Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Life


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-03-2008, 02:58 PM   #201 (permalink)
Confused Adult
 
Shauk's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA
ORANGE TEXT IS ORANGE


Quote:
Originally Posted by vanblah
Really?



The point I am making is not to infringe on anyone's desire to be sexually expressive. I whole-heartedly endorse our ability to be expressive in any way, shape or form. What I am talking about is when it's appropriate and when it's not.

Did you see the little back-and-forth that ngdawg and I had during the whole grammar nazi portion of the conversation? There is a time and place for it.

When a woman walks down the street and is the (unwanted) recipient of OVERT male sexual desire (ie, wolf whistles) then it becomes offensive.

It is certainly not a black-and-white issue (no reference to racism).
yeah, to reference the 1st post you quoted, I find it offensive to others, not so much myself. I really don't mind, I went pages and pages without replying but I just had my brain start to twitch that people were taking it SO SO seriously.

Really, who's being hurt by the phrase "i'd hit it" ?

it's not intended for the would be "hittee" to hear anyway.* If you say that to her face, you're being too forward, you're going to make her uncomfortable, you're going to come across like a jackass, it's fine to be sexually attracted to another person, its fine to convey that to them, but I think people should make no mistake here and truly realize that women, are going to choose what they want, despite what you do/try/say/think/feel. They will make exceptions and accept flaws if they think you have something they want, be it a quality or value or just flat out attraction.

So in truth, this thread is a giant "nice guys finish last" rant in disguise to me.

*Much like my journal isn't for people I write about to read, or much like something you tell your buddies in confidence isn't to be shared, and really, I think "I'd hit it" is pretty much just a way of seeking validation of your attraction amongst your peers, kinda like a very brief way of saying "Wow I think she's attractive, you guys notice her?" yes, it's more crude than the phase I just wrote, it's very base and it's like "hey this was my initial reaction before i've had time to go find out if she has a personality.

Attraction happens. deal.

Last edited by Shauk; 04-03-2008 at 03:01 PM..
Shauk is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:03 PM   #202 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shauk
He's already got me pegged through and through as some sexist disrespecting uncompromising ignorant baby, why bother writing a real response to that level of douchebaggery?
I don't actually believe this about you, but your post read like a rant rather than an educated response. If you don't believe what you initially posted (perhaps it was hyperbole), perhaps you could clarify:

Quote:
1st off, you're insulting people who like being sexually expressive, seriously, fuck it.
Why do you believe that asking if there is a "better way" to express your sexual desire "insults" you? The way it is written seems to imply that you believe you are entitled to "express yourself sexually" no matter what. My "poor little baby" was a bit inflammatory, and I apologize. It just reads like a person who feels entitled to do something regardless of how it might make other people feel.

As for this:

Quote:
2nd off, lets just go ahead and ACKNOWLEDGE right now that girls being the subject of sexual desire is a role that they can participate in, no one HAS to be a model, a porn star, a stripper, or a prostitute, no one has to wear skimpy clothing, no one has to show any skin, in fact, fuck it, lets all move to israel.
I still maintain that this is an ignorant position. Not that you in particular are ignorant, but holding a position like this reveals an ignorance to the fact that women are subjected to unwanted sexual desire without themselves inviting it by their clothing or profession. There are plenty of women wearing business suits who still receive unwanted jeers or advances. To believe that they deserved it, therefore, would be a position ignorant of what really happens.

In response to this:

Quote:
honestly, what is the problem here? hot guy with lots of money and big dong comes up and says "i'd hit it" to you, "oh teehee" it's a joke, you'll let it slide.
I was probably too rude. I just don't see this as convincing evidence of anything, really. It reads like a verbal re-telling of a story, not like a reasoned argument.

And finally, my response to:

Quote:
secondly, the fight for equality is useless, be it genders, races, social class, religion. all it takes is ONE person to be an individual, to have a varying mindset from the masses, and there you go, you are now inequal. Maybe very similar, but thats it.
Follows the same reasoning. It doesn't appear that you've been conventionally educated on what the "pursuit of equality" is, or you wouldn't present a straw man such as this. Perhaps you could clarify what you think the "goal" of the fight for equality is?

[EDIT: Your latest post]
Quote:
Really, who's being hurt by the phrase "i'd hit it" ?
You, like willravel, make the mistake of assuming that because YOU aren't offended by something means that no one is.

As for the belief that this is a "nice guys rant" in disguise, you've got me in the wrong box. I'm anything but a nice guy. I just strongly believe in the idea that the words we use dramatically effects us, our surroundings, and eventually our world.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel

Last edited by Jinn; 04-03-2008 at 03:06 PM..
Jinn is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:10 PM   #203 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shauk
I find this conversation to be insulting.

1st off, you're insulting people who like being sexually expressive, seriously, fuck it.

What do you want? to change the fucking saying to "I'd hit her" ? because "her" isn't "it"? Then we're going into the fun lil violent sounding territory.

2nd off, lets just go ahead and ACKNOWLEDGE right now that girls being the subject of sexual desire is a role that they can participate in, no one HAS to be a model, a porn star, a stripper, or a prostitute, no one has to wear skimpy clothing, no one has to show any skin, in fact, fuck it, lets all move to israel.

3rd, a lot of the view points expressed in this thread (this is no longer just about the "i'd hit it" statement, lets not kid ourselves) are rather insulting to the members of TFP who've participated in the exhibition forum.


honestly, what is the problem here? hot guy with lots of money and big dong comes up and says "i'd hit it" to you, "oh teehee" it's a joke, you'll let it slide.

bum with tiny wang and scary looking features says the same thing? "omg sexual harrassment, unwelcome advance, pig! sexist!"

get over your labels. seriously.

be completely honest with yourself and admit you've probably let something from the opposite sex "slide" under your fem-dar because you had your own interests vested in them at some point.

