11-28-2005, 06:16 AM | #41 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
sexual harrasment in the office is when the person doesn't like your flirting.. otherwise it's okay. hell I'd have no complaints if one of my female bosses wanted to sleep with me to get ahead... but that's never happened...
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
11-28-2005, 11:01 AM | #42 (permalink) | |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Quote:
|
|
11-28-2005, 11:03 PM | #43 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: buckle of the snow belt
|
now admit it:
some of us are thinking, "where were these teachers when I was in high school?"
__________________
10th sig ~> "How many a dispute could have been deflated into a single paragraph if the disputants had dared to define their terms?" -- Aristotle |
11-30-2005, 01:03 AM | #44 (permalink) | |
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
11-30-2005, 05:11 AM | #45 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
Personally I think that I can separate what I need to separate from it in order to get what I want in return for the sex.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
11-30-2005, 08:43 AM | #47 (permalink) |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Of course there is a double standard and its a damn good one if you ask me.
The laws were written by men (and most likely men who had daughters). We don't know what goes through a woman’s mind, but you hear about the woman being lonely, needing someone, etc, and this is from other women. As a guy, if you are going to nail a 14 year old its not because you are lonely, its because you want to fuck the kid, period. As men we know what goes through men’s minds and its pure lechery. The old joke about how horrified women would be if they could indeed read our minds is quite true. We know what drives men and as such we want to protect our daughters and wives from it. On the other hand being men, we see no harm if such had happened to us. You got to nail the teacher, hurray! I wouldn't feel emotionally scared or used. The only trap is the falling in love one, where you fall for the first girl you nail (which happens to be your teacher), and it doesn't seem that prison stops that based on past history. So should I wring my hands at the horrible double standard out there, that somehow there is an inequity between men and women when it comes to statutory rape? I'm not losing any sleep over it.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
11-30-2005, 08:52 AM | #48 (permalink) |
Junkie
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
|
What I find truly fascinating, though not at all surprising...
The woman in this thread: http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthread.php?t=97483 (not as attractive as the woman in the above story) Some folks seemed ready string up the unattractive woman... but the attractive woman.. well hot damn she's hot where was she when I was 14 seemed to be the standard reply... So the double standard isn't really so much men vs women.. it's also what the person looks like..
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
|
11-30-2005, 08:54 AM | #49 (permalink) | |
Still Free
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
|
Quote:
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead. "Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly." |
|
11-30-2005, 10:02 AM | #50 (permalink) | |
Lover - Protector - Teacher
Location: Seattle, WA
|
I feel oddly comfortable with it staying exactly like it is. Double-standard, sure.. but do I think it'll ever change? Nah. I should probably feel the need to rebel and "fight the man," but in this case -- I think its fine where it is.
Quote:
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel Last edited by Jinn; 11-30-2005 at 10:05 AM.. |
|
11-30-2005, 10:07 AM | #51 (permalink) | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
I'm curious as to why a female who has sex with children should receive less of a sentence than a male. Please elaborate. *I usually agree with you on most subjects, however I think this is where we part ways |
|
11-30-2005, 10:11 AM | #52 (permalink) |
Lover - Protector - Teacher
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Yea I dunno.. I went to type out my response and I realized that .. well I'm not really sure.. lemme think about that one.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel |
11-30-2005, 08:14 PM | #53 (permalink) |
Tilted
Location: Montana
|
If i was getting fucked by a hot teacher, model quality to boot, when i was going to school at 14 or 15, it might have inspired me to care enough to stick around and to better, and i would have kept my mouth shut!. Who knows, wishful thinking i guess.
|
12-01-2005, 10:10 AM | #55 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
12-01-2005, 10:45 AM | #56 (permalink) | |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Quote:
There is the way things are...and there is "the way things ought to be". Penned by a mentor of yours, I believe.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
|
12-01-2005, 01:12 PM | #57 (permalink) | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
So, the male child consents to sex and that makes it ok for the woman to be a child molester? The female victim throws herself onto a male and it makes him a monster? You can throw all the little pervy excuses you want. The fact of the matter is that a child molester.... is a child molester. |
|
12-01-2005, 01:17 PM | #58 (permalink) |
Apocalypse Nerd
|
This subject has been done to death.
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...ghlight=LaFave for one... |
12-02-2005, 02:34 AM | #59 (permalink) |
Banned
|
Sometimes it's just about the harm done.
Example: 1. Woman is punched in the face by her husband one day. She shoots him in the face. Most likely she will receive some sort of sentence, even if something light because of "self defense" (even though being punched in the face isn't a mortal wound). 2a. Woman is punched in the face by her husband, every day, for a year. After a year of it, he hits her one day and she snaps and shoots him in the face. Find me a jury that would convict her of anything, I bet it would never happen. 2b. Woman is punched in the face by her husband, then beaten for 30 minutes or an hour. She fears, though he has made no actual threats to do so, that he will beat her until she dies. She shoots him in the face. Now, tell me, what's the difference between the first scenario, and 2a/2b? Is it the multiple number of times it was done? Is it the severity of the one time it was done? Yes. It's in the harm that was caused. If you have a 24 year old male and a 14 year old girl, you will almost definitely see psychological harm from it. Reverse the scenario (24 year old female and 14 year old male) and, although the offense is the same, the actual harm done could realistically be much less. It depends on the person. Should the harm caused and future mental state of the victim be taken into account when sentencing? That's the question. Here's another: You speed and get clocked at 20mph over the limit. The harm that could have been done because of your speed is what it is. You speed in a school zone during peak time, get clocked doing 20 over the limit, and you get a much, much, much larger ticket. Why? The harm that could have been done is much greater. That's what I see is at the heart of this whole type of problem. Last edited by analog; 12-02-2005 at 02:37 AM.. |
12-05-2005, 04:27 AM | #61 (permalink) | |
Insane
|
Quote:
Example: 1. Man is punched in the face by his wife one day. He shoots her in the face. Most likely he will receive some sort of sentence, even if something light because of "self defense" (even though being punched in the face isn't a mortal wound). --> Doesn't sound right to me now? 2a. Man is punched in the face by his wife, every day, for a year. After a year of it, she hits him one day and he snaps and shoots her in the face. Find me a jury that would convict him of anything, I bet it would never happen. --> Again I can't see this happening? 2b. Man is punched in the face by his wife, then beaten for 30 minutes or an hour. he fears, though she has made no actual threats to do so, that she will beat him until he dies. He shoots her in the face. --> Again Same scenarios, same potential harm, likely different sentences... guys can be abused as well, and a guy doing this is likely to get a worse sentence than a woman abusing a man. |
|
Tags |
craving, grown, oldswtf, women, year |
|
|