Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Knowledge and How-To


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-26-2004, 12:04 AM   #1 (permalink)
The Pusher
 
Rlyss's Avatar
 
Location: Edinburgh
Sound, two televisions, that sort of thing

Hi everyone.

I was thinking this morning about some things. When you shine a torch (flashlight) on one spot, it is bright. And when you shine another torch on that same spot, it's even more bright. I think it's even twice as bright, is that correct?

Does the same thing happen with sound? If I have one television set on volume 10, it is that loud. If I turn on another television to the same station, and also set that at volume 10, does it become louder? What if I have a dozen televisions, all on volume 10? Is there no difference? How does that work?

Last edited by Dorito2; 06-26-2004 at 12:07 AM..
Rlyss is offline  
Old 06-26-2004, 02:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Leicester, UK
Sound and light 'waves' can interfere with each other. They may do this constructively (superimpose) or destructively (cancel out).

Think about something like a sporting event. If one person sings alone then they wouldn't be heard very well. If you have an entire ground singing all those sound waves come together and can be heard kms away. All the extra energy is coming together and causing the vibrations of the air particles to be even stronger (this is what sound basically is).

If you brought two tv sets together they would be twice as loud only if the waves of vibration were 'perfectly' in phase.

Your two torches probably wouldn't be twice as bright but would more then likely be brighter. The only way to look at light sources and see how they interfere is to use lasers. These are light sources where the waves are in phase with each other.

Check out anything on Young's two-slit experiment or on diffraction gratings to explain it.

A quick google gave this: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/light/u12l1b.html
it's not a bad explanation.

Quite a strong argument for light being a wave as opposed to a stream a particles. (It is quantum mechanics that makes the link but that is a different story)
llama8 is offline  
Old 06-26-2004, 07:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
Quote:
Originally posted by llama8
If you brought two tv sets together they would be twice as loud only if the waves of vibration were 'perfectly' in phase.

Your two torches probably wouldn't be twice as bright but would more then likely be brighter.
Phase isn't the only consideration. I don't know about light for sure, but I suspect that it is like sound in that increases in power function more on the log scale than the linear one. Not to mention the effect of distance on the whole equation - doubling the distance from a source quarters the amount of energy received. This is quick and dirty. If I have a chance I'll look up the details later and post a better explanation.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
ubertuber is offline  
Old 06-26-2004, 01:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Leicester, UK
Quote:
Originally posted by ubertuber
Phase isn't the only consideration. I don't know about light for sure, but I suspect that it is like sound in that increases in power function more on the log scale than the linear one. Not to mention the effect of distance on the whole equation - doubling the distance from a source quarters the amount of energy received. This is quick and dirty. If I have a chance I'll look up the details later and post a better explanation.

Yea that's true my point I was trying to make is the amplitudes of the waves at a given point add up as you would expect to occur. Obviously the amount of energy at a given point depends on lots of factors.
llama8 is offline  
Old 06-26-2004, 01:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
Quote:
Originally posted by llama8
Yea that's true my point I was trying to make is the amplitudes of the waves at a given point add up as you would expect to occur. Obviously the amount of energy at a given point depends on lots of factors.
You are and were totally correct - I wasn't trying to replace your point, only add to it. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
ubertuber is offline  
Old 06-26-2004, 10:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
The Pusher
 
Rlyss's Avatar
 
Location: Edinburgh
So two televisions side-by side will be roughly twice as loud? I've tried that sort of thing with two radios and it hasn't seemed like it was on volume 20 (if, say, each are set on volume 10).

Thanks for the explanations guys, some of it is a little over my head but I appreciate it
Rlyss is offline  
Old 06-27-2004, 11:40 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Sound volume increases logarithmically as power increases, at least as perceived by the human ear. It takes a tenfold increase in power to create twice the apparent loudness. Phase cancellation and reinforcement also come into play. If you generate a sound whose frequency matches the resonant frequency of the enclosing space, you get what's known as a standing wave. It has a "booming" quality that makes it sound much louder than other sounds in the same room.

Last edited by SinisterMotives; 06-27-2004 at 11:42 AM..
SinisterMotives is offline  
Old 06-27-2004, 02:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: USA
If the two tvs are at the same volume level, combined they will be only 3 decibels louder then a single unit, this is given in an open environment, though it may be a little louder because of reflection off the walls. A 3dB increase is only a slight increase in the noticed sound level. This doesn't take into account the frequency levels, as ours ears will applify or attenuate certain frequecies.

Heres the formulas for those who care:

(P1/Pref)squared = antilog(db_level/10)
same for second sound source

(Ptotal/Pref)^2 = (P1/Pref)+(P2/Pref)squared


So if you had two t.v.'s giving off an equal sound level of 75 dB each.

(P1/Prer)^2 = (P2/Pref)^2=3.16*10^7
(Ptot/Pref)^2 = 6.32*10^7

When converted back into dBs the new sound level is 78 dB.

where P1 and P2 and Ptot are the sound pressure levels in N/m^2

dB_level is the measured sound pressure level in decibels.

Hope that makes sense to everyone!
oberon04 is offline  
 

Tags
sort, sound, televisions, thing


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:01 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360