Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Life (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-life/)
-   -   Your daughter tells you she's pregnant (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-life/131009-your-daughter-tells-you-shes-pregnant.html)

jewels 01-31-2008 08:20 AM

Your daughter tells you she's pregnant
 
All the threads lately about unwanted pregnancy, parenting, custody and what's morally right got me to thinking. I wonder if this question wouldn't help all of us to see these issues a little differently. I'm also curious if those that are parents now would see it differently than those that don't plan on children for some time.

Whether you are or not: Let's say you're a happily married parent of at least one daughter. Shortly after she begins her senior year in high school (17ish?), she comes home and tells you she's pregnant.

You've already done all the right things. You taught her to wait for love. Taught her about birth control. Been good, loving parents.

What would you do? Have her quit school and get a job and raise the child? Talk to the boy's parents? Take her for an abortion? Tell her to have the baby, you'll raise it. Or tell her she needs to decide on her future?

Writing this, I'm struggling with my own response. My 24-year old, thankfully, is not pregnant and although she's with a guy and on a good career path, of no concern in this regard. I have two teen girls at home and although they still think penises are gross (thank Gawd!) I know this will change and know that no matter what they're taught, they will make some unwise decisions in their lifetime and a parent should always be armed. :D

I tend to think that I'd try to make a decision with her. Talk it out. Hear her feelings and fears, and what she thinks would be right for her. Let her know that I will be there for emotional support whether she opted to have the baby or not, but if she intended to stay in my home with a baby the responsibility and financial burden would be between her and the father.

I'm not sure if that's a weak response, but I'm not totally sure I've weighed everything. I'd be really interested to hear what you guys would do in this scenario.

vanblah 01-31-2008 08:37 AM

Well, my daughter is only 6 so it's rather hard for me to speculate. It would really depend on HER personality. I can sit here and spout lofty ideals all day long but in the end it really doesn't do any good.

Is she promiscuous? Is she an other-wise non-promiscuous kid who had an accident? Is she the kind of kid who maybe did this out of spite? It's been known to happen. These are all factors in the way I would deal with this situation; there are myriad other factors as well.

I could only hope to help her make a decision that is best for her based on the kind of person she is. I would hope that I had done a good enough job raising her that she understands the consequences and is able to assume some amount of personal responsibility. I would hope that she is attracted to men who have at least equal understanding of those consequences and responsibility. Understanding and accepting responsibility is certainly not a preventative--especially when hormones are involved. I remember those days all too well.

The point is, there is rarely--if ever--a single answer that will fit all scenarios. There's no way to predict the future; there's no way to tell what a child will be like when he or she grows up. You can only guide them along a path that will hopefully be a good one. So there's no way to tell how you can or should or even will react in this situation.

Willravel 01-31-2008 08:46 AM

"Honey I love you but you did this before you were ready. I'm very disappointed in you.", would be the only thing I'd say that was negative to her. From there on I'd do everything in my power to make sure that my daughter and grandchild were cared for. Assuming she was still in school, I'd ask that she go to school part time and we'd make arrangements about baby-sitting (I'd LOVE to babysit my grandchild).

The unlucky young man who knocked up daddy's little girl would be a slightly different story. I'd speak to him with his parents, and it would not be a comfortable discussion. He will be monitored very closely by me personally to make sure that he gets perfect grades AND is going to go to college full time and get a part time job. Even if he somehow lives up to my demands, it'd take years before he earned my trust.

If he tries to leave her, there will be problems.

vanblah 01-31-2008 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
young man who knocked up daddy's little girl would be a slightly different story

So, just because he's the guy he's going to get the brunt of your displeasure? Sounds like a double-standard to me; and you'll be setting up a horrible situation for the new parents. Unless he forced her to have sex unprotected then he didn't "knock up daddy's little girl"--they did it together and thus should be treated equally.

Quote:

If he tried to leave her, there will be problems
It might be a better situation if HE DOES leave her ... sometimes two people should just not be together even AFTER they have kids.

Life is not black and white.

Hain 01-31-2008 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
If he tries to leave her, there will be problems.

I'd like to see what kinda solution a sorta licensed troubleshooter would invoke.

I am 21, not thinking about a family, so not even thinking about kids and someone higher up ought to prevent me from ever having children. Given the descriptions my father told me of his childhood, the things I heard about my older brother, how my childhood "experiments" were jacked-up versions of his, my lil' bundles of hell would probably set the Earth on fire from their sandbox with stolen parts and tools from my garage.

I have to agree with Will, though. _[Insert Deity]_ forbid I have daughter, and she became pregnant as a teen, I'd be disappointed, and I'd let her know. After that I would do everything to see that she makes decisions she can live with, and I wouldn't mind help raising a grandchild, having already survived what was to be Armageddon with her childhood, I could then watch this lil' bundle of hell with diapers assemble the for-sure Doomsday device in his/her sandbox.

Not so sure about the boy... Definitely disappointed with him... Have a talk with the parents too [see where we went wrong].

Jinn 01-31-2008 09:17 AM

I'd give her the option of either (a) getting an abortion or (b) moving out.

The way I see it, she'll be thanking me in two years.

Because in two years:

(a) She aborted a bunch of cells she didn't really want from a guy she won't like in two years, went on to college and is living a normal, college girl's life, dating normally.

or

(b) She is two years down the road, having kept a baby she didn't want with a guy she didn't like, forced into minimum-wage slave labor hell of a life so she can support the crying eat n' poop machine. She'd commit suicide if she didn't have a kid to take care of.

Why would you ever choose (b)? Because some idiot thinks a bunch of cells is worth saving? I think not. If she wants to choose (b) because she thinks by some deviation of logic that this fertilized clump of suck is actually a 'human life', then there's no way I'm going to financially support another idiot. The US already has enough. Besides, I wouldn't raise a child to be so stupid. Choice (a) should be pretty obvious to her by the time she's 17.

Willravel 01-31-2008 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanblah
So, just because he's the guy he's going to get the brunt of your displeasure? Sounds like a double-standard to me; and you'll be setting up a horrible situation for the new parents. Unless he forced her to have sex unprotected then he didn't "knock up daddy's little girl"--they did it together and thus should be treated equally.

You understand that "knock up daddy's little girl" means that he got my daughter pregnant, right? And as such, that's exactly what he did in the scenario in the OP?