1st, you just have to shatter the illusion that we're all equal, we're not. I'm better than you at some things, you're better than me at some things, and some people like me more than others, there is no level playing field for any of us and it has nothing to do with me being, white, or a male, or whatever sociology inspired classification you can wall me in to.

secondly, the fight for equality is useless, be it genders, races, social class, religion. all it takes is ONE person to be an individual, to have a varying mindset from the masses, and there you go, you are now inequal. Maybe very similar, but thats it.


Women have strengths that men do not, access to an entire sub culture that men do not.
Men have strengths the Women do not, access to an entire sub culture that Women do not.

thats just the way it is, it's genetic, it's biological, it's social, it's supply and demand, thats life, you can participate or not.
Some girls want the attention, some girls dont, some guys like "i'd hit it" some guys don't.

really, thats it, thats the end of discussion, live and let live.
Uhhhh, let me get this straight. You are offended, personally, by the discussion of behavior that some of us here feel offended by? Ow, my head.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:20 PM   #204 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by abaya
Ustwo, what's the point? I was talking about swimming pool shower rooms (the part you conveniently left out of my quote), and how they view all kinds of bodies there, in a non-sexual context... and how this helps counteract the usual images on TV.

My point was that Icelanders generally don't give a shit about nudity, at least not the way that a lot of Americans do... and that I think that's a healthy thing. I'm quite sure that this commercial didn't even register a blip on the radar screen for people here.

(Where the hell did you find that commercial, btw?!)
You know, this may come as a shock but we don't lock the fat girls up in the US and keep them from going swimming. Women in the US see EVERY body type quite a bit, we are a 'large' nation. I'm pretty sure they shower naked too before going in the pool, at least thats the rule on the door.

Really comparing anywhere to iceland is a bit difficult. Iceland is for all intents one people, and my suburb has almost 2/3rds its population. If you include a neighboring one, we have a greater population, and a more diverse one.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:27 PM   #205 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JinnKai
You, like willravel, make the mistake of assuming that because YOU aren't offended by something means that no one is.
And YOU have made the mistake of ASSUMING that because something is sexual in nature it's inherently HORRIBLE and DEEPLY oFfEnSiVe. NG and Shani, people who are much more woman than you'll ever be, have said it doesn't bother them at all, and MM and Abaya have each said that it's not a big deal.

Just what will it take for you to understand that "I'd hit it" is AT WORST kinda rude and a reflection of bad character? At best it's a friggin compliment. You're acting like it's the N word for women. It's not. It's more like calling a black man "articulate", actually, in that some might find it sorta offensive but many don't really care.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:38 PM   #206 (permalink)
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
You know, this may come as a shock but we don't lock the fat girls up in the US and keep them from going swimming. Women in the US see EVERY body type quite a bit, we are a 'large' nation. I'm pretty sure they shower naked too before going in the pool, at least thats the rule on the door.

Really comparing anywhere to iceland is a bit difficult. Iceland is for all intents one people, and my suburb has almost 2/3rds its population. If you include a neighboring one, we have a greater population, and a more diverse one.
Have you been in a women's locker room lately?

I can honestly tell you that the majority of women do not shower out in the open in the locker room. The university gym's locker room here is half open, half closed off cubicles, and the open half rarely gets used. And the rinse-off shower required before getting in a pool does not require nudity. Nudity is actually quite hard to come by; Americans don't have the same sense of skinship that other cultures do. We see the body as something that needs to be covered. Even in the sauna, I've only ever seen one or two women besides myself naked. I joined another gym last year, and one of their selling points was the individual changing room/shower room/bathroom combinations instead of locker rooms.

/threadjack
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:43 PM   #207 (permalink)
Confused Adult
 
Shauk's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by JinnKai
I don't actually believe this about you, but your post read like a rant rather than an educated response. If you don't believe what you initially posted (perhaps it was hyperbole), perhaps you could clarify:




Why do you believe that asking if there is a "better way" to express your sexual desire "insults" you? The way it is written seems to imply that you believe you are entitled to "express yourself sexually" no matter what. My "poor little baby" was a bit inflammatory, and I apologize. It just reads like a person who feels entitled to do something regardless of how it might make other people feel.
It doesn't insult ME, i'm not that sexually expressive, sure, i like talking about it, participating in it, but it doesn't motivate me to do anything, I don't aspire to "get laid", I don't live for it, i've never been to a strip club. I think girls are entitled to participate in being sexual objects if they want, if they want to have sex on film, or wear skimpy clothes on music videos, good for them, thats what they choose to do. If this was a discussion on slavery, it'd be different, but this is a product of a team of individuals exercising their freedoms to CHOOSE, There are some beautiful women in the world and I APPRECIATE that they share that with the world, and yeah my base reaction to my exposure to some of these is admittedly "i'd hit it" and yeah I might even say it outloud to a guy friend or 2, but now we're supposed to read this thread and shuffle our feet and feel guilty for an admission of how we feel? Isn't that repression? We're supposed to be ashamed of this and keep it to ourselves? This is what we need to adopt as a social grace? so not only is the GBLT scene repressed we want to throw ourselves into that category with them? What next? white guilt?

