Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Entertainment


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-12-2005, 09:58 AM   #1 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Pennsylvania
DaVinci Code movie taking out the religious aspect

If you want to read this article: http://www.phenomenamagazine.com/0/e...22&obj_id=3741 before going further, this thread will make more sense.

The abbreviated version:

The film version of The Da Vinci Code is attempting to reduce the offence that the best-selling book caused to Roman Catholics.

So, if they take out religion, the Magdalene, the sacred feminine, Opus Dei, the sex ritual, the Priory of Sion... then, I guess they'll be left with a great car chase movie...


This makes me not want to see the movie anymore. Trying to take religion out of the movie and anything that may offend the Catholic church? I have a better idea: let's make another Jurassic Park movie and take out all the dinosaurs so we don't offend any archeologists. That movie would make about as much sense.

This has to be one of the most ridiculous things I've heard in quite some time.
redlotuss9 is offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 10:29 AM   #2 (permalink)
Omnipotent Ruler Of The Tiny Universe In My Mind
 
mystmarimatt's Avatar
 
Location: Oreegawn
Personally, I was never all that interested in seeing the book filmed in the first place.

Dan Brown's novels are in the same vein as those of Jack Whyte's Camulod Chronicles, Both authors use formulaic narratives and story structures to show what they really want to show, all of the nifty information they've dug up. The plots of these stories end up as they should: pointless, drab canvasses upon which each author can paint how brilliant they are and what their extensive research has produced.

Even if the religious leanings in The Da Vinci Code were left in the script, chances are, the movie would still come out as a middle-of-the-road, ho-hum thriller, that's not all that good to begin with.
__________________
Words of Wisdom:

If you could really get to know someone and know that they weren't lying to you, then you would know the world was real. Because you could agree on things, you could compare notes. That must be why people get married or make Art. So they'll be able to really know something and not go insane.
mystmarimatt is offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 10:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
I hear they will be remaking the Passion of the Christ and taking out the crucifixtion - because that offended some people...

what idiocy on the parts of the movie makers... some parts of it could be removed I suppose...but .. eh- -it just made the book more interesting...
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
maleficent is offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 10:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
zen_tom
Guest
 
The Da Vinci Code was one of the most ridiculous books I've read in a long time, in my opinion, anything they do to change the plot is going to be a bonus. In fact, adding dinosaurs wouldn't be a bad idea at all, it would certainly make it more entertaining and highbrow. Imagine the merchandising!
 
Old 08-12-2005, 10:43 AM   #5 (permalink)
Submit to me, you know you want to
 
ShaniFaye's Avatar
 
Location: Lilburn, Ga
I think the fact that they want to change the MAIN CENTRAL THEME of the book is ridiculous, why even make it a movie to start with? That would be like remaking star wars without the dark side because it offended the jedi masters (if there were such a thing...dont ask...thats the only analogy that came into my head )
__________________
I want the diabetic plan that comes with rollover carbs. I dont like the unused one expiring at midnite!!
ShaniFaye is offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 07:57 PM   #6 (permalink)
Functionally Appropriate
 
fresnelly's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto
I doubt that the filmakers will actually purge the movie of any of the central religious themes. It's not suprising that representives of Opus Dei and the Catholic church have approached the producers with their concerns, and I imagine Sony simply hopes to create and exploit controversy for the sake of publicity. I think that this article is just the first example.

The book's hypothesis is bunk and the church can always dismiss it. If any change is made, it will be that a distinction between Opus Dei and the villans will be emphasized.

If the church and Opus Dei are as savvy as Sony, they'll use the controversy to espouse their views too. The dance begins...
__________________
Building an artificial intelligence that appreciates Mozart is easy. Building an A.I. that appreciates a theme restaurant is the real challenge - Kit Roebuck - Nine Planets Without Intelligent Life
fresnelly is offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 08:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Muahahahahahaha! That is so fucking hilarious.




And that is all that can be really said about that.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 08:11 PM   #8 (permalink)
is a tiger
 
Siege's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by maleficent
I hear they will be remaking the Passion of the Christ and taking out the crucifixtion - because that offended some people...
I hope they remake titanic without the boat sinking
__________________
"Your name's Geek? Do you know the origin of the term? A geek is someone who bites the heads off chickens at a circus. I would never let you suck my dick with a name like Geek"

--Kevin Smith

This part just makes my posts easier to find
Siege is offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 08:56 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seige
I hope they remake titanic without the boat sinking
oh goodness no, that was the only good part of that movie
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
maleficent is offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 09:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
Go Cardinals
 
soccerchamp76's Avatar
 
Location: St. Louis/Cincinnati
I think all movies should be love stories in which nobody is insulted, injured, killed, or hurt in any way. That way, everyone is satisfied and nobody has to be offended. Except those offended by happiness.

