Filosoficably Speeking. . . - Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Sun Tzu · 10-12-2006, 09:58 PM

Every choice human being strives instinctively for a condominiumism and a secrecy where he, she, or he is freed from the crowd, the multitude, the majority, where he may forget the rule of “humanity,” being their explicitation:—apart from the one case in which vast complexiaty of insanity is pushed straight to such men by an even stronger instinct, as a seeker after knowledge in grade school sense in the great and exceptional sense. Yet never looking to the pollywogs for any mere stature of exclamation.

Anyone who, in interaction with distraction, does not occasionally shimmer in all the colors of distress, green and gray with disgust, satiety, sympathy, gloominess, loneliness, ambidextrious, bodoaciousness of the tatas is certainly not a man of higher taste; supposing, however, that he does not take all this burden and disgust upon himself voluntarily, that he persistently avoids it, and remains, as I said, quietly and proudly hidden in his citadel, namely TFP.

One thing is certain: he was not made, he was not predestined, for accumulated condominium, would one day have to say to himself: “To hell with my good taste! I’m going no where!! Ha Ha Ha! Exception—than I, the exception!”—and he would go down, and above all, he would go “inside.” The long and serious study of the average condominim consequently much disguise, self-overcoming, familiarity, bad contact—all contact is bad contact except with one’s equals—detartrated.

Ch'i · 10-12-2006, 10:15 PM

Due to the title, I will answer in a way I recently learned. Randomly.

Your thought adeui without a formulation of increment. But I cannot for the like fo me think odd from girth rightly injected. Flinty appetite ground and tore jail in denoting thread. Rightousness guised incandescently hidden mini doodle. Fallacy Jr. capitulates; opposision judged a filthy pyro. Sing spotted images of grimaced golfing at all costs. Window via Bonsla because of a growing bipedal giraffe. Awkward and quiet.

Explicit.

Sun Tzu · 10-13-2006, 05:43 PM

We can ascribe to forgetfulness the fact what while fandamtanbulous we are digesting what we live through and experience and then absorb (we might call the process mental ingestion or for short tacklehuggingflyingglomp.

[Einverseeling]), we are conscious of what is going on as little as we are with the thousand-fold process which our bodily nourishment goes through (so-called physical ingestion taco neck syndrome..) The doors and windows of consciousness are shut which allows tacitical penetration, deviatiation thus emansification of the oralation, aside you end up with a sabor-toothed crotch rocket.

Mini doodle huh? From time to time, so that it stays undisturbed from the noise and struggle with which the underworld of our functional organs and orgasms keeps them working for and against one another—a small quiet place, a little tabula rasa [blank slate] of the consciousness, so that there will again be room for something new, above all, for the nobler functions and officials, for ruling, thinking ahead, determining what to do and like I said in my previous post pollywogs.

I said, the use of active forgetfulness, like some porter at the door, a maintainer of psychic order, quiet, and etiquette. From that we can see at once how, if forgetfulness were not present, there could be no happiness, no cheerfulness, no hoping, no pride, no present. The man in whom this repression apparatus is harmed and not working properly we can compare to a dyspeptic (and not just compare)—he is "finished" with nothing.

Ch'i · 10-13-2006, 06:39 PM

Why aren't you watching Battlestar Galactica?

Grasshopper Green · 10-13-2006, 06:54 PM

Don't attempt to read this thread while drunk.

Sun Tzu · 10-14-2006, 01:03 AM

Its rather eceptionalized, exemtplified, detoxified, detaxified, William Defoed that you should mention that Medusa. You see, every person who is familiar with such considerations has no doubt felt a deep mistrust of all idealism of this sort: just as often as knitted in a fabric of condominiums quite early convinced short of the eternal consistency, omnipresence, and fallibility of the laws of nature. Drunkedness concluded that so far as we can penetrate here—from the telescopic heights to the microscopic depths—everything is secure, complete, infinite, regular, and without any gaps. Science will be able to dig successfully in this shaft forever, and the things that are discovered will harmonize with and not contradict each other. How little does this resemble a product of the imagination, for if it were such, there should be some place where the illusion and reality can be divined.

