto |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Eh?
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
|
Uh...i have like 80 horsepower...and realistically, i probably put 55 to the ground, if that. I swear to god, when you floor it, in 3rd gear, the car doesn't noticably move faster. Its insane.
1982 reliant K w/ a 2.2l 4 cylinder. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
Please touch this.
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
|
02 Accord Coupe V6 - 200hp
04 Accura TL - 270hp
__________________
You have found this post informative. -The Administrator [Don't Feed The Animals] |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Florida
|
'88 T-Bird Turbo Coupe - 190hp stock, probably around 210-ish after opening up the intake and cranking up the boost a bit.
'93 Lincoln Mark VIII - 280hp What is the most underpowered car you've ever owned/drove? Mine would be a friend's '90 Taurus with the 3.0 V6. I think something might have been wrong with it. I know they're not exactly Ferraris, but this particular one was dumbfoundingly slow. I'll never forget taking off from a stoplight up a hill with the pedal almost floored, only to be outrun by a Pinto towing a small trailer. That's just sad. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
My XR6-Turbo puts out 200kw MORE than that Daewoo; ie, 240Kw in total. Not that I use it though... Boys and their toys, eh? Mr Mephisto |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) |
Lost!!
Location: Kingston, Ontario
|
Even know my Shelby-Z has a somewhat blowin engine it still must be up over 100hp...but I think stock power was 175hp....hoping after I getting the new engine to put some mods on it and get it up over 200hp!
if its not already there! and my 82 Chevy G20 Van w/ a 89 5.7l 350, probably like 80hp's right now, the motor isn't running on all 8 cylinders I think I got a dead plug! |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: San Diego, CA.
|
Jeep is quoted at 195hp, 215lb/ft i believe.. Nothing impressive, but in a car just under 3000lbs, it gets it moving pretty quick.
Must under powered.....hmmm, we breifly owned a 88 Ranger with a crappy tiny 4 banger that supposedly had 82hp, or something tiny like that. Prolly made like 40 at the wheel. It was horribly underpowered.
__________________
Dont cry kid, It's not your fault you suck. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 (permalink) |
Buffering.........
Location: Wisconsin...
|
1987 Cadillac Deville 4.1L V8 a very sad 130hp
1984 Mustang...hoping I can push at least 350hp out of a 302..
__________________
Donate now! Ask me How! Please use the search function it is your friend. Look at my mustang please feel free to comment! http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthread.php?t=26985 |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 (permalink) |
Riding the Ocean Spray
Location: S.E. PA in U Sofa
|
435rwhp/455rwtq on my barely modified '95 Supra which is normal for turning up the boost on this turbo car. Factoring in about 16% drive line losses, that makes 517 bhp compared to original factory rated 320 bhp. Not bad for hardly any modification cost.
Spyder_Venon, That's damn serious power you have there. I can understand that with all the front drive around now you could get confused. Unless yours is strangely modified, Firebirds never had FWHP front wheel hp or fwtq since they are rear wheel drive, so you have rwhp and rwtq. Maybe just an abbreviation or terminology misunderstanding. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
I'm astounded at the numbers of cars here with 175+ BHP that posters are describing as "not bad" or "ok" etc...
No offense meant, but American motor engineering must be pretty shit if you can't get excellent performance out of a car with that power. Just goes to show you that BHP is not the measure of all things. I guess it's kinda like comparing clock speed on CPUs! You have to take into account the whole package. The quality of the breaks, the torque (Nm or lbs you Americans) and the actual weight of the car. All very interesting (in a minor male kind of way). To the amusement of my wife, I think I'm slowly turning into a rev head myself... Mr Mephisto |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: MN
|
Quote:
Flywheel HP -sorry I should have clairied a little better FWD= front wheel drive but wait! FWHP= front wheel horse power or in my case, fly wheel hp.... ![]()
__________________
The local track whore |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: PA
|
Quote:
Poorly programmed auto trannies are also a lot more common here (and most people don't know that you can and should shift them manually). Anyway, I have a Corvette with ~300 hp. The slowest car I've ever driven was a 1978 Mercedes 240D - 70 hp and over 3200 lbs. 0-60 in >25 seconds! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Toronto
|
Europe doesn't have POS cars, they're just more practical and economical for their environment than some other cars out there. Realistically, to maintain highway speeds, a car of moderate weight shouldn't need much more than 40 hp with a properly geared transmission.
