Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Gaming


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-19-2003, 04:38 PM   #41 (permalink)
Junkie
 
thats my biggest problem with were blizz is heading

seems to be to much focus on graphics and not enough of good game making
dragon2fire is offline  
Old 11-19-2003, 04:49 PM   #42 (permalink)
Funran
 
Location: Norman, OK
[QUOTE]Originally posted by seretogis
[B] There is already a large FFXI thread, which you can post all sorts of praise for FFXI, on. This is a thread that was specifically created for World of Warcraft, and by posting only vague praise for another game, without any sort of real information, you aren't really helping the thread out at all. If you like something about FFXI and hope that it is implemented in WoW, or dislike that it will not be implemented in WoW, post that. That would stimulate discussion and get some ideas and comments floating around. Of course, it's not against the rules to post "Why play WoW when you can play FFXI?", but imho it really isn't a worthwhile contribution.



I have no intention of ever playing FFXI, for a variety of reasons. I have friends who have played it (past tense), and I've played EverQuest for three years (perhaps the worst failure of any mmorpg as far as the customer is concerned), and really don't trust Square to do a good enough job to warrant me paying monthly and investing huge amounts of time into a character.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a new WoW update for those who don't check the Blizzard site every couple of days. Trolls and Gnomes have been added to the Town Hall and there is a Tradeskills page hidden away.



Quote:
Originally posted by seretogis
For the love of god, stop.

Please.

Just stop.
I see, so I guess you telling me to stop is posting about FFXI is ok? Sure, ok.

Also, i am just one out of 5 people that had to say something about FFXI.
__________________
How much is y'all Piolkles?
IckUber is offline  
Old 11-20-2003, 03:04 PM   #43 (permalink)
Huggles, sir?
 
seretogis's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally posted by dragon2fire
thats my biggest problem with were blizz is heading

seems to be to much focus on graphics and not enough of good game making
What?

Blizzard has been getting slammed for not focusing enough on graphics, because the models in WoW are not as detailed as those in EQ2. The major selling-point of WoW is that it will not just be pretty pictures with levels, but a deep story-driven game with dynamic events and a reason to play. You are the first person that I have seen claim that Blizzard is focusing too much on graphics, and that is not whining because Night Elves don't look photorealistic.
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames
seretogis is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 11:03 AM   #44 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally posted by seretogis
What?

Blizzard has been getting slammed for not focusing enough on graphics, because the models in WoW are not as detailed as those in EQ2. The major selling-point of WoW is that it will not just be pretty pictures with levels, but a deep story-driven game with dynamic events and a reason to play. You are the first person that I have seen claim that Blizzard is focusing too much on graphics, and that is not whining because Night Elves don't look photorealistic.

you have played warcraft 3 right

its blizz worse game by far


to much graphic not enough good old fashion programing


unlike there other games there is not a dam thing that is origanl or innovative
dragon2fire is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 12:33 PM   #45 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Orange County, California
Quote:
Originally posted by dragon2fire
you have played warcraft 3 right

its blizz worse game by far


to much graphic not enough good old fashion programing


unlike there other games there is not a dam thing that is origanl or innovative
What are you smoking?
Plan9Senior is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 12:33 PM   #46 (permalink)
Swashbuckling
 
Location: Iowa...sometimes
Quote:
Originally posted by dragon2fire
you have played warcraft 3 right

its blizz worse game by far


to much graphic not enough good old fashion programing


unlike there other games there is not a dam thing that is origanl or innovative
It's my favorite game of all time
I challange you to find a bad review.

