07-14-2003, 11:19 AM | #42 (permalink) | |
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
Quote:
Sleepyjack, these are originally puzzles where you are allowed to ask "yes or no" questions of the person to determine what went on. TIO just knows them all, like I do. Did you go through a gifted program in school, perhaps? And where are your riddles, Mr. Smarty Man, TIO? Sleepyjack, your answer is "three." Number of letters in the word version of the number, e.g. four -- four, three -- five, etc. And Cynthetiq's is Superman/Kryptonite.
__________________
it's quiet in here |
|
07-14-2003, 10:43 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: The Land Down Under
|
Sin, Hard8s
Nice one; I hadn't heard that one before. And since Kadath wants questions...I'll start with an easy one. A traveller met two men eating lunch, and joined them. One of the men had 3 loaves, and the other had 5. All were the same size. The three men shared the loaves equally. After they had eaten, the traveller gave the men 8 gold coins as payment for the food. How should the men fairly divide the money?
__________________
Strewth |
07-14-2003, 11:07 PM | #46 (permalink) |
Fast'n'Bulbous
Location: Australia, Perth
|
hmm my maths may be a little shaking, nut basicallly here is my working for the answer.
ok 8 loafs between 3 guys. 8/3 = 2.66 loafs each abouts one guy has 3 loafs so 3 - 2.66= 0.33 of his loaf was unaccounted for. the other guy has 5 loafs. 5 - 2.66 = 2.33 so he had 2.33 loafs accounted for then theres a total of 2.66 loafs which the other guy ate and is gonna consequently pay for, by the 8 coins. He then would've had 0.33 of one guys loaf and 2.33 of the other guys loaf. maths again 2.33/2.66 = 0.8759 and 0.33/2.66 = 0.124 ok nows that the percentage of the total payment each should get. edit: ignore the rounding errors, i just did it with my trusty calc and it works out exact...pretty sure its right as well. .8759*8 = 7 0.124*8 = 1 therefore the guy with 5 loafs gets 7 coins and the guy with 3 loafs gets 1 coin. i guess. Is that right. Sorry if my maths and explanation is a little shady, it was my first go Last edited by Sleepyjack; 07-14-2003 at 11:10 PM.. |
07-14-2003, 11:25 PM | #47 (permalink) |
Fast'n'Bulbous
Location: Australia, Perth
|
ok i found this old one i know back from HS, its pretty cool. Sorry for the formating, thats how i got it off the web page....
Three guys in a hotel call room service and order two large pizzas. The delivery boy brings them up with a bill for exactly $30.00. Each guy gives him a $10.00 bill, and he leaves. When he hands the $30.00 to the cashier, he is told a mistake was made. The bill was only $25.00, not $30.00. The cashier gives the delivery boy five $1.00 bills and tells him to take it back to the 3 guys who ordered the pizza. On the way back to their room, the delivery boy has a thought....these guys did not give him a tip. He figures that since there is no way to split $5.00 evenly three ways anyhow, he will keep two dollars for himself and give them back three Dollars. OK! So far so good! He knocks on the door and one fellow answers. He explains about a mix up in the bill, and hands the guy the three dollars, then departs with his two dollar tip in his pocket. Now the fun begins! remember $30-$25=$5 Right? $5-$3=$2 Right? So what's the problem? All is well, right? Not quite. Answer this: Each of the three guys originally gave $10.00 each. They each got back $1.00 in change. That means they paid $9.00 each, which times three is $27.00. The delivery boy kept $2.00 for a tip. $27.00 plus $2.00 equals $29.00. Where the heck is that other dollar???????????? |
07-15-2003, 01:45 AM | #48 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: The Land Down Under
|
Well done, Sleepyjack.
