Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Knowledge and How-To


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-16-2006, 10:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
Banned from being Banned
 
Location: Donkey
Self teaching vs. College

I'm not sure if it's stress, lack of motivation, or what, but I'm going to end up dropping my Calc 3 class this semester.

Maybe I lack the discipline to get up every morning, drive 15 miles to class, stay for an hour, then drive back and have to work 8 hours (sometimes much more), but the fact is, I still maintain a STRONG interest in math and physics. If the school were closer to me, I'd be more inclined to go each and every day.

It gave me an idea: teach myself. Despite dropping the class, I'll still read the calc book and work the problems, understanding the concepts that each section conveys. I won't get a grade, or college credit, but the knowledge - which is the only thing that matters (at least, to me).

Hell, I read up on special relativity and work out the problems (for ex, from Feynman's books) to get a better understanding of it all.. just for shits and giggles, as something to do. Whenever books dive into topics of chemistry where it doesn't elaborate, and I'm unfamiliar with the topic, I find myself on wiki, google.. wherever, finding information, teaching myself those topics.

I would also feel more comfortable knowing I can learn at my own pace. If I'm having a stressful day, or need to work 12 hours, there won't be that feeling of "failure" if I don't complete my homework or didn't find time to study.

Using the library, the internet, or maybe even buying used textbooks here and there, I'm curious as to how well this method would work as I get more advanced into the physics/math.

The determination is there, and I almost feel more.. willing and motived to do this as opposed to actually attending class.

Another advantage is... when I decide to take up Calc 3 again, or take physics/chemistry, I'll be VERY familiar with the material making it easier and less stressful to be pressured into the schedule those classes would require. Meaning.. I wouldn't necessarily have to spend 3 hours on homework doing basic force problems because I already understand it.

I had an idea to email the heads of math and physics departments at nearby colleges, asking them what textbooks they use in their courses.. that way I can head out and get what I need.

I notice through my classes that the professors don't really elaborate much beyond the scope of the book. I've done it before where I missed 2 days, but read the material myself and fully understood it. Upon going back to class, I actually found I was ahead of where the professor was.

Has anyone done this, or know of anyone who's done this?

Any thoughts?
__________________
I love lamp.
Stompy is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 12:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
MexicanOnABike's Avatar
 
Location: up north
ya. teaching yourself can work great. i thought myself everything there is to know about computers including 3dgraphics and i'm ahead of my classes right now. only problem i have is setting a schedule to learn. if i have 1 week, i'll do much more but with no actual class, you might start to loose interest? but if you dont need the grade, then ya, it's a good idea.
__________________
MexicanOnABike is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 01:36 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned from being Banned
 
Location: Donkey
Yeah, I taught myself programming at a young age and have been doing it professionally for about 10 years now.

I was just wondering if the more.. "advanced" areas of life, ie the math and physics, could be done in the same way (although I don't see why they couldn't).

Just wondering how prevalent self-taught physicists/mathematicians are.

Another idea I had was.. whether or not I could get a scholarship, or some type of incentive if I approached a university already possessing this knowledge.
__________________
I love lamp.

Last edited by Stompy; 03-16-2006 at 02:00 PM..
Stompy is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 06:04 PM   #4 (permalink)
Crazy
 
I have a lot of thoughts about this. A very good friend of mine, and myself, found ourselves thinking similarly several years ago... I decided to stay in school, he decided not to.

The bottom line is, intellectually we are still at the same place. I am enormously in debt, he isn't. I have done a lot of networking, he hasn't. In my opinion, the days of single-handedly defining a field regardless of background are over... the bottom line is that networking is what is going to get you a job and get you into a respected position of the field regardless of your ability to learn on your own.

Programming is a different thing, because it's still new, theoretical math, however...

Anyway, if you do indeed intend, and dedicate yourself, to going back after getting a head-start, it could be incredibly beneficial to the networking process...
__________________
I'm swimming in the digital residue of a media-drenched world. It's too cold.
robbdn is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 06:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Self instruction (in my own anecdotal experience) is always more effective than structured learning at achieving SPECIFIC knowledge. If you a specific question or specific set of questions, you'll likely better reach a solution by researching it yourself. However, General Knowledge about a topic really only comes from instruction: assuming your instructor is an expert or relative expert in their field, they'll be directing you toward the general ideas that are precursors to the individual research you'll later do.

I wouldn't count on scholarships, and unfortunately -- knowledge means very little unless you can demonstrate or document it. Demonstration is often not an option, because it would waste a great deal of acceptance comittees' and employers' time to let everyone demonstrate their knowledge. If you're learning for the intrinsic benefit of learning, go ahead. But if you're learning with the idea that it will help you in the future -- only the documentation of an accredited "school" will have an immediate effect.

Trust me, I hate my 21 credit hours just as much as the next guy, and I know that I could learn it more efficiently under my own tutelage. But very few HR departments will hire someone without a piece of paper to back up their claims of brilliance.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel

Last edited by Jinn; 03-16-2006 at 06:17 PM..
Jinn is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 12:54 PM   #6 (permalink)
Pip
Likes Hats
 
Pip's Avatar
 
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stompy
I notice through my classes that the professors don't really elaborate much beyond the scope of the book. I've done it before where I missed 2 days, but read the material myself and fully understood it. Upon going back to class, I actually found I was ahead of where the professor was.