And no, I'm not going to treat them equally. It's my prerogative to be overprotective of the young woman who I have raised since she was an infant. They will both be going to school and they will both have a stern talking to. The only difference is that SHE WILL BE PREGNANT. Welcome to a biologically implemented double standard that everyone keeps telling me about in the other thread. She's going to have morning sickness, mood swings due to hormonal imbalances, she'll inflate and suddenly find herself a lot heavier, etc. He won't. In other words, for the first 9 months, she won't need me riding her other than to make sure she's safe, prepared, and still going to school. The young man, on the other hand, is not pregnant. This is when I have to make sure that he will be able to provide for her. This means that he busts his ass in school, gets plenty of "responsibility" themed talks from me, and finds a job.
Quote:

Originally Posted by vanblah
It might be a better situation if HE DOES leave her ... sometimes two people should just not be together even AFTER they have kids.

Life is not black and white.

That's true, but it's not as easy as "he's not up to the job" so he can just leave. He'll end up under my thumb one way or another because that's just how I operate. This is the one area in life when Willravel stops being fair or whatever.

If you fuck my daughter, get her pregnant, and try to leave, expect me to do something about it. You WILL pay child support, which means you WILL have a job. You WILL be in the child's life. If you're not mature enough for that, then you will be doing a lot of maturing because I said so.

Outside of this specific scenario, I am a pretty calm, kind, fair guy, but this is a serious situation and I won't be walking on eggshells.

Jinn 01-31-2008 09:32 AM

Quote:

The young man, on the other hand, is not pregnant. This is when I have to make sure that he will be able to provide for her. This means that he busts his ass in school, gets plenty of "responsibility" themed talks from me, and finds a job.
[...]
That's true, but it's not as easy as "he's not up to the job" so he can just leave. He'll end up under my thumb one way or another because that's just how I operate. This is the one area in life when Willravel stops being fair or whatever.

If you fuck my daughter, get her pregnant, and try to leave, expect me to do something about it. You WILL pay child support, which means you WILL have a job. You WILL be in the child's life. If you're not mature enough for that, then you will be doing a lot of maturing because I said so.
Things might be nice in your fantasy world where you can actually control another person, but in the real world, this is harassment at the very least.

He has parents too, and I don't think they'd be too pleased with you telling their spawn what to do or not to do. Furthermore, you can't force another individual to do what you want in the way you seem to imply without breaking many laws. I'd file a restraining order on you as soon as I turned 18, or have my parents do it in my stead. I'd also tell you to take a flying leap off a cliff, because if you talked to me again after that point the police would be on the way.

The ONLY thing that can be forced upon this kid is child support, and only a COURT OF LAW can enforce such a thing. Luckily for him, you being "mad" or whatever you want to call it actually translates to diddly squat in terms of reality.

vanblah 01-31-2008 09:34 AM

To anyone saying that they would be disappointed in their daughter or the boy--think really hard about this for a moment: are you disappointed with the person or the situation?

To be disappointed in a person implies that their actions were caused by a certain level of maliciousness (ie. "you know better but you did it anyway"). But we all know that there is no form of birth control that is 100% effective (besides surgical means).

Teenagers are going to have sex ... we all know it. There is no stopping it. Birth control fails.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
You understand that "knock up daddy's little girl" means that he got my daughter pregnant, right? And as such, that's exactly what he did in the scenario in the OP?

I'm familiar with what the phrase "knocked up" means. In this (hopefully) hypothetical situation he didn't GET your daughter pregnant. Unless he forced her, they did it together. Period (or lack thereof).

Willravel 01-31-2008 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanblah
To anyone saying that they would be disappointed in their daughter or the boy--think really hard about this for a moment: are you disappointed with the person or the situation?

Both. My safe sex practices are the stuff of legend. It's reasonable, thus, to presume that I would be getting the pill with my daughter when she was 16-17 and teaching her all about the many forms of birth control and contraceptives, because I'm aware that like her old man she may very well be sexually active when she's young. She will be armed with knowledge at a young age. One would hope that this would make the unexpected pregnancy unlikely, but to be honest there are times when young people are caught up in the moment and forget to do what they should be doing. They behave in an irresponsible manner. As such, I'm sure I'd have every right to be disappointed with my daughter (and obviously the boy, though he may not have had such vigilant parents). I can be disappointed in her for letting herself forget all that I and her mother had carefully taught her.
Quote:

Originally Posted by vanblah
Teenagers are going to have sex ... we all know it. There is no stopping it. Birth control fails.

The failure rates of compound birth control are nearly astronomical. If you combine pill, condom, and spermicide, your chances of getting pregnant drop off to an area close to 1/60,000 (according to my doctor). Those are the same odds that I've gambled with since I was 13, and I've never gotten someone pregnant that I didn't intend.
Quote:

Originally Posted by vanblah
I'm familiar with what the phrase "knocked up" means. In this (hopefully) hypothetical situation he didn't GET your daughter pregnant. Unless he forced her, they did it together. Period (or lack thereof).

He put his penis in my daughter's vagina and ejaculated, releasing sperm that fertilized her egg. He knocked her up. It has nothing to do with "GET"ting someone pregnant, and I'm not even sure what that means.

Infinite_Loser 01-31-2008 09:54 AM

She's moving out and getting a job. Oh... And the guy is going to marry her or I'll shoot him. Simple :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by JinnKai
(a) She aborted a bunch of cells she didn't really want from a guy she won't like in two years, went on to college and is living a normal, college girl's life, dating normally.

Statistics say she's likely to make the same mistake again and have another abortion, FYI.

Jinn 01-31-2008 10:02 AM

Quote:

Statistics say she's likely to make the same mistake again and have another abortion, FYI.
Neither I nor my spawn have ever or will ever fall into the statistical cess pool of mediocre idiots known as "the majority of the World."

What statistics, by the way? Care to provide a source?

Willravel 01-31-2008 10:06 AM

47% of all abortions are performed on women who have had at least one previous abortion.

Infinite_Loser 01-31-2008 10:11 AM

Last I saw it was 48%, but 47% is close enough.

Willravel 01-31-2008 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Last I saw it was 48%, but 47% is close enough.

Still, bear in mind that the statistic I liked above is from a pro-life website. I'm not 100% sure about the number's reliability.

vanblah 01-31-2008 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
It has nothing to do with "GET"ting someone pregnant, and I'm not even sure what that means.

But that is the word you used:

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
You understand that "knock up daddy's little girl" means that he GOT my daughter pregnant, right?

(Bold and caps are mine).

