Rekna

Salt lake city has the following city ordiance pertaining to people living together.


What is the legality of such an ordiance? The problem is Salt Lake City has a ton of really big homes because of the morman families. There are homes with 5+ bedrooms that people own and rent out. Is such an ordiance legal and under what grounds could it be fought?

NoSoup

I'm not sure what the purpose of such an ordinance once was, but this seems like the type of ordinance that was once passed long ago that is no longer enforced.

For instance, it is illegal in the state of Wisconsin to eat a slice of apple pie unless there is cheese on top...

__________________
I have an aura of reliability and good judgement.

Just in case you were wondering...

pavel_lishin

Oh, those wacky mormons.

I wonder if you can redefine a house to no longer be a single housing unit.

__________________
Vote Quimby!

thingstodo

Yes, there are guidelines for this, called aprtment housing. However, there are another set of restrictions and rules.

It is quite legal to have pretty much any ordinance a city votes on. You always can challenge these things, but it could get quite expensive to do so. It kind of makes sense to limit the numbr of unrelated adults or you'd get a whole bunch of people sharing limited space.

__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves.

Stangers have the best candy.

BAMF

They do this in college towns to keep students out of family neighborhoods.

Anexkahn

it really seems like that is one of those ordinances that wouldnt hold up, but if it would be worth fighting the fight or not is the question.

Dilbert1234567

I’m sure if it was ever tested it would be unconstitutional. But some one has to challenge it

__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen

Rekna

A friend of mine just had thier house inspected for this. i guess some neighbors reported them. Pretty lame if you ask me.

JStrider

yup.... here in Lubbock, Tx we have a very similar law

apparently way back when the law was made it was intended to prevent brothels or some such

but now they just use it to kick college students out of some neighberhoods.

__________________
-=JStrider=-

~Clatto Verata Nicto

magictoy

I doubt it's unconstitutional--if so, a lot of hotels are in hot water for charging by the number of room occupants.

What IS illegal is specifying "no children," or "no more than four occupants" or the like, which is an attempt to limit the number of children in a unit. Except in senior citizens' complexes, which seem to occupy their own privileged category.

More likely, the owner doesn't want to be on the hook for the additional utilities, additional wear and tear, and complaints from the neighbors.

Dilbert1234567

A law dictating where someone can live is unconstitutional (I think). However if a private citizen, renting out a hotel or a house wants to regulate who or how many can live in a place is perfectly fine.

__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen

The_Jazz

Unless they discriminate based on race, religion, etc.

__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo

iccky

All cities dictate where people can and can't live. It's called zoning. This is just a normal zoning regulation. Cities can pass pretty much any zoning regulations they want as long as they don't discriminate against protected classes like gender, age, race etc.

iccky

Here's a story about a very simmilar case.

Story from missouri.