|
View Poll Results: Are polls an accurate reflection of public opinion. | |||
Yes. | 4 | 13.33% | |
No. | 26 | 86.67% | |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
11-24-2003, 08:37 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
Almost never. Too many organizations doing polls that have no business doing them.
Creating a non-biased poll is part science and a lot of art. You have to create questions that are clearly understood by the vast majority of those that you poll, you then need to be consistent in the coding of the answers, and correctly calculate the results. Now, to make it more complicated, you need to create a panel. A true random panel of the population you want to measure is the most valid but almost no one goes to the trouble of attempting one. The other more valid alternative would be to create a sample that is representative (in terms of demographics, opinions, etc) of the population as a whole. This method is not ideal but is better than what you typically get which is a narrowly focused self selected sample with a lot of biases. Most polls contain misleading (or outright biased) questions, large gaps in both sample size and representation, and the assumptions that the publishers make based on the "results" are more often than not leaps of faith with no real statistical footing. But other than that, they're great.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
11-24-2003, 08:53 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: "TX"
|
kudos onetime2, you should be a pollster. I agree that the questions are often biased, and every in which I have participated has had at least one question requiring more than a clear yes or no/ agree or disagree answer. Abortion, for instance. It would be foolish to immediatley answer yes always or no always without considering the individual case. (in my opinion)
|
11-24-2003, 12:38 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: ...We have a problem.
|
Scientific polls are typically constructed with more forethought as they are generally part of a funded study. There will be questions that will seem biased to the person being interviewed, but they are strategically placed within the poll to ensure overall, a more accurate result. I have been part of putting together research polls and if conducted properly, they can be very accurate and very informative. Now the ones we see here on the TFP, television, in magazines, etc. are a different story. That is why you see that margin of error percentage - to account for poll placement and those who may have not answered truthfully or who may have felt pressured to give a certain answer. For instance, if you post a poll about beef on a site frequented by vegetarians, your outcome will be much different than had you posted that same poll on a website geared toward the hamburger buying public. Research - grants, studies and soforth - depends upon poll accuracy, so they can't all be crap.
__________________
Cruel words erode self-esteem like the ocean eats away the shore. |
11-24-2003, 05:09 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
Quote:
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
|
11-24-2003, 08:16 PM | #9 (permalink) |
Boy am I horny today
Location: T O L E D O, Toledo!!
|
No way. The polls are set up (usually by the media) using language that entices the respondent to answer the way the ask it. I work in market research, and some of the things we do seem to skew the data. You can not ask an unbiased question, one way or the other. You can get close, but there are no unbiased questions in the way they are asked.
|
Tags |
accurate, opinion, polls, public, reflection |
|
|