You consistently ignore the fact that it takes two. It doesn't matter how much you prepare your daughter; it doesn't matter how much you teach her. The fact is, unless you know with absolute certainty that she GOT pregnant on purpose ... you should NOT be disappointed with HER. Be disappointed with the situation ... but not the person.

You can quote statistics all you want, but that doesn't mean it couldn't happen--even to you or your daughter. Just because you aren't a statistic (in this matter) doesn't mean that your daughter will be so lucky.

Willravel 01-31-2008 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanblah
You consistently ignore the fact that it takes two. It doesn't matter how much you prepare your daughter; it doesn't matter how much you teach her. The fact is, unless you know with absolute certainty that she GOT pregnant on purpose ... you should NOT be disappointed with HER. Be disappointed with the situation ... but not the person.

1/60,000 means that statistically she either hit the jackpot or (more likely) she didn't do what she was supposed to. I have every right to be disappointed if my daughters acts in an irresponsible manner.
Quote:

Originally Posted by vanblah
You can quote statistics all you want, but that doesn't mean it couldn't happen--even to you or your daughter. Just because you aren't a statistic (in this matter) doesn't mean that your daughter will be so lucky.

1/60,000. You're more likely to be killed by a tsunami or a bee sting. It's literally actually close to the odds of being struck by lightning and dying as a result.

It's not even close to being likely. What is infinitely more likely is that they had sex without protection.

Plan9 01-31-2008 11:38 AM

Like that nuclear missile don't-launch line used at silos everywhere during the Cold War:

"Abort - abort - abort!"

Ustwo 01-31-2008 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JinnKai
I'd give her the option of either (a) getting an abortion or (b) moving out.

The way I see it, she'll be thanking me in two years.

Because in two years:

(a) She aborted a bunch of cells she didn't really want from a guy she won't like in two years, went on to college and is living a normal, college girl's life, dating normally.

or

(b) She is two years down the road, having kept a baby she didn't want with a guy she didn't like, forced into minimum-wage slave labor hell of a life so she can support the crying eat n' poop machine. She'd commit suicide if she didn't have a kid to take care of.

Why would you ever choose (b)? Because some idiot thinks a bunch of cells is worth saving? I think not. If she wants to choose (b) because she thinks by some deviation of logic that this fertilized clump of suck is actually a 'human life', then there's no way I'm going to financially support another idiot. The US already has enough. Besides, I wouldn't raise a child to be so stupid. Choice (a) should be pretty obvious to her by the time she's 17.

Jinn sometimes I forget how young you are, and then you remind me.

Jinn 01-31-2008 12:06 PM

Quote:

Jinn sometimes I forget how young you are, and then you remind me.
Better than being infantile? I can pee farther than you...

If you care to elaborate on how my youth is showing I'd be pleased to hear.

Willravel 01-31-2008 12:21 PM

I usually take it as "I disagree with you, but I don't feel like saying why".

Plan9 01-31-2008 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
I usually take it as "I disagree with you, but I don't feel like saying why".

Yeah, ya POO-POO FACE!

Jinn 01-31-2008 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Still, bear in mind that the statistic I liked above is from a pro-life website. I'm not 100% sure about the number's reliability.

Thank you for acknowledging this will. I thought it was suspect myself, so I did a bit of searching.

It appears they removed part of the sentence for effect. It changes the meaning considerably, in my opinion.

"Abortion No" said this:
Quote:

47% of all abortions are performed on women who have had at least one previous abortion.
They claim this statistic is taken from "pro-abortion sites, like the Alan Guttmacher Institute and Planned Parenthood's Family Planning Perspectives."

The AGI said:

Quote:

Each year, about two out of every 100 women aged 15–44 have an abortion; 47% of them have had at least one previous abortion.
For clarification, I went to the original source. AGI took this statistic from Jones RK, Darroch JE and Henshaw SK, Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000–2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(5):226–235..

which said:

Quote:

A large proportion (73%) of all women having abortions had been pregnant before: Some 48% had had a previous abortion, including 36% who had experienced both a previous birth and an abortion and 12% who had experienced only a previous abortion. It is also worth noting that 52% of women having abortions in 2000 intended to have (more) children in the future, and 22% were unsure of their birth intentions (not shown).
So there we have it. You can make it seem epidemic by saying that 47% of abortions are performed on women who had a previous one by omitting the rest of the sentence.
47% seems like a lot until you consider all of the factors. Only 2 out of every 100 women has an abortion, which means that less than 1% of women will have more than one abortion. Even more, of those 47%, 36% have had a child AND an abortion, meaning they're not just aborting and aborting like No Abortion suggests.

PonyPotato 01-31-2008 12:45 PM

Considering how hardened I've become to my little sister's screw ups, I'm pretty positive I'd give her the options of a) an abortion, b) giving the child up for adoption, or c) moving out and doing it on her own.

One of my good friends had an unexpected pregnancy in her first year of college, and she decided to keep the baby. She and the guy broke up (he was/is abusive), and she stayed in school. Guess who takes care of her kid, even now when she's out of school with a good job? Her parents still have her little girl because she still doesn't want to take full responsibility for her. I never want to find myself in a situation like that.

RangerJoe 01-31-2008 12:53 PM

Other than ghoastgirl, it doesn't sound like any of you have been through anything even similar to this. We all know how we would WANT to act, but when it actually happens, more than likely we will all act differently.

I was 16 when I got pregnant with my son. It was stupidity on my part - the guy and I didn't have anything even resembling a relationship. I also never told my mom I was sexually active. I had sex only one time before, why embarrass myself? When I finally did tell my mom, she freaked out, literally. Screaming and yelling, throwing shit, threats. She was pissed. A day later, my mom, my sister, and I all sat down at the dining room table and discussed what we would do. She told me my options - adoption, abortion, giving her the child until I was ready and prepared to raise it, or keeping him for myself. All in all it was my choice.
Obviously, I chose to keep him. I went to school and worked full time, but eventually I was doing too much. I dropped out of school my senior year because I was failing two classes I needed to graduate due to absences. So, I went to working full time. Never did graduate.

I don't think I'm doing so bad now, and my mom definitely makes sure that I'm taking care of my son. I would hope if I ever have a daughter (or even if the situation happens with my son) and she tells me she is pregnant, that I would react the same way as my mom did. List the options, explain the options, and then leave the decision up to her. After all, it IS her life. As long as I give her the information that is needed, I can only assume she would make the decision that would be best for her.