# Computer Strategy Game of the Year - Academy of Interactive Arts and Sciences
# Game of the Year - Gamespot
# Game of the Year - Macworld
# Game of the Year - XSages
# Game of the Year - Fragland
# Game of the Year - Cinescape
# Game of the Year - Gaming Illustrated
# Best PC Game of the Year - GameNOW
# Best Real-Time Strategy Game of the Year - PC Gamer
# Best Multiplayer Strategy Game of the Year - Gamespot
# Best PC Strategy Game of the Year - GameNOW
# Best PC Strategy Game of the Year - Game Revolution
# Best PC Strategy Game of the Year - Telefragged
# Best PC Strategy Game of the Year - OCAddiction
# Best PC Strategy Game of the Year (Reader's Choice) - GameSpot
# Readers’ Choice 2002: Best PC Game of the Year - GamePro
# Strategy Game of the Year - Gamer's Pulse
# Gamer's Choice: Overall PC Game of the Year - Gamespy
# Gamer's Choice: PC Strategy Game of the Year - Gamespy
# Best Non-Interactive 3D Game Cinematics - International 3D Awards
# Best Cinematic - IGN
# Best CG Cinematics (tie) - Gamespy's Best of E3 2002 Awards
# Best Opening Movie - Game Chronicles
# Editor's Choice (10 out of 10 rating) - Game Chronicles
# Editor's Choice (9.6 out of 10 rating) - Gaming Illustrated
# Editor's Choice (9.5 out of 10 rating) - SLCCentral
# Editor's Choice (9.5 out of 10 rating) - The Entertainment Depot
# Editor's Choice (95 out of 100 rating) - Action Trip
# Editor's Choice (94 out of 100 rating) - PC Gamer
# Editor's Choice (93 out of 100 rating) - Gaming Excellence
# Editor's Choice (93 out of 100 rating) - Invisible Dream
# Editor's Choice (9.3 out of 10 rating) - IGN
# Editor's Choice (92 out of 100 rating) - Gamitopia
# Editor's Choice (9.1 out of 10 rating) - Firing Squad
# Editor's Choice (8.7 out of 10 rating) - Strategy Gaming Online
# 5 out of 5 rating - Games First
# 5 out of 5 rating (Award for Excellence) - Wargamer.com
# 5 out of 5 rating (Seal of Excellence) - The Adrenaline Vault
# 6 out of 6 rating (Drool Award) - Gamers Depot.com
# 9.7 out of 10 rating (Outstanding Game Award) - GameZone.com
# 97 out of 100 rating - Wired Play
# 96 out of 100 rating (Award of Excellence) - The Gamers Temple
# 95 out of 100 rating (GG Platinum Award) - Gone Gold
# 93 out of 100 rating - Game Rankings
# 9.3 out of 10 rating - Geek Haven
# 9.3 out of 10 rating (Game of the Month July 2002) - GameSpot
# 92 out of 100 rating (AOG Approved) - All Out Games
# 9 out of 10 rating (Mindless Choice Award) - Mindless Games
# 90 out of 100 rating (Gamers' Choice Award) - Game Over
# 8.9 out of 10 rating (Silver Hell Award) - Gamer's Hell
# 4 out of 5 rating (Top Game) - Games Domain
# Best Cut Scenes 2002 - XSages
# Best Cinematic/Cut-Scene Audio - Music4Games.net
BuddyHawks is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 12:58 PM   #47 (permalink)
Funran
 
Location: Norman, OK
Umm, yeah what are you smoking, warcraft 3 was the greatest thing to come out from blizzard since starcraft. I cant wait for them to develop starcraft II. What ARE you smoking son?
__________________
How much is y'all Piolkles?
IckUber is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 01:40 PM   #48 (permalink)
Junkie
 
war carft 3 is not origanal or innovative

it does not hold a canddle to any of blizzards other games for replayabity

that said if it did not come form blizz i would problay like it but i hold blizzard to a higher starand then making a rehash of a better game that being warlords battle cry 2


maybe i would like it more if they had done it frist or best

witch they did neither
dragon2fire is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 02:34 AM   #49 (permalink)
Funran
 
Location: Norman, OK
Quote:
Originally posted by dragon2fire
war carft 3 is not origanal or innovative

it does not hold a canddle to any of blizzards other games for replayabity

that said if it did not come form blizz i would problay like it but i hold blizzard to a higher starand then making a rehash of a better game that being warlords battle cry 2


maybe i would like it more if they had done it frist or best

witch they did neither
Your highly outnumbered. look at all those awards, they dont give shit games, awards like that. Warcraft III is one of the best PC games on the market right now.
__________________
How much is y'all Piolkles?
IckUber is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 01:28 PM   #50 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally posted by IckUber
Your highly outnumbered. look at all those awards, they dont give shit games, awards like that. Warcraft III is one of the best PC games on the market right now.

