Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Motors


View Poll Results: What is the power of your car engine?
Less than 100 BHP 6 4.51%
100 to 200 BHP 51 38.35%
200 to 300 BHP 43 32.33%
300+ BHP 28 21.05%
I don't know 2 1.50%
I don't care 3 2.26%
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2004, 06:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Engine power

So, why do we all like powerful engines in our cars?

It never used to mean much to me, but when I got to Australia (home of the 'rev heads), I went native and bought a OTT 4.0 litre Turbo-charged rear-wheel beast.

Wierd, when you consider I only commute about 12km to work, across city traffic, once or twice a week.

So, what powered engine did you spend your money on?


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
Old 04-22-2004, 07:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
Eh?
 
Stare At The Sun's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Uh...i have like 80 horsepower...and realistically, i probably put 55 to the ground, if that. I swear to god, when you floor it, in 3rd gear, the car doesn't noticably move faster. Its insane.

1982 reliant K w/ a 2.2l 4 cylinder.
Stare At The Sun is offline  
Old 04-22-2004, 10:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
Addict
 
2003 quadcab Hemi ram. I havent dynoed it but they claim 345hp and 375tq. Either way, it gets my 6,000 brick moving right quick.
zfleebin is offline  
Old 04-22-2004, 11:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: USA
95 camaro z, 285 stock, got some mods on it so its over 310 easy...dont really know what it is for sure
__________________
Twist of the wrist
ducati999 is offline  
Old 04-22-2004, 11:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
02 Accord Coupe V6 - 200hp
04 Accura TL - 270hp
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 04-22-2004, 11:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Very Proud of Ya
 
Location: Simi Valley, CA
300 hp - 1958 Ford Fairlane 500 Skyliner
Quite the beast.
__________________
Do not speak Latin in front of the books.
TheClarkster is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 01:48 AM   #7 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Sarasota
Just under 200 HP in my SLK. It's not that I wouldn't like more, but that's enough to make the car plenty fun.
bodypainter is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 02:23 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Florida
'88 T-Bird Turbo Coupe - 190hp stock, probably around 210-ish after opening up the intake and cranking up the boost a bit.

'93 Lincoln Mark VIII - 280hp

What is the most underpowered car you've ever owned/drove?

Mine would be a friend's '90 Taurus with the 3.0 V6. I think something might have been wrong with it. I know they're not exactly Ferraris, but this particular one was dumbfoundingly slow. I'll never forget taking off from a stoplight up a hill with the pedal almost floored, only to be outrun by a Pinto towing a small trailer. That's just sad.
irseg is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 03:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Australia
2003 Daewoo Matiz

3 cylinder making a massive 40Kw

Damn that thing flies!
flyboy is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 03:44 AM   #10 (permalink)
Metal and Rock 4 Life
 
Destrox's Avatar
 
Location: Phoenix
Massive 150Hp 1999 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 3.0L ... heh, but I still love it.
__________________
You bore me.... next.
Destrox is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 05:01 AM   #11 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally posted by TheClarkster
300 hp - 1958 Ford Fairlane 500 Skyliner
Quite the beast.
This baby sounds beautiful.

Please tell me you have some pics?!


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 05:04 AM   #12 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally posted by flyboy
2003 Daewoo Matiz

3 cylinder making a massive 40Kw

Damn that thing flies!
Sheesh... That's kinda funny and sad at the same time.

My XR6-Turbo puts out 200kw MORE than that Daewoo; ie, 240Kw in total.

Not that I use it though...

Boys and their toys, eh?



Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 06:23 AM   #13 (permalink)
Lost!!
 
Scorps's Avatar
 
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Even know my Shelby-Z has a somewhat blowin engine it still must be up over 100hp...but I think stock power was 175hp....hoping after I getting the new engine to put some mods on it and get it up over 200hp!

if its not already there!


and my 82 Chevy G20 Van w/ a 89 5.7l 350, probably like 80hp's right now, the motor isn't running on all 8 cylinders I think I got a dead plug!
Scorps is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 07:18 AM   #14 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: MN
My new motor for the bird did 687.1 FWHP and 522.0 FWTQ. You got to love a SBC that will rev to 7k
__________________
The local track whore
Spyder_Venom is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 08:12 AM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Diego, CA.
Jeep is quoted at 195hp, 215lb/ft i believe.. Nothing impressive, but in a car just under 3000lbs, it gets it moving pretty quick.

Must under powered.....hmmm, we breifly owned a 88 Ranger with a crappy tiny 4 banger that supposedly had 82hp, or something tiny like that. Prolly made like 40 at the wheel. It was horribly underpowered.
__________________
Dont cry kid, It's not your fault you suck.
Peryn is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 08:14 AM   #16 (permalink)
Buffering.........
 
merkerguitars's Avatar
 
Location: Wisconsin...
1987 Cadillac Deville 4.1L V8 a very sad 130hp
1984 Mustang...hoping I can push at least 350hp out of a 302..
__________________
Donate now! Ask me How!

Please use the search function it is your friend.

Look at my mustang please feel free to comment!

http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthread.php?t=26985
merkerguitars is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 09:16 AM   #17 (permalink)
Lost!!
 