Against this, the following must be said: if each us had a different kind of sense perception—if we could only perceive things now as a bird, now as a worm, now as a plant, or if one of us saw a stimulus as red, another as blue, while a third even heard the same stimulus as a sound and William Defoe, or perhaps Nick Nolte—then no one would speak of such a regularity of nature, rather, nature would be grasped only as a creation which is subjective in the highest degree. After all, what is a law of nature as such for us? We are not acquainted with it in itself, but only with its effects, which means in its relation to other laws of nature—which, in turn, are known to us only as sums of relations. Therefore all these relations always refer again to others and are thoroughly incomprehensible to pllywogs in their essence. All that we actually know about these laws of nature is what we ourselves bring to them—time and space, and therefore relationships of succession and number.

uncle phil · 10-17-2006, 12:45 PM

also sprachen zarathustra...

Ch'i · 10-17-2006, 03:13 PM

Sie und Ihr Deutsch.

hotzot · 10-18-2006, 12:47 AM

[QUOTE=Sun Tzu]
bodoaciousness of the tatas is certainly not a man of higher tasteQUOTE]

Ohhhhh I don't know about that!

CSflim · 10-19-2006, 01:30 PM

Sun Tzu: I understand where you are coming from. However, I refer you to Pretextual libertarianism and deconstructivist narrative by Jane S. A. Dietrich and Thomas O. Sargeant.

Quote:

1. Smith and pretextual libertarianism

“Sexual identity is fundamentally elitist,” says Marx; however, according to Bailey[1] , it is not so much sexual identity that is fundamentally elitist, but rather the stasis, and subsequent collapse, of sexual identity. The premise of Sontagist camp states that the significance of the writer is significant form, but only if modernist narrative is invalid. It could be said that if pretextual libertarianism holds, we have to choose between deconstructivist narrative and precultural theory.

“Society is responsible for capitalism,” says Marx. An abundance of narratives concerning a self-referential reality may be discovered. However, in The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas, Eco reiterates capitalist libertarianism; in Foucault’s Pendulum, however, he denies pretextual libertarianism.

The characteristic theme of the works of Eco is the futility, and thus the defining characteristic, of neosemanticist sexual identity. Therefore, Debord promotes the use of Sontagist camp to deconstruct class divisions.

Many situationisms concerning pretextual libertarianism exist. But Marx uses the term ‘Sontagist camp’ to denote the role of the artist as poet.

The main theme of Cameron’s[2] critique of pretextual libertarianism is a mythopoetical whole. It could be said that Debord uses the term ‘dialectic desublimation’ to denote the failure, and subsequent stasis, of prestructuralist language.
2. Sontagist camp and dialectic capitalism

In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and figure. Parry[3] implies that we have to choose between pretextual libertarianism and Baudrillardist simulation. However, the primary theme of the works of Eco is not desituationism, but subdesituationism.

If one examines dialectic capitalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject pretextual libertarianism or conclude that narrativity serves to reinforce capitalism. Marx uses the term ‘postdeconstructive theory’ to denote the bridge between society and truth. But the example of dialectic capitalism intrinsic to Eco’s The Island of the Day Before is also evident in The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas.

The characteristic theme of Humphrey’s[4] analysis of Lacanist obscurity is not dematerialism, but subdematerialism. Foucault suggests the use of dialectic capitalism to analyse and read society. However, any number of appropriations concerning the role of the participant as poet may be revealed.

Lyotard uses the term ‘pretextual libertarianism’ to denote not, in fact, theory, but neotheory. Therefore, in The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics), Eco analyses deconstructivist feminism; in The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas he affirms dialectic capitalism.

Debord’s critique of pretextual libertarianism holds that sexual identity has intrinsic meaning. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a dialectic capitalism that includes language as a reality.

The premise of preconceptual deconstruction states that discourse is a product of communication. Therefore, Sontag promotes the use of deconstructivist narrative to challenge sexism.

The main theme of the works of Eco is the collapse, and therefore the futility, of capitalist class. In a sense, subcultural nihilism holds that culture may be used to marginalize the underprivileged, but only if narrativity is equal to culture; if that is not the case, Foucault’s model of pretextual libertarianism is one of “capitalist narrative”, and thus intrinsically unattainable.

The primary theme of Hanfkopf’s[5] analysis of deconstructivist narrative is the common ground between truth and sexual identity. But several theories concerning pretextual libertarianism exist.
3. Realities of paradigm

If one examines dialectic capitalism, one is faced with a choice: either accept textual subdialectic theory or conclude that consensus comes from the masses. The subject is contextualised into a dialectic capitalism that includes art as a whole. Thus, the characteristic theme of the works of Eco is not narrative, as textual desemioticism suggests, but prenarrative.

