Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Knowledge and How-To


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-10-2003, 03:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
You've tested positive for cancer! How worried should you be?

This is a reasonably simple mathematical problem, with a very startling result.

The premise is this:
We have a test for cancer that is 98% accurate. That is, that 98% of the subjects who do have cancer will test positive, and 98% of the subjects who do not have cancer will test negative.
You've undergone the test, and the results have come back.
Bad news! You've tested positive!
But the question is, how worried should you be?
Given that 0.5% of the population has cancer, what is the probability that you have cancer, having recieved a positive result?

(Hint: If you don't know where to begin, apply the values to a set population of say 10,000 and work from that)
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 09-10-2003, 05:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
Invisible
 
yournamehere's Avatar
 
Location: tentative, at best
Where did you get the statistic <i>"Given that 0.5% of the population has cancer. . . "</i>?

That seems rather low (by about a factor of 60), considering that cancer is the 2nd-leading cause of death in the United States (I can't speak for the statistics in Ireland)
__________________
If you want to avoid 95% of internet spelling errors:
"If your ridiculous pants are too loose, you're definitely going to lose them. Tell your two loser friends over there that they're going to lose theirs, too."
It won't hurt your fashion sense, either.
yournamehere is offline  
Old 09-10-2003, 05:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by yournamehere
Where did you get the statistic <i>"Given that 0.5% of the population has cancer. . . "</i>?

That seems rather low (by about a factor of 60), considering that cancer is the 2nd-leading cause of death in the United States (I can't speak for the statistics in Ireland)
Sorry....I didn't mean that to be a statement of fact! Yeah, you're right it does look like I meant it that way!
The 0.5% is just a part of the problem.

To make it more realistic, rather than testing for cancer as a whole, make it a test of some particular form of cancer, which 0.5% of the population have.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 09-10-2003, 06:03 PM   #4 (permalink)
Invisible
 
yournamehere's Avatar
 
Location: tentative, at best
Well, in that case, with a population of 10,000 - only 50 people would have <i>that</i> cancer, of which 49 would test positive.

Of the remaining 9,950 people who do not have cancer, there will be 9,751 who test negative, and 199 with false-positive results.

Therefore, of the 248 people who tested positive, only 49 of them really have cancer. So - roughly - only 1 in 5 positive results are actually correct. So there's an 80% chance you don't have cancer.

And, of course, there's one poor guy out there falsely believing he doesn't have cancer.
____________________________________________

Added later: Of course, this assumes <i>everyone</i> gets tested for cancer - in the real world, you wouldn't be tested for it unless you were showing some symptoms, or had abnormal test results.
__________________
If you want to avoid 95% of internet spelling errors:
"If your ridiculous pants are too loose, you're definitely going to lose them. Tell your two loser friends over there that they're going to lose theirs, too."
It won't hurt your fashion sense, either.

Last edited by yournamehere; 09-10-2003 at 08:15 PM..
yournamehere is offline  
Old 09-11-2003, 01:55 AM   #5 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by yournamehere

Added later: Of course, this assumes <i>everyone</i> gets tested for cancer - in the real world, you wouldn't be tested for it unless you were showing some symptoms, or had abnormal test results.
Wow, you're really hard to please!
__________________
CSflim is offline  
 

Tags
cancer, positive, tested, worried

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:07 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360