As for your question, it's an oldie but a goodie. Very hard to spot at first. Each guy did pay $9. Then, $2 of the $27 went to the delivery boy, and the other $25 went to the pizza place. The trick is where you add the $2 to the $27 collected. That shouldn't be there. One of my favourites: A businessman had an important meeting which led him to fly from London to New York on the concorde (this is in the past, before it crashed). When he left home in the morning, his wife drove him to the airport and kissed him goodbye as he went through to the departure lounge. She did some shopping at the airport, and saw the concorde take off on time. The businessman's flight from London to NY was, of course, a direct flight. He went straight through customs when he arrived in NY, and had no baggage to collect. There in the arrivals hall was his wife, waiting to drive him home! She had only seen him off that morning, and had not flown or taken a boat; how did she get there to meet him?
__________________
Strewth |
07-15-2003, 06:50 AM | #49 (permalink) | |
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
Quote:
Well, off the top my head I'd say at no point does it say the guy only took one flight. If he's, say the pilot of the concorde... So he lives in NYC, flew the concorde out to London, then flew it back to NYC. Since it's the concorde and does the flight in about 2 hours or some such sick amount of time, it's easily possible to fly to Europe and back to America in the space of one working day. If I'm right about this, it doesn't hold up as well as it did before the concorde crashed, because it NEEDS to use a plane that can do the distance in such a short amount of time, and that you're forced to make reference to the fact that this was before it crashed draws unwanted attention to the type of plane. Of course, if I'm wrong.... How about: Four friends are on their way home at night. They come to a darkened bridge that is, for whatever reason, only traversable by two people at once. Also, they have only one flashlight between them, and the flashlight must be carried whenever crossing the bridge. They cannot risk losing the flashlight by throwing or rolling it back across the bridge, so someone must convey it back for the group to cross. The four friends are varied in athletic ability. One is a sprinter and can cross the bridge in one minute flat. The second is a soccer player and can cross in two minutes. The third is a typical unathletic American and can only cross in five minutes, and the last has a broken leg. It takes him ten minutes. The good news is that it takes only the greater amount of time for two people to cross, i.e., the sprinter takes the fat slob's pace. They have 17 minutes to get all the way across : how do they do it?
__________________
it's quiet in here |
|
07-15-2003, 08:50 AM | #50 (permalink) |
Fast'n'Bulbous
Location: Australia, Perth
|
yay, i finally got it.
ok there alwyas gonna be 5 trips minimum. I just got stuck trying to use the sprinter too much. Like kept getting sprinter+soccer = 2 sprinter back = 1 sprinter + typical = 5 sprinter back = 1 then sprinter + leg guy = 10 total = 19 alas, finally realised that you really need to get the broken leg guy and the typical guy to go over together as there only move to optimise the get over time. anyways here it is. sprinter + socer = 2 soccer back = 2 leg + typical = 10 sprinter back = 1 sprinter + soccer = 2 total =17 cool little trick, got me thinking again on holidays. cheers as for that airplane one, thats mind boggling... is it on a real life scale or some game thing...hmm i dunno. Although i only quickly read kadaths reply i didn't really get it. Maybe i'll think about it later, the bridge is still on my mind lol |
07-16-2003, 02:09 AM | #51 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: The Land Down Under
|
Jack, Kadath was correct. The man lived in New York. He flew to London for the meeting, and flew back that night to his wife. With that knowledge, read the question again and see if it makes any more sense
__________________
Strewth |
07-17-2003, 12:59 AM | #52 (permalink) |
Fast'n'Bulbous
Location: Australia, Perth
|
k, i get it now
another little maths riddle, not a baddie A frog fell into a well 12 feet deep. He could jump 3 feet, but every time he jumped 3 feet, he fell back 2 feet. How many times did he have to jump to get out of the well? |
07-17-2003, 06:14 AM | #54 (permalink) |
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
Actually, I vote for eight jumps, depending on whether you consider jumping to 10 feet able to get out of the well, or if he needs clearance. Think about it this way: the first number is how high he reaches with the jump, the second is where he falls back to.