These cars are also small, which is convenient in European towns. If any of you have ever been to Rome, you know how much a pain in the ass it is to create room to let an suv down a narrow cobblestone road. The opposing lanes have to pull over to let the suv through. Plus, gas prices in North America are only now reaching the levels Europe has had for a long time. Suddenly, a displacement of under a litre producing close to 50 miles per gallon doesn't seem like such a bad idea after all. The SMart car is ideal for Europe for all of these reasons. |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 (permalink) |
Upright
|
I enjoy driving fast. But 300 HP seems to be just about enough I guess.
`04 Audi A8L - 330 HP `98 Audi A8 - 300 HP `99 Lexus GS400 - 300 HP I want to upgrade the brakes, and maybe the engines on the old A8, but I just don't have the time. On the low end, I've got a `90 Miata and a `something MG Midget (that I'm storing for someone). |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 (permalink) |
The sky calls to us ...
Super Moderator
Location: CT
|
'97 Buick Century - 165 when it's running right. Weighs damn near two tons with me in it, and the transmission sucks, so I don't get a huge amount of enjoyment out of it. Being 6'8" sucks when you're looking for a fast car.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: On a gravel road rough enought to knock fillings out of teeth.
|
My current truck ('94 F-350 with a 460) is listed at 245 HP. I beleive my old '86 F-350 with a 460 had more than that, since you could drop the hammer and make all 4 rear tires break loose on a 7000 pound truck.
![]() MrselfDestruct- You need a truck. I'm 6'6", and I look real silly trying to drive a car. ![]()
__________________
Judge me all you want, but keep the verdict to yourself. |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
I find this amusing. Let me simply list the following EUROPEAN car manufacturers. BMW Mercedes Audi VolksWagon Maserati Ferrari Lambourghini Lotus Briton Jaguar Rolls Royce Bentley Porche Aston Martin all this just off the top of my head. In the US you have... erm... let's see... what about?... no.... erm.. Ford? Mr Mephisto |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: PA
|
Mr. Mephisto, I much prefer the European cars you mention over american (or japanese) ones. I wasn't saying Europeans can't make good cars. I meant that if you go to Europe, dinky little crap cars that would never be sold in the US are very common. Those are the things I'm talking about. Your average person doesn't own the cars you mention in most European countries.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 (permalink) | |
Lost!!
Location: Kingston, Ontario
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 (permalink) |
COMPLETED and A TRAINER
Location: BEAN_TOWN
|
200hp 1996 ford windstar mini van...Big, great low end pickup and can I cruise all day doing 80mph on the highway in my captain chair...and so can my other passanger...the thing has 4 of those lovely seats.
__________________
LEATHER, LATEX and LACE "SSC" "Nothing That Gives Pleasure is Bad" Quality is for those who know what they want and are at peace with what they have. "S/M is about emotion; the erotic tension between my impulse toward something and my resistance against it."-- Virginia Barker |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 (permalink) |
Upright
|
My car
100HP Toyota Corolla (4k-c 1290cc engine)
It has a 42/88 cam (wheeee) 32/36 Downdraft weber 2.25" exhuast system Not the fastest car in the world :P ![]() Will end up as a rally car in the next 12 months... Daily driver for now Last edited by ozzybogan; 04-24-2004 at 09:32 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
Hmmmm.... I have a 2.3 turbo Thunderbird that I don't drive much anymore. My dad has a little Triumph TR7 with a dead engine. Now that could be a fun combo! ![]() |
|
![]() |
Tags |
engine, power |
|
|