Punk.of.Ages 01-31-2008 01:02 PM

If she's old enough to get pregnant, she's old enough to make her own choices. I would give her support in whatever she decided she wanted to do. Period.

World's King 01-31-2008 01:08 PM

Find the nearest flight of stairs...



Okay, I'm kidding of course.

Willravel 01-31-2008 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Punk.of.Ages
If she's old enough to get pregnant, she's old enough to make her own choices.

Women can get pregnant before they're 13 sometimes. So I have to disagree with this statement being a blanket statement. I would agree if she was 17+, though.

vanblah 01-31-2008 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by merleniau
Considering how hardened I've become to my little sister's screw ups, I'm pretty positive I'd give her the options of a) an abortion, b) giving the child up for adoption, or c) moving out and doing it on her own.

Out of curiosity, are you talking about giving your sister these options or are you talking about a future daughter?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinnkai
I'd give her the option of either (a) getting an abortion or (b) moving out.

That may seem like the answer but the thing is, when you give a person (especially a teenager) ultimatums like these then you run the risk of exacerbating the problem. If the teenager wants to keep the child then they will move out and then the situation really gets bad.

Think about the last time someone gave you an ultimatum. Teenagers are not known for their cool-headedness during stressful times.

You can talk all you want about how "it's your house and, therefore, your rules" (I'm not saying that Jinnkai is implying this statement) but the fact is it is a human being you are dealing with-- a fairly mature human being with her own thoughts and ideas. This is not a six-year-old.This is a human being that you have been responsible for for many years. A human being in which you have a considerable amount of emotional, mental, and financial investment.

Say your daughter wants to really keep the baby and the guy with whom she conceived doesn't want to marry her or take care of her (beyond legal responsibilities). Are you really, really going to kick her out and run the risk of producing yet another low-income mom with a child that has no hope for the future?

Have we really produced a society that is so selfish that it would turn its back on its own flesh and blood? It doesn't really take much to help someone out in this situation. Raising a child (even a grand child) is not that difficult.

And yes, abortion may be the correct answer, but you can't force it upon someone. You may be able to exercise your parental rights if the daughter is young enough; but if she really wants to keep the baby then you're just going to ruin your relationship.

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Women can get pregnant before they're 13 sometimes.

Isn't there a story in the news right now about a 10-year-old girl giving birth?

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
So I have to disagree with this statement being a blanket statement. I would agree if she was 17+, though.

Yep, and even some 17-year-olds may be emotionally incapable of making a good decision without guidance. All of these scenarios really depend on the kind of girl your daughter turns out to be. Nothing is certain so you can't say with any certainty how you'd react.

Ustwo 01-31-2008 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
I usually take it as "I disagree with you, but I don't feel like saying why".

More like taking the time.

Jinn my boy, obviously you are going through your radical stage, its all over your posts lately. You most likely don't know any women who had children at an early age and are glad they didn't abort because you are hanging out with self centered adult children who haven't really 'grown up' yet.

Being a 'normal' college girl, isn't all what its cracked up to be once you step away from the university and enter the real world.

So while you so arrogantly decide of course abortion is the best route, I mean a kid would crimp her style after all, know that there are many who are glad they didn't take that route, and one I know personally who wishes she didn't.

I don't hold it against you, you can't really understand it yet.

Punk.of.Ages 01-31-2008 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Women can get pregnant before they're 13 sometimes. So I have to disagree with this statement being a blanket statement. I would agree if she was 17+, though.

Before 13... that would probably warrant an abortion.

If it's in the 15-17 range, "Guess what honey... you get to become an adult early."

She made an adult decision getting pregnant. Now she gets to make another adult decision (keep it or not). Should she decide to keep it, many more adult decisions will follow.

Of course I will support her and advise her through it, but ultimately it will be better for her if I let her figure it out.

Infinite_Loser 01-31-2008 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JinnKai
47% seems like a lot until you consider all of the factors. Only 2 out of every 100 women has an abortion, which means that less than 1% of women will have more than one abortion. Even more, of those 47%, 36% have had a child AND an abortion, meaning they're not just aborting and aborting like No Abortion suggests.

Yes, less than 1% of the population will have more than one abortion but it's important to note that only 2% of the population will have an abortion. .95 out of 100 isn't worth noting, but .95 of 2 is a substantial number. Anyway, you seem to ignore the fact that the 36% is part of the 47%, meaning that 11% of the people who had one abortion will have another one and no children while the other 36% will have at least one other abortion and one child. That doesn't change the fact that people who have one abortion are likely to have another one nor does it change the fact that they are more likely to have another abortion than people who have never had an abortion are to have one. Seriously. No one mentioned anything about aborting children with reckless regard, so I don't know why you bother bringing that up. The original statement was that people who have one abortion are likely to have another one. Not really sure how/why you bother arguing against that, but meh.

Plan9 01-31-2008 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Being a 'normal' college girl, isn't all what its cracked up to be once you step away from the university and enter the real world.

Uh... subject matter expert? :orly:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
So while you so arrogantly decide of course abortion is the best route, I mean a kid would crimp her style after all, know that there are many who are glad they didn't take that route, and one I know personally who wishes she didn't.

How about her cramping the kid's style with a mediocre-to-shitty life prospect? Nom nom nom! Mmmm, a potential life of food stamps and minimum wage jobs rocks my socks.

...

My not-a-genius point: Women can almost always make another kid. Other people will have unwanted kids even if said woman can't and that gives you a chance to adopt if you really want a brat of your own. Let us not populate the world with human mistakes, the product of bad judgment, when we have the technology to remedy the situation. Let's not encourage people to throw away their currently evolving life for one that hasn't even stared yet because they fear the Old 'n Holy Jesus-Fetus. It's for the Greater Good in the Hood.

Fetus: ITZ A MARACLE.

Or not.

jewels 01-31-2008 01:24 PM

/insert ustwo quote/

Jinn doesn't need defending, but I don't understand why you're attempting to belittle his opinions as though your life's experience has given you such great wisdom.

I'm far from his age, but I still hold the same beliefs I did when I was his age, which are pretty close to his. Age has nothing to do with it. Personally, I would prefer my daughter have an abortion if she did become pregnant at 17. The only difference is that I would respect her wishes.

Jinn 01-31-2008 01:29 PM

Thank you for taking the time to explain how you arrived at your conclusion Ustwo.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanblah
You can talk all you want about how "it's your house and, therefore, your rules" (I'm not saying that Jinnkai is implying this statement) but the fact is it is a human being you are dealing with-- a fairly mature human being with her own thoughts and ideas. This is not a six-year-old.This is a human being that you have been responsible for for many years. A human being in which you have a considerable amount of emotional, mental, and financial investment.

