Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Knowledge and How-To


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-06-2005, 03:05 PM   #1 (permalink)
Crazy
 
trib767's Avatar
 
Location: London, UK
Calories in food

Just wondering, when they say a food item has a number of calories in it, how is this worked out ?
trib767 is offline  
Old 04-06-2005, 04:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Filling the Void.
 
la petite moi's Avatar
 
Location: California
One calorie, also known as a kilocalorie, is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of 1 kilogram of water 1 degree Celsius.
la petite moi is offline  
Old 04-06-2005, 06:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Observant Ruminant
 
Location: Rich Wannabe Hippie Town
As for how they measure the calories: they literally burn the food, then measure the heat released.

This is the main fallacy in calorie-counting. Wood, for goodness sake releases calories. But you, a human, can't absorb nourishment or calories from wood. You're not equipped to break wood down.

By the same token, burning a potato or an apple or banana may well release more calories in heat than your body could ever liberate from the same fruit from the digestive process. So it's not just about calories, but about how easily the calories in a particular food are absorbed by the body. And this varies a lot.
Rodney is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 06:26 AM   #4 (permalink)
Banned from being Banned
 
Location: Donkey
I don't have the time to look up the exact numbers at the moment, but all food is, of course, made up of protein, fat, and carbs, each of which has their own caloric value.

I think carb/protein are 4 calories per gram and fat is 9 calories per gram.. not 100% sure on that, though.
__________________
I love lamp.
Stompy is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 11:38 AM   #5 (permalink)
Mjollnir Incarnate
 
Location: Lost in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stompy
I think carb/protein are 4 calories per gram and fat is 9 calories per gram.. not 100% sure on that, though.
That's about right. People today are all afraid of calories. Calories are just energy. Granted, that energy can turn into love handles, but that's probably because you either don't exercize enough or ate too many calories.

Also, it's the amount of energy required to raise 1 gram of water 1 degree celsius. Another, more modern, definition is 1 calorie = 4.18 joules.
Slavakion is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 12:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slavakion
That's about right. People today are all afraid of calories. Calories are just energy. Granted, that energy can turn into love handles, but that's probably because you either don't exercize enough or ate too many calories.

Also, it's the amount of energy required to raise 1 gram of water 1 degree celsius. Another, more modern, definition is 1 calorie = 4.18 joules.
actually I tend to think that people are more afraid of FAT than calories, which is why Snackwells and other low fat items sell so well even though the total caloric value isn't less.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 01:54 PM   #7 (permalink)
Insane
 
1 Cal as it is most often used in food industry is in fact 1 kcal, which is 1000 cal or 4184 Joules. So a food calorie (Cal) is the energy required to raise 1kg of water by 1 Kelvin (or Celsius, doesn't make any difference in this case).

Regarding the calories of individual component, Carbs do in general give you about 4 Cal and so do fats. Proteins give you 9 Cals.

However, I remember reading somewhere recently, that you cannot judge the actual energy you obtain by these values for few reasons. First reason was mentioned by Rodney. The other one is that the more complex the molecule gets the less energy (per gram) your organism will be able to get from it even if it manages to break it down completelly. This is due to the fact that during every step of the breakdown (which increase with the complexity of the molecule), a small fraction of heat is lost and therefore is not used to make ATP.
__________________
If you multiply that by infinity and take it to the depths of forever, you will, perhaps, get just a glimpse of what I am talking about. --Meet Joe Black--
vinaur is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 02:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
Crazy
 
trib767's Avatar
 
Location: London, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodney
As for how they measure the calories: they literally burn the food, then measure the heat released.
Really? That thought did occur but I thought it can't be how it's done. So they'll take a ready-meal and torch it ? How do they measure the heat released, with a thermometer ?

I'm just really curious for the sake of it. it's one of those things that's been at the back of my mind for years.....
trib767 is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 04:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
Quote:
Originally Posted by trib767
Really? That thought did occur but I thought it can't be how it's done. So they'll take a ready-meal and torch it ? How do they measure the heat released, with a thermometer ?

