Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > Tilted Fun Zone


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-21-2009, 08:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Ayatollah blasts rhetoric with... rhetoric

Original article.
Quote:
Iranian leader: Obama's rhetoric not enough

TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Saturday he sees no change in U.S. policy toward Iran despite the U.S. promise of a "new beginning."

Khamenei said a change in rhetoric is not enough, and Washington must practice what it preaches, according to the English-language Press TV channel in Iran.

He also promised that Iran will change its policy if the United States does so as well, Press TV reported.

Khamenei's comments, which he made in a televised address to mark the start of the Iranian New Year on Friday, come a day after U.S. President Barack Obama reached out to Iran in a videotaped message.

A spokesman for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad condemned U.S. foreign policy Friday in response to the video.

Obama's message spoke of "new beginnings" with the promise of a new year.

"My administration is now committed to diplomacy that addresses the full range of issues before us, and to pursuing constructive ties among the United States, Iran and the international community," the president said in his message Friday.

Obama said the United States seeks engagement with Iran that is "honest and grounded in mutual respect."

The president's message is part of a dramatic shift in tone from that of the Bush administration, which branded Iran as part of an "axis of evil" along with North Korea and Iraq. It also echoes Obama's inaugural speech in which he told the Muslim world, "We seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect."
Don't Miss

* Obama offers Iran 'the promise of a new beginning'
* Zakaria: Obama impresses with first foreign policy moves

Ahmadinejad said last month that Iran would welcome talks with the United States "in a fair atmosphere with mutual respect."

Khamenei also said world powers have come to realize they are not able to block Iran's nuclear progress. He looked back on the February 25 testing of Iran's first nuclear power plant, at Bushehr, as one of the "joyful developments" of the past year.

Last month, the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security released a report saying that Iran has reached "nuclear weapons breakout capability" -- it has enough uranium to make a nuclear bomb.

The report was based on an analysis of data from the International Atomic Energy Agency. However, an IAEA official who asked not to be named cautioned against drawing such dramatic conclusions from the data, saying Iran's stock of low-enriched uranium would have to be turned into highly enriched uranium to be weapons-grade material. That hasn't been done, the official said.

The United States has had tortuous relations with Tehran since the Islamic revolution in 1979.

Meanwhile, the widow of the late founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, died Saturday morning after a long period of illness, the Iranian-run Islamic Republic News Agency said.
advertisement

A funeral for Khadije Saghafi was scheduled to be held Sunday in Tehran and she was set to be laid to rest in Khomeini's tomb, the agency reported.

Khomeini was the leader of the 1979 revolution that led to the toppling of the shah of Iran and the ushering in of an Islamic state. He died in 1989.
Khomeini claims that a change in US policy towards Iran will cause a shift in how the countries view each other, but is there really any realistic chance that, even with a major shift in US policy towards Iran that anything will actually change?

In a country where the nominal GDP ranks 29th at nearly 400 billion dollars, yet the per capital annual GDP ranks 85th at just over $5000, is Tehran willing to let go of the US as a scapegoat for any problems faced within the country?

In the end, I don't think this is anything more than rhetoric. He's assuming Obama will not meet what he's asked for, so he can easily turn around and say, "we were willing to try, but once again, the US is completely unwilling to step up to the table."

Your thoughts?
__________________
"Fuck these chains
No goddamn slave
I will be different"
~ Machine Head
spectre is offline  
Old 03-22-2009, 03:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
comfortably numb...
 
uncle phil's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: upstate
nuke 'em 'til they glow?

__________________
"We were wrong, terribly wrong. (We) should not have tried to fight a guerrilla war with conventional military tactics against a foe willing to absorb enormous casualties...in a country lacking the fundamental political stability necessary to conduct effective military and pacification operations. It could not be done and it was not done."
- Robert S. McNamara
-----------------------------------------
"We will take our napalm and flame throwers out of the land that scarcely knows the use of matches...
We will leave you your small joys and smaller troubles."
- Eugene McCarthy in "Vietnam Message"
-----------------------------------------
never wrestle with a pig.
you both get dirty;
the pig likes it.
uncle phil is offline  
Old 03-22-2009, 12:04 PM   #3 (permalink)
Riding the Ocean Spray
 
BadNick's Avatar
 
Location: S.E. PA in U Sofa
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncle phil View Post
...'til they glow?...
whoa, man!!! I just had a flashback to the psychedelic ayatollah

BadNick is offline  
Old 03-22-2009, 01:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
james t kirk's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto
The gov't in Iran survives on crisis.

No crisis and the people will begin to ask pointy questions like, "how come we're so poor and you're so rich?", and "how come we don't have free will?" and "why is it that we can't have free elections?", "and what about women's rights?"

The current gov't in Iran is basically a totalarian hard line regime steeped in Islamic rhetoric.

No-one in their right mind would want that kind of government.

A perpetual state of war with the US is required in order to ensure its unquestioned survival. "Now is not the time to be questioning the word of the Ayatollah Ibrihm, the USA wants to destroy us all"

Now what happens when that is not the case and all the Iranian people see is a bunch of incompetent fools telling them what to do?

The problem for the Ayatollahs and the rest of their useless buddies is the internet.

The great communication revolution is more powerful than anything before or since. It allows the Iranians access to see and know what is really going on in the world, not was some Islamo fascist tells them. And the beauty is that the Ayatollahs can't stop it. The Iranians aren't that much different than you or I. They want freedom, they want security, they want blue jeans.

Without the threat of big bad America, these fools will surely fall.

Obama held out an olive branch and the Iranian people now know it.

30 years of trying to beat Iran into the ground with a stick simply have not worked. Quite the opposite in fact. Obama is simply smart enough to realize that and he's removing the threat.
james t kirk is offline  
Old 03-22-2009, 02:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
ring's Avatar
 
Location: ❤
...eye spy a spectacled smoothness....

please don't kill the best math teachers in the world please.
ring is offline  
Old 03-22-2009, 03:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Riding the Ocean Spray
 
BadNick's Avatar
 
Location: S.E. PA in U Sofa
I hope we can maintain a consistent offer of peace and cooperation, but I'm concerned that the hardliners can create a situation where that will be hard to do.
BadNick is offline  
Old 03-23-2009, 01:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
comfortably numb...
 
uncle phil's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: upstate
if we can ensure peace and prosperity not only for ourselves but also for all the nations of the world, praise will rain down upon us, good things will be said about us, and we will be princes in our realm...
__________________
"We were wrong, terribly wrong. (We) should not have tried to fight a guerrilla war with conventional military tactics against a foe willing to absorb enormous casualties...in a country lacking the fundamental political stability necessary to conduct effective military and pacification operations. It could not be done and it was not done."
- Robert S. McNamara
-----------------------------------------
"We will take our napalm and flame throwers out of the land that scarcely knows the use of matches...
We will leave you your small joys and smaller troubles."
- Eugene McCarthy in "Vietnam Message"
-----------------------------------------
never wrestle with a pig.
you both get dirty;
the pig likes it.
uncle phil is offline  
 

Tags
ayatollah, blasts, rhetoric


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:17 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360