bull shit there are tons and i mean tons of great games to not get a award

and there are more then a few bad game to get awards


war 3 is one of them


i am sorry but there is better much better in rts games
dragon2fire is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 03:52 PM   #51 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Orange County, California
Reading comprehension is your friend
Plan9Senior is offline  
Old 11-24-2003, 04:11 PM   #52 (permalink)
Addict
 
CyCo PL's Avatar
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
Hey, WoW looks like it's gonna be a great game. But I'm kind of not looking forward to it as much as before since I got FFXI. I'm not going to judge how good WoW is until I play the beta test... Even if I don't get in I can still play it a LAN center in town that is getting into it.
CyCo PL is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 05:41 PM   #53 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: NY
I thinks MMORPG's should be like 20-30 dollars. cuz u need to pay every month to play ne ways, and the cost of makin these games cant be more than 5 dollars at the most... If you sold a game for 20 dollars that cost you 5 dollars, and the gamer didnt like it, you get a 15 dollar profit.. if the buyer did like it, you get that constant flow of cash.. an MMORPG being the same price as an offline game from the beginning sounds wrong... .. just my opiny
__________________
b000yahed up your w000pah!!

Joygasm~!!
thephuse is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 07:34 PM   #54 (permalink)
Tilted
 
I've very exited for this game to be released.

The only MMORPG I paid for was ATITD, 13$/mo and free to download and try for 24hours of play time. I knew I was going to hate it until I tried it . I wish more companies adopted this tactic.
TheFirstDuffMan is offline  
Old 11-25-2003, 10:19 PM   #55 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: NJ
Currently playing EQ and FFXI, but one of them will most likely be getting the boot when WoW is release. Well, for me, it sure is shaping up nicely to my style of play. =) Can't wait!
Vyxen is offline  
Old 11-27-2003, 10:20 PM   #56 (permalink)
Loser
 
I'm very much looking forward to the release of beta. I don't want to wait another damn year to play a new MMORPG and Horizons and EQ2 aren't really interesting me nearly as much as WoW is.
clydestinkybeef is offline  
Old 11-28-2003, 09:37 AM   #57 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: NJ
Anyone read up on the trade skills? Go to the blizz website and check 'em out if you haven't. It looks BAD-ASS. And the best part?

Taken from the Blizzard website:
There are many unique weapons and other armaments that cannot be found on any of the vendors or monsters in the game, but can only be created by Blacksmiths.


Now try and tell me that doesn't get you hard.
__________________
Embrace the flame
Czernobog is offline  
Old 11-29-2003, 06:43 AM   #58 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
WoW is going to suck with PK zones. Its warcraft for christ sake and its going carebear?

This WILL bomb.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-29-2003, 11:02 AM   #59 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Salt Lake City
Quote:
Originally posted by thephuse
I thinks MMORPG's should be like 20-30 dollars. cuz u need to pay every month to play ne ways, and the cost of makin these games cant be more than 5 dollars at the most... If you sold a game for 20 dollars that cost you 5 dollars, and the gamer didnt like it, you get a 15 dollar profit.. if the buyer did like it, you get that constant flow of cash.. an MMORPG being the same price as an offline game from the beginning sounds wrong... .. just my opiny
umm the reason there is a fee is because they continue to add content, and often times there is more content in the beginning then other games. These games usually keep on a staff of people to help with gamers problems while playing as well. It's like belonging to a club. And yes the actual disk may have cost 5 dollars but there were many hours upon hours of programming to get the disk to come out.
__________________
The most important things are the hardest things to say. They are the things you get ashamed of because words diminish your feelings. Words shrink things that seem timeless when they are in your head to no more than living size when they are brought out. -Stephen King
Beltruckus is offline  
Old 11-29-2003, 01:21 PM   #60 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally posted by dragon2fire
you have played warcraft 3 right