In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of poststructuralist culture. The figure/ground distinction depicted in Eco’s The Name of the Rose emerges again in The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics), although in a more constructive sense. In a sense, Foucault’s essay on dialectic capitalism states that the task of the writer is deconstruction.

“Society is impossible,” says Debord. Sartre uses the term ‘neocultural libertarianism’ to denote a self-falsifying paradox. Therefore, if pretextual libertarianism holds, we have to choose between deconstructivist narrative and semantic narrative.

The main theme of Finnis’s[6] analysis of pretextual libertarianism is the bridge between class and sexual identity. Bataille suggests the use of subtextual discourse to modify consciousness. It could be said that the characteristic theme of the works of Eco is the futility, and some would say the dialectic, of patriarchial society.

Humphrey[7] suggests that we have to choose between dialectic capitalism and Marxist socialism. Thus, Sartre promotes the use of pretextual libertarianism to attack capitalism.

If dialectic capitalism holds, we have to choose between deconstructivist narrative and neodialectic sublimation. Therefore, in Sex, Madonna denies dialectic capitalism; in Material Girl, however, she analyses deconstructivist narrative.

Baudrillard suggests the use of dialectic capitalism to analyse and read sexual identity. However, deconstructivist narrative states that expression is created by communication.

Sartre promotes the use of dialectic capitalism to deconstruct outdated perceptions of class. It could be said that an abundance of deconstructions concerning the role of the artist as observer may be discovered.

Bataille suggests the use of deconstructivist narrative to challenge sexual identity. However, Porter[8] suggests that we have to choose between the premodern paradigm of context and dialectic neotextual theory.

The subject is interpolated into a dialectic capitalism that includes truth as a totality. Thus, the main theme of Cameron’s[9] critique of deconstructivist narrative is the economy, and therefore the fatal flaw, of cultural society.
4. Dialectic capitalism and subdialectic discourse

In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the distinction between within and without. If deconstructivist narrative holds, the works of Stone are not postmodern. In a sense, many narratives concerning subdialectic discourse exist.

If one examines textual rationalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject pretextual libertarianism or conclude that academe is part of the economy of consciousness, given that Derrida’s essay on subdialectic discourse is valid. The primary theme of the works of Stone is a mythopoetical whole. However, Drucker[10] holds that we have to choose between deconstructivist narrative and the postcapitalist paradigm of discourse.

The characteristic theme of Dietrich’s[11] critique of subdialectic discourse is the rubicon of materialist class. Therefore, if deconstructivist narrative holds, we have to choose between pretextual libertarianism and neoconceptual desituationism.

Lacan uses the term ‘dialectic discourse’ to denote the role of the reader as writer. It could be said that pretextual libertarianism implies that sexuality, paradoxically, has objective value.

Baudrillard promotes the use of deconstructivist narrative to deconstruct the status quo. Therefore, the example of subdialectic discourse intrinsic to Stone’s JFK is also evident in Natural Born Killers.

Several narratives concerning the difference between class and sexual identity may be revealed. Thus, the premise of deconstructivist narrative holds that culture is capable of intent, but only if sexuality is distinct from language.

1. Bailey, W. O. C. (1972) Postdialectic Theories: Deconstructivist narrative in the works of Eco. And/Or Press

2. Cameron, F. Y. ed. (1989) Pretextual libertarianism in the works of Joyce. Harvard University Press

3. Parry, H. B. I. (1993) Realities of Dialectic: Deconstructivist narrative and pretextual libertarianism. University of Michigan Press

4. Humphrey, P. ed. (1970) Pretextual libertarianism in the works of Mapplethorpe. Yale University Press

5. Hanfkopf, Z. I. (1994) Forgetting Derrida: Pretextual libertarianism and deconstructivist narrative. Schlangekraft

6. Finnis, T. ed. (1977) Pretextual libertarianism in the works of Gibson. University of Massachusetts Press

7. Humphrey, A. B. (1992) The Futility of Narrative: Pretextual libertarianism in the works of Madonna. Loompanics

8. Porter, F. Q. Z. ed. (1978) Deconstructivist narrative and pretextual libertarianism. Cambridge University Press

9. Cameron, T. (1989) Deconstructing Sontag: Deconstructivist narrative in the works of Stone. Panic Button Books

10. Drucker, P. S. ed. (1991) Pretextual libertarianism and deconstructivist narrative. Harvard University Press

11. Dietrich, M. (1970) The Absurdity of Sexual identity: Pretextual libertarianism in the works of Koons. University of Georgia Press

Source: http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo

Sun Tzu · 10-19-2006, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uncle phil

also sprachen zarathustra...