/sarcasm

Anyways, this could and is mot likely is a marketing ploy to get people to discuss the film and thus advertise it. Taking out the religious aspects, as others have said, is the same as taking out the sinking of the Titanic, the crucifixion in Passion, the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park.
__________________
Brian Griffin: Ah, if my memory serves me, this is the physics department.
Chris Griffin: That would explain all the gravity.
soccerchamp76 is offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 09:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
I'm offended by happiness.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 08-13-2005, 04:53 AM   #12 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Is it just me or is the source of this information just a little spurious? Has this story been picked up by *anyone* else?
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 04:13 AM   #13 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
Is it just me or is the source of this information just a little spurious? Has this story been picked up by *anyone* else?

You beat me to it. This isn't exactly the Associated Press here....
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 06:44 AM   #14 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by mystmarimatt
Dan Brown's novels are in the same vein as those of Jack Whyte's Camulod Chronicles, Both authors use formulaic narratives and story structures to show what they really want to show, all of the nifty information they've dug up. The plots of these stories end up as they should: pointless, drab canvasses upon which each author can paint how brilliant they are and what their extensive research has produced.
Yep. I read Deception Point, which was pretty decent, though completely formulaic. There's a prologue, as there is in each of his books. The first sentence of the prologue introduces a character who appears to be happily going about his own business in the Arctic. In fact the first two words of the novel are his name. Two words into the book I knew that character would be dead before the end of the prologue. And he was.

In case you haven't read all of Dan Brown's books... If you've read one of them, you've read all of them. Angels and Demons is The Da Vinci Code with antimatter produced at CERN. Deception Point is The Da Vinci Code with a meteorite and NASA. Digital Fortress is Da Vinci Code with a supercomputer at the NSA (and as a technologist, this particular novel made me very embarassed for Mr. Brown).

They're not bad reads (well, excluding Digital Fortress) but mostly they're a playing ground for the interesting research Brown has done.

Incidentally, see <a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000844.html">this brilliant article</a> excoriating Brown for the stylistic naivete and awkwardness of his prose:

<blockquote>Brown's writing is not just bad; it is staggeringly, clumsily, thoughtlessly, almost ingeniously bad. In some passages scarcely a word or phrase seems to have been carefully selected or compared with alternatives. I slogged through 454 pages of this syntactic swill, and it never gets much better. Why did I keep reading? Because London Heathrow is a long way from San Francisco International, and airline magazines are thin, and two-month-old Hollywood drivel on a small screen hanging two seats in front of my row did not appeal, that's why. And why did I keep the book instead of dropping it into a Heathrow trash bin? Because it seemed to me to be such a fund of lessons in how not to write.</blockquote>

Last edited by ratbastid; 08-14-2005 at 06:49 AM..
ratbastid is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 08:20 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master of No Domains
 
portwineboy's Avatar
 
Location: WEEhawken, New Joisey
Quote:
Originally Posted by mystmarimatt
Dan Brown's novels are in the same vein as those of Jack Whyte's Camulod Chronicles, Both authors use formulaic narratives and story structures to show what they really want to show, all of the nifty information they've dug up. The plots of these stories end up as they should: pointless, drab canvasses upon which each author can paint how brilliant they are and what their extensive research has produced.
Wow I totally disagree with your opinion of the Whyte novels. I enjoyed the Camulod books and thought they added an interesting perspective to an old story. I've given them to several friends and they agreed.

I do however find your comments on Brown to be spot on. I read a lot of technothrillers, alt history and whatever the hell one might call this genre of books. I read Da Vinci before it was a huge hit, thought it was okay and read the rest of his books. Deception Point was terrible. I'd rather read Clive Cussler's old Dirk Pitt. Digital Fortress was even worse...both suffered from drab, unoriginal plots and cardboard characters. Give me Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child's Special Agent Pendergrast anyday.
__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher.
If you can read this in English, thank a veteran.
portwineboy is offline  
Old 08-15-2005, 01:18 AM   #16 (permalink)
Omnipotent Ruler Of The Tiny Universe In My Mind
 
mystmarimatt's Avatar
 
Location: Oreegawn
Quote:
Originally Posted by portwineboy
Wow I totally disagree with your opinion of the Whyte novels. I enjoyed the Camulod books and thought they added an interesting perspective to an old story. I've given them to several friends and they agreed.

I do however find your comments on Brown to be spot on. I read a lot of technothrillers, alt history and whatever the hell one might call this genre of books. I read Da Vinci before it was a huge hit, thought it was okay and read the rest of his books. Deception Point was terrible. I'd rather read Clive Cussler's old Dirk Pitt. Digital Fortress was even worse...both suffered from drab, unoriginal plots and cardboard characters. Give me Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child's Special Agent Pendergrast anyday.
Well, to be fair, I wasn't accurate in comparing Whyte's novels to Brown's, I actually love Whyte's novels, and I think what he's come up with is fascinating, it's just that the plots in each of the novels are so similarly structured, that they just grate on me, slightly.
__________________
Words of Wisdom:

If you could really get to know someone and know that they weren't lying to you, then you would know the world was real. Because you could agree on things, you could compare notes. That must be why people get married or make Art. So they'll be able to really know something and not go insane.
mystmarimatt is offline  
Old 09-07-2005, 06:41 PM   #17 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
I love Dan Browns work
__________________
There's a whole world all around us and we don't even realize it!
rashorangutan is offline  
Old 09-07-2005, 08:13 PM   #18 (permalink)
Psycho
 
spongy's Avatar
 
I enjoyed the books as well, but the stories are almost exactly the same in each one... so read them, just not all four in a month as i did.
__________________
The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed.