Say your daughter wants to really keep the baby and the guy with whom she conceived doesn't want to marry her or take care of her (beyond legal responsibilities). Are you really, really going to kick her out and run the risk of producing yet another low-income mom with a child that has no hope for the future?

After reading this, you're right. I wouldn't kick her out but god would I hate myself for it. We are talking about hypothetical situations here, so it makes two things evident; (1) you can't really talk directly about what you'd do unless you already have a daughter this age, because your feelings toward your own spawn would certainly influence it and (2) you can't really know that this would ever happen. I'd love to believe that I would raise a child who was careful enough, and if not, as adamantly pro-choice that this wouldn't ever become an issue.

So in light of that, I stand by what I said. I can only address what I'd want to do, not what I will do. It's hypothetical.

Willravel 01-31-2008 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Being a 'normal' college girl, isn't all what its cracked up to be once you step away from the university and enter the real world.

I respect the fact that you are willing to admit that you have such a familiarity with being a normal college girl. Was it a cross-dressing thing, or was there an operation involved?

Or maybe you can't admit that
Quote:

Originally Posted by Willravel, right now
Ustwo doesn't know.

It's okay to admit you don't have the answers to everything, even if it's admitting that you've never been a college girl.

Ustwo 01-31-2008 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jewels443
/insert ustwo quote/

Jinn doesn't need defending, but I don't understand why you're attempting to belittle his opinions as though your life's experience has given you such great wisdom.

I'm far from his age, but I still hold the same beliefs I did when I was his age, which are pretty close to his. Age has nothing to do with it. Personally, I would prefer my daughter have an abortion if she did become pregnant at 17. The only difference is that I would respect her wishes.

Have you heard of another term....

I think its adoption?

Yes thats it.

I'll add that the problem with Jinn wasn't that he advocated abortion, but that it was he thinks its have a meaningless abortion, and that any other option is stupid.

Willravel 01-31-2008 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Yes, less than 1% of the population will have more than one abortion but it's important to note that only 2% of the population will have an abortion. .95 out of 100 isn't worth noting, but .95 of 2 is a substantial number. Anyway, you seem to ignore the fact that the 36% is part of the 47%, meaning that 11% of the people who had one abortion will have another one and no children while the other 36% will have at least one other abortion and one child. That doesn't change the fact that people who have one abortion are likely to have another one nor does it change the fact that they are more likely to have another abortion than people who have never had an abortion are to have one. Seriously. No one mentioned anything about aborting children with reckless regard, so I don't know why you bother bringing that up. The original statement was that people who have one abortion are likely to have another one. Not really sure how/why you bother arguing against that, but meh.

I'll give you this, but you have to take down your avatar. Bestiality is against TFP rules.

Plan9 01-31-2008 01:33 PM

*glues on fake mustache, knocks on door*

Hey, I'm here for the abortion circle jerk!

jewels 01-31-2008 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Have you heard of another term....

I think its adoption?

Let's not do the choice battle here, okay? The point is that you can't say you're wiser because that would be your CHOICE. You're attempting to force your CHOICE down someone else's throat.

vanblah 01-31-2008 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crompsin
My not-a-genius point: Women can almost always make another kid. Other people will have unwanted kids even if said woman can't and that gives you a chance to adopt if you really want a brat of your own. Let us not populate the world with human mistakes, the product of bad judgment, when we have the technology to remedy the situation. Let's not encourage people to throw away their currently evolving life for one that hasn't even stared yet because they fear the Old 'n Holy Jesus-Fetus. It's for the Greater Good in the Hood.

Fetus: ITZ A MARACLE.

Or not.

Well, abortion is nothing new nor are we the only animal that does it.

I'm certainly pro-choice--but I don't agree that it's always the right decision and it certainly shouldn't be made lightly. Who's to say that every young mother will turn out to be a welfare statistic? My mom was 17 when she conceived my older brother with my father. We were never on welfare ... (but just to be fair my parents did divorce when my mom was 23 about 2 years after I was born; so statistically speaking we fit right in).

Again, I will reiterate, abortion may or may not be the right decision ... but it may not fit in with your plan since your daughter is the one who will really have to make the decision.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JinnKai
We are talking about hypothetical situations here, so it makes two things evident; (1) you can't really talk directly about what you'd do unless you already have a daughter this age, because your feelings toward your own spawn would certainly influence it and (2) you can't really know that this would ever happen. I'd love to believe that I would raise a child who was careful enough, and if not, as adamantly pro-choice that this wouldn't ever become an issue.

So in light of that, I stand by what I said. I can only address what I'd want to do, not what I will do. It's hypothetical.

QFT.

Also, I just realized that in my post to which you are replying I implied that 6-year-olds are not human ...

I want to state for the record that my 6-year-old is very much human; despite the way she acts sometimes.

:)

Ustwo 01-31-2008 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jewels443
Let's not do the choice battle here, okay? The point is that you can't say you're wiser because that would be your CHOICE. You're attempting to force your CHOICE down someone else's throat.

I can say I'm wiser because Jinn's choice was have an abortion or you are a dumb ass who ruined your life.

Thats simply not true.

Willravel 01-31-2008 01:57 PM

Hey, Ustwo, what would your answer be to the OP? I'm just honestly curious.

Ustwo 01-31-2008 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Hey, Ustwo, what would your answer be to the OP? I'm just honestly curious.

To dependent on other variables.

I've known idiots who knocked up their girlfriends (and I think they are idiots for it yes, BC isn't rocket science) but they have been together for 20 years now. It can work and if the situation was such I'd be ok with that. A lot would depend on the quality of the boy and his parents as well. If his parents were interested in working it out as well and he seemed to have a clue it would positivity influence that avenue.

If it was apparent a long term relationship would not work out for whatever reason, I'd recommend adoption.

I'd be in favor of abortion only for health, rape, or very unusual circumstances. Such as she is a genius (who couldn't figure out birth control somehow) and had a very limited window to do a once in a life time program. I suppose the same could be said if she were on an athletic scholarship. I'd not recommend it as a rule if she was getting the typical Mrs. degree though. I don't think 9 months of your life is that long.

