jwoody

Voting on this round is now closed.

The winner was "Harry Potter & The Sorcerer's Stone" by 18 votes to 5.

__________________
.

Destrox

Dang.. This always happens to me for movie voting brackets..

Theres always a good 50% or more I never would have put on that list.

So who got to pick who's the top 16 there?

__________________
You bore me.... next.

jwoody

The IMDB all time worldwide box office takings.

The only fair way judge how good a film is, right?

http://www.imdb.com/boxoffice/alltim...ion=world-wide

__________________
.

Destrox

Wouldnt it have been best to use top RANKING, and not top money making?

Ah well, I'll still vote the whole way though either way :P

__________________
You bore me.... next.

jwoody

No.

Charlatan

Titanic is a colossal waste of time...

__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke

FaderMonkey

Woohoo!! I just put Titanic ahead by 1! I know it won't last though. Titanic is one of those movies everyone seems to love to hate.

absorbentishe

That's a fact!

Speed_Gibson

I am not much help here as I have never seen any Harry Potter movie, but Titanic was so awful that the other option would almost have to be better.
-slightly offtopic- Just thought of that amusing t-shirthell.com shirt: "Harrys a pothead and the Sorcerer's stoned"
edit: never have seen Lion King either

__________________
Started talking to yourself I see.
Yes, it's the only way I can be certain of an intelligent conversation.

Black Adder

Speed_Gibson

that would be the proper way to judge how popular a film was, not how good it was.
For instance Falling Down with Michael Douglas is far better (IMO) than some (edit: actually most if not all of those) of the other live action films listed, but made far less money. Which is course brings up the point of opinion; how much a film made, even if it was awful, is a tangible basis whereas everyone has their likes and dislikes in the cinema.
My personal listings would cover much more of the <1950ish releases or films with structural merit that are not so effects driven for more current ones.

__________________
Started talking to yourself I see.
Yes, it's the only way I can be certain of an intelligent conversation.

Black Adder

vermin

Harry Potter only got my vote 'cause it's shorter.

Titanic had the advantage of "naked titties", but 3 hours was just too damn long.

__________________
If puns were sausages, this would be the wurst.

Charlatan

OK... point taken...

Titanic is a colossal waste of time (except for Kate Winslet's boobies).

bundy

my round one vote went to Harry Potter in this round, but its going to lose the next round to LOTR:TTT.

__________________
Ohayo!!!

WarWagon

I can't believe people out there actually liked Titanic. If Finding Nemo doesn't come out on top, I'm going to be making a lot of posts in the Beat Up A Fellow TFP'er thread.

jwoody

Additional notes:

Voting on this tie will continue until 1pm GMT (7am Central time, US & Canada) 14th May.

Voting for the second tie, LOTR:ROTK v Star Wars: The Phantom Menace, will commence today from 1pm GMT (7am Central time, US & Canada) and will close 48 hours later on 15th May with a proper time limit on the poll.

__________________
.

Luki

I saw the Titanic in the theaters and I hated it. It was drug out and their choice of DiCaprio, not a chance of my favor. The best part was when she let him sink to the bottom

__________________
Your part is silent you little toad - a line from the new phantom of the opera