Stephen King
spongy is offline  
Old 09-12-2005, 12:27 PM   #19 (permalink)
Insane
 
Locke7's Avatar
 
It is true though. I've read Da Vinci, Angels & Demons, and Digital Fortress. They really are the same 3 stories, twisted around a little different plot line, but suprisingly the same chronology.

Someone dies, someone comes to research, finds huge conspiracy, almost gets killed by people keeping conspiricy a secret. World will end hero's don't solve big ridiculous riddle. Riddle solved, world back to normal. Although nothing in the world has actually changed, because everything is still a secret.

Dang, maybe I should have put that in spoiler tags.
Locke7 is offline  
Old 09-12-2005, 06:46 PM   #20 (permalink)
Psycho
 
spongy's Avatar
 
Don't forget the betrayal and the hero getting shot.
__________________
The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed.

Stephen King
spongy is offline  
Old 09-13-2005, 04:07 PM   #21 (permalink)
...is a comical chap
 
Grasshopper Green's Avatar
 
Location: Where morons reign supreme
If they *do* make a movie in which the religious aspect is removed....it would be the shortest movie in modern memory. Which might not be a bad thing.

I finished the Da Vinci Code last month, after eagerly buying it at the bookstore. I was very disappointed; there were a few intriguing parts but for the most part, it was repetitive and dull. Definitely wasn't worth the hardback price...more suited for the discount bin.
__________________
"They say that patriotism is the last refuge to which a scoundrel clings; steal a little and they throw you in jail, steal a lot and they make you king"

Formerly Medusa
Grasshopper Green is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 01:27 PM   #22 (permalink)
big damn hero
 
guthmund's Avatar
 
I thought this deserved reviving since the new trailer came out recently. Get it here

It looks to me that they've taken nothing from the book. The self inflicted beatings of Silas, the circlice, the Magdalene.... I even caught a glimpse of ol' naked Jacques sprawled out in the middle of The Louvre.

In fact, it looks like Ron Howard has stayed fairly true to the story, whether that pleases you or inflames your indignation is irrelevant. At least, it appears what you see is what you get, which is more than I can say for a lot of other movies out there.

Personally, I enjoyed the book. It wasn't exactly thought provoking material (there are a lot of books that cover the same information much, much better) nor was it a stylistic masterpiece; it was just enough of each to keep it entertaining, which is what I assume the movie is going to be.
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.
guthmund is offline  
Old 12-15-2005, 08:56 PM   #23 (permalink)
Mine is an evil laugh
 
spindles's Avatar
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
I think it will make a better movei than it did a book - I quite liked the look of the trailer.
__________________
who hid my keyboard's PANIC button?
spindles is offline  
Old 12-15-2005, 09:01 PM   #24 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaniFaye
I think the fact that they want to change the MAIN CENTRAL THEME of the book is ridiculous, why even make it a movie to start with? That would be like remaking star wars without the dark side because it offended the jedi masters (if there were such a thing...dont ask...thats the only analogy that came into my head )

Not like it's the first time. Remember Clear and Present Danger? They used Clancy's character names, and the general locations, but EVERYTHING else was different.
shakran is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 06:45 AM   #25 (permalink)
People in masks cannot be trusted
 
Xazy's Avatar
 
Location: NYC
LOL, this is why hollywood cannot make money, they just do not get it.
Xazy is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 08:34 PM   #26 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Colorado
They should leave all the religious symbolism and everything in it of course, but that's in a perfect world. God forbid we offend someone, lest box office profits are affected somehow. Besides, if people would just remember that a large portion of this book was fiction, and that Dan Brown thus used "shady" sources and unproven theories and such to construct his novel, then maybe people wouldn't get so bent out of shape. Of course, this is Christianity we're talking about here... yay for fundamentalists.
__________________
No pienses mal quiero
Alguien que me sepa amar
Un amor real y verdadero
Si viene bien y si no
Viene ya qué más da
La vida sigue igual...
Nada extraño me hace falta para estar feliz
-Jaci Velásquez
Altitude is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 08:08 AM   #27 (permalink)
lascivious
 
Mantus's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zen_tom
In fact, adding dinosaurs wouldn't be a bad idea at all, it would certainly make it more entertaining and highbrow. Imagine the merchandising!
Da Vinci Kong!
Mantus is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 12:25 PM   #28 (permalink)
Still fighting it.
 
flamingdog's Avatar
 
Thing is, you can kind of see their point. The film is full of shit, and people are going to believe it, because, you know, I'm sure there'll be some sort of text card at the start saying it's based on real research or something, just like there is in the novel. In some people's minds that's tantamount to saying 'this is all true'. I wonder if people are going to be as exposed to the alternate point of view? I somehow doubt it.

This is on my 'don't bother' list.

Edit: ratbastid: Excoriating! There's a word you don't see much.
flamingdog is offline  
 

Tags
aspect, code, davinci, movie, religious, taking


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360