Those people have to grow up having feelings for people that society tells them is wrong to do so and get all mentally damaged over it, because people keep putting rules and rules and rules in place when they really aren't even in a position to be making said rules. They don't speak for everyone.

if anything I just think we're supposed to be cool with going the other direction and being able to say "hey, this is where I stand sexually on this particular person" to a friend be it eloquent or crude, just at least be expressive and communicate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JinnKai
I still maintain that this is an ignorant position. Not that you in particular are ignorant, but holding a position like this reveals an ignorance to the fact that women are subjected to unwanted sexual desire without themselves inviting it by their clothing or profession. There are plenty of women wearing business suits who still receive unwanted jeers or advances. To believe that they deserved it, therefore, would be a position ignorant of what really happens.
I never once stated it was "deserved" and I, am trying to stick with the "i'd hit it" topic as an idea of "expression" instead of "harrassment" Some people are attractive to me, i'm not going to worry about the potential that this girl has me in her "unwanted advances" category because society will grind to a halt the minute people adopt that line of thinking, we're already dealing with that crap in the workplace that so much as asking for a date is grounds for harassment when it shouldn't be. A simple question with a simple answer and leave it at that, if she says no, then great, leave it at that. If it continues, then yeah it's harassment. What she deserves is really up to the person who's in a position to offer her anything, a deserving person cannot receive anything without someone to give her that thing she deserves, be it attention, a compliment, or if I may say so at the risk of being labeled "crude" good ol sex.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JinnKai
Follows the same reasoning. It doesn't appear that you've been conventionally educated on what the "pursuit of equality" is, or you wouldn't present a straw man such as this. Perhaps you could clarify what you think the "goal" of the fight for equality is?
I'm as equally able to be sexually objectified as any woman is, and if you think johnny depp isn't fantasized about by some woman, or brad pitt, or.. so on and so on, you've got to be joking.

I call that pretty equal. They "choose" to have pictures of themselves taken in the near nude, shirtless and watered down, touched up in photoshop, whatever, the same process a female model would go through.

I don't understand your dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
Uhhhh, let me get this straight. You are offended, personally, by the discussion of behavior that some of us here feel offended by? Ow, my head.
yeah, I didn't express myself very clearly, hopefully my last post clears things up a little.

Last edited by Shauk; 04-03-2008 at 03:44 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Shauk is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:45 PM   #208 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onesnowyowl
Have you been in a women's locker room lately?

I can honestly tell you that the majority of women do not shower out in the open in the locker room. The university gym's locker room here is half open, half closed off cubicles, and the open half rarely gets used. And the rinse-off shower required before getting in a pool does not require nudity. Nudity is actually quite hard to come by; Americans don't have the same sense of skinship that other cultures do. We see the body as something that needs to be covered. Even in the sauna, I've only ever seen one or two women besides myself naked. I joined another gym last year, and one of their selling points was the individual changing room/shower room/bathroom combinations instead of locker rooms.

/threadjack
That's prolly cuz everyone's obese and is in some way ashamed of showing their body. It *is* the US, after all, the land of rampant obesity.
match000 is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:49 PM   #209 (permalink)
 
abaya's Avatar
 
Location: Iceland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I'm pretty sure they shower naked too before going in the pool, at least thats the rule on the door.
Nope. See Snowy's post. Sorry Ustwo, you can't pretend to be an expert on this one, unless you start dressing as a woman and hanging out in American women's locker rooms for 12 years of public education and an entire lifetime at the local swimming pool. What does your wife say?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Really comparing anywhere to iceland is a bit difficult. Iceland is for all intents one people, and my suburb has almost 2/3rds its population. If you include a neighboring one, we have a greater population, and a more diverse one.
Now this paragraph, I do agree with... Iceland is a pretty crazy little country, and it's tough to generalize that out to bigger nations. However, that doesn't mean the points I make about Iceland are invalid. There are some things about this place that I do appreciate (very few, believe me)... one of them is the openness about women's bodies and sex that they have here, in comparison with the US (and even more in comparison with other countries, once again usually non-Western ones).

Quote:
Originally Posted by match000
That's prolly cuz everyone's obese and is in some way ashamed of showing their body. It *is* the US, after all, the land of rampant obesity.
There's a shit-ton of obese people here in Iceland, too. And yet people walk around in bikinis and speedos like it's no thing, because there just isn't the same sense of "shame" about one's body ingrained in people here.
__________________
And think not you can direct the course of Love;
for Love, if it finds you worthy, directs your course.

--Khalil Gibran

Last edited by abaya; 04-03-2008 at 03:51 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
abaya is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:51 PM   #210 (permalink)
peekaboo
 
ngdawg's Avatar
 
Location: on the back, bitch
Wow...I haven't seen a conversation go this long and on such a topic since Tec's back deck many moons ago.....
Pass the chips....
ngdawg is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:51 PM   #211 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by abaya
Nope. See Snowy's post. Sorry Ustwo, you can't pretend to be an expert on this one, unless you start dressing as a woman and hanging out in American women's locker rooms for 12 years of public education and an entire lifetime at the local swimming pool.
So, you're saying he's an expert?
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 04:02 PM   #212 (permalink)
comfortably numb...
 
uncle phil's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: upstate
wow...

ng, neither have i...
__________________
"We were wrong, terribly wrong. (We) should not have tried to fight a guerrilla war with conventional military tactics against a foe willing to absorb enormous casualties...in a country lacking the fundamental political stability necessary to conduct effective military and pacification operations. It could not be done and it was not done."
- Robert S. McNamara
-----------------------------------------
"We will take our napalm and flame throwers out of the land that scarcely knows the use of matches...
We will leave you your small joys and smaller troubles."
- Eugene McCarthy in "Vietnam Message"
-----------------------------------------
never wrestle with a pig.
you both get dirty;
the pig likes it.
uncle phil is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 04:26 PM   #213 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onesnowyowl
Have you been in a women's locker room lately?

