12-29-2008, 08:26 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: The Cosmos
|
My temperature in space/orbit
I was curious about temperatures in space and looked up the question. Turns out because of background radiation it's about 3 Kelvin assuming your not next to a sun. And that's after the object has had a long time to cool off.
But my question is what would my temperature be for the first hour or so, in space? Let's say in orbit on the dark side of earth. Because wouldn't my body heat take a long time to dissipate? Since I'd be in a vacuum. (Obviously I'd die rather quickly because of the vacuum and dangers of space but this isn't along the vein of survival) |
12-29-2008, 08:59 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
Location: Southern England
|
Heat loss would only be radiative, in the absence of fluid about you (air or water) there's no medium for conduction and in free fall there's no method for convection.
You also have to account for heat gain from solar radiation. Imagine the hottest day you've ever experienced. That is the heat of the sun fully attenuated by the atmosphere. In space, assuming you were in Earth orbit, you would potentially heat up faster than you'd col down, unless you were in shade. So the answer to "how long would it take to get to 3K?" is "It depends".
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air, And deep beneath the rolling waves, In labyrinths of Coral Caves, The Echo of a distant time Comes willowing across the sand; And everthing is Green and Submarine ╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝ |
12-29-2008, 03:57 PM | #4 (permalink) | |
Tone.
|
Quote:
But in order to stay on the dark side of the earth, you'd have to not be orbiting (else the orbit would naturally carry you around to the shiny side). In order to remain in Earth's shadow, you would have to provide constant, and very powerful, thrust against the pull of gravity. The heat from the rocket would warm you right up |
|
12-29-2008, 05:37 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Are you wearing your tinfoil hat at the time or not? It makes a big difference.
Seriously, I'd say a lot depends on what you're wearing, your weight, how hydrated you are and a bunch of other variables like how close to an atmosphere you are, how close to expended rocket fuel you are (and how hot that is), if there's any sources of radio activity, etc. If you're naked on the dark side of the moon and completely in shade, I'll guess that your core temperature well below 0C in an hour. If you want more specific, I suggest you look for information on liver temperature readings after death. I'm sure that there are studies that you could at least extrapolate a close enough answer.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
12-29-2008, 06:50 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Eccentric insomniac
Location: North Carolina
|
Space is pretty hot. One of the bigger challenges for NASA is keeping objects cool in space, particularly in Low Earth Orbit where satellites and spacecraft are continually exposed to friction and conduction off hot particles with very little radiative cooling ability.
For simple radiative cooling in 'cold' space, the equation would be of the form: F(T)=F(0)e^(-k*t) Where T is time, F(T) is temperature as a function of Time, e is Eulers number and k is a coefficient of cooling. Of course, all temperature measurements are in absolute, and K will vary with the emissivity of the particular body in space as well as the units chosen.
__________________
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill "All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dream with open eyes, to make it possible." Seven Pillars of Wisdom, T.E. Lawrence |
12-29-2008, 07:09 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: The Cosmos
|
Yall are being too literal this is hypothetical. Basically I just want to know, barring all other ill effects, if I'd freeze to death in a couple minutes naked in space (outside of the atmosphere completely).
Has there been any experiments done on living tissue exposed to space? (not just vacuum) I'm sure there must be. |
12-29-2008, 07:13 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
If you somehow avoided the vacuum problem but were otherwise naked in shadow, yes, you would freeze to death, but probably in less than a couple of minutes. Remember, 35F water will kill you in 5. Naked in Northern Siberia in January will kill you in 5 as well.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
|
12-30-2008, 09:37 AM | #10 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: The Cosmos
|
Wow, I don't know where to start. I feel like you're all (almost all) talking down to me and not even bothering to read my posts. Yes, I know space is harsh. This is a thought experiment I was hoping we could have some fun in discussing. Instead, for whatever reason, some of you see fit to poopoo all over it.
|
12-30-2008, 12:49 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Tone.
|
So basically what you're asking us is "barring the idea that a tomato is red, what color is the tomato."