its blizz worse game by far
Since everyone jumped on dragon for saying this, I'm going to back it. I was flat out addicted to WC2 & SC. Couldn't stop playing them to save my life. WC3 started strong but then just drifted. I never did finish it. It was beautiful and smooth but ultimately somehow shallow. I don't care how many awards it won, Blizzard let me down with that one.
empu is offline  
Old 11-29-2003, 09:26 PM   #61 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Orange County, California
Quote:
Originally posted by empu
Since everyone jumped on dragon for saying this, I'm going to back it. I was flat out addicted to WC2 & SC. Couldn't stop playing them to save my life. WC3 started strong but then just drifted. I never did finish it. It was beautiful and smooth but ultimately somehow shallow. I don't care how many awards it won, Blizzard let me down with that one.
Sounds like you are worn out on the genre, not the game.
Plan9Senior is offline  
Old 11-29-2003, 10:17 PM   #62 (permalink)
Swashbuckling
 
Location: Iowa...sometimes
Quote:
Originally posted by Plan9
Sounds like you are worn out on the genre, not the game.
possiby, but im guessing he just didn't like the game
BuddyHawks is offline  
Old 11-29-2003, 11:32 PM   #63 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Plan9
Sounds like you are worn out on the genre, not the game.

I know thats not the case with me i play warlords battlecry 2 all the time
dragon2fire is offline  
Old 11-30-2003, 12:02 AM   #64 (permalink)
Crazy
 
All I can say is that the game didn't take it to that extra level for me. I won't try to tell you I thought it was a bad game. But held to the (incredibly high) standard that StarCraft set, it didn't deliver. If I hadn't played so much WC2 & SC I'm sure my expectations would've been different, so perhaps in a sense I was "worn out". But if SC2 were released today I would buy it immediately.

I'm glad to hear that so many of you had a great experience with WC3. But I wanted to acknowledge dragon2fire's controversial opinion as shared by at least one other gamer.
empu is offline  
Old 11-30-2003, 02:00 AM   #65 (permalink)
Go Ninja, Go Ninja Go!!
 
Location: IN, USA
now, I don't play RTS, so i can't really say what I think about WC3.. although the graphics were polished nicely. To me its just like any other RTS on the market with a few perks. But I must say, I've Seen Dragon2Fire play Battlecry 2 quite a few times, and that game looks excellent. Personally I think it is probably a lot better than WC3.
__________________
RoboBlaster:
Welcome to the club! Not that I'm in the club. And there really isn'a a club in the first place. But if there was a club and if I was in it, I would definitely welcome you to it.
GakFace is offline  
Old 12-01-2003, 12:31 AM   #66 (permalink)
The Ultimate Badass
 
Location: Tampa
god, galaxies was awesome... after the problems that all mmrpgs have with launch... but then people kept complaining and they kept nerfing everything. i swear i went through 8 diff chars before i just gave up.... they made everything useless. my friend got lucky and sold chars over ebay for like 500 bucks before they got nerfed... they mustve been pissed... and as far as ffx1 goes.... well i heard u cant create char so everyone u run into looks exactly the same as you (yay!) sounds like a school uniform type of thing... blah, and the fact that the controls were prob just remapped in 1 min for the pc port, paying no attention as to offer a configuration option. horrible horrible... wow.... is gonna tear them all apart. i thought ffx1 would have achance ... but not in this world... or this hell.
__________________
"The laws that keep us safe, these same laws condemn us to boredom. Without access to true chaos, we'll never have true peace. Unless everything can get worse, it won't get any better. This is all the stuff the Mommy used to tell him. She used to say, "The only frontier you have left is the world of intangibles. Everything else is sewn up too tight." Caged inside too many laws. By intangibles, she meant the Internet, movies, music, stories, art, rumors, computer programs, anything that isn't real. Virtual realities. Make-believe stuff. The culture. The unreal is more powerful than the real. Because nothing is as perfect as you can imagine it. Because it's only the intangible ideas, concepts, beliefs, fantasies that last. Stone crumbles. Wood rots. People, well, they die."
skaterpunk is offline  
 

Tags
wow


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360