I can honestly tell you that the majority of women do not shower out in the open in the locker room. The university gym's locker room here is half open, half closed off cubicles, and the open half rarely gets used. And the rinse-off shower required before getting in a pool does not require nudity. Nudity is actually quite hard to come by; Americans don't have the same sense of skinship that other cultures do. We see the body as something that needs to be covered. Even in the sauna, I've only ever seen one or two women besides myself naked. I joined another gym last year, and one of their selling points was the individual changing room/shower room/bathroom combinations instead of locker rooms.

/threadjack
Don't know about every locker room out there but I do know when my wife goes to the gym there are fully nude women in hers. I know this sadly not from hidden camera shots but the rather amusing commends my son was making at age 2 while in there with her.

'Look mommy boobies! Boobies! Boobies!'

Ah thats my boy.

But seriously don't give me this covered up non-sense. I could do without seeing another 14 year old girl 60lbs over weight showing her fat roll in a bare midriff shirt at the mall hanging around hot topic. I'll add spandex is NOT for everyone.

No we are not a puritanical society, not in the least. I deal with kids pretty much every day of those ages, and I know what they wear/don't ware. Nothing says 'prude' like a shorts that say juicy with a thong at 12.

We might be a degree short of Europeans but only a small degree, and the first nude beach I have been on was in the good old USA.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 04:34 PM   #214 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
here's a curious sidebar to all this.
i was considering pasting the entire oed definition of the verb "to hit" but before i copied it, i looked at the etymology and now am confused. so there are 28 definitions of the verb, almost all of which have to do with delivering a blow, striking or a derivation of striking. but they all come from this root:

Quote:
[Late OE. hyttan = ON. hitta to hit upon, light upon, meet with, Sw. hitta, Da. hitte to hit, find.
App. from Norse: cf. Branch II; but the senses under I seem to have been developed at an early date in Eng. from the notion ‘get at, reach’.]
all of which make me wonder if this curious little expression was launched by some drunken etymology-obsessed gentleman in a publick house somewhere.

it's a shame these slang bits don't travel with footnotes...
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 05:15 PM   #215 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
And YOU have made the mistake of ASSUMING that because something is sexual in nature it's inherently HORRIBLE and DEEPLY oFfEnSiVe. NG and Shani, people who are much more woman than you'll ever be, have said it doesn't bother them at all, and MM and Abaya have each said that it's not a big deal.

Just what will it take for you to understand that "I'd hit it" is AT WORST kinda rude and a reflection of bad character? At best it's a friggin compliment. You're acting like it's the N word for women. It's not. It's more like calling a black man "articulate", actually, in that some might find it sorta offensive but many don't really care.
I think a big problem with this discussion is that people are talking around each other. So let me clarify two things:

1. I have stated that these kinds of comments in a joking or ironic manner are completely acceptable to me, because using them in a joking or ironic manner is making a statement in a negative way about the use of them in a serious or habitual manner. In other words, if you are truly using these phrases in a joking or ironic manner you are acknowledging that the use of them is a joke - something to be made fun of. This is the context in which I consider the phrases to be casual. And this sort of use doesn't bother me, obviously, because I do think it is a joke...as in, deserving of mockery.

2. Now, I have also stated that I do support Jinn's assertion that the widespread usage of these terms could be symptomatic of the commonplace sexual objectification of women. And I think the guys here expressing their 100%, no-doubt-whatsoever convictions that the prevalence of sexualized images of women in the media have had no effect on their perspectives towards women and this issue (and women's perspectives about themselves and their role in society) are either in denial or afraid of losin' out on that good thing they got goin' on. Is being able to spout inane comments and see half-naked chicks rubbin' up on beer bottles during halftime on Sundays really worth dismissing outright the negative consequences that perhaps are being proliferated by these things? Wait, don't answer that.

I look over this discussion and I see an attempt at dialogue by some people and an attempt to squelch the dialogue by others. And I'm really puzzled as to why it has engendered so much possessive obstinacy in some people. What exactly is being threatened by this discussion? I've seen far less visceral reactions to issues like torture and the death penalty than is being exhibited on this thread. The more I think about it, the more I have to wonder exactly what is the nerve being hit here.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce

Last edited by mixedmedia; 04-03-2008 at 05:18 PM.. Reason: thinking too fast for my typing abilities...changed word
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 05:40 PM   #216 (permalink)
peekaboo
 
ngdawg's Avatar
 
Location: on the back, bitch
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
I think a big problem with this discussion is that people are talking around each other. So let me clarify two things:

1. I have stated that these kinds of comments in a joking or ironic manner are completely acceptable to me, because using them in a joking or ironic manner is making a statement in a negative way about the use of them in a serious or habitual manner. In other words, if you are truly using these phrases in a joking or ironic manner you are acknowledging that the use of them is a joke - something to be made fun of. This is the context in which I consider the phrases to be casual. And this sort of use doesn't bother me, obviously, because I do think it is a joke...as in, deserving of mockery.

2. Now, I have also stated that I do support Jinn's assertion that the widespread usage of these terms could be symptomatic of the commonplace sexual objectification of women. And I think the guys here expressing their 100%, no-doubt-whatsoever convictions that the prevalence of sexualized images of women in the media have had no effect on their perspectives towards women and this issue (and women's perspectives about themselves and their role in society) are either in denial or afraid of losin' out on that good thing they got goin' on. Is being able to spout inane comments and see half-naked chicks rubbin' up on beer bottles during halftime on Sundays really worth dismissing outright the negative consequences that perhaps are being proliferated by these things? Wait, don't answer that.