3 -- 1 4 -- 2 5 -- 3 6 -- 4 7 -- 5 8 -- 6 9 -- 7 10(out) -- 8 My riddle...hmm. Easy one off the top of my head. Father and his son are out driving together. They get in a terrible car accident. Both are rushed to the hospital. The doctor for the son walks in, sees the boy on the table, and says "I cannot operate on this boy: he is my son." Explain!
__________________
it's quiet in here |
07-17-2003, 09:00 AM | #55 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: The Land Down Under
|
Kadath, the well is 12 feet deep :P
The two involved in the crash were the son and grandson of the surgeon. For more family fun: At a family reunion, the following relationships existed: father, mother, son, daughter, uncle, aunt, brother, sister, nephew, neice, and cousin. What is the minimum number of people who could have been there? And a classic: a man in front of a painting says "Brothers and sisters have I none, but this man's father is my father's son." Who is in the picture?
__________________
Strewth Last edited by TIO; 07-17-2003 at 09:03 AM.. |
07-17-2003, 09:42 AM | #56 (permalink) | ||
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last first: Himself. The other one. I come up with 4. Bobby is brother and uncle, and father. Susie is mother, sister and aunt. Tommy is nephew and cousin and son Annie is niece and cousin and daughter. A brother and sister, and each has one kid.
__________________
it's quiet in here |
||
07-17-2003, 09:44 AM | #57 (permalink) |
Fast'n'Bulbous
Location: Australia, Perth
|
@ kadath, also the doctor could've been the sons mother. Everyone thinks a guy is a doctor fro some reason.
for the family question, i got 4....no idea how right it is 1 man, 1 women, 1 girl, 1 boy basically the man and women are bro and sister and each has a child of different sexes, it doen't matter which one goes to which. That covers all of those relaitonships. unless there is some kind of inner breading..... also i guess he's looking at a picture of himself... i'll add some more later unless i am completely wrong EDIT: damn kadath beat me by 2 minutes Last edited by Sleepyjack; 07-17-2003 at 09:47 AM.. |
07-17-2003, 11:27 AM | #58 (permalink) |
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
Sorry buddy, glad we confirmed each other though. But you are dead bang on with the doctor question, including the reason people get it wrong. Oh, and you wanted "inbreeding." Mmmmm...inner breading...
__________________
it's quiet in here |
07-18-2003, 01:28 AM | #59 (permalink) |
Fast'n'Bulbous
Location: Australia, Perth
|
old classic. A similar variation is in that old movie labrynth with David Bowie and the bog of etenral stench
You arrive at the gate of heaven and hell. Two guardians are here. None of them is seating in front of a particular gate, they are just walking around. One of the gate leads to heaven, the other to hell, and as you might have guessed, you have to find which one. The only thing you know is that one of the guardian is always lying and the other always telling the truth. You can ask one question to one of them. |
07-18-2003, 01:36 AM | #60 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: The Land Down Under
|
Quote:
You're both wrong about the painting. Jack, ask one of them, "If I ask the other guard where your gate leads to, what will he say?" If the guard says "Heaven," the gate leads to hell, and vice versa.
__________________
Strewth |
|
07-18-2003, 06:28 AM | #63 (permalink) |
Rookie
Location: Oxford, UK
|
A longer one, but a good one, and better suited to the more elderly... feel free to ask questions if you've not heard it before
A man is driving his car to work. He switches on the radio to hear some music playing, and immediately drives his car off the convenient nearby cliff to kill himself. He is not mentally unhinged/suicidal before switching on the radio... why does he kill himself?
__________________
I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones. -- John Cage (1912 - 1992) |
07-18-2003, 09:45 AM | #64 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: The Land Down Under
|
Well done, Cliche
I haven't heard that one before, either! Methinks I'm going to like having you in this thread Did he perhaps hear on the news that his involvement in some crime or scandal had been discovered?
__________________
Strewth |
07-18-2003, 06:39 PM | #65 (permalink) | |
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
Quote:
And I'm going to have to approach cliche's as a yes/no game...but not yet. Not yet.
