![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#41 (permalink) | 
| 
			
			 ...is a comical chap 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			Location: Where morons reign supreme 
				
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 From a very stereotypical, very 1950's-esque view of gender roles, I'm not a typical woman: 
		
		
		
		
		
			I make more money than my husband. I am not motherly; my husband is fantastic with children. I take care of the cars; he washes the dishes. I watch movies with car chases and things blowing up; he loves chick flicks. Very, very few people on this Earth have seen me cry; he frequently wants to talk about feelings. Until fairly recently, he was a better cook than I. All that aside...do I need him? You better believe it. I don't need him to take care of me per se, but I need him nonetheless because he makes my world a better place. No one can calm me down like he can when I'm having an anxiety attack. No one else can sense when I need a hug, even when I haven't said a damn thing. No one else loves me unconditionally like he does. I'm not a caregiver type, and I managed absolutely fine when he was in the military and was gone for extensive periods of time. I don't need him to pay my bills, or balance my checkbook, or mow my lawn (I do need him to open jars every once in awhile!), but I still need him. I admire caregivers (see mm's post above) because they have strengths that I don't possess. I am surrounded by women who want nothing more than to find a man to marry so they can stay home and have kids and be housewives - it's not my cup of tea, but who am I to suggest that that view is wrong? If that's what floats their boats (both his and hers), then more power to them. It's just not for me, and I doubt it ever will be. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	"They say that patriotism is the last refuge to which a scoundrel clings; steal a little and they throw you in jail, steal a lot and they make you king" Formerly Medusa  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#42 (permalink) | 
| 
			
			 Upright 
			
			
			
			
			 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 i think it's been made apparent by the previous posts that a certain amount of mutual dependence and venerability are necessary to forming strong relationships... Maybe the  childishness of one of the partners in a relationship is acting as a primitive substitute? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#43 (permalink) | |
| 
			
			 Upright 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			Location: Lowell, Massachusetts - USA 
				
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 My mom was a self empowered lady. As a result, I am attracted to that kind of woman. I actually do not mind being intimidated. It happens and I get over it. There is a difference between a childlike and a childish persona. I do like that authentic and transparent open and natural expression from a person in my life. Sex is best with a degree of trust and innocents. As I see it naturally. It is what I like. Two self empowered adults can communicate authentically and still be kind and sensitive to what they recognize as their partners vulnerable points. I recognize that each of us has these vulnerable areas, although I would be hard pressed to prove it. Somehow lost in all this discussion was your interest in starting a family. In my view the kind of guy that would fit best with your preferences will not be easy to find. I suggest that you keep doing what you think best and add a confidence factor to that effort. The law of attraction works best when you add the gratitude energy beforehand. Best Wishes!!! John  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Tags | 
| relationships | 
		
  | 
	
		 |