I look over this discussion and I see an attempt at dialogue by some people and an attempt to squelch the dialogue by others. And I'm really puzzled as to why it has engendered so much possessive obstinacy in some people. What exactly is being threatened by this discussion? I've seen far less visceral reactions to issues like torture and the death penalty than is being exhibited on this thread. The more I think about it, the more I have to wonder exactly what is the nerve being hit here.
I might ask the same thing. You're taking this way too personally. Given what you've dealt with in the past, at least what you've shared, I think there's an issue of sensitivity that transcends a mere not liking the phrase.
This is not to say you should; if you think something is rude, then to you, it's rude. But your comments border on male bashing or at the very least, projection of an incident or incidents onto specific members of society.

Sexual objectivity is a fact of life, no matter how much we wish it'd go away. Everyone of us is guilty of it, whether in public of private. We don't wear sweats and dirty tshirts to turn on our men, we wear lingerie. We don't think dirty thoughts about the bald guy with the beer gut, we think them about the likes of a Brad Pitt(well, I don't, can't stand the guy, but as an analogy....).
If someone doesn't have the manners to keep his "I'd hit that" to a whisper, you don't have to acknowlege it. On the other hand, Ratbastid's legendary drunken "I could SO do you" got him quite the lovely arrangement....
ngdawg is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 05:57 PM   #217 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg
I might ask the same thing. You're taking this way too personally. Given what you've dealt with in the past, at least what you've shared, I think there's an issue of sensitivity that transcends a mere not liking the phrase.
This is not to say you should; if you think something is rude, then to you, it's rude. But your comments border on male bashing or at the very least, projection of an incident or incidents onto specific members of society.
I think that's a little cheap, ng, and it presumes...a lot. Chiefly, it presumes that I would have felt differently before these things occurred 3 years ago. I won't get into the other things that I think it presumes. Maybe in another discussion.

Quote:
Sexual objectivity is a fact of life, no matter how much we wish it'd go away. Everyone of us is guilty of it, whether in public of private. We don't wear sweats and dirty tshirts to turn on our men, we wear lingerie. We don't think dirty thoughts about the bald guy with the beer gut, we think them about the likes of a Brad Pitt(well, I don't, can't stand the guy, but as an analogy....).
If someone doesn't have the manners to keep his "I'd hit that" to a whisper, you don't have to acknowlege it. On the other hand, Ratbastid's legendary drunken "I could SO do you" got him quite the lovely arrangement....
Again, I don't feel like this really addresses the questions and concerns I've expressed on this thread. I keep getting told that I just don't understand how people are. Well, yes I do. I am a person, too. I have my own thoughts and feelings about the subject, and just because I am in the minority on this thread doesn't mean I'm the only person thinking them.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 05:58 PM   #218 (permalink)
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
I'd hit ALL of you.

*hip thrust*
__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."
Plan9 is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 07:02 PM   #219 (permalink)
peekaboo
 
ngdawg's Avatar
 
Location: on the back, bitch
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
I think that's a little cheap, ng, and it presumes...a lot. Chiefly, it presumes that I would have felt differently before these things occurred 3 years ago. I won't get into the other things that I think it presumes. Maybe in another discussion.
Didn't mean it to be...but yea, it presumes because of what's been said, not that it may have been different in some time frame before. I mean, of all things to be so "insulted" or adamant about, this is what's so evil?? A crude comment or two?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
Again, I don't feel like this really addresses the questions and concerns I've expressed on this thread. I keep getting told that I just don't understand how people are. Well, yes I do. I am a person, too. I have my own thoughts and feelings about the subject, and just because I am in the minority on this thread doesn't mean I'm the only person thinking them.
I think the comments were made about not knowing how some guys' minds are, not about how people are.
Your concerns have been "addressed" just not in the manner you might have hoped for(more presumptions, but, hey...sue me )
Just seems that, with 6 pages of this, a lot more is being made of a simple phrase than is warranted. It is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
And to say that men are the ones who claim not to be affected by the sexualized view of women and not recognize that women too are affected is just as much a denial as you claim has been shown here.
We do it to each other, we do it to ourselves. We show ourselves in a way to invite an "I'd hit that". It's when you* turn around and get indignant about the very thing you invited that you can expect not to have your views or comments taken seriously. This is not to say that anything more deviant than commentary should be expected, but let's not kid ourselves.

That's a few more words than I planned on on this subject......



*you is collective and not meant as a personal finger pointing.
ngdawg is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 07:38 PM   #220 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg
Didn't mean it to be...but yea, it presumes because of what's been said, not that it may have been different in some time frame before. I mean, of all things to be so "insulted" or adamant about, this is what's so evil?? A crude comment or two?
Well, to presume that my opinions are being skewed by my experience you would have to, by necessity, assume that I was different before it happened. I have lots of strong opinions about a lot of things, doesn't mean they're all floating around out there on the vagaries of my own personal experience.

I think your perspective is just as skewed and overly defensive as several of the other people on this thread. There is hardly a consensus here against my point of view. And for the record, please show me examples of where I have stated how evil this is and how deeply insulted I am. What I see, especially after going back and looking at the responses to my initial posts, is a grossly over-defensive reaction to my point of view.