Infinite_Loser 01-31-2008 02:23 PM

If everyone who agrees with abortion was aborted before they were born, then we'd never have to worry about an abortion topic as there wouldn't be anyone to defend the practice.

On topic, though, I can definitely say I'm wiser than anyone who would have an abortion. Why? 'Cuz I'm not foolish enough to get anyone pregnant if I can't handle the consequences.

Plan9 01-31-2008 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
If everyone who agrees with abortion was aborted before they were born, then we'd never have to worry about an abortion topic as there wouldn't be anyone to defend the practice.

Wrong. We have these things called "free will" and "education."

Or would you like to abort human choice, too?

Infinite_Loser 01-31-2008 02:42 PM

If I've said it once, I've said it a million times: Free will =/= Free reign to do as you please. Because you can doesn't mean you should.

And I'm all for human choice, just so long as we abort those who make, or agree with, the wrong one.

>_>

vanblah 01-31-2008 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
And I'm all for human choice, just so long as we abort those who make, or agree with, the wrong one.

Sorry for the threadjack here: but does this mean that you want to kill anyone who disagrees with you?

jewels 01-31-2008 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
I can say I'm wiser because Jinn's choice was have an abortion or you are a dumb ass who ruined your life.

Thats simply not true.

You can but you won't? I don't get what you're saying. I've never complained about any decisions I've made, nor do you know what those were, so I know you're not talking about me here.

Quote:

I don't think 9 months of your life is that long.
I don't think nine months of your life is too long either. Who should decide what you do for the next nine months?

I realize you're sensationalizing selected responses. But the fact remains that most Pro-Choicers are just that. We're for abortion when it's the best choice. I stated my preference, but I would definitely be sure my child knew that carrying that baby for herself or for adoption were viable options.

You've never been a girl or a woman and never experienced the possibility of being in that position. Yes, you're a father but you've never been the mother of a teenage girl and been around multitudes of teen girls as an adult. You come across as lacking with the compassion and integrity it would take to support your daughter when she needs it most. (Although I somehow get the feeling that you're a big pile of mush around your kids. :orly: )

Hijack Shmyjack, I don't care. At least we know that you would make that decision on behalf of your daughter.

Remind me to tell you one day about my cousin's controlling father and the impact it had on her life. :)

Mantus 02-01-2008 12:00 AM

I'd support an abortion. Wouldn't make the kid go against her wishes though. If she chose to keep it I would support that choice and kick her out on her ass.

Charlatan 02-01-2008 12:39 AM

First of all, I would hope that if she was mature enough to have sex that she would be mature enough to make the call on what to do about getting pregnant without needing my input.

That said, if she asked for my advice, I would discuss all of the available options. Tell that I would support whatever she decides. Then let her decide what to do for herself.

I won't list what the options are because every situation is different but it would include:

Abortion
Adoption
Keeping the baby

Infinite_Loser 02-01-2008 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghoastgirl1
Have you ever peed on a stick and watched it tell you theres something growing that's not supposed to be there at that particular time?

(Unprotected) sex invariably leads to pregnancy. In other words, that 'something' was growing exactly where it was supposed to be, as per nature.

Quote:

A child deserves better than that and I decided against having it. Plain and simple.
So instead you'll just kill it. That's terribly flawed logic.

Quote:

I believe this is a topic that needs to be moved into the Ladies Lounge. Insensitivity on this topic from certain male members is overwhelming and insulting to ladies such as myself and those who have been in similar situations.
I'd just like to point out that it has nothing to do with insensitivity nor does it have anything to do with being male. One doesn't need to be female or have had an abortion in the past to discuss abortion-- Otherwise, you'd have to discount the opinion of *every* male on this board and not just the ones you don't agree with.

RangerJoe 02-01-2008 02:36 AM

As a side note, I'd like to know how everyone's reactions would differ if their son came home and said he got a girl pregnant.

vanblah 02-01-2008 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RangerJoe
As a side note, I'd like to know how everyone's reactions would differ if their son came home and said he got a girl pregnant.

Pretty much the same way. I don't have a son ... but my reaction would depend upon the kind of person he is.

I can say without a shadow of a doubt that I would NEVER "kick out" a child of mine for something like this and I find it incredibly disturbing that anyone WOULD kick out their own children. Unless a teenager is physically abusive I don't really understand how you could.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mantus
I'd support an abortion. Wouldn't make the kid go against her wishes though. If she chose to keep it I would support that choice and kick her out on her ass.

What a great way to show support.

Mantus 02-01-2008 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanblah
What a great way to show support.

My bad...forgot this forum was serious business :|

Plan9 02-01-2008 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RangerJoe
As a side note, I'd like to know how everyone's reactions would differ if their son came home and said he got a girl pregnant.

Mine would be the same. Flush-the-fetus! Whether or not the girl's parents agree? Who knows?

If I have kids... I'm buying them condoms for their 15th birthday.

I sure they'll already have some experience with them by then anyhow.

vanblah 02-01-2008 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mantus
My bad...forgot this forum was serious business :|

If it was a joke, I apologize for my reaction. This wasn't in the humor forum and sarcasm doesn't come through very well in writing. It's sometimes very hard for people to guess (or second-guess) the intent behind written words since we rely so much on body language in everyday speaking.

jewels 02-01-2008 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
So instead you'll just kill it. That's terribly flawed logic.

You mean it's not your logic.

Quote:

I'd just like to point out that it has nothing to do with insensitivity nor does it have anything to do with being male. One doesn't need to be female or have had an abortion in the past to discuss abortion-- Otherwise, you'd have to discount the opinion of *every* male on this board and not just the ones you don't agree with.
It has everything to do with insensitivity. How can you care more about what happens to a fertilized ova more than for a woman, a living, breathing, thinking, albeit flawed human being?

And I don't believe *every* male on this board shares your lack of sensitivity.

Hain 02-01-2008 01:14 PM

I would make sure my son or daughter made a decision that he/she could live with. I believe there is no worse and cruel judge than one's self. I would help in any way, but the choice and consequences will ultimately weight upon him/her.

If it was my son, I would make sure he fulfills his duty to provide for and help with the girl he got pregnant, whatever choice they decide. If my daughter told me she was pregnant, I would damn straight make sure the guy that got her pregnant did all he can to help her and provide for her with her decision. Legally of course, regardless of my frustration at the situation.
An ex girlfriend and I once mused about what our kids would be like. This ultimately lead to the topic of pregnancy and abortion. She told me something that weighed heavily on me. "If I got pregnant, I would have an abortion. I would never tell you." I realized how much such knowledge would in deed weigh upon me. I would not be able to live with myself. That's why I'd make sure they can accept the consequences of their actions.
Quote:

Originally Posted by jewels443
How can you care more about what happens to a fertilized ova more than for a woman, a living, breathing, thinking, albeit flawed human being?