Has anyone done this, or know of anyone who's done this?
Don't you know you're supposed to have read the material before the lecture? It's one of those things everyone talks about but few have experienced: being "in phase". I was in phase once, because I was going on a trip on the date of a Mechanics theory exam, so I learned the stuff on my own and took an earlier exam. However, I still had to do the practical exam on the ordinary date, so I attended the lectures even though I alredy knew the material. It was a neat experience, not being completely lost for once.

I don't know what exactly Calc III corresponds to... some math/physics/engineering courses are a lot easier to learn on your own than others, it's best to ask friends who have taken it already what they think.
Pip is offline  
Old 03-19-2006, 04:49 AM   #7 (permalink)
A Storm Is Coming
 
thingstodo's Avatar
 
Location: The Great White North
Quote:
Originally Posted by JinnKai
If you're learning for the intrinsic benefit of learning, go ahead. But if you're learning with the idea that it will help you in the future -- only the documentation of an accredited "school" will have an immediate effect.

Trust me, I hate my 21 credit hours just as much as the next guy, and I know that I could learn it more efficiently under my own tutelage. But very few HR departments will hire someone without a piece of paper to back up their claims of brilliance.
That is a key thing. If you need the paper it really isn't an option. And the side benefits of networking, etc. previously mentioned can also be important.
__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves.

Stangers have the best candy.
thingstodo is offline  
Old 03-21-2006, 11:47 AM   #8 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Minnesota
The penchant for teaching yourself is incalculably valuable, but the checkmark that having a degree will garner on your resume has a price tag. Here in America that price tag is about 20,000 bucks a year in salary.

In order to get a meaningful education from college one must be self taught. Professors can show you where the information is, but there is only one person who can learn it, and how well you learn it is wholly dependant on how willing you are to teach yourself the material.
__________________
Fact: Global levels of Oxygen are depleting.
Fact: Global levels Carbon Dioxide are increasing.

(icy hell)Mars<------EARTH------>Venus(burning hell)
LeviticusMky is offline  
Old 03-21-2006, 01:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
I'm not a blonde! I'm knot! I'm knot! I'm knot!
 
raeanna74's Avatar
 
Location: Upper Michigan
I took an Advanced English Grammar class in college and failed it. Totally flat out got an 'F'. BUT I wanted to nail that class and I had to take it over again. I went home over Christmas break. Got a grammar textbook and workbook and drilled myself hard on it. I spent about 4 or 5 hours at it a day over break. I went back the next semester, signed up for the class again and came out with a 'B+'. It was worth while to do that work and so satisfying to have a marker of my improvement like that. So if you have that drive to learn what it is you want to learn then do it yourself but if you need the paper go back again afterwards and take that class again and get yourself a better grade in the process.
__________________
"Always learn the rules so that you can break them properly." Dalai Lama
My Karma just ran over your Dogma.
raeanna74 is offline  
Old 03-21-2006, 02:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
frogza's Avatar
 
Location: Right Here
In my experience, if you want knowledge for the sake of knowledge, teach yourself. If you want knowledge for the sake of money, go to school.
frogza is offline  
Old 03-22-2006, 12:52 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned from being Banned
 
Location: Donkey
I want the knowledge for sake of having the knowledge. Yeah, a degree is always beneficial, but I have a pretty stable career.

I think I just wanted others opinions on how realistic something like this could be.. and so far it doesn't sound like a bad way to go at all.

I've also found a ton of math and physics textbooks via P2P of classes I was planning on taking, along with their solutions manuals to check my problems.
__________________
I love lamp.
Stompy is offline  
Old 03-22-2006, 01:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stompy
Just wondering how prevalent self-taught physicists/mathematicians are.
They don't exist. At least not if you mean professional physicists or mathematicians. But then you already have a career. There are certainly a lot of interesting things that you can pick up on your own.

A big issue is that problem-solving is really the most important thing in these fields. In what is generally called a Calc 3 class, there are really only a handful of specific types of problems that you're expected to learn about. Once you get the basic idea, that's that. At any higher level, the level of abstraction and "openness" climbs very very quickly. That makes some level of solution feedback much more important. Upper level (beyond freshman or occasionally sophomore year) textbooks also do not have solution manuals or a significant number of examples. They don't repeat themselves like intro books either.

Another thing is that universities generally force you to learn subjects in an order that you might think is boring or unimportant. It can sometimes take an extra couple of years of study to realize that you really did need to know all of that "irrelevant" stuff to fully appreciate and understand the subject. For example you mention studying special relativity a bit. I don't really know your background, but a lot of people try to get into that without a solid background in the physics that came before it. That would be a very bad idea in my opinion. The same follows for any piece of physics, though. It's all connected, and it all builds on what came before.

Finally, when you get into the newer stuff, you eventually come to realize that there are no textbooks you can go to anymore. The vast majority of knowledge in these fields has never been written up for students. There are also disagreements between different authors, and you really need to decide on your own exactly what each conclusion assumes, and how reasonable it is.

Anyway, sorry about being so pessimistic. Good luck in whatever you end up doing. If you need any textbook recommendations, I could probably help you out.
stingc is offline  
 

Tags
college, teaching

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:29 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360