Quote:
I think the comments were made about not knowing how some guys' minds are, not about how people are.
Your concerns have been "addressed" just not in the manner you might have hoped for(more presumptions, but, hey...sue me )
Just seems that, with 6 pages of this, a lot more is being made of a simple phrase than is warranted. It is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously.
And to say that men are the ones who claim not to be affected by the sexualized view of women and not recognize that women too are affected is just as much a denial as you claim has been shown here.
We do it to each other, we do it to ourselves. We show ourselves in a way to invite an "I'd hit that". It's when you* turn around and get indignant about the very thing you invited that you can expect not to have your views or comments taken seriously. This is not to say that anything more deviant than commentary should be expected, but let's not kid ourselves.

That's a few more words than I planned on on this subject......



*you is collective and not meant as a personal finger pointing.
Again, instead of actually addressing my comments (and no they haven't been addressed directly, frankly, respectfully and honestly) you want to make a case about how I just don't understand. I sense in this reply something a little more than simple disagreement and more like a beef, so I'm gonna leave it at that.

But, you know, you did answer one question for me. In that, if a woman acknowledges her own sexuality in a public way then she has forfeited the right to defend herself from exploitation. Good to know. Then all this high-handed talk around here about it being safe to explore one's sexuality and refraining from making cheap or insulting comments is just a load of bullshit to make women feel more comfortable about posting naked pictures of themselves. I can't believe I have found a use for the word 'hornswoggled' twice in one day. Guess it's just one of them days, lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg
This is not to say that anything more deviant than commentary should be expected, but let's not kid ourselves.
All I can say to this, is that it's too bad that your personal experiences have left you with this rather bleak outlook on men.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 07:44 PM   #221 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
But, you know, you did answer one question for me. In that, if a woman acknowledges her own sexuality in a public way then she has forfeited the right to defend herself from exploitation.
Huh?

The dots, I can not connect them.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 07:47 PM   #222 (permalink)
“Wrong is right.”
 
aberkok's Avatar
 
Location: toronto
Seems clear to me, Ustwo. Below is an example of this line of thinking:
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerclown
And every woman who's posted in this thread has posted nude pics of themselves here. All hail the rational irrationality of women.
__________________
!check out my new blog! http://arkanamusic.wordpress.com

Warden Gentiles: "It? Perfectly innocent. But I can see how, if our roles were reversed, I might have you beaten with a pillowcase full of batteries."
aberkok is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 07:59 PM   #223 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Click.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 08:04 PM   #224 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberkok
Seems clear to me, Ustwo. Below is an example of this line of thinking:
I was unaware that powerclown and ngdawg were the same person.



This upsets and confuses me.

But still with this new information at my disposal, and powerclown I really wish you would have told me this sooner, it still answers nothing about said exploitation.

Where is the exploitation that apparently ngdawg/powerclown has said they have a forfeited their rights too?

I can only conclude that being objectified means you are exploited. Is this the intent or is there some other exploitation I'm missing.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 08:37 PM   #225 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg
It's when you* turn around and get indignant about the very thing you invited that you can expect not to have your views or comments taken seriously. This is not to say that anything more deviant than commentary should be expected, but let's not kid ourselves.
It's this statement. And I can't wait to see the acrobatics involved in pointing out just how misunderstood I am about this statement. It's pretty plain: because I posted pictures of myself here, I don't deserve to be taken seriously on this subject. (disclaimers not withstanding, for if it is not directed at me, then who is it being directed at?) But regardless of who it is directed at, the message is plain.

Not to mention that the crux of this issue is not with women posting pictures of themselves on the internet, but simply walking out of their door on any particular day where they will encounter people who have no idea what they're doing on the internet.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 08:46 PM   #226 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
All I'm getting from this thread after the 4th page is:

Uh-huh
Nuh-uh
Uh-huh
Nuh-uh

Throw in the occasional one-liner and thinly-veiled baiting and I'm beginning to wonder why this thread remains open.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses
JumpinJesus is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:00 PM   #227 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Oh, and just to clarify, I've never had what I would consider to be sexually offensive comments made about me here at TFP. Because here, we've decided that there should be, uh, rules about appropriate responses to female members and their posting of personal information and photographs. But if that is only a courtesy being made to make women feel at ease, then it's really just a meaningless bit of protocol meant to give women a false sense of security when participating in these more vulnerable ways. Because I highly doubt most women who post here, would post without them. And maybe that's okay for some women, but it kind of deflates the concept of 'evolution' for me and turns it into a sort of internet variation on 'of course, I'll still respect you in the morning.'

I do expect more, goddamnit, and not because of some unattainable sense of propriety, but because I already know it exists.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:00 PM   #228 (permalink)
Confused Adult
 
Shauk's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA
This thread.

We choose to participate in it.

We are judged by what we post in it.

the judgements may not be welcome, however, on the other hand, some are acceptable.

for example, some people may agree with me and consider my reasoning sound, some people my disagree with me, and consider me a fool.

Either way, it's MY choice to participate in this thread. I'm not being exploited because someone is going "whoo hoo! a fool!"

I LIKE participating in threads, I don't HAVE to. I'm well aware of the risks of doing so, but I don't feel exploited despite the couple fo recent judgements passed on the thread.


There is a market for this forum, hence, it has members, it has partipants, it has lurkers.



everything i said above applies to women and the sex industry.

Sex appeal is a tangible sellable product, just because some people have an issue with it and want this to go away, and call it exploitation, objectification, or whatever buzzword, it's part of society, it's an acceptable part of society, it's legal, it makes billions, and as long as there are hormones, there will be sex, and as long as there is sex, and more demand than there is supply, it will be marketed and sold and women will make money off the men who want it because THEY CAN, they're in an optimal position to do so.