Ah scientifically for commercial exudating: For fear--that is man's original and fundamentally feeling; through fear everything is explained, original sin and original virtue. Through fear there grew thus MY virtue, that is tons say: Science.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ch'i

Sie und Ihr Deutsch.

Let us still give special consideration to the formation of concepts. Every word immediately becomes a concept, inasmuch as it is not intended to serve as a reminder of the unique and wholly individualized original experience to which it owes its birth, but must at the same time fit innumerable, more or less similar cases—which means, strictly speaking, never equal—in other words, a lot of unequal cases. Every concept originates through our equating what is unequal. No leaf ever wholly equals another, and the concept "leaf" is formed through an arbitrary abstraction from these individual differences, through forgetting the distinctions; and now it gives rise to the idea that in nature there might be something besides the leaves which would be "leaf"—some kind of original form after which all leaves have been woven, marked, copied, colored, curled, and painted, but by unskilled hands, so that no copy turned out to be a correct, reliable, and faithful image of the original form.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSflim

Sun Tzu: I understand where you are coming from. However, I refer you to Pretextual libertarianism and deconstructivist narrative by Jane S. A. Dietrich and Thomas O. Sargeant.

Source: http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo

If one can look past the stale passive interpretation of the confirmation them and only then will they realize:

Went of stiff stalk
Looked out gimmie gill
Saw mother whaley backer digging up fum facker
Called out tom wacker to chase out mother whaley backer out of fill fum facker

Ch'i · 10-19-2006, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sun_Tzu

If one can look past the stale passive interpretation of the confirmation them and only then will they realize:

Went of stiff stalk
Looked out gimmie gill
Saw mother whaley backer digging up fum facker
Called out tom wacker to chase out mother whaley backer out of fill fum facker

Upon a closer enabled meaning I can see a construct of freshly stereotyped Igbo. Forcefully wounding a misleading plethora of beards, inanely and insanely. Yahoo? Nevermore.

10-12-2006, 09:58 PM	#1 (permalink)
Sun Tzu Conspiracy Realist Location: The Event Horizon	Filosoficably Speeking. . . Every choice human being strives instinctively for a condominiumism and a secrecy where he, she, or he is freed from the crowd, the multitude, the majority, where he may forget the rule of “humanity,” being their explicitation:—apart from the one case in which vast complexiaty of insanity is pushed straight to such men by an even stronger instinct, as a seeker after knowledge in grade school sense in the great and exceptional sense. Yet never looking to the pollywogs for any mere stature of exclamation. Anyone who, in interaction with distraction, does not occasionally shimmer in all the colors of distress, green and gray with disgust, satiety, sympathy, gloominess, loneliness, ambidextrious, bodoaciousness of the tatas is certainly not a man of higher taste; supposing, however, that he does not take all this burden and disgust upon himself voluntarily, that he persistently avoids it, and remains, as I said, quietly and proudly hidden in his citadel, namely TFP. One thing is certain: he was not made, he was not predestined, for accumulated condominium, would one day have to say to himself: “To hell with my good taste! I’m going no where!! Ha Ha Ha! Exception—than I, the exception!”—and he would go down, and above all, he would go “inside.” The long and serious study of the average condominim consequently much disguise, self-overcoming, familiarity, bad contact—all contact is bad contact except with one’s equals—detartrated. __________________ *To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.- Stephen Hawking*

10-13-2006, 05:43 PM	#3 (permalink)
Sun Tzu Conspiracy Realist Location: The Event Horizon	We can ascribe to forgetfulness the fact what while fandamtanbulous we are digesting what we live through and experience and then absorb (we might call the process mental ingestion or for short tacklehuggingflyingglomp. [Einverseeling]), we are conscious of what is going on as little as we are with the thousand-fold process which our bodily nourishment goes through (so-called physical ingestion taco neck syndrome..) The doors and windows of consciousness are shut which allows tacitical penetration, deviatiation thus emansification of the oralation, aside you end up with a sabor-toothed crotch rocket. Mini doodle huh? From time to time, so that it stays undisturbed from the noise and struggle with which the underworld of our functional organs and orgasms keeps them working for and against one another—a small quiet place, a little tabula rasa [blank slate] of the consciousness, so that there will again be room for something new, above all, for the nobler functions and officials, for ruling, thinking ahead, determining what to do and like I said in my previous post pollywogs. I said, the use of active forgetfulness, like some porter at the door, a maintainer of psychic order, quiet, and etiquette. From that we can see at once how, if forgetfulness were not present, there could be no happiness, no cheerfulness, no hoping, no pride, no present. The man in whom this repression apparatus is harmed and not working properly we can compare to a dyspeptic (and not just compare)—he is "finished" with nothing. __________________ *To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.- Stephen Hawking*

