06-14-2008, 08:14 AM | #2 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
10 years ago I'd tell you not to buy Ford, but Ford's really stepped up recently. Quite frankly, I can't really think of a reason not to get it. It's a decent vehicle.
Edit: I'm on Edmunds and they don't list an "SEL". I see "S", "SE", and "SES" Last edited by Willravel; 06-14-2008 at 08:17 AM.. |
06-14-2008, 09:26 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: Northern Hemisphere
|
Ohh. SES.
All of Ford's other model's with leather are SEL, so I thought this was too... The only thing I see wrong with it is is the lack of rear headrests. Other than that, I don't really see anything wrong. And, with decent negotiation, it'll be much cheaper than a similarly equipped Civic.
__________________
50 % of statistics are made up; including this one. |
06-14-2008, 09:37 AM | #4 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Yes, and current Fords are actually poised to last longer than their predecessors by a considerable margin, though I'm not sure it will last as long as a Civic. And they're cheap to repair.
Yeah, I can't really think of a reason to talk you out of it. What I will recommend, though, is to replace the airbox with a cold air intake. I know it sounds silly, but the air box is built to be replaced in cars. |
06-14-2008, 10:41 AM | #5 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Baltimore MD
|
i find the new foci to be ugly cars.
however it's quite practical and i'm sure it will serve you well.
__________________
-Tim- ~I swear sometimes i feel like i'm married to a child. ~You better watch who you're calling a child, Lois, cause if i'm a child than you know what that makes you? a pedophile. and i'll be damned if i'm going to stand here and be lectured by a pervert. |
06-14-2008, 02:56 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Wise-ass Latino
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
|
The '08s have Sync, right?
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer. -From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator |
06-14-2008, 05:04 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: reykjavík, iceland
|
the rear headrests are a bit strange. i thought all new cars had them on all seats. i know 3 people that were killed because the back seat of the car had no headrests
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor. she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron. physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable? |
06-15-2008, 10:17 AM | #10 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: Northern Hemisphere
|
Since it's an '08, I can only get demo or new. "New" cars sold as used always have something wrong with them (totalled, high km, no maintenance done, etc.)
__________________
50 % of statistics are made up; including this one. |
06-18-2008, 07:52 AM | #11 (permalink) | |
Tilted
|
Quote:
*edited for clarity to what a "CAI" will actually do |
|
06-18-2008, 08:20 AM | #12 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
It's mostly about increased airflow which makes the engine run more efficiently, but a decent CAI will have a heat shield, like this one:
http://www.steedafocus.com/store/Fue...duct_info.html That heat shield means that the air coming in will be cooler, which means a theoretical increased efficiency. |
06-18-2008, 08:45 AM | #13 (permalink) |
Wise-ass Latino
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
|
In my neck of the woods, we call that bench racing.
While an aftermarket intake might be beneficial in a performance engine when used with other parts such as headers, underdrive pullies, camshafts, and a remapped ECU, the 2.0 engine in the Focus is anything but. At best, an aftermarket intake on a stock engine does nothing to improve performance or efficiency. At worst, an aftermarket intake on a stock engine does nothing to improve performance or efficiency.
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer. -From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator |
06-18-2008, 08:52 AM | #14 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
At best it improves efficiency. Which is the idea. Replace factory restrictions with aftermarket parts to free up the potential of the vehicle. I'm not suggesting to get a turbo, intake manifold, ceramic headers and a catback system. I'm just talking about a slight increase in efficiency.
|
06-18-2008, 09:31 AM | #15 (permalink) |
Wise-ass Latino
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
|
There is no increase in fuel efficiency to be found with the installation of a cold air intake.
What you're failing to consider is the air/fuel ratio. This ratio is monitored and controlled by the ecu to ensure that the engine operates as close to a stoichermetric ratio of 14.7 pounds of air to 1 pound of gasoline as possible. When this combustion ratio is not met, byproducts of incomplete combustion is produced. Too rich, and you get excess hydrocarbons (HC). Too lean and you get excess nitrogen oxide (NOx). The ecu monitors this mixture through the oxygen sensor in the exhaust stream and adjusts the air/fuel mixture to compensate for an excessively lean or rich mixture. This is known as closed-loop feedback operation. So what happens when you throw in a cold-air intake (assuming you'll move more air through the engine)? During closed loop operations, the oxygen sensor will detect that the extra air coming into the engine has leaned out the fuel mixture, and the ecu will compensate by adding more fuel to richen things back to that magical 14.7:1 ratio. There's a lot more that happens, but this is the very very very basics of closed-loop operation. So while you think you're increasing volumetric efficiency (in theory) with the installation of a cold-air intake, you're really decreasing fuel efficiency with the installation of a cold air intake.
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer. -From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator |
06-18-2008, 09:37 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Quote:
In my car, there was an increase in fuel efficiency with the installation of a CAI, btw. Of course, I have over double the HP of a Focus. |
|
06-18-2008, 09:40 AM | #17 (permalink) | |
Tilted
|
Quote:
If this was a used, performance car I'd agree with you. This is a new economy car though. |
|
06-18-2008, 10:15 AM | #18 (permalink) | |
Wise-ass Latino
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
|
Quote:
The installation of a CAI on an otherwise stock engine will be as effective as the installation of a loud muffler to increase power. There will be no quicker throttle response because that is determined more by the design of the intake manifold than an intake pipe. You have an Eclipse. I had one too and I experienced the same increases when I installed my bolt-ons. That was because those parts affected the performance of the turbocharger more than anything, namely in reducing lag. Turbocharged engines are much more responsive to bolt-on parts than any naturally-aspirated engine will ever be. It's an all-or-nothing commitment with today's naturally aspirated engines. These aren't the engines of yesterday where they were intentionally choked up to meet fuel economy and emissions regulations and you could get away with adding a part here or a part there. The slight gains you envision are simply not there anymore.
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer. -From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator |
|
Tags |
2008, focus, ford, sel |
|
|