Scorps's Avatar
 
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Quote:
Originally posted by merkerguitars
1987 Cadillac Deville 4.1L V8 a very sad 130hp
1984 Mustang...hoping I can push at least 350hp out of a 302..
you should slap a Supercharger on the Deville
Scorps is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 09:17 AM   #18 (permalink)
Stereophonic
 
brandon11983's Avatar
 
Location: Chitown!!
99 Grand Am GT coupe, 175 hp. It gets the job done.
__________________
Well behaved women rarely make history.
brandon11983 is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 10:02 AM   #19 (permalink)
Poo-tee-weet?
 
JStrider's Avatar
 
Location: The Woodlands, TX
93 ford explorer
160hp at 4200 rpm
4.0L 6 cyl

i wish it had a bit more power... the whole thing about not being able to hold highway speeds up a hill kinda blows....
__________________
-=JStrider=-

~Clatto Verata Nicto
JStrider is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 10:34 AM   #20 (permalink)
Psycho
 
89transam's Avatar
 
Location: Central California
My 89 that I just sold had about ~270 ish to the wheels (based on similar combos)

My new 96 Ford contour has 140 Hp at the flywheel.
__________________
I'd rather be rich than stupid.
89transam is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 12:31 PM   #21 (permalink)
Riding the Ocean Spray
 
BadNick's Avatar
 
Location: S.E. PA in U Sofa
435rwhp/455rwtq on my barely modified '95 Supra which is normal for turning up the boost on this turbo car. Factoring in about 16% drive line losses, that makes 517 bhp compared to original factory rated 320 bhp. Not bad for hardly any modification cost.

Spyder_Venon,
That's damn serious power you have there. I can understand that with all the front drive around now you could get confused. Unless yours is strangely modified, Firebirds never had FWHP front wheel hp or fwtq since they are rear wheel drive, so you have rwhp and rwtq. Maybe just an abbreviation or terminology misunderstanding.
BadNick is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 01:12 PM   #22 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I'm astounded at the numbers of cars here with 175+ BHP that posters are describing as "not bad" or "ok" etc...

No offense meant, but American motor engineering must be pretty shit if you can't get excellent performance out of a car with that power. Just goes to show you that BHP is not the measure of all things.

I guess it's kinda like comparing clock speed on CPUs!

You have to take into account the whole package. The quality of the breaks, the torque (Nm or lbs you Americans) and the actual weight of the car.

All very interesting (in a minor male kind of way). To the amusement of my wife, I think I'm slowly turning into a rev head myself...


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 01:37 PM   #23 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: MN
Quote:
Originally posted by BadNick

Spyder_Venon,
That's damn serious power you have there. I can understand that with all the front drive around now you could get confused. Unless yours is strangely modified, Firebirds never had FWHP front wheel hp or fwtq since they are rear wheel drive, so you have rwhp and rwtq. Maybe just an abbreviation or terminology misunderstanding.

Flywheel HP -sorry I should have clairied a little better

FWD= front wheel drive

but wait!

FWHP= front wheel horse power or in my case, fly wheel hp....

acronyms suck....
__________________
The local track whore
Spyder_Venom is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 02:58 PM   #24 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr Mephisto
I'm astounded at the numbers of cars here with 175+ BHP that posters are describing as "not bad" or "ok" etc...

No offense meant, but American motor engineering must be pretty shit if you can't get excellent performance out of a car with that power. Just goes to show you that BHP is not the measure of all things.
Well weight matters just as much, but I don't think its any engineering failure. We in the US don't have true POS cars like europe does (I don't know about Oz), so we have higher standards on what's fast and what isn't.

Poorly programmed auto trannies are also a lot more common here (and most people don't know that you can and should shift them manually).

Anyway, I have a Corvette with ~300 hp. The slowest car I've ever driven was a 1978 Mercedes 240D - 70 hp and over 3200 lbs. 0-60 in >25 seconds!
stingc is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 04:26 PM   #25 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Toronto
Europe doesn't have POS cars, they're just more practical and economical for their environment than some other cars out there. Realistically, to maintain highway speeds, a car of moderate weight shouldn't need much more than 40 hp with a properly geared transmission.
These cars are also small, which is convenient in European towns. If any of you have ever been to Rome, you know how much a pain in the ass it is to create room to let an suv down a narrow cobblestone road. The opposing lanes have to pull over to let the suv through.
Plus, gas prices in North America are only now reaching the levels Europe has had for a long time. Suddenly, a displacement of under a litre producing close to 50 miles per gallon doesn't seem like such a bad idea after all.
The SMart car is ideal for Europe for all of these reasons.
wakelagger is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 04:38 PM   #26 (permalink)
Tilted
 
i probably have the slowest vehicles here. 305 hp dodge ram 3500 4x4
and a 81 mercedes 240 D lol
cr25ovet is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 04:38 PM   #27 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: PA
I know that there are good reasons that Europe has cars like that, but it still stands that they offer a very poor driving experience by american standards (on american-style roads). That's what I meant by "POS" .
stingc is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 05:07 PM   #28 (permalink)
Loser
 
New budget roller motor, conservatively about 525 horse before spray.
WarWagon is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 06:07 PM   #29 (permalink)
Upright
 
I enjoy driving fast. But 300 HP seems to be just about enough I guess.