No, you would not freeze to death because you would pass out in about 14 seconds, and die of hypoxia long before you froze. Assuming you could breathe, the alvioli in your lungs would burst due to the pressure differential in the vacuum. Assuming there was no vacuum, yes, you'd freeze. Quickly. But there /is/ a vacuum and so except perhaps for some harmless frost around the mouth and nose, you wouldn't freeze for a very long time. and since you're somehow maintaining position on the shady side of the earth, you wouldn't have any heating effects either. Your scenario asks us to remove all of the conditions in outer space, and then asks us to tell you what being in outer space is like. Your question is only answerable if we remove all the current laws of physics from consideration. At that point, since we're in some alternate constructed universe, any answer we give you is both trite and meaningless, since the artificial environment you're insisting we consider is of your own invention and has nothing whatsoever to do with reality. We aren't poopooing all over your question, but we aren't giving you incorrect answers either. |
12-30-2008, 12:59 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Okay, so assuming the person is in the middle of nowhere, naked, and that 3K is the blackbody temperature of the surrounding universe, with some simplifications one could apply the following equation:
Q = S*A*E_s(T_b^4 - T_s^4) Where S is the Stephan Boltzmann constant, 5.67x10^-8 W/m^2-K^4 A is the surface area of the person's naked body, 1.8m^2, roughly E_s is the emmisivity of human skin, 0.97 T_b is the temperature of the body in K, here ~310K (I have assumed that the body temp is uniform) T_s is the temperature of space in K, 3K Q is about 900 Watts. The typical metabolic heat generation for a sleeping person with 1.8m^s worth of skin is 40W/m^2 is 108 W. This means that your net heat loss would be ~800 W. Assuming the the specific heat of the human body is approximately the same as the specific heat of water, (C_p = 4187 J/kg-K), a 200 lb person (mass = 90 kg), and that we're only concerned with temperatures above 0 C, you could figure out how fast your temperature would be dropping using the following equation: dT/dt = Q/(mass*C_p) dT/dt is about 2 thousandths of a degree Celcius per second. So if your body was uniformly 310K, initially you'd be losing a degree every 8 minutes. It would take about 40 minutes of naked stillness to reach stage 3 hypothermia. There are probably errors in this analysis. And even if error free, it is pretty approximate. If you were behind the earth you'd be getting some heat from the earth, so you'd take a little longer to freeze to death. |
12-30-2008, 01:01 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: The Cosmos
|
Yes, some of you are shak...Do you not know what a thought experiment is? This has nothing to do with surviving in space! Einstein imagined riding a beam of light. Guess what? He didn't actually think he could! Nor was his thought experiment actually about saddling a photon and riding it to the rodeo.
Peace, I'm done with this thread. |
12-30-2008, 01:12 PM | #15 (permalink) | |
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
Location: Southern England
|
Quote:
That said, I think that the calculation given by filtherton is excellent.
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air, And deep beneath the rolling waves, In labyrinths of Coral Caves, The Echo of a distant time Comes willowing across the sand; And everthing is Green and Submarine ╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝ |
|
12-31-2008, 12:29 PM | #17 (permalink) |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
I like it too, filthy, but the one thing that I don't like about it is that it doesn't really calculate the impact of the cold on extremities. Fingers and toes could theoretically freeze solid before death.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
12-31-2008, 02:39 PM | #19 (permalink) |
pigglet pigglet
Location: Locash
|
How about this? If some crazy cat microwaved a cow carcass up to human body temperature, and chunked that bitch out into space, how long would it take until it reached ambient space temperature? Perhaps that would relieve the difficulties posed in the original question?
props to filthy for whipping out stefan boltzman...I was looking for ye olde T^4 up in here. And if you want some FEA software, see if your school has a license for COMSOL. It would still be a bitch to make up the body when you pull out your mesh.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style |
12-31-2008, 03:13 PM | #21 (permalink) |
pigglet pigglet
Location: Locash
|
I hear you - I'd love to just get access to some of the parallel machines at one of the unis around the states, and pop onto it using an SSH client. In fact, I may be doing that sometime in the near future if I can convince people to let me. But anywho, the only thing I think you'd need to consider in the above equation is that the calculation of your Q is dependent on the initial temps, with a dependence of T^4. So by the time it drops in half, your driving force has dropped substantially. So your Q is going to drop like T^4, and your time is going to shoot out a bit. I think.
Back to that FEA software. Shit, my girlfriend is home. Time to run.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style |
Tags |
space or orbit, temperature |
|
|