__________________
it's quiet in here |
|
07-18-2003, 11:12 PM | #66 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
|
|
07-19-2003, 03:25 AM | #67 (permalink) |
Shade
Location: Belgium
|
My 2 cents:
A man lives in a very tall building, almost at the top floor. In the morning, he takes the elevator down to ground-level, gets in his car, goes to work, comes back home, takes the elevator to the 8th floor, goes up all the way to the top by the stairs, and gets back to his apartment. The next day, he takes the elevator downstairs again, all the way to groundlevel, gets in his car, goes to work, comes home, takes the elevator to the 8th floor, and runs up the stairs for the remaining floors... Why does he do this, assuming it's not to work out?
__________________
Moderation should be moderately moderated. |
07-19-2003, 11:18 AM | #69 (permalink) |
Fast'n'Bulbous
Location: Australia, Perth
|
oh so he couldn't reach the higher buttons on the elevator?
thats very clever @TIO, i beleive kadath was refering the yes no game in order to solve cliche's riddle. Unfortunaly, these things are normally much more effective with a real time element. Like that albatros soup one, cliches one about the car would probably have a lot of backstory as well in order to solve it. |
07-19-2003, 12:20 PM | #70 (permalink) | |
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
Quote:
__________________
it's quiet in here |
|
07-21-2003, 10:35 AM | #71 (permalink) |
Rookie
Location: Oxford, UK
|
TIO:
the radio was playing music only Xell101: narcolepsy - he remained conscious throughout, and deliberately drove his car off the cliff sleeper agent - good but no bored of music - despite being quite repetitive, the music was actually the kind he would normally enjoy and play I'll drop some more hints if ppl are keen
__________________
I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones. -- John Cage (1912 - 1992) |
07-21-2003, 12:58 PM | #72 (permalink) | |
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
Quote:
And I kind of want to ask a cheating question: is the solution some sort of joke, wherein he hears The Byrds Turn, Turn, Turn and is forced to comply or something?
__________________
it's quiet in here |
|
07-21-2003, 01:17 PM | #73 (permalink) |
Rookie
Location: Oxford, UK
|
Kadath:
He is suicidal afterwards - he deliberately swerves his car off the cliff As for the song reminding him of something in the past - yes, you could say it does And the solution is no joke!
__________________
I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones. -- John Cage (1912 - 1992) |
07-21-2003, 01:40 PM | #74 (permalink) | ||
Tilted
Location: Austin, TX
|
Quote:
Quote:
sorry i myself don't know of any riddles to share |
||
07-21-2003, 08:22 PM | #75 (permalink) | |
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
Quote:
__________________
it's quiet in here |
|
07-21-2003, 09:49 PM | #76 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: The Land Down Under
|
wlcm, read the first response to the loaves question. Each man ate 2 2/3 loaves, so the one with 3 loaves gave away 1/3 of a loaf, and the other gave away 2 1/3 loaves.
Cliche, that's a great riddle! I haven't heard it before, and I must admit, I'm stumped! Does he know the DJ or programming manager from the radio station? Is the song being played some kind of signal to him? *brain wave* Is the question set near the end of some war or another? Does the enemy's national athem on the radio signal this man's nation's defeat in the war?
__________________
Strewth |
07-21-2003, 11:06 PM | #78 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Cut off my head and I shall still be found
Though somewhat shorter, still the same in sound. Cut off my tail, I still remain the same Bereft of both, I will not change my name Not even if you deprive of my middle Now lest as me you would considered be I pray you quickly to find out this riddle Quote:
|
|
07-22-2003, 06:22 AM | #79 (permalink) |
Rookie
Location: Oxford, UK
|
Kadath:
nothing special about which song is playing TIO: yes, he does know the station manager and the DJ - but no, the song is not a signal - and no, the war isn't relevant
__________________
I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones. -- John Cage (1912 - 1992) |
07-22-2003, 06:35 AM | #80 (permalink) | |
Insane
|
Quote:
Toss in some stuff about losing all his money in the divorce... I dunno, could happen. |
|
Tags |
riddle |
|
|