We all came from there, didn't we? We all ended here, didn't we? I am not going to argue abortion. I've already explained my sentiments on it, and those sentiments are not shared universally. Sometimes it is the only option. I just can't believe it would be an option faced by my self and my SO.

Infinite_Loser 02-01-2008 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghoastgirl1
It's terribly insensitive. I don't agree with half the things you say on the board but I won't allow you to try to call my logic flawed on this particular subject because you deem yourself high and mighty because you have never gotten someone pregnant.

People only get upset over things they perceive to be true. Obviously you, at some level, don't believe what you typed out otherwise you wouldn't be up in arms over what I said. Contrary to what my signature says, I don't deem myself superior to anyone, but I do like to believe that I'm better equipped to make informed decisions and accept the consequences of those actions than certain people are.

Quote:

Discussing abortion is a sensitive topic that you have chosen to handle in a less than gentle manner. I resent your views of me just "killing it because that was my flawed logic."
*Points above*

If you want flowery, sugar-coated words then you're definitely barking up the wrong tree.

Quote:

I also resent your immaturity toward this topic.

I have nothing to prove to you. Think your immature thoughts and be on your merry way. I'm sure you'll respond in a less than tasteful manner proving that you're somehow right.
Okay... So let me get this straight. You're the one who became pregnant at 16 and ran off and got an abortion without notifying your parents because you "didn't want it" yet *I'm* the immature one? Mmmkay.

Notice I never once actually called you immature, but since you want to play that little game... Yes, I'm calling you-- And anyone else who resorts to having an abortion-- As immature. As many times as I say this, people either ignore it or try to make it much more complicated than it actually is; Either you have sex, accept the consequences of those actions and (wo-)man up and take care of any child produced as a result of those actions (Rape nonwithstanding, of course) OR you keep your pants on/stick strictly to self-indulgence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jewels443
It has everything to do with insensitivity. How can you care more about what happens to a fertilized ova more than for a woman, a living, breathing, thinking, albeit flawed human being?

Because the overwhelming majority of abortions aren't done for the well-being of the female, but for matters of convenience or because it would "ruin her life" (Hah! I wish, as a guy, I could get away with the "It would ruin my life" excuse). That's why.

Quote:

And I don't believe *every* male on this board shares your lack of sensitivity.
Okay... Lemme' try this again. To discredit the opinions of someone based on the fact that they're 1.) Not a female and 2.) Never had an abortion would mean that you would have to discredit the opinion of *every* male and *every* female who hasn't had an abortion. Either you accept the opinions of everyone-- Not just those whom you agree with-- Or you accept none. You can't pick and choose >_>

Oh, and because I don't try to rationalize/excuse destructive behavior doesn't make me 'insensitive'.

LoganSnake 02-01-2008 02:45 PM

Infinite_Loser, you're completely wrong because I don't agree with you.

That statement makes about as much sense as pretty much every post you've made in this thread. You have an opinion: congratulations. Don't try to force your opinion on others who have their own opinions.

Infinite_Loser 02-01-2008 02:52 PM

Notice the only time I said someone was 'wrong' was in jest (Post #48).

Oh, and about the whole opinion thing... *Points to the bottom of post #63*

LoganSnake 02-01-2008 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Notice the only time I said someone was 'wrong' was in jest (Post #48).

Saying that somebody's logic is flawed (as compared to yours, I assume) is a form of saying that they're wrong the way I see it. You might be able to prove false logic if the topic wasn't so subjective.

Willravel 02-01-2008 02:57 PM

Ourcrazymodern?-ism:
I was born and so were all of you.

LoganSnake 02-01-2008 02:59 PM

Well, my mom actually wanted me, so that would explain my presence in this realm you call reality.

Nole of 4UrMe 02-01-2008 03:19 PM

Okay, I accept in advance the quality and quantity of flaming I will likely be enciting against mysef; but . . . my daughter is 22, graduated from college, and a manager at her work. Even with all that, she knows I will likely disown her if she gets pregnant. Not that I'm against sex, I'm not and I know she has gone through some very "slutty" times in her brief "career", as did I. However I am 100% planned, yes PLANNED parenthood. As I tell her, she doesn't yet have a job she likes, or friends that she respects; she doesn't know if she wants to stay put in this town or leave to somewhere very different. It would be entirely unfair to both her and any child for her to have one at this time. Carelessness is what I'm against. Children should be valuable enough to be considered BEFORE the choice to be pregnant/parent, not valuable by default because of carelessness.

Therefore if my daughter gets pregnant before she is happy with herself and her life, I would let it be her decision, but if she didn't have an abortion, our relationship end completely. Then of course, I have to evaluate the "party line" vs reality. Reality, I would disown her till she had no longer an option to abortion, that way I couldn't harp on her everyday. Then I would listen to see if she fully grasped the responsibility she was taking on and truly wanted it. If so, I'd un-disown her; if I didn't think so, I'd have to walk away, I can't see parents that don't take the raising of their children totally seriously.

BTW my son has the same threat over his head for getting a girl pregnant before she primarily, and he secondarily know themselves and are generally happy with their lives.

correction= *if he gets a girl pregnant. (for getting sounds like he has gotten a girl pregnant and he hasn't)

Ustwo 02-01-2008 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nole of 4UrMe
Okay, I accept in advance the quality and quantity of flaming I will likely be enciting against mysef; but . . . my daughter is 22, graduated from college, and a manager at her work. Even with all that, she knows I will likely disown her if she gets pregnant.

Just how adult do your children have to be before you would not disown her for not getting an abortion?

Your post is perhaps the most disturbing one I've read and my gut reaction is no mother could be so controlling and disturbing.

I do love how it would be unfair to the child.....more unfair than abortion?

Please.

TFP has a lot of dysfunctional family people, and dysfunctional people in general. Any of you wish you were aborted to be fair to you?

Give me a break on this sophistry. Its nothing to do with fairness to the child, its convenience to the mother, or in this case apparently the grandmother.

Infinite_Loser 02-01-2008 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Give me a break on this sophistry. Its nothing to do with fairness to the child, its convenience to the mother, or in this case apparently the grandmother.