10-13-2006, 06:54 PM	#5 (permalink)
Grasshopper Green ...is a comical chap Location: Where morons reign supreme	Don't attempt to read this thread while drunk. __________________ "They say that patriotism is the last refuge to which a scoundrel clings; steal a little and they throw you in jail, steal a lot and they make you king" Formerly Medusa

10-14-2006, 01:03 AM	#6 (permalink)
Sun Tzu Conspiracy Realist Location: The Event Horizon	Its rather eceptionalized, exemtplified, detoxified, detaxified, William Defoed that you should mention that Medusa. You see, every person who is familiar with such considerations has no doubt felt a deep mistrust of all idealism of this sort: just as often as knitted in a fabric of condominiums quite early convinced short of the eternal consistency, omnipresence, and fallibility of the laws of nature. Drunkedness concluded that so far as we can penetrate here—from the telescopic heights to the microscopic depths—everything is secure, complete, infinite, regular, and without any gaps. Science will be able to dig successfully in this shaft forever, and the things that are discovered will harmonize with and not contradict each other. How little does this resemble a product of the imagination, for if it were such, there should be some place where the illusion and reality can be divined. Against this, the following must be said: if each us had a different kind of sense perception—if we could only perceive things now as a bird, now as a worm, now as a plant, or if one of us saw a stimulus as red, another as blue, while a third even heard the same stimulus as a sound and William Defoe, or perhaps Nick Nolte—then no one would speak of such a regularity of nature, rather, nature would be grasped only as a creation which is subjective in the highest degree. After all, what is a law of nature as such for us? We are not acquainted with it in itself, but only with its effects, which means in its relation to other laws of nature—which, in turn, are known to us only as sums of relations. Therefore all these relations always refer again to others and are thoroughly incomprehensible to pllywogs in their essence. All that we actually know about these laws of nature is what we ourselves bring to them—time and space, and therefore relationships of succession and number. __________________ *To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.- Stephen Hawking*

10-17-2006, 12:45 PM	#7 (permalink)
uncle phil comfortably numb... Super Moderator Location: upstate	also sprachen zarathustra... __________________ "We were wrong, terribly wrong. (We) should not have tried to fight a guerrilla war with conventional military tactics against a foe willing to absorb enormous casualties...in a country lacking the fundamental political stability necessary to conduct effective military and pacification operations. It could not be done and it was not done." - Robert S. McNamara ----------------------------------------- "We will take our napalm and flame throwers out of the land that scarcely knows the use of matches... We will leave you your small joys and smaller troubles." - Eugene McCarthy in "Vietnam Message" ----------------------------------------- never wrestle with a pig. you both get dirty; the pig likes it.

10-12-2006, 10:15 PM	#2 (permalink)
Ch'i Artist of Life	Due to the title, I will answer in a way I recently learned. Randomly. Your thought adeui without a formulation of increment. But I cannot for the like fo me think odd from girth rightly injected. Flinty appetite ground and tore jail in denoting thread. Rightousness guised incandescently hidden mini doodle. Fallacy Jr. capitulates; opposision judged a filthy pyro. Sing spotted images of grimaced golfing at all costs. Window via Bonsla because of a growing bipedal giraffe. Awkward and quiet. Explicit.

10-13-2006, 06:39 PM	#4 (permalink)
Ch'i Artist of Life	Why aren't you watching Battlestar Galactica?

10-17-2006, 03:13 PM	#8 (permalink)
Ch'i Artist of Life	Sie und Ihr Deutsch.

10-18-2006, 12:47 AM	#9 (permalink)
hotzot We're having potato pancakes! Location: stalag 13	[QUOTE=Sun Tzu] bodoaciousness of the tatas is certainly not a man of higher tasteQUOTE] Ohhhhh I don't know about that! __________________ The Bully Boys are here!