05-14-2003, 12:06 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Delicious
|
Why is Ham bigger than bread?
It really pains me when two things that are mostly eaten together aren't perfect matches for each other. Why is Ham(Deli ham mostly) Bigger than the bread its put on. You can fold it over, but then you end up with half of the sandwich 2 slices of ham, and the other half 1 slice of ham. You can put 2 slices of ham, fold them both over and have 3 equal slices of ham on the bread, but we all know 3's a crowd and way to much for a light snack. If they are going to make it bigger, couldn't they at least make it twice as large so when its folder it covers the bread evenly. This is almost as bad as the hotdog/bun scenerio for me...
|
05-14-2003, 12:27 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Eccentric insomniac
Location: North Carolina
|
I think it is the result of poor ham-to-bread communication.
__________________
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill "All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dream with open eyes, to make it possible." Seven Pillars of Wisdom, T.E. Lawrence |
05-14-2003, 07:22 AM | #5 (permalink) | |
through charlatans phone
Location: Northcoast
|
Quote:
One more thing. If you do resort to baloney, make sure to fry it first. Lard improves the taste of everything! |
|
05-14-2003, 09:27 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Naughty Just Right
Location: Euphoria
|
Nature's Harvest Old Settler Wheat holds a slice of ham perfectly.
But yes, I get your dillema. Bones hit the other one..hot dogs & buns. Cheese slices are another...they are too small!
__________________
In the depth of winter, I finally learned that there was within me an invincible summer. ~Albert Camus |
05-14-2003, 11:24 AM | #9 (permalink) |
comfortably numb...
Super Moderator
Location: upstate
|
ever try fried bologna, onions, and cheese on a bun for a hangover remedy? also, lebanon bologna (from southern pennsylvania) is great. so what if the meat doesn't fit perfectly; that's the fun part of sandwichery...
__________________
"We were wrong, terribly wrong. (We) should not have tried to fight a guerrilla war with conventional military tactics against a foe willing to absorb enormous casualties...in a country lacking the fundamental political stability necessary to conduct effective military and pacification operations. It could not be done and it was not done." - Robert S. McNamara ----------------------------------------- "We will take our napalm and flame throwers out of the land that scarcely knows the use of matches... We will leave you your small joys and smaller troubles." - Eugene McCarthy in "Vietnam Message" ----------------------------------------- never wrestle with a pig. you both get dirty; the pig likes it. |
05-14-2003, 12:29 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Gastrolithuanian
Location: low-velocity Earth orbit
|
Well hello there,
This thread unearthed an old math memory... The Ham Sandwich Theorem: Regardless of the distribution of ham and cheese in a sandwich, you can use one slice to divide the sandwich into two parts containing equal parts of bread, ham and cheese. The general case of the Ham-Sandwich Theorem says that if we have n regions in n-dimensional space, then there is some hyperplane, which cuts each exactly in half, measured by volume. The general proof is suggested by the argument in the two-dimensional case. There, for each possible direction s for the cut, we clearly have, for each region, a line in direction s bisecting that region. But the two lines for the two regions are offset by some distance d(s). We'd like to find a direction with d(s) = 0. Note that, if we have rotate our direction by 180 degrees, we get back to the same pair of bisecting lines, but they now have the opposite orientation. Adopting the convention that the distance d between the lines is a signed quantity depending on the orientation, we see that d(s+180) = -d(s). Thus it is clear that d is neither always positive nor always negative. Since d is a continuous function, by the intermediate-value theorem it must achieve a value of 0 for some direction. Thinking of the circle of directions as the unit circle in the plane, we might write -s instead of s+180 for the opposite direction. Thus we have a function d from the circle of directions to the real numbers, with the property that antipodal points map to negatives of each other: d(-s) = -d(s). Such a function must be zero somewhere. *looks around* Anyone still awake? -GH |
05-14-2003, 05:42 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
Indifferent to anti-matter
Location: Tucson, AZ
|
Originally posted by d4in
Quote:
__________________
If puns were sausages, this would be the wurst. |
|
05-14-2003, 07:45 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Everything's better with bacon
Location: In your local grocer's freezer.
|
You're using bread that is too small OR you're not dividing your ham properly in order to fit on the bread you're using. Take some engineering classes, it will help you with your ham sandwich making.
__________________
It was like that when I got here....I swear. |
Tags |
bigger, bread, ham |
|
|