QFT (And, yes, that's a factually correct statement supported by mountains upon mountains of physical evidence).

Nole of 4UrMe 02-01-2008 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Just how adult do your children have to be before you would not disown her for not getting an abortion?

Your post is perhaps the most disturbing one I've read and my gut reaction is no mother could be so controlling and disturbing.

I do love how it would be unfair to the child.....more unfair than abortion?

Please.

TFP has a lot of dysfunctional family people, and dysfunctional people in general. Any of you wish you were aborted to be fair to you?

Give me a break on this sophistry. Its nothing to do with fairness to the child, its convenience to the mother, or in this case apparently the grandmother.

It has nothing to do with age. It has to do with (in case you missed it) Planned parenthood. It has to do with her having a child because she wants to not because she thinks it will enhance a bad life or worse yet a bad relationship. It has to do with her knowing herself and giving herself time to enjoy her adult life, because once that child is born, she won't have her life if she is being a proper parent till the child is well past 10 years old. It has to do with truly valuing child/children and the parenting that goes with it.

As for the fairness of abortion, not a day goes by that I don't wish my parents had aborted me as my grandmother thought they should have. Nothing to do with me as I wasn't me yet. It had to do with my parents still wanting so much more for themselves that my grandmother feared the kids would be neglected as "mom" was only having kids to try to keep "dad," and she was also determined that she would not be a "mother" because she (my mother) believed that "mothers" were stupid. She never intended on caring for us in the least. And "dad" hated children, never wanted any, only stayed because back then that's what was done. He beat us regularly in the same styles as the recently found little girl's body, Riddley, in Texas. Since my brother is a junkie, well, you make the call. I believe and have experienced things worse than death and so has he.

JumpinJesus 02-01-2008 05:45 PM

The laws of nature don't take into consideration social mores.

Speaking of responsibility before sex is a worthless argument because we're biologically wired to have sex once we reach sexual maturity.

Sure, we can rationalize away some of that biology, but it still remains that we seek sex instinctively. We all love to prosthelytize in manners that suggest we're far more mature than that, but to say we were mature enough when we were 18, 19, or 20 to turn down sex because there was the slightest chance of pregnancy is ludicrous. If you were or are that mature, congratulations, now use your vast wisdom for good instead of finger-wagging.

And now for moderator-mode:

You all know the rules and you all love to be right, but if you can't take your hostility and personal attacks out of your posts, then we will remove your ability to post in this thread.

World's King 02-01-2008 05:56 PM

How can you attack someone on what their personal response would be to something.



"I really like this cheeseburger."

"No you don't motherfucker. You like ham sandwiches."

Miss Mango 02-01-2008 07:19 PM

Im rather torn on the issue. But one thing that I know without a doubt, is that I would want my daughter to finish school, baby or not. Graduating from high school is non-negotiable. It is far too important for her well being and chance at life for me to kick her out and make it impossible for her to go to school.

Obviously, I would support her decision to do what she thinks is best. If she wants to keep the baby, I would help her with daycare until she graduates. Besides, itd be a grandbaby, Id want to watch the baby a lot anyway.

There would be terms set up though, that they have to move out a year after she completes high school. This would give her time to find an apartment/house to rent, get a job, and secure financial aid to help pay for daycare. I would also try to show her the options of going to a community college part time so that she can still get an associates degree or be working towards it. Young mothers, especially single, have their way to school completely paid by the Pell Grant.

Overall, it would be very tough, but I wouldnt just drop my daughter and let her flounder around, especially not with a baby involved.

Willravel 02-01-2008 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by World's King
How can you attack someone on what their personal response would be to something.

"I really like this cheeseburger."

"No you don't motherfucker. You like ham sandwiches."

To be fair, you do love ham sawwiches. And stuffed olives.

Nole of 4UrMe 02-01-2008 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JumpinJesus
The laws of nature don't take into consideration social mores.

Speaking of responsibility before sex is a worthless argument because we're biologically wired to have sex once we reach sexual maturity.

Sure, we can rationalize away some of that biology, but it still remains that we seek sex instinctively. We all love to prosthelytize in manners that suggest we're far more mature than that, but to say we were mature enough when we were 18, 19, or 20 to turn down sex because there was the slightest chance of pregnancy is ludicrous. If you were or are that mature, congratulations, now use your vast wisdom for good instead of finger-wagging.

Just to clarify, in no way have I ever expected or asked my daughter (or son) not to have sex. My daughter chose to wait till after she was 18 and from the time she was 15 till 18, I was worrying her regualarly because she was seemingly growing up chill to the point of frigid. Fortunately her libido kicked in at 18 (she was menstruating since 9 so it was a long wait for her) anyway, then she went sex crazy. I think that was/is just grand.

I am against her getting pregnant, not against her having sex. Educated women can generally utilize some method to avoid pregnancy. Generally these methods work.

The_Jazz 02-02-2008 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by World's King
How can you attack someone on what their personal response would be to something.



"I really like this cheeseburger."

"No you don't motherfucker. You like ham sandwiches."


WK - this may be the funniest and most insightful thing you've ever posted on this board. And that's really saying something.

Sue 04-01-2010 02:04 PM

I have no children, but hypothetically, she'd either have to give it up for adoption or, depending on how far along she was, there'd be an appointment made at the local clinic. Unless there's some extreme measure like this is her high school sweetheart and they're going to be together forever, it's not happening in my household (hypothetically).

Plan9 04-01-2010 02:26 PM

Wow, zombie unexpected/unnecessary fetus thread.

Punk.of.Ages 04-01-2010 10:03 PM

Man, I miss UsTwo...

LordEden 04-02-2010 04:48 AM

Yeah I'm not sure about the need for a resurrection here, but whatever. This seems like one of those threads that needed to stay dead.

I have an opinion, but I'll write it later. Or not at all looking that the old posts in this thread.

Toaster126 04-02-2010 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghoastgirl1 (Post 2392334)
You have no right to tell women what they should do in such a situation as you will NEVER be in such a situation.

Oddly enough, this was the only thing I was offended by in this entire abortion of a thread.

(I see what I did there. :) )

You seem like a smart girl, so I'm assuming you were just being a little too strong with your wording... you don't truly think someone must be a woman to have a response to this situation, or gay to have an opinion about gay rights, or blah blah blah, right?

Man, I feel dirty quoting something from years ago.

LoganSnake 04-02-2010 05:17 PM

http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/1897/...nlinkpunch.jpg


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360