Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Knowledge and How-To


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-19-2008, 09:38 AM   #1 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Evolutionary Altruism

Martin, otto and I had a rather interesting discussion last night in the IRC chat about altruism. I mentioned that altruism was a survival trait (something I remembered from college), but I had some trouble articulating my argument because I had been working on my car while conference calling a local food distributor all day (not to mention seeing The Dark Knight at the midnight showing on Thurs).

Altruism develops in many animals of higher intelligence that are more social as a sort of "I'll scratch your back" arrangement only for survivability. For some animals, living in a pack or tribe instead of on one's own vastly increases their odds of survival because the individuals can pool their respective strengths and they can team up to fight off danger. In the development of these societies, the ability to work together was of paramount importance. A pack that can work together more efficiently had a higher survivability rate. This is where altruism came in. Trust has to be developed, which means that emotions like guilt, embarrassment, an pride took center stage to help build the mutual trust between members of a pack. This trust lead to behavior that was in the interest of the whole pack even over the individual. When a soldier bravely dives on a grenade, he is doing so in order to save his friends so that they may continue on. This same behavior can be seen in many higher primates, like chimpanzees. I would certainly trust someone who did something selflessly for me, and I'd be more inclined to return the favor.

Here is some further reading:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-teo012207.php
http://www.livescience.com/animals/0..._altruism.html
Willravel is offline  
Old 07-19-2008, 09:59 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
Bob Trivers was the first person to describe the conditions under which reciprocal altruism should evolve. Trivers is one of the more well-known biologists in the history of evolutionary biology. His paper is:

Trivers, R. L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35-57.

A LOT of biological research on altruism was inspired by his paper.


He reflects on the paper 30 years later here:

Trivers, R. 2005. Reciprocal altruism: 30 years later. In C.P. van Schaik and P.M. Kappeler (eds.) Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and Evolution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp 67-83.

He spends a lot more time talking about humans in the second paper.

Last edited by sapiens; 07-19-2008 at 10:03 AM..
sapiens is offline  
Old 07-19-2008, 10:02 AM   #3 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapiens
Bob Trivers was the first person to describe the conditions under which reciprocal altruism should evolve. He's one of the more well-known biologists in the history of evolutionary biology. His paper is:

Trivers, R. L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35-57.

A LOT of biological research on altruism was inspired by his paper.
Fantastic! I'll definitely give that a read.
Willravel is offline  
Old 07-19-2008, 10:14 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
Another important paper in the field:

Axelrod R. & Hamilton, W. D. 1981: The evolution of cooperation. — Science 211: 1390–1396.

Unfortunately, I can't find a pdf of it.

Finally, here's an excerpt from John Maynard Smith's book Evolution and the Theory of Games in which he discusses the evolution of altruism:

http://www.heretical.com/ess/evolcoop.html
sapiens is offline  
Old 07-19-2008, 10:21 AM   #5 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
At first, I had to ask myself if reciprocal altruism could compete with inclusive fitness. But I realized that in order to maximize reproduction in a species that has reciprocal altruism, an individual that adheres to the social norms may be more likely to reproduce. Ain't evolution somethin?
Willravel is offline  
Old 07-19-2008, 10:24 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
I'm not sure what you mean regarding competition between reciprocal altruism and inclusive fitness.
sapiens is offline  
Old 07-19-2008, 10:31 AM   #7 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapiens
I'm not sure what you mean regarding competition between reciprocal altruism and inclusive fitness.
I was probably thinking of the colloquial term "selfish gene". Selfishness is the opposite of altruism, but the selfish gene really isn't about the same kind of selfishness as that which is discussed in reciprocal altruism.
Willravel is offline  
Old 07-19-2008, 10:39 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
I was probably thinking of the colloquial term "selfish gene". Selfishness is the opposite of altruism, but the selfish gene really isn't about the same kind of selfishness as that which is discussed in reciprocal altruism.
Ok, that makes sense. In common usage, altruism and selfishness are antithetical. From an evolutionary perspective (or "selfish gene" perspective), reciprocal altruism is selfish.
sapiens is offline  
Old 07-19-2008, 11:15 PM   #9 (permalink)
I have eaten the slaw
 
inBOIL's Avatar
 
Selfishness and altruism can go hand in hand. For example, a worker bee passes her genes on more effectively by aiding her sisters than she would by reproducing herself.
__________________
And you believe Bush and the liberals and divorced parents and gays and blacks and the Christian right and fossil fuels and Xbox are all to blame, meanwhile you yourselves create an ad where your kid hits you in the head with a baseball and you don't understand the message that the problem is you.
inBOIL is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 08:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
I'm so bad for this. I've been meaning to reply here for a while and have not gotten to it. Apologies to those who've been waiting to hear from me on this subject.

Firstly, before I go any further, I think it's important to note that biology is not my area of expertise. I don't know much about it and what I do know is chiefly confined to the sphere of arthropods, which have always fascinated me for no adequately explained reason. Interestingly, the animals aside from humans that could most easily be said to be altruistic in nature are primarily arthropods; I'm thinking particularly of eusocial colonial insects, such as bees, ants and termites.

The discussion, as noted by Willravel, evolved in the chat as an off-shoot of some other socio-political discussion, in which I asserted that there is no such thing as altruism, except as an intellectual construct.

Altruism is defined as an unselfish concern or devotion to the welfare of others. It implies to me that the altruistic individual performs an action (or actions) that are devoid of personal gain. What's interesting about this is how it contrasts with criminal psychology, which teaches that there's nearly always a motive or benefit behind an individual's actions, even if it's not readily apparent. In other words, people very rarely do something for no reason at all.

Of course, this becomes easily obfuscated. An above example is the soldier who jumps on a grenade for his comrades. Such a person seemingly has nothing to gain and everything to lose from this action, yet chooses to undertake it anyway. I've no idea how common such a thing actually is, but there's certainly enough apocryphal accounts of such heroics that we can assume that it does at least happen. I think one would need to look more deeply at the soldier's motivations. Religious and military indoctrination are of course quite high on the list.

What's interesting about humanity is how we conflict with our own instincts. We've taken socialism and technology to an extreme where in some situations we counter our own instincts. On a warm day, for example, I still choose to leave the house fully clothed. I don't particularly need or want my clothes, except that it would be socially unacceptable for me to leave without them.

I think that if we move into other animals we begin to see some more clear-cut cases. My dictionary has "behavior by an animal that is not beneficial to or may be harmful to itself but that benefits others of its species" as an alternate definition for the word altruism, and that is pretty clear cut and again with eusocial insects it's very common.

I'm not particularly interested in discussing altruism in primates or arthropods if I'm honest, precisely because it is so clear cut. What particularly interests me is altruism within humanity. I argue that humans are almost entirely selfish and small minded and there has to be a real benefit in order to break out of that thinking. Perhaps it seems pessimistic to think that way, but it's important to note also that the gain behind an action does not need to be material. Sometimes it's spiritual or emotional instead, and that's equally valid. As a child I was taught to be kind to others. Such behaviour was positively reinforced, and now I continue to get a good feeling from being kind. It's not an instinctive thing by any means; on the other hand, instincts, while powerful, are not all-controlling.

Virtue is not it's own reward, except in cases of complex social conditioning.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame

Last edited by Martian; 07-22-2008 at 09:27 AM.. Reason: Fixed a malapropism
Martian is offline  
 

Tags
altruism, evolutionary

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360