I dont understand why women who use their bodies are looked down upon?
is the brain also not a part of the body? why does it matter which part you use? not everyone is the same, some people play the hand they were dealt, and some people were dealt a better hand of hearts than spades. *shrug*

Last edited by Shauk; 04-03-2008 at 09:03 PM..
Shauk is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:02 PM   #229 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
We're not the same person.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
It's pretty plain: because I posted pictures of myself here, I don't deserve to be taken seriously on this subject.
I didn't mean it that way at all...I'm sorry you took it that way. My comment was in poor taste, and I apologize. I just thought it was a little strange for people to be getting all up in arms about "I'd hit it" - something that apparently carries more weight with some than I realized, but looking back I can see your point and its implication, and you are correct. I've always understood and appreciated this place as an outlet for free expression - in all forms - and do not wish to tarnish that reputation in any way. So again, I'm sorry mixedmedia.
powerclown is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:04 PM   #230 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
Oh, and just to clarify, I've never had what I would consider to be sexually offensive comments made about me here at TFP. Because here, we've decided that there should be, uh, rules about appropriate responses to female members and their posting of personal information and photographs. But if that is only a courtesy being made to make women feel at ease, then it's really just a meaningless bit of protocol meant to give women a false sense of security when participating in these more vulnerable ways. Because I highly doubt most women who post here, would post without them. And maybe that's okay for some women, but it kind of deflates the concept of 'evolution' for me and turns it into a sort of internet variation on 'of course, I'll still respect you in the morning.'

I do expect more, goddamnit, and not because of some unattainable sense of propriety, but because I already know it exists.
Unfortunately, there is too much of the, "yeah, yeah, I won't ask for more photos or make lewd comments, now where are the naked chicks of tfp??"
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses
JumpinJesus is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:09 PM   #231 (permalink)
Confused Adult
 
Shauk's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA
and another thing, maybe i'm just weird, or maybe girls are just too used to their whole "pick and fuck" ability/power over men. But if I post pictures, if any man posts pictures of himself, I don't think a single one of us would blink an eye in frustration if a girl says something like "i'd hit it" straight to our face or in a post. I consider it flattery, I take it as a compliment, I daresay, I think it's kinda COOL.

Does that make me fucked up?

blah at all of this.
Shauk is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:39 PM   #232 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shauk
and another thing, maybe i'm just weird, or maybe girls are just too used to their whole "pick and fuck" ability/power over men. But if I post pictures, if any man posts pictures of himself, I don't think a single one of us would blink an eye in frustration if a girl says something like "i'd hit it" straight to our face or in a post. I consider it flattery, I take it as a compliment, I daresay, I think it's kinda COOL.

Does that make me fucked up?
It makes me sad when nobody comments on pictures I post.

I want to feel pretty, dammit!

In other news, this whole topic makes me want to listen to the Offspring.
<embed src="http://www.seeqpod.net/cache/seeqpodSlimlineEmbed.swf" wmode="transparent" width="300" height="80" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="domain=http://www.seeqpod.com&playlistXMLPath=http://www.seeqpod.com/api/music/getPlaylist?playlist_id=841943d008"></embed>
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 10:59 PM   #233 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
I think the only thing that would make me want to listen to The Offspring is, perhaps, Nickelback. And luckily, thanks to my highly successful five-step Nickelback avoidance system, this never has to happen.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 11:50 PM   #234 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
I think the only thing that would make me want to listen to The Offspring is, perhaps, Nickelback. And luckily, thanks to my highly successful five-step Nickelback avoidance system, this never has to happen.
Hey, I like the Offspring. And I say that if it helps you to avoid Nickleback then it's all good.

FUN FACT - Dexter Holland is, by all accounts, a very smart man. He has a master's in molecular biology, and the only reason it isn't a PhD is because the Offspring took off before he could finish his studies.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 12:25 AM   #235 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Well, truthfully, I'm only familiar with a couple of their songs, but that genre really isn't my bag.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 12:40 AM   #236 (permalink)
 
abaya's Avatar
 
Location: Iceland
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
here's a curious sidebar to all this.
i was considering pasting the entire oed definition of the verb "to hit" but before i copied it, i looked at the etymology and now am confused. so there are 28 definitions of the verb, almost all of which have to do with delivering a blow, striking or a derivation of striking. but they all come from this root:
Quote:
[Late OE. hyttan = ON. hitta to hit upon, light upon, meet with, Sw. hitta, Da. hitte to hit, find.
App. from Norse: cf. Branch II; but the senses under I seem to have been developed at an early date in Eng. from the notion ‘get at, reach’.]
all of which make me wonder if this curious little expression was launched by some drunken etymology-obsessed gentleman in a publick house somewhere.

it's a shame these slang bits don't travel with footnotes...
ON = Old Norse. It must have come with the Vikings to England. We still use this word daily in Icelandic, since we basically speak Old Norse that has evolved a tiny bit over 1,200 years.

Að hitta = to meet (meet up with someone), though as far as I know, it's not related to the word for fuck (which is að ríða, or "to ride"). So in Iceland, presumably going back to the settlement of Norwegian Vikings here in 874, the usually pick-up line is "You want to ride?" (as in, ride a horse)--and yes, that is actually how people ask someone to come home with them from the bars. There is no such thing as dating in Iceland.

(Just woke up; thought I'd contribute some lighter fare.)
__________________
And think not you can direct the course of Love;
for Love, if it finds you worthy, directs your course.