`04 Audi A8L - 330 HP
`98 Audi A8 - 300 HP
`99 Lexus GS400 - 300 HP

I want to upgrade the brakes, and maybe the engines on the old A8, but I just don't have the time.

On the low end, I've got a `90 Miata and a `something MG Midget (that I'm storing for someone).
mofunk is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 08:26 PM   #30 (permalink)
Insane
 
2004 TL- 270
2003 EL- 127
__________________
Don't mind the name. It was chosen before I discovered that there were forums that didn't start with "Titty."
jizzmasterp is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 08:37 PM   #31 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
'97 Buick Century - 165 when it's running right. Weighs damn near two tons with me in it, and the transmission sucks, so I don't get a huge amount of enjoyment out of it. Being 6'8" sucks when you're looking for a fast car.
MSD is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 09:18 PM   #32 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: On a gravel road rough enought to knock fillings out of teeth.
My current truck ('94 F-350 with a 460) is listed at 245 HP. I beleive my old '86 F-350 with a 460 had more than that, since you could drop the hammer and make all 4 rear tires break loose on a 7000 pound truck.

MrselfDestruct- You need a truck. I'm 6'6", and I look real silly trying to drive a car.
__________________
Judge me all you want, but keep the verdict to yourself.
BoomTruck is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 11:00 PM   #33 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally posted by stingc
I know that there are good reasons that Europe has cars like that, but it still stands that they offer a very poor driving experience by american standards (on american-style roads). That's what I meant by "POS" .

I find this amusing. Let me simply list the following EUROPEAN car manufacturers.

BMW
Mercedes
Audi
VolksWagon
Maserati
Ferrari
Lambourghini
Lotus
Briton
Jaguar
Rolls Royce
Bentley
Porche
Aston Martin


all this just off the top of my head.


In the US you have... erm... let's see... what about?... no.... erm.. Ford?



Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
Old 04-23-2004, 11:36 PM   #34 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Durham
Heh, all i know is i just got my baby. I found a 98' 3000GT VR4, stock and it pulls 300bhp stock. And with the little mods i did i think i pull around 345bhp, that area.
__________________
Killing is not an answer, its a solution.
orangeaidcow is offline  
Old 04-24-2004, 07:26 AM   #35 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Mr. Mephisto, I much prefer the European cars you mention over american (or japanese) ones. I wasn't saying Europeans can't make good cars. I meant that if you go to Europe, dinky little crap cars that would never be sold in the US are very common. Those are the things I'm talking about. Your average person doesn't own the cars you mention in most European countries.
stingc is offline  
Old 04-24-2004, 09:51 AM   #36 (permalink)
Lost!!
 
Scorps's Avatar
 
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Quote:
Originally posted by MrSelfDestruct
'97 Buick Century - 165 when it's running right. Weighs damn near two tons with me in it, and the transmission sucks, so I don't get a huge amount of enjoyment out of it. Being 6'8" sucks when you're looking for a fast car.
damn it must be hard to find a car you fit in!
Scorps is offline  
Old 04-24-2004, 09:58 AM   #37 (permalink)
In transition
 
Location: north, no south abit, over to the right, getting warmer...there!
210 Horse Power for my turbocharged 98 Jetta 2.0.
matteo101 is offline  
Old 04-24-2004, 10:24 AM   #38 (permalink)
COMPLETED and A TRAINER
 
Location: BEAN_TOWN
200hp 1996 ford windstar mini van...Big, great low end pickup and can I cruise all day doing 80mph on the highway in my captain chair...and so can my other passanger...the thing has 4 of those lovely seats.
__________________
LEATHER, LATEX and LACE "SSC"
"Nothing That Gives Pleasure is Bad"

Quality is for those who know
what they want and are at peace with what they have.

"S/M is about emotion; the erotic tension between my impulse toward something and my resistance against it."-- Virginia Barker

i8one2 is offline  
Old 04-24-2004, 09:28 PM   #39 (permalink)
Upright
 
My car

100HP Toyota Corolla (4k-c 1290cc engine)

It has a 42/88 cam (wheeee)
32/36 Downdraft weber
2.25" exhuast system

Not the fastest car in the world :P



Will end up as a rally car in the next 12 months... Daily driver for now

Last edited by ozzybogan; 04-24-2004 at 09:32 PM..
ozzybogan is offline  
Old 04-24-2004, 10:05 PM   #40 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr Mephisto
I'm astounded at the numbers of cars here with 175+ BHP that posters are describing as "not bad" or "ok" etc...

No offense meant, but American motor engineering must be pretty shit if you can't get excellent performance out of a car with that power. Just goes to show you that BHP is not the measure of all things.
175hp is great in something like a VW Golf. In a large American car, it sucks.

Hmmmm.... I have a 2.3 turbo Thunderbird that I don't drive much anymore. My dad has a little Triumph TR7 with a dead engine. Now that could be a fun combo!
irseg is offline  
 

Tags
engine, power


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:22 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360