I'm just really curious for the sake of it. it's one of those things that's been at the back of my mind for years.....
It's called a bomb calorimeter. It is essentially a sealed container placed in a water bath.
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry.
Redlemon is offline  
Old 04-08-2005, 09:49 AM   #10 (permalink)
Mjollnir Incarnate
 
Location: Lost in thought
You can also use a styrofoam coffee cup, with a bit (lot) less accuracy.
Quote:
1 Cal as it is most often used in food industry is in fact 1 kcal, which is 1000 cal or 4184 Joules. So a food calorie (Cal) is the energy required to raise 1kg of water by 1 Kelvin (or Celsius, doesn't make any difference in this case).
Well, that's a pain in the ass. If some says gram, I expect them to mean gram, not kilogram.
Slavakion is offline  
Old 04-10-2005, 07:57 AM   #11 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Canada
Slavakion, yeah it is a pain in the ass. Don't be worried if you're getting confused, it's a confusing system of naming they've developed.

1 calorie is the energy to raise 1 gram of water 1°C.

1 kilocalorie is 1000 calories, which means it's equivalent to the energy to raise 1 kg of water 1°C.

Food manufacturers are actually listing kilocalories on their food labels, not calories. But, by spelling it "Calorie" with a capital C, instead of calorie, they assume that's enough of a difference to be clear.

So basically it's the food industry that messed everything up when they started labelling things with capital letters and assuming that changed the definition.

*sigh*
Poloboy is offline  
Old 04-11-2005, 03:17 PM   #12 (permalink)
Crazy
 
trib767's Avatar
 
Location: London, UK
Ok, so assuming I set fire to my dinner and work out it's calories using one of those cool bomb things, I now look at the other side of the equation: How do calorie meters, etc, work out what you've burned in the gym. Surely there are loads of assumptions there, right ? I guess there is a technically accurate method but those meters in the gym don't come close ?
trib767 is offline  
Old 04-11-2005, 06:17 PM   #13 (permalink)
Insane
 
My guess would be that they would measure the actual work you've done and add in your body temperature increase and maybe, somehow, how much heat you've released into the atmosphere.

I'd imagine it being done in a thermally isolated room and measuring the increase of the temperature of the atmosphere.

Oh and those meters in the gym just take the stats of your workout and use the formula derived from the data obtained above to calculate the calories you've burnt.

The reason why the meters would be so much off, is because every person's metabolism is different and the way you do exercises also affects your energy output

Once again this is only the way I would imagine doing it, so it might be, and probably is, incorrect.
__________________
If you multiply that by infinity and take it to the depths of forever, you will, perhaps, get just a glimpse of what I am talking about. --Meet Joe Black--

Last edited by vinaur; 04-11-2005 at 06:22 PM..
vinaur is offline  
Old 04-14-2005, 07:28 PM   #14 (permalink)
Crazy
 
The only reason i know about all this is because of one of those saturday morning "mr. science" style shows where some guy was having a little girl set fires to high calorie food. Good stuff to know.
__________________
"How soft your fields so green, Can whisper tales of gore"
"Thou art god"
jaco is offline  
Old 04-15-2005, 02:48 AM   #15 (permalink)
Mjollnir Incarnate
 
Location: Lost in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by trib767
How do calorie meters, etc, work out what you've burned in the gym. Surely there are loads of assumptions there, right ? I guess there is a technically accurate method but those meters in the gym don't come close ?
There would have to be a lot of assumptions made. Say you were on a treadmill. The machine would assume that at this speed, and this incline, the average human body burns approximately this many calories. Cheaper machines might dispense with speed and incline and just give you something based on time. It's adequate for rough approximations, but not really accurate.
Slavakion is offline  
Old 04-18-2005, 10:59 AM   #16 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
A good treadmill also factors your weight into the equation.
kutulu is offline  
 

Tags
calories, food


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360