--Khalil Gibran

Last edited by abaya; 04-04-2008 at 06:19 AM..
abaya is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:14 AM   #237 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerclown
We're not the same person.
Oh thank God, thats a relief.

All of my sexual fantasies are back in order now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg
It's when you* turn around and get indignant about the very thing you invited that you can expect not to have your views or comments taken seriously. This is not to say that anything more deviant than commentary should be expected, but let's not kid ourselves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
But, you know, you did answer one question for me. In that, if a woman acknowledges her own sexuality in a public way then she has forfeited the right to defend herself from exploitation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
It's this statement. And I can't wait to see the acrobatics involved in pointing out just how misunderstood I am about this statement. It's pretty plain: because I posted pictures of myself here, I don't deserve to be taken seriously on this subject. (disclaimers not withstanding, for if it is not directed at me, then who is it being directed at?) But regardless of who it is directed at, the message is plain.

Not to mention that the crux of this issue is not with women posting pictures of themselves on the internet, but simply walking out of their door on any particular day where they will encounter people who have no idea what they're doing on the internet.
Yes you misunderstood. ngdawg's statement is if someone acts/dresses/projects themselves in a sexual manner they shouldn't be offended when people think of them in that context. You here is the imperial you so to speak.

You took it a step beyond though using the concept of exploitation, and I agree with ngdawg on this. IF you project your own sexuality you shouldn't be offended when thats picked up on. To use TFP for example even though it really doesn't matter what the example is, if you post pictures of your vagina spread eagle and then get upset if someone says 'I'd hit it' you are being unrealistic and naive.

You are not being exploited because someone thinks you are fuckable.

So I need to ask again, what is this exploitation that has you so upset? If its just that someone might say they would like to have sex with you when you are acting in a sexual way, I can't agree thats even wrong or close to exploitation. No one is defending someone just walking up to some random female and saying 'Oh I'd hit that, ya hey der mamma', but thats something completely different from the OP or even the concept of language such as this in the male vernacular.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

Last edited by Ustwo; 04-04-2008 at 07:21 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 07:23 AM   #238 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shauk
and another thing, maybe i'm just weird, or maybe girls are just too used to their whole "pick and fuck" ability/power over men.
SHAUK! TAKE BACK THE POWER!

Don't fuck on the third date. Wait until 4 or 5.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 07:51 AM   #239 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Yes you misunderstood. ngdawg's statement is if someone acts/dresses/projects themselves in a sexual manner they shouldn't be offended when people think of them in that context. You here is the imperial you so to speak.

You took it a step beyond though using the concept of exploitation, and I agree with ngdawg on this. IF you project your own sexuality you shouldn't be offended when thats picked up on. To use TFP for example even though it really doesn't matter what the example is, if you post pictures of your vagina spread eagle and then get upset if someone says 'I'd hit it' you are being unrealistic and naive.
I'm not talking about women who are posting spread eagle pictures of their vaginas. I guess I interpreted ng's comment that way because I am the one making comments here not some fictional woman posting naked pictures of herself or wearing hot pants to the grocery store and then whining when some guy says she looks sexy. Who has said anything about that?

The real women being addressed in this thread and by the OP are women on the street.

Quote:
You are not being exploited because someone thinks you are fuckable.
The implication is that if you have ever presented yourself in a way that could be seen as desirable by men, then you forfeit the right to make this argument. Bullshit.

Quote:
So I need to ask again, what is this exploitation that has you so upset? If its just that someone might say they would like to have sex with you when you are acting in a sexual way, I can't agree thats even wrong or close to exploitation. No one is defending someone just walking up to some random female and saying 'Oh I'd hit that, ya hey der mamma', but thats something completely different from the OP or even the concept of language such as this in the male vernacular.
What has made me, not upset, but adamant in my convictions and I've said it again and again is that it is not simply the phrase, but the implications of its widespread acceptance in our society. And let me tell you, it takes more than one viewpoint to create six pages of dialogue. I've found that the reaction to my viewpoint is far more emotional and over the top than I am being. You yourself have resorted to all sorts far-fetched statements and examples to make your case. The spread-eagle picture reference above being a perfect example of this. Rather, I maintain that it is I who have hit a nerve here, not vice versa and that hotspot has yet to be explained to me.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-04-2008, 08:12 AM   #240 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
to back what mm said:

just read through the responses to this thread from the shocked and outraged gentlemen who cannot imagine why this particular phrase or phrases like them could possibly be at the least strange and at most problematic--how these responses are constructed such that ANY question about either the existence and actions of some inward fuckwit fratboy persona that enables/justifies/directs sexual desire is a threat to ALL forms of personae and ALL forms of male sexuality---how questions about the "right to be immature and stupid" gets asserted as an enormous non-sequitor than then nags about over and over in the bizarre little tunnel that is this thread----it is among the most proactively defensive threads i remember having seen on tfp.

and it's done without the SLIGHTEST trace of self-consciousness.
in fact, much of this seems to be a long series of arguments AGAINST self-consciousness.
as if sexuality is a space of immediacy and introducing self-consciousness into it fucks everything up.
where does this come from?


anyway defensiveness on this scale is a pretty clear indication that some nerve has been struck, and it seems to have to do with some commonalities in this community over the construction of masculinity and sexuality that is inhabited/invested in/lived through.

but it's not obvious *what exactly* has tripped all this...but it is obvious that something strange is going on here.

read the thread--take a break from busily defending your inner frat boy or from collapsing the particular into the universal or whatever other logical mistake you find yourself indulging in order to swat away whatever it is about this that has your panties in a twist---and read the thread.

it is a peculiar collective psychological document